Author

admin

Browsing

Dollar Tree said Wednesday that it’s gaining market share with higher-income consumers and could raise prices on some products to offset President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

The discount retailer’s CEO, Michael Creedon, said the company is seeing “value-seeking behavior across all income groups.” While Dollar Tree has always relied on lower-income shoppers and gets about 50% of its business from middle-income consumers, sustained inflation has led to “stronger demand from higher-income customers,” Creedon said.

Dollar Tree’s success with higher-income shoppers follows similar gains from Walmart, which has made inroads with the cohort following the prolonged period of high prices.

Trump’s tariffs on certain goods from China, Mexico and Canada — and the potential for broad duties on trading partners around the world — have only added to concerns about stretched household budgets. While Dollar Tree will use tactics like negotiating with suppliers and moving manufacturing to mitigate the effect of the duties, it could also hike the prices of some items, Creedon said.

Dollar Tree has rolled out prices higher than its standard $1.25 products at about 2,900 so-called multi-price stores. Certain products can cost anywhere from $1.50 to $7 at those locations.

The retailer weighed in on higher-income customers and the potential effect of tariffs as it announced its fourth-quarter earnings. Dollar Tree also said it will sell its struggling Family Dollar chain for about $1 billion to a consortium of private-equity investors.

Dollar Tree said its net sales for continuing operations — its namesake brand — totaled $5 billion for the quarter, while same-stores sales climbed 2%. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $2.11 for the period.

It is unclear how the figures compare to Wall Street estimates.

For fiscal 2025, Dollar Tree expects net sales of $18.5 billion to $19.1 billion from continuing operations, with same-store sales growth of 3% to 5%. It anticipates it will post adjusted earnings of $5 to $5.50 per share for the year.

Creedon said the expected hit from the first round of 10% tariffs Trump levied on China in February would have been $15 million to $20 million per month, but the company has mitigated about 90% of that effect.

Additional 10% duties on China imposed this month, along with 25% levies on Mexico and Canada that have only partly taken effect, would hit Dollar Tree by another $20 million per month, Creedon said. The company is working to offset those duties, but did not include them in its financial guidance due to the confusion over which tariffs will take effect and when.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Oil executives are warning that President Donald Trump’s tariffs and “drill, baby, drill” message have created uncertainty in energy markets that is already affecting investment.

The executives, shielded by anonymity, bluntly criticized Trump in their responses to a survey conducted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas from March 12 to March 20.

“The administration’s chaos is a disaster for the commodity markets,” one executive said. ”‘Drill, baby, drill’ is nothing short of a myth and populist rallying cry. Tariff policy is impossible for us to predict and doesn’t have a clear goal. We want more stability.”

Several executives said Trump’s steel tariffs are raising their costs, making it difficult to plan for future projects.

“Uncertainty around everything has sharply risen during the past quarter,” another executive said. “Planning for new development is extremely difficult right now due to the uncertainty around steel-based products.”

They also criticized the suggestion by White House advisers such as Peter Navarro that Trump’s “drill, baby, drill” agenda aims to push oil prices down to $50 a barrel to fight inflation.

“The threat of $50 oil prices by the administration has caused our firm to reduce its 2025 and 2026 capital expenditures,” an executive said. ”‘Drill, baby, drill’ does not work with $50 per barrel oil. Rigs will get dropped, employment in the oil industry will decrease, and U.S. oil production will decline as it did during COVID-19.”

CNBC has asked the White House for comment.

The Dallas Fed Energy Survey is conducted every quarter with about 200 firms responding. The survey covers operators in Texas, southern New Mexico and northern Louisiana.

The scathing criticism in the Dallas Fed survey stood in contrast to major oil companies’ public comments at the industry’s big energy conference in Houston earlier this month.

Executives mostly praised Trump’s energy team during the event and welcomed the administration’s focus on increasing leasing and slashing red tape around permitting.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

The S&P 500, NASDAQ 100, and Russell 2000 fell 10.5%, 13.8%, and 19.5%, respectively, from their recent all-time highs down to their March lows. Each index paused long enough and deep enough for a correction, with the Russell 2000 nearly reaching cyclical bear market territory (-20%).

At this point, there’s key price resistance on the S&P 500. Moving through it doesn’t necessarily mean we’re “in the clear.” However, failure to move through and then rolling back over increases the odds of another test of recent low price support. Check out the range I’m watching on the S&P 500:

Key price resistance, in my view, is at 5782 on the S&P 500. That was the gap support from early November and also the price support from mid-January. Now we’re trying to break above that resistance, while at the same time trying to hang onto now-rising 20-day EMA support.

As for support, the April and August lows in 2024 intersect beautifully with the March 2025 low. That’s something to keep an eye on if we begin to head lower again. The price support on the S&P 500 is now just above 5500, so a close beneath that level would be damaging – at least in the very near-term. I say that, because any new closing low would be accompanied by a higher PPO, a positive divergence. Many times, a reversing candle and a positive divergence will mark a significant bottom. So there’ll be plenty to watch over the next few days to few weeks.

I also want to show you how the S&P 500 is performing on a short-term chart vs. the NASDAQ 100, which is the more aggressive index:

It’s just a little thing, but the S&P 500 and NASDAQ 100 had been trading mostly in unison over the past week or two, but with this morning’s weakness, note that the NASDAQ 100 has moved back down to Monday’s opening gap higher, while the S&P 500 still remains well above it. Here’s one reason for it:

Since the Fed announcement one week ago, discretionary stocks (XLY) had reversed its downtrend vs. staples stocks (XLP). But check out today’s action! Maybe this is just short-term and we’ll see a reversal later, but it’s hard to be overly encouraged when staples goes up 1.14%, while discretionary drops 0.64%.

It’s a warning sign.

I know there are TONS of mixed signals out there and everyone wants to know whether this recovery is the REAL DEAL or if it was only temporary before the next shoe drops. Well, if you’re interested, I’ll be hosting a FREE event on Saturday.

Correction or Bear Market?

That’s the topic of our Saturday event, which will begin promptly at 10am ET. I will be providing multiple angles/charts/strategies and what each of them are telling us. If you’d like to join me on Saturday and would like more information, REGISTER NOW.

Even if you have a prior commitment on Saturday, we plan to record the event and send out the recording to all who register. So act now to attend and/or receive your copy of the recording.

Happy trading!

Tom

In this exclusive StockCharts video, Joe shares how to use multi-timeframe analysis — Monthly, Weekly, and Daily charts — to find the best stock market opportunities. See how Joe uses StockCharts tools to create confluence across timeframes and spot key levels. Joe then identifies strength in commodities, QQQ, and finishes up by reviewing symbol requests from viewers.

This video was originally published on March 26, 2025. Click this link to watch on Joe’s dedicated page.

Archived videos from Joe are available at this link. Send symbol requests to stocktalk@stockcharts.com; you can also submit a request in the comments section below the video on YouTube. Symbol Requests can be sent in throughout the week prior to the next show.

Gold at $3,100 and silver at $50? That might’ve sounded wild a year or two ago, but it’s now the upper trajectory some analysts are eyeing. With consumer confidence cratering to a 12-year low, inflation expectations rising, and central banks hoarding bullion like it’s the latest fashion, gold is holding firm above $3,000 per ounce and silver is knocking on $34.

There’s another thing to consider: the gold-to-silver ratio is still high, reaching 91:1 on Monday and 89.7 on Tuesday, hinting that silver may be massively undervalued. If the ratio snaps back to historical norms, silver could explode past $40, even $50, while gold edges toward $3,100 or higher.

FIGURE 1. CHART OF GOLD/SILVER RATIO. The historical average is at 65:1, well below the data on the chart. Any level above 87 signals a potential buying opportunity.

Note how the price of silver, namely its rallies highlighted in the shaded area below the chart, is responding to the ratio. I’m going to cover this in more detail below, as the ratio serves not only as guidance but also as an important component for an entry setup.

So, if analysts are targeting $3,100, where is gold now, and what setup might it present? Take a look at a daily chart.

FIGURE 2. DAILY CHART OF GOLD. Gold is pulling back, an ideal setup for those who are bullish on the yellow metal.

Gold has pulled back from its all-time high of $3,056, coinciding with an overbought reading in the Relative Strength Index (RSI). The Quadrant Lines give you a wide range of support levels for entry.

  • The second quadrant, containing the previous swing high at $2,960, may see some bulls jumping in.
  • Below that, the third and fourth quadrants coincide with the two previous swing lows near $2,890 and $2,840.

Staying within and bouncing from these quadrants could signal continued strength in the current swing. Below that level would indicate the end of the current uptrend, and whether the price reverses or falls into a range, you will likely find plenty of support at the two areas highlighted in magenta.

Next, take a look at a daily chart of silver.

FIGURE 3. DAILY CHART OF SILVER. According to the gold/silver ratio, silver may be poised for another leg up.

Take a look at the green circles highlighting where the gold/silver ratio exceeded 89. These are relatively high levels, considering that the average ratio reading is between 65 to 75 depending on the historical average you’re measuring. As soon as the ratio falls below that level, silver tends to rally. You see this twice in January, plus once in February and March; now that the ratio has risen above this level once again, will silver rally in response? That’s the big question, and one you should keep focused on.

The $40–$50 target range that many analysts are eyeing is still a distance away. The RSI, holding above the 50 line, suggests there’s room for more upside before hitting overbought territory.

If you’re bullish on silver, hoping for it to reach the projected levels above $40 and toward $50, here’s what you should focus on:

  • Silver would need to break above resistance levels at $34.25, the most recent swing high, and $34.75, which would see the grey metal enter its 12-year high territory, paving the way to $40 and above.
  • If silver pulls back, it should stay above (ideally) $32.75 and $31.75.
  • A close below $31.75, even if it finds support at the next swing low at $30.75, would signal weakness and likely invalidate the current uptrend.

What does this mean for investors using ETFs like SLV and GLD?

As a stock investor, you’re likely not seeking exposure to precious metals in the futures or spot market. The most commonly traded metals-backed options are the following ETFs:

  • SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), which you could learn more about in the StockCharts’ Symbol Summary; and
  • iShares Silver Trust (SLV), whose info is also available in the Symbol Summary.

The prices will differ as ETFs are structured differently. With that said, what do these price moves mean for the ETFs?

  • If gold climbs to $3,100 an ounce, GLD—designed to track 1/10th of an ounce—could be trading in the $310 to $330 range.
  • If silver makes a run at $50, SLV could surge right alongside it, potentially hitting $50 per share.

If you’re looking to ride the metals rally without holding physical bullion, these ETFs offer a direct and highly liquid way to gain exposure. And if silver’s historical catch-up to gold kicks in, SLV could potentially deliver the bigger upside.

At the Close

Gold and silver are both showing signs of strength, backed by macroeconomic pressure, historical ratios (at least for silver), and the overall technical context. Silver could be setting up for a catch-up move that might outperform gold in percentage terms. So, stay nimble, watch your levels, and remember that when silver moves, it often moves fast.


Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

After a blistering snapback rally over last the week, a number of the Magnificent 7 stocks are actively testing their 200-day moving averages.  Let’s look at how three of these leading growth names are setting up from a technical perspective, and see how this week could provide crucial clues to broader market conditions into April.

META Remains Above an Upward-Sloping 200-Day

While most of the Mag 7 names already broke below their 200-day moving averages, Meta Platforms (META) is one of the few that have remained above this key trend indicator.  We can see a very straightforward downtrend of lower lows and lower highs from the mid-February peak around $740 to last week’s low around $575.

With the recent bounce, META has now established clear support at the 200-day as well as the December 2024 swing low.  This “confluence of support” suggests that a break below $575 would confirm a new downtrend phase for this leading internet stock.  Only if we saw a break back above the 50-day moving average around $650 would we consider an alternative bullish scenario here.

Will AMZN Hold This Long-Term Trend Barometer?

While META is still holding its 200-day moving average, Amazon.com (AMZN) broke below its 200-day back in early March.  The recent bounce off $190 has pushed AMZN back above the 200-day this week, with the Monday and Friday lows sitting almost perfectly on this long-term trend indicator.

The most important question here is whether Amazon will be able to hold above its 200-day, but given the meager momentum readings, a failure here seems more likely.  Note how despite the recent uptrend move, the RSI has remained below the 50 level through mid-week.  This lack of upside momentum indicates a lack of willing buyers, and suggests a breakout here as an unlikely outcome.  

Similar to the chart of META, we’re watching for any move above the 50-day moving average, which would tell us to consider the recent upswing to have further upside potential.  

Failure Here Would Signal Renewed Weakness for TSLA

Now we come to one of the weaker charts out of the mega cap growth names, Tesla Inc. (TSLA).  Tesla lost over half its value from a peak around $480 in mid-December 2024 to its March 2025 low around $220.  This week’s pop higher has pushed TSLA right up to the 200-day moving average, but no further.

Tesla was one of the first Magnificent 7 stocks to set a peak, as many of these growth names continued to make higher highs into early 2025.  TSLA finally registered an oversold condition for the RSI in late February, before a bounce in mid-March which pushed the RSI back above the crucial 30 level.

When a stock fails to break above the 200-day moving average, as we see so far this week for Tesla, it means that there just isn’t enough buying power present to reverse the longer-term downtrend phase.  Until and unless TSLA can push above the 200-day, we’d much rather look for opportunities elsewhere.  

As legendary investor Paul Tudor Jones is quoted, “Nothing good happens below the 200-day moving average.”  Given the recent upswings for these key growth stocks, and their current tests of this long-term trend barometer, investors should be prepared for a failure at the 200-day and brace for what could come next for the Magnificent 7.

RR#6,

Dave

PS- Ready to upgrade your investment process?  Check out my free behavioral investing course!

David Keller, CMT

President and Chief Strategist

Sierra Alpha Research LLC

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice.  The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.  

The author does not have a position in mentioned securities at the time of publication.    Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

Guess who’s coming to the NFL league meetings?

Serena Williams and Caitlin Clark.

The two sports icons will be featured on a panel discussion hosted by Mellody Hobson on Sunday night, part of the kickoff for the league meetings in Palm Beach, Fla. The panel, which will also include Eli Manning, will focus on the growth of women’s sports.

The NFL has a vested interest as it promotes growth in women’s flag football, coinciding with an increasing number of women in key roles with the league and its teams.

“The NFL is certainly interested in learning from the experience of some of the greatest athletes who have ever lived,” Jeff Miller, an NFL executive vice president, said during a media Zoom call on Wednesday. “Certainly, Serena Williams fits that description, and Caitlin Clark’s engagement with college basketball and the WNBA, as well as Mellody Hobson, who is part-owner of the Broncos and invests in sports, including women’s sports.

“The owners, the clubs, are interested in learning more.”

Miller emphasized that flag football is a high priority for the NFL, stepping up efforts as the 2028 Summer Games loom with women’s and men’s flag football debuting as Olympic sports.

Flag football also represents another avenue for the NFL to strengthen its international footprint amid ambitions to boost football (i.e. American football) as a more prominent global sport.

“This is really about the momentum over the last few years,” said Troy Vincent, NFL executive vice president, football operations.

Clark, who became college basketball’s all-time leading scorer at Iowa and was the WNBA’s Rookie of the Year last season with the Indiana Fever, has publicly stated a desire to become an NBA owner.

Hobson, president and co-CEO of Ariel Investments and former Starbucks chair, purchased a share of the Broncos in 2022.

Vincent knows the optics that the panel discussion will reiterate to owners and other key NFL figures, as more women gain prominent roles in the industry.

And there’s no denying the star power pegged to help hammer home the relevance of women’s sports to the NFL.

As Vincent put it, “We just want to continue that conversation amongst the membership.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Throughout a fascinating, often scintillating, often perplexing, now-circuitous NFL career, Russell Wilson has always been where his feet are … even if his head frequently seems to be in the clouds. Eternally upbeat, Russ always seems to view that proverbial glass as brimming over – and maybe that’s inevitable when you’ve crafted your own “Mr. Unlimited” persona as an alter ego.

Yet the boundaries Wilson rarely acknowledges have typically been apparent to much of the football world.

There was the time his interception in the final minute of Super Bowl 49 wrested defeat from the jaws of victory for the Seattle Seahawks, ending their bid to win consecutive titles. Wilson was sure they’d be back on the Super Sunday stage and maybe even fulfill some of their dynastic projections at the time. But it never happened, a locker room rift with Wilson at its center accelerating the demise of the Legion of Boom era.

Then there was the time he trademarked the phrase “Let Russ Cook” during the 2020 campaign, effectively co-signing the pleas of Seattle fans who wanted him to have more offensive freedom despite then-coach Pete Carroll’s preference to adhere to a ball-control philosophy for three quarters – at least. But neither the Seahawks nor Wilson have won a playoff game since, his relationship with the franchise souring to the point that he was a member of the Broncos by 2022.

Ah, yes … Denver. Wilson headed east to the Rockies in search of a second ring that would be wholly divorced from his NFL roots in the Emerald City, where the Seahawks’ lone Lombardi is often (and rightly) credited mostly to its historically good LOB defense. Wilson, naturally, wanted to win big for the Broncos, who surrendered a boatload of draft capital to acquire him before subsequently granting a five-year, $243 million extension.

You know the rest. After arriving as the presumed post-Peyton Manning savior, bringing his own support staff into the facility and punctuating every interview with ‘Broncos Country, Let’s Ride’ – a bit which Wilson remained committed to uncomfortably deep into a 5-12 season that rookie head coach Nathaniel Hackett didn’t survive to completion – this horse was beaten to death in so many ways. Wilson was released a year later, at great salary cap cost, after coach Sean Payton went into “Let’s deride” mode as it pertained to his QB’s play and style before eventually benching him (which was at least partially a financial decision).

Last season with the Pittsburgh Steelers? It was obvious to many (me included) that Wilson, now 36, had enough left in the tank to help them to another nine- or 10-win regular season, and that was probably about it – Justin Fields clearly the better option if the team wanted to actually invest at the quarterback position rather than go the patchwork route. Despite Fields’ encouraging six-week start while Wilson recovered from a training camp calf injury, coach Mike Tomlin clearly disagreed – with me? – and pivoted to Wilson, that decision initially appearing inspired but ultimately proving the naysayers correct even as Wilson remained publicly confident that Pittsburgh was a Super Bowl-caliber squad … even as it melted down prior to entering the postseason smelter.

So what is my point?

You might think it’s to cook Russ – he agreed to join the New York Giants on a one-year deal Tuesday evening – as he enters the 14th season of his NFL career. (And it’s completely fair to wonder how Wilson’s approach to interviews and social media plus his sometimes awkward and cringey shtick play in the hyper-aware Big Apple – where everything is amplified – given how much it was parsed in much smaller NFL markets. Also, you totally forgot when he announced a 2019 record-setting contract extension with the Seahawks … while in bed … shirtless … with his wife, Ciara … after midnight … even on the West Coast. So yeah.)

But no.

This is where the scales get (somewhat) balanced, and I remind you that he is a 10-time Pro Bowler, a championship-certified quarterback who’s started 17 playoff games, a guy who’s prevailed in 130 of his 216 NFL appearances (a remarkable winning percentage of .604). His 99.8 career passer rating ranks fifth in league history.

Do I think, with one season to re-establish himself, Wilson will take a Giants team – one that will probably be fortunate to finish third in the NFC East – to the postseason? No, not so much. But that’s not really the point this time.

Aside from Daniel Jones’ 2022 outlier, the Giants have been saddled with sub-par quarterback play since Eli Manning was in his prime a decade ago – and even he had his share of misadventures. Wilson should provide a measure of stability if he can continue to replicate his career-long statistical norms, which he did in Pittsburgh last year and, frankly, even in Denver in 2023. Sure, he and coach Brian Daboll will have to blend the parameters of the playbook with Wilson’s penchant for freelancing and thriving outside of structure – but isn’t that what Daboll did while coaching Josh Allen in Buffalo? Wilson is also generally pretty good at safeguarding the ball, which Jones (and even Manning) wasn’t.

Yet that may all be secondary.

Manning was notorious for his insipid public approach as the face of the franchise (even if that was at odds with his far more playful and beloved reputation in the locker room). Just about every time Jones was at the podium, he appeared as if he’d just embarked on a colon cleanse.

Wilson isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, which was well documented in Seattle. He’s also very much the cup of tea many of his past teammates have preferred. His sunny disposition online and in the public eye – and, presumably, in the Giants’ building – should be a welcome, and likely needed, change of pace for an operation that’s endured so much football misery since it last won the Super Bowl 13 years ago. And like Manning and Jones before him, Wilson is quick to praise teammates, whether or not they deserve it, and equally willing to shoulder blame, whether or not he deserves it.

And even if his earnest approach isn’t necessarily infectious, his experience and professionalism should be boons – however temporary – to a young team with promising young players like Malik Nabers, Tyrone Tracy, Andrew Thomas and Theo Johnson (and that’s just on the offensive side). New York should also allow Wilson to make a much bigger philanthropic footprint while enabling him to slake his non-football interests and maybe even grease the skids to his post-NFL endeavors.

Wilson can be a spectacular, flawed, mesmerizing, frustrating player. That was the case in Pittsburgh last year – and very much true during his Tarkenton-esque prime in Seattle. That should not only play well on New York’s back pages, it should also make the Giants relevant and entertaining anew – possibly even competitive but minus the expectations that followed Russ to Denver and, to a more muted extent, Pittsburgh. Maybe Wilson winds up being the optimal bridge to Shedeur Sanders. Maybe Wilson winds up being the optimal bridge to Arch Manning. Whatever the case, it’s actually hard to imagine things going worse for Big Blue than they already have in recent years.

So best to embrace some of Wilson’s banal optimism and start fresh in 2025 for an organization that really has nowhere to go but up after tying for the league lead with 14 losses in 2024. At least one of Wilson’s new teammates, receiver Darius Slayton already has, noting on X that his new quarterback’s Super Bowl triumph 11 years ago occurred at MetLife Stadium.

Better yet, Slayton advised: “Giants country…..Lets Ride”

For better or worse.

But – channeling Russ here – undoubtedly for the better. Go, G-Men.

All NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The 2025 women’s NCAA Tournament enters the Sweet 16 with all four No. 1 seeds still alive. UCLA, South Carolina, USC and Texas have moved handily through the first two rounds. We also have a couple surprise teams still left in the March Madness bracket. But does any of that change this round?

We asked our USA TODAY Sports Network experts for their bold predictions for the Sweet 16, which starts on Friday. Here are the possible upsets on their radars.

TCU vs. Notre Dame prediction

TCU will top the Fighting Irish.Notre Dame won’t have an answer for TCU’s size, and Hailey Van Lith will make sure the Horned Frogs aren’t overwhelmed by the moment. She’s been here before, and having that voice on the floor is going to be an X factor for TCU. — Nancy Armour, USA TODAY

UCLA vs. Ole Miss prediction

Ole Miss will top UCLA. The Rebels are no stranger to a Cinderella run, spoiling No. 1 Stanford’s tournament in 2023. Ole Miss’ defense will give the Bruins’ guards trouble, and it’ll send UCLA home much earlier than expected. — Cora Hall, Knoxville News Sentinel 

USC vs. Kansas State prediction

Kansas State will top Southern Cal. When JuJu Watkins suffered a season-ending knee inury against Mississippi State in the second round, it did not look good. The Trojans will miss her, and Kansas State, with star Ayoka Lee, clutch up down the stretch to win a close game. — Cory Diaz, Lafayette Advertiser 

LSU vs. NC State prediction

LSU will top the Wolfpack. It’ll be a chalky Sweet 16 with the top teams having distinguished themselves but Kim Mulkey’s squad could make a Final Four push. — Maxwell Donaldson, The Gadsden Times 

Texas vs. Tennessee prediction

Two Longhorns will go off against Lady Vols. The Lady Volunteers’ fantastic March madness run will end dramatically against Texas. Madison Booker and Rori Harmon will combine for 55 points to lift the Longhorns into the Elite Eight. — Meghan L. Hall, For The Win 

Tennessee will top Texas. The Lady Vols have been underrated in this tournament, delivering an upset over No. 4 Ohio State in the second round. The last time the Lady Vols faced the Longhorns was in late January and they lost by four. Coach Kim Caldwell had just given birth to her son and wasn’t there to coach. — Jenna Ortiz, The Arizona Republic 

Women’s basketball schedule for Sweet 16

All times Eastern.

Friday, March 28

  • (2) Duke vs. (3) North Carolina | 2:30 p.m. on ESPN
  • (1) South Carolina vs. (4) Maryland | 5 p.m. on ESPN
  • (2) NC State vs. (3) LSU | 7:30 p.m. on ESPN
  • (1) UCLA vs. (5) Ole Miss | 10 p.m. on ESPN

Saturday, March 29

  • (2) TCU vs. (3) Notre Dame | 1 p.m. on ABC
  • (1) Texas vs. (5) Tennessee | 3:30 p.m. on ABC
  • (2) UConn vs. (3) Oklahoma | 5:30 p.m. on ESPN
  • (1) Southern California vs. (5) Kansas State | 8 p.m. on ESPN
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

LeBron James had one of the worst shooting nights of his career Wednesday, but the NBA’s all-time leading scorer still managed to come through when it mattered most.

James’ tip-in at the buzzer gave the Los Angeles Lakers a 120-119 victory over the Indiana Pacers.

The game-winning tip, off a Luka Doncic miss, was just the fourth field goal of the night for James. He didn’t hit a field goal in the first three quarters — the first time that had happened in his 1,553-game career, per ESPN’s Dave McMenamin — entering the final frame with just three points on 0-for-6 shooting.

James, in his third game back from injury, came alive in the fourth, though, scoring eight straight points for the Lakers at one point. He extended his epic 10-point streak in the process and saved his best for last:

The game-winning buzzer-beater was the eighth of James’ career, including playoffs, bringing him into a tie with Kobe Bryant and Joe Johnson for the second most all-time. Only Michael Jordan has more, with nine.

This story has been updated with new information.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY