Author

admin

Browsing

The New York Jets will have to navigate the rest of the preseason without their backup quarterback, but the team is holding out hope that it will be at full strength behind center by Week 1.

‘He’s still going through his protocols as far as his rehab, so we’ll see exactly where he is in the next couple weeks,’ Glenn said.

Taylor, 36, is expected to provide a veteran presence behind Justin Fields, whom the team signed to a two-year, $40 million contract in March.

As Aaron Rodgers’ backup in 2024, the 14-year veteran appeared in two games and completed 17 of 22 passing attempts for 119 yards and three touchdowns.

Fields, who completed three of four passes for 34 yards and ran for a touchdown in last week’s preseason opener against the Green Bay Packers, said earlier in the month he hoped he would play alongside the first-string offense in each preseason contest.

The Jets open the season on Sept. 7 against Rodgers and the Pittsburgh Steelers.

Jets QB depth chart

With Taylor out, undrafted rookie Brady Cook and 2024 United Football League MVP Adrian Martinez could be in line for extensive work in the remaining two preseason games, with the next tilt coming Saturday against the New York Giants.

Here’s the way the Jets QBs are listed:

  • Justin Fields
  • Tyrod Taylor (Injured)
  • Adrian Martinez
  • Brady Cook
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Paige Bueckers and the Dallas Wings travel to Indianapolis to face All-Stars Aliyah Boston, Kelsey Mitchell and the Indiana Fever on Tuesday, Aug. 12, a matchup that features two No. 1 overall WNBA draft picks.

Not only will the Fever be without Caitlin Clark, the No. 1 overall pick for the 2024 WNBA Draft, Indiana will also be without guards Sydney Colson (left ACL tear) and Aari McDonald (broken right foot) after they both suffered season-ending injuries in the Fever’s 95-60 loss to the Phoenix Mercury on Aug. 7.

Meanwhile, the Wings are looking to snap a five-game losing streak, which marks their second-longest of the season. Bueckers has been the bright spot in the Wings’ disappointing season and leads all rookies in points (18.5 per game), assists (5.3) and minutes (34.2).

USA TODAY Sports will provide updates and highlights for Tuesday’s game between the Fever and Wings:

Halftime: Wings 42, Fever 42

The Dallas Wings led by as many as 14 points in the second quarter, but the Fever went on a series of runs to erase the deficit and even it up at halftime, 42-42.

The Fever started to see some shots go down in the second quarter and outscored the Wings 27-19 in the period. Indiana improved to 47.1% from the field and 38.5% from the 3-point line. Kelsey Mitchell is the first Fever player to score double-digits, followed by nine points from Sophie Cunningham and eight from Aliyah Boston.

Wings forward Maddy Siegrist leads the Wings with 12 points in 15 minutes in her first start since June 6. Siegrist, who missed 18 games this season due to a knee injury, is 5-of-9 from the field and 2-of-4 from 3. The Wings are collectively shooting 43.2% from the field and 31.3% from the 3-point line. Paige Bueckers appeared to be shaken up and grabbed at her hip area after Indiana’s Lexie Hull landed on her on a rebound attempt, but Bueckers stayed in the game.

End of Q1: Wings 23, Fever 15

The Wings have a 12-point lead over the Fever after one quarter, led by Dallas’ Li Yueru, who has eight points off the bench. Paige Bueckers and Maddy Siegrist each added five points apiece.

The Fever, meanwhile, have struggled to find any offensive rhythm so far. Indiana is shooting 26.7% from the field and 25.0% from the 3-point line. To make matters worse, the Fever have given up six turnovers, which the Wings converted to 10 points. Chloe Bibby has a team-high six points off the bench.

Arike Ogunbowale ruled out

The Wings will be without Arike Ogunbowale after she was ruled out ahead of the Wings’ matchup against the Fever on Sunday. Ogunbowale was initially listed as questionable with a right knee injury entering Tuesday, before being downgraded to out.

What time is Indiana Fever vs. Dallas Wings?

The Indiana Fever will host the Dallas Wings at 7:30 p.m. ET on Tuesday, Aug. 12 at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis. The game will be broadcast nationally on ESPN.

How to watch Indiana Fever vs. Dallas Wings: TV, stream

  • Time: 7:30 p.m. ET
  • Location: Gainbridge Fieldhouse (Indianapolis)
  • TV channel: ESPN
  • Streaming: ESPN+, Fubo (free trial to new subscribers)

Stream the Fever vs. Wings on Fubo

Is Caitlin Clark playing today? Injury update

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast. Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The global pharmaceutical market reached a total value of US$1.38 trillion in 2024, according to Research and Markets, up significantly from the US$888 billion seen just over a decade earlier in 2010.

Experienced and novice investors alike may want to consider pharmaceutical exchange-traded funds (ETFs) as a way to gain exposure to the top pharma companies. Like all ETFs, pharmaceutical ETFs are a good option for those who want to trade a set of assets in the pharmaceutical industry instead of focusing solely on individual pharmaceutical stocks.

The main advantage of a pharmaceutical ETF is the fact that it can provide exposure to an overarching sector, but still trades like a stock. Pharma ETFs also offer less market volatility and lower fees and expenses.

Big pharma ETFs

Many of these funds have diverse holdings across some of the most important sectors in the pharmaceutical industry, including pain therapeutics, oncology, vaccines and biotechnology. Data was gathered on August 11, 2025.

1. iShares US Pharmaceuticals ETF (ARCA:IHE)

Total assets under management: US$539.44 million

Created on May 5, 2006, this iShares ETF tracks some of the top US pharma companies. In total, the iShares US Pharmaceuticals ETF has 41 holdings, with the vast majority being large-cap stocks.

Of its holdings, Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) and Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) are by far the largest portions in its portfolio, coming in at weightings of 25.51 percent and 17.68 percent, respectively. The next highest are Royalty Pharma (NASDAQ:RPRX) at 5.04 percent, Viatris (NASDAQ:VTRS) at 4.94 percent and Merck & Co (NYSE:MRK) at 4.59 percent.

2. VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (NASDAQ:PPH)

Total assets under management: US$494.34 million

Established in late 2011, the VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF tracks the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. It has the capacity to provide big returns, even though there are some risks attached to the ETF. An analyst report indicates that investors looking for ‘tactical exposure’ to the pharma sector might consider this ETF as an investment option.

The ETF has 25 holdings, with the top five being Eli Lilly at a weight of 15.81percent, Johnson & Johnson at 12.08 percent, Novartis (NYSE:NVS) at 7.80 percent, Merck & Co. at 6.33 percent and Novo Nordisk (NYSE:NVO) at 5.94 percent.

3. Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF (ARCA:PJP)

Total assets under management: US$240.1 million

The Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF is primarily focused on providing exposure to US-based pharma companies. An analyst report states that this ETF chooses individual securities based on certain investment criteria, namely stock valuation and risk factors. Invesco changed the fund’s name from the Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF in August 2023.

This ETF was started on June 23, 2005, and currently tracks 31 companies. Its top holdings are Johnson & Johnson with a weight of 5.25 percent, Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:GILD) at 5.08 percent, AbbVie (NYSE:ABBV) at 4.95 percent, and both Pfizer (NYSE:PFE) and Merck & Co. at 4.83 percent each.

4. SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (ARCA:XPH)

Total assets under management: US$150.91 million

The SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF came into the market on June 19, 2006, and represents the pharmaceutical sub-industry sector of the S&P Total Markets Index. An analyst report for the ETF suggests that due to its narrow focus — which includes pharma giants that post ‘big returns’ during times of consolidation — it should not be considered for a long-term portfolio.

This pharma ETF tracks 43 holdings, with relatively close weighting among its holdings. XPH’s top five holdings are Elanco Animal Health (NYSE:ELAN) with a weight of 4.21 percent, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:TARS) with a weight of 4.18 percent, Johnson & Johnson at 4.02 percent, Royalty Pharma at 3.98 percent and Viatris at 3.89 percent.

5. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF

Total assets under management: US$111.67 million

The KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF was launched in February 2018 and tracks an index of large- and mid-cap Chinese stocks in the healthcare sector, all weighted by market capitalization. According to an analyst report, the fund provides investors with ‘exposure to a relatively small slice of the Chinese economy.’

The ETF tracks 46 holdings, and its top five are BeOne Medicines at 8.26 percent, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine (SHA:600276) at 8.24 percent, WuXi Biologics (HKEX:2269) at 6.71 percent, Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics (SZSE:300760) at 5.95 percent and CSPC Pharmaceutical Group (HKEX:1093) at 5.39 percent.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no investment interest in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Keith Weiner, founder and CEO of Monetary Metals, discusses gold and silver’s performance so far this year and shares his outlook for the rest of 2025.

He also explains what makes today’s gold bull market different than those seen in prior years.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (INDEXNASDAQ:NBI) is still trading at three-year highs, despite current market volatility, in response to breakthrough innovations and increased deals involving biotech stocks listed on the NASDAQ.

After dropping to a low of 3,637.05 in October 2023, the index climbed to a nearly three year peak of 4,954.813 on September 19, 2024. While the index had pulled back to 4,530.69 as of August 5, 2025, further growth could be in store in the future.

According to a Towards Healthcare analyst report, the global biotech market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 12.5 percent from now to 2034, reaching a valuation of US$5.04 trillion.

Driving that growth will be favorable government policies, investment in the sector, increased demand for synthetic biology and a rise in chronic disorders such as cancer, heart disease and hypertension.

The top NASDAQ biotech stocks have seen sizeable share price increases over the past year. For those interested in investing in biotech companies, the best-performing small-cap biotech stocks are outlined below.

Data was gathered on August 5, 2025, using TradingView’s stock screener. Small-cap biotech stocks with market caps between US$50 million and US$500 million at that time were considered for this list.

1. Tiziana Life Sciences (NASDAQ:TLSA)

Year-to-date gain: 227.8 percent
Market cap: US$256.36 million
Share price: US$2.26

Tiziana Life Sciences is a clinical-stage biopharma which is developing therapies for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, degenerative diseases, and cancer-related to the liver. Its pipeline of candidates is built on its patent drug delivery technology that provides a possible alternative to intravenous delivery. Tiziana’s lead candidate is intranasal foralumab, a fully human anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody.

Tiziana Life Sciences shares hit US$1.69 on March 7 after the company filed its investigational new drug application to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for a Phase 2 clinical trial in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), which is supported by the ALS Association. However, by early April that value had fallen back to US$0.78 per share.

A series of positive news flow later in the spring helped to give Tiziana shares another boost. In April, John Hopkins University and the University of Massachusetts commenced dosing of the biotech company’s intranasal foralumab in Phase 2 trials for patients with non-active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. On May 7, the company shared positive results from the use of its lead candidate in improving the quality of life for patients with that form of multiple sclerosis.

Tiziana is also studying the use of intranasal foralumab for treating moderate Alzheimer’s disease. On May 9, it announced that PET scans of a patient with moderate Alzheimer’s showed a significant reduction in microglia activation associated with neuroinflammation after three months of treatment.

Shares of Tiziana reached US$1.62 on May 13.

On July 21, the company announced an ‘unexpected discovery’ in its findings of an immunologic analysis of the patient with Alzheimer’s disease.

‘In an unexpected discovery, the analysis revealed an increase in phagocytosis markers in classical monocytes, suggesting that nasal foralumab may enhance their ability to clear amyloid plaques,’ the press release states. ‘This unexpected effect may open new avenues for treating Alzheimer’s Disease by targeting both inflammation and amyloid accumulation.’

Tiziana’s share price climbed through the remainder of the month, hitting a year-to-date high of US$2.50 on July 31.

2. Palvella Therapeutics (NASDAQ:PVLA)

Year-to-date gain: 224.98 percent
Market cap: US$416.08 million
Share price: US$37.64

Palvella Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biopharma developing treatments targeting rare genetic skin diseases for which there are no FDA-approved therapies. The company’s product pipeline centers on its patented QTORIN platform, which has an initial focus on rare genetic skin diseases.

Its lead product candidate, QTORIN rapamycin, is currently in a Phase 2 clinical trial in cutaneous venous malformations, and a Phase 3 clinical trial in microcystic lymphatic malformations (LM). QTORIN rapamycin has been granted breakthrough therapy designation, orphan drug designation and fast track designation from the FDA for the treatment of microcystic LMs.

After starting the year at US$12.00, shares of Palvella had surged to US$20.99 by February 18. About a week earlier, the company had shared plans to expand the Phase 3 trial to include pediatric patients from three to five years of age. That momentum in Palvella’s share price continued to rally to US$29 per share on March 13.

June produced a number of significant milestones for Palvella. On June 9, the company received initial proceedings from a grant issued by the FDA Office of Orphan Products Development for its Phase 3 trial, and on June 23, it completed enrollment for the trial with 51 subjects, 25 percent over its target. The company closed out the month with news it was added to the broad-market Russell 3000 Index and the Russell 2000 Index.

The company said it remains on track to deliver top-line Phase 3 data in Q1 2026 to support its planned new drug application submission later that year.

While the company didn’t release news in July, Palvella Therapeutics’ share price climbed significantly through the month to hit a year-to-date high of US$39.87 on July 28.

3. OKYO Pharma (NASDAQ:OKYO)

Year-to-date gain: 163.03 percent
Market cap: US$117.35 million
Share price: US$3.13

OKYO Pharma is a clinical-stage biopharma developing therapies for the treatment of neuropathic corneal pain and dry eye disease. Its lead candidate is urcosimod, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and non-opioid analgesic.

So far in 2025, the company has achieved multiple milestones related to its Phase 2 trial of urcosimod for treatment of neuropathic corneal pain.

On April 30, OKYO announced plans to end the trial early to analyze the data from the patients who had completed the trial, with the goal of accelerating its clinical development and expanding the program. Supporting the decision was the fact that urcosimod had previously demonstrated safety in OKYO’s completed Phase 2 trial of the candidate to treat patients with dry eye disease.

The next day, news broke that the FDA granted urcosimod fast track designation for the treatment of neuropathic corneal pain. OKYO’s stock price reached US$1.57 on May 1.

On July 17, OKYO posted strong top-line data from its Phase 2 clinical trial, and stated it is planning a meeting with the FDA to discuss next steps for its lead drug candidate. The following day, OKYO received US$1.9 million in non-dilutive funding to support its clinical development of urcosimod.

Shares of OKYO hit a year-to-date high of US$3.17 on August 5.

4. IO Biotech (NASDAQ:IOBT)

Year-to-date gain: 129.47 percent
Market cap: US$144.28 million
Share price: US$2.16

IO Biotech is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing immune-modulating therapeutic cancer vaccines based on its T-win technology platform, designed to activate T cells to target both tumor cells and the immune-suppressive cells. The company’s lead cancer vaccine candidate IO102-IO103, which has the brand name Cylembio, is currently in clinical trials.

The FDA granted breakthrough therapy designation to IO102-IO103 when used in combination with Merck’s (NYSE:MRK) anti-PD-1 therapy KEYTRUDA for the treatment of advanced melanoma based on positive Phase 1/2 first line metastatic melanoma data.

At the start of the year, IO Biotech completed enrollment in its Phase 2 trial of IO102-IO103 with KEYTRUDA as a treatment given before and after surgery for resectable melanoma or head and neck cancer.

On February 4, the company published results from a preclinical study of its second immune-modulatory therapeutic cancer vaccine candidate, IO112, targeting arginase 1, which plays a key role in immune suppression.

In mid-March, IO Biotech was named to Fast Company’s list of the World’s Most Innovative Companies of 2025. The following month, the company presented new preclinical data for its lead candidate IO102-IO103 as well as IO170, which targets Transforming Growth Factor beta.

In its Q1 2025 financial results and business highlights released on May 14, IO Biotech shared that a readout of primary endpoint data from its pivotal Phase 3 trial of its lead investigational therapeutic cancer vaccine in patients with advanced melanoma is expected in the third quarter of 2025.

Shares of IO Biotech reached a year-to-date high of US$2.40 on July 28.

5. Spero Therapeutics (NASDAQ:SPRO)

Year-to-date gain: 110.95 percent
Market cap: US$124.12 million
Share price: US$2.22

Spero Therapeutics is developing novel treatments for rare diseases and multi-drug resistant bacterial infections with high unmet need. The company’s lead drug candidate is tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (HBr), a late-stage development asset developed in collaboration with pharma giant GSK (NYSE:GSK) to treat complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis.

Spero has an exclusive license agreement with GSK for the development and commercialization of the drug candidate in all ex-Asia markets. The FDA has granted tebipenem HBr qualified infectious disease product and fast track designations.

Shares in Spero traded below US$1.00 for much of the first half of 2025. However, the stock’s value surged 245 percent on May 28 to reach US$2.35 per share after Spero reported that its Phase 3 trial evaluating tebipenem HBr for treating cUTIs met its primary endpoint and stopped early for efficacy. GSK plans to include the findings in a filing to the FDA during H2.

Spero shares reached a year-to-date high of US$3.04 on July 9.

Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

(TheNewswire)

TORONTO, ON, August 13, 2025 TheNewswire – Silver Crown Royalties Inc. ( Cboe: SCRI,OTC:SLCRF; OTCQX: SLCRF; FRA: QS0) ( ‘Silver Crown’ or the ‘Company’ ) is pleased to announce that, further to its press release dated August 7, 2025, it has closed the acquisition of a royalty on 90% of the cash equivalent of silver produced each quarter from the past producing Scotia Mine (the ‘Silver Royalty’ ) with EDM Resources Inc. ( TSX-V: EDM; FSE: P3Z) ( ‘EDM’ ). The Silver Royalty provides for minimum of the cash equivalent of 7,000 ounces per year for 10 years starting at commercial production on the Scotia Mine. SCRi paid $250,000 in cash at closing and issued 60,000 units (‘ Units ‘) to EDM per Unit at a deemed value of C$10.00, with each Unit consisting of a common share in the capital of SCRi (‘ Common Share ‘) and one warrant exercisable into an additional Common Share at a price of C$13.00 for a period of 36 months following the date hereof. SCRi must pay EDM an additional C$250,000 cash payment following the date hereof as deferred consideration for the Silver Royalty.

ABOUT EDM RESOURCES INC.

EDM Resources Inc. (‘EDM’) ( TSX-V: EDM; FSE: P3Z) is a Canadian exploration and mining company that has full ownership of the Scotia Mine and related facilities near Halifax, Nova Scotia. Through its wholly owned subsidiary, EDM also holds several prospective exploration licenses near its Scotia Mine and in the surrounding regions of Nova Scotia .

ABOUT Silver Crown Royalties INC.

Founded by seasoned industry professionals, Silver Crown Royalties ( Cboe: SCRI | OTCQX: SLCRF | FRA: QS0) is a publicly traded silver royalty company dedicated to generating free cash flow. Silver Crown (SCRi) currently holds five silver royalties. Its business model offers investors exposure to precious metals, providing a natural hedge against currency devaluation while mitigating the adverse effects of production-related cost inflation. SCRi strives to minimize the economic burden on mining projects while simultaneously maximizing shareholder returns. For further information, please contact:

Silver Crown Royalties Inc.

Peter Bures, Chairman and CEO

Telephone: (416) 481-1744

Email: pbures@silvercrownroyalties.com

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This release contains certain ‘forward looking statements’ and certain ‘forward-looking information’ as defined under applicable Canadian and U.S. securities laws. Forward-looking statements and information can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘should’, ‘expect’, ‘intend’, ‘estimate’, ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘continue’, ‘plans’ or similar terminology. The forward-looking information contained herein is provided for the purpose of assisting readers in understanding management’s current expectations and plans relating to the future. Readers are cautioned that such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. Forward-looking statements and information include, but are not limited to, SCRi must pay EDM an additional C$250,000 cash payment following the date hereof as deferred consideration for the Silver Royalty . Forward-looking statements and information are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions that, while believed by management to be reasonable, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual actions, events or results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information, including but not limited to: the impact of general business and economic conditions; the absence of control over mining operations from which SCRi will purchase gold and other metals or from which it will receive royalty payments and risks related to those mining operations, including risks related to international operations, government and environmental regulation, delays in mine construction and operations, actual results of mining and current exploration activities, conclusions of economic evaluations and changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; accidents, equipment breakdowns, title matters, labor disputes or other unanticipated difficulties or interruptions in operations; SCRi’s ability to enter into definitive agreements and close proposed royalty transactions; the inherent uncertainties related to the valuations ascribed by SCRi to its royalty interests; problems inherent to the marketability of gold and other metals; the inherent uncertainty of production and cost estimates and the potential for unexpected costs and expenses; industry conditions, including fluctuations in the price of the primary commodities mined at such operations, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and fluctuations in interest rates; government entities interpreting existing tax legislation or enacting new tax legislation in a way which adversely affects SCRi; stock market volatility; regulatory restrictions; liability, competition, the potential impact of epidemics, pandemics or other public health crises on SCRi’s business, operations and financial condition, loss of key employees. SCRi has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers are advised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information. SCRi undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information except as required by applicable law. Such forward-looking information represents management’s best judgment based on information currently available.

This document does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, securities of the Company in Canada, the United States or any other jurisdiction. Any such offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy the securities described herein will be made only pursuant to subscription documentation between the Company and prospective purchasers. Any such offering will be made in reliance upon exemptions from the prospectus and registration requirements under applicable securities laws, pursuant to a subscription agreement to be entered into by the Company and prospective investors. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

CBOE CANADA DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS NEWS RELEASE.

Copyright (c) 2025 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Disney’s ESPN and Fox Corp. are teaming up to offer their upcoming direct-to-consumer streaming services as a bundle, the companies said Monday.

The move comes as media companies look to nab more consumers for their streaming alternatives, and draw them in with sports, in particular.

Last week, both companies announced additional details about the new streaming options. ESPN’s streaming service — which has the same name as the TV network — and Fox’s Fox One will each launch on Aug. 21, ahead of the college football and NFL seasons.

The bundled apps, however, will be available beginning Oct. 2 for $39.99 per month. Separately, ESPN and Fox One will cost $29.99 and $19.99 a month, respectively.

While the bundle will offer sports fans a bigger offering at a discounted rate, the streaming services are not exactly the same.

ESPN’s flagship service will be an all-in-one app that includes all of its live sports and programming from its TV networks, including ESPN2 and the SEC Network, as well as ESPN on Disney-owned ABC. The app will also have fantasy products, new betting tie-ins, studio programming and documentaries.

ESPN will also offer its app as a bundle with Disney’s other streaming services, Disney+ and Hulu, for $35.99 a month. That Disney bundle will cost a discounted $29.99 a month for the first 12 months — the same price as the stand-alone app.

Last week, ESPN further beefed up the content on its streaming app when it inked a deal with the WWE for the U.S. rights to the wrestling league’s biggest live events, including WrestleMania, the Royal Rumble and SummerSlam, beginning in 2026. The sports media giant also reached an agreement with the NFL that will see ESPN acquire the NFL Network and other media assets from the league.

The Fox One service, however, will be a bit different. Fox had been on the sidelines of direct-to-consumer streaming for years after its competitors launched their platforms. Just this year, it said it would offer all of its content — including news and entertainment — from its broadcast and pay TV networks in a streaming offering. Fox One won’t have any exclusive or original content.

Fox’s move into the direct-to-consumer streaming game — outside of its Fox Nation app and the free, ad-supported streamer Tubi — came after it abandoned its efforts to launch Venu, a joint sports streaming venture with Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery.

Both Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch and Disney CEO Bob Iger said during separate earnings calls last week that they were exploring bundling options with other services. Since Fox announced the Fox One app, Murdoch has said the company would lean into bundles with other streaming services.

“Announcing ESPN as our first bundle partner is evidence of our desire to deliver the best possible value and viewing experience to our shared customers,” said Tony Billetter, SVP of strategy and business development for FOX’s direct to consumer segment, in a release on Monday.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Miami Dolphins running back Alexander Mattison’s promising preseason and 2025 NFL season were cut short on Sunday.

The veteran running back, who was spending his first season with the Dolphins, suffered a neck injury in Miami’s first preseason matchup against the Chicago Bears, which will sideline him for the entirety of the 2025 season.

Mattison was taken to the hospital after suffering the neck injury and subsequently had surgery, according to ESPN.

That ends a promising offseason for Mattison, who was angling to make the roster as a depth running back. He was entering his first season with the Dolphins after signing a one-year deal with the team this offseason, after he spent the 2024 season with the Las Vegas Raiders.

Here’s the latest on Mattison:

Alexander Mattison injury update

The Dolphins running back underwent neck surgery and is out for the entirety of the 2025 NFL season, as confirmed by The Palm Beach Post (part of the USA TODAY Network).

Mattison is expected to make a full recovery and he has full strength and motion.

Mattison injured his neck in Miami’s preseason Week 1 matchup vs. the Bears. Following a catch out of the backfield, Mattison collided with Bears defensive back Alex Cook, and he was thrown to the ground awkwardly.

The running back did walk off the field under his own power and gave a thumbs-up to fans. He was later taken to the hospital by ambulance.

Mattison was a standout in Dolphins camp and entered preseason Week 1 as the second back behind De’Von Achane. Mattison finished his matchup with three rushes for eight yards and one reception for 21 yards.

This story will be updated.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Baylor University has sued Boston University for the private university’s use of the interlocking ‘BU’ logo design.

The lawsuit, which was filed in Texas federal court on Aug. 8, is against the Trustees of Boston University and for federal trademark infringement, federal unfair competition and false designation of origin under the Trademark Act of 1946, Texas statutory trademark infringement and common law trademark infringement.

‘While Baylor does not generally object to Defendant’s use of the initials ‘BU’ in connection with its university, it does object to Defendant’s adoption and use of a specific interlocking BU design that is identical or strikingly similar to Baylor’s federally registered marks,’ states the lawsuit, which was obtained by the USA TODAY Sports Network.

The lawsuit states that Boston University’s interlocking ‘BU’ mark is ‘essentially identical and/or confusingly similar to Baylor’s federally registered Interlocking BU.’

The school is asking the court to require Boston University to ‘destroy all goods, packaging, signage, advertisements, internet postings and advertisements, and any other materials bearing or using an interlocking BU mark’ and for Baylor to recover the costs of this lawsuit, with interest, and to receive any further financial relief that is determined.

The lawsuit mentions that Baylor became aware of a promotion and sale of three hats by Boston University’s campus spirit store in 2018 that used ‘an essentially identical and/or confusingly similar interlocking BU’ logo. It said when Baylor when notified Boston University of this ‘in or around December 2021,’ the school ‘did not cease use’ of the logo.

Looking at Boston University’s website for the acceptable branding logos for the university and the university’s athletic department, the interlocking ‘BU’ logo that the lawsuit is referring to does not appear. The university’s athletic department page does, however, show a ‘BU’ logo with the letters side by side rather than interlocking.

The interlocking logo does appear in several offerings on Boston University’s Campus Store website and another website that sells Boston University-licensed merchandise, as alluded to in the lawsuit. Notably, the lawsuit mentions that the interlocking ‘BU’ logo that Baylor is seeking removal of is used by several of Boston University’s club sports programs, which look to be sponsored by Boston University’s Fitness and Recreation Center and not its athletic department.

This isn’t the first time that both universities have taken up this matter legally.

As noted in the lawsuit, Baylor applied to register the interlocking ‘BU’ logo design with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in 1987, but Boston University opposed the application. Both universities would settle a year later, when they signed an agreement that stated both universities ‘must be able to coexist by using the letters ‘BU’ for their respective universities.’

Baylor University, which competes in the Big 12 Conference, was founded in 1849. Boston University, which competes in the Patriot League and Hockey East, was founded in 1839.

USA TODAY Sports’ Scooby Axson contributed to this story

This post appeared first on USA TODAY