Author

admin

Browsing

(TheNewswire)

Provides Drilling Update at Silver King

Vancouver, British Columbia, March 5th, 2025 TheNewswire – Prismo Metals Inc. (‘Prismo’ or the ‘Company’) (CSE: PRIZ,OTC:PMOMF) (OTCQB: PMOMF) is pleased to announce the closing of its previously announced transaction with Blade Resources Inc. (‘Blade’) pursuant to which Prismo has assigned all of its rights, interests and obligations in the Hot Breccia copper project, located  in the heart of the Arizona copper belt (the ‘Transaction’), to Blade.

Alain Lambert, CEO of Prismo, commented: ‘In our opinion, Hot Breccia is one of the most compelling copper exploration opportunities in North America. We remain committed to advancing it toward drilling. The principals and financial backers of Blade have a long history and strong track record in raising significant capital for exploration programs of the scale required at Hot Breccia. We expect this will result in Hot Breccia being drilled this year.’

For additional commentary on the Transaction, please watch the interview Alain Lambert gave to Radius Research:

Drilling Update at Silver King

Dr. Craig Gibson, Chief Exploration Officer of Prismo provided an update on the current drill program at the Company’s Silver King project located in Arizona: ‘The first drill hole at Silver King, SK-26-01 was drilled vertically and was successful in traversing the mineralized body as projected from the historic workings and reached a total depth of 477 feet (145 meters). Two small voids that are likely underground workings were intersected near the elevation of the 114′ level and quartz veining extended from this level for about 100 feet down hole. Visible sulfide minerals are present in several intervals and the presence of silver minerals, including native silver, was confirmed through visual identification and with a handheld XRF analyzer. Freibergite (Ag bearing tetrahedrite), stromeyerite (AgCuS) and probably acanthite (AgS) are also present. The second hole, SK-26-02 is currently at a depth of 155 feet.’

Phase 1 Drill Program Highlights:

  • 1,000 meters of diamond drilling to test the upper portion of the steeply plunging, pipe-like Silver King mineralized body 

  • Fully funded program 

  • Additional drilling to test lower down in the mineralized structure and mineralized areas adjacent to the historic mine may also be completed 


Click Image To View Full Size

Fig. 1.  Permitted drill sites planned for initial Phase I drilling at the Silver King mine shown by white dots.  The orange line indicates the approximate location of the cross section in Fig. 2.  View looking south-easterly.

Drilling is currently focused on testing the upper portion of the steeply west-dipping pipelike stockwork and breccia zone that historically produced high-grade silver and base metals (Fig. 2), as well as targets adjacent to and beneath historic workings. Initial drilling is estimated at 1,000 meters in nine holes. A second phase of drilling will be dedicated to testing at deeper levels and areas adjacent to the historic mine.  The silver mineralization at Silver King is similar to that of portions of the nearby Magma Mine, and exploration for nearby copper mineralization is warranted.

The Magma Mine and Silver King Mine share a common regional geological framework in the Superior Mining District, characterized by a Precambrian to Paleozoic stratigraphic sequence including Pinal Schist basement, diabase sills, the Apache Group sediments, and Paleozoic limestones like the Martin Formation, all tilted eastward and intruded by Laramide-age igneous bodies such as quartz diorite stocks and andesite sills. While both exhibit fault-controlled mineralization—east-trending faults and veins with hydrothermal alteration like silicification and potassic zoning—Silver King features epithermal-mesothermal silver-dominant veins in porphyry with minerals like stromeyerite, tetrahedrite, and acanthite, contrasting Magma’s mesothermal copper-focused veins and limestone replacement ores (mantos) rich in chalcopyrite and bornite. This vertical zoning suggests Silver King’s shallower silver-enriched system may transition into deeper copper styles like Magma’s, with overlapping sulfides indicating potential for untapped polymetallic extensions, especially given Magma’s link to the underlying Resolution Copper porphyry deposit.

 

Fig. 2.  Cross section through Silver King mine showing workings and first four planned drill holes.

 


Click Image To View Full Size

Chief Exploration Officer Dr. Craig Gibson supervising drilling at Silver King


Click Image To View Full Size

Core logging at Silver King, hole SK-26-01

Additional Information on the Transaction

In consideration for the Transaction, Prismo was issued 6,755,000 common shares of Blade and received a cash payment of $185,000. Following completion of the Transaction, Prismo owns approximately 24% of Blade’s issued and outstanding shares and is Blade’s largest single shareholder (see additional early warning disclosure below).

Strategic Rationale of the Transaction

The Transaction provides several strategic benefits:

  • Value Creation: Prismo is leveraging its investments in Hot Breccia into a significant stake in a company dedicated to advancing the Hot Breccia project. 

  • Access to Capital with Limited Dilution: The structure provides enhanced access to capital for the Hot Breccia drill program through Blade, without direct dilution to Prismo shareholders. 

  • Strategic Focus: Prismo will focus on advancing its remaining Arizona projects — Silver King and Ripsey Gold — while Blade dedicates its efforts to advancing Hot Breccia. 

  • Enhanced Attractiveness to Strategic Partners: With the potential for 100% ownership of Hot Breccia, Blade will be in a better position to possibly attract majors or strategic buyers. 

Additional Prismo Rights under the Transaction

Under the terms of the Transaction:

  • Prismo has the right to nominate one representative to Blade’s board of directors. The Company has not yet determined its initial nominee. 

  • Blade has granted Prismo participation rights in future equity offerings, allowing Prismo to subscribe for shares on substantially the same terms as other investors in order to maintain its undiluted ownership percentage in Blade. 

Early Warning Disclosure

This news release is issued in accordance with National Instrument 62-103 – The Early Warning System and Related Take-Over Bid and Insider Reporting Issues. Prior to the Transaction, Prismo did not own any common shares of Blade. The common shares of Blade were acquired by Prismo for a total consideration of $2,364,250 and were acquired for investment purposes with a view to Blade’s potential listing on a Canadian stock exchange.

Except as described in this news release, Prismo has no present plans or intentions that relate to or would result in any of the matters enumerated in paragraphs (a) through (k) of Item 5 of Form 62-103F1.

Prismo will file an early warning report in accordance with applicable securities laws, which will be available under Blade’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca . A copy of the early warning report may be obtained by contacting Gordon Aldcorn at the contact details below.

Qualified Person

Dr. Craig Gibson, PhD., CPG., a Qualified Person as defined by NI-43-01 regulations and Chief Exploration Officer and a director of the Company, has reviewed and approved the technical disclosures in this news release.  

About Prismo Metals Inc.

Prismo (CSE: PRIZ,OTC:PMOMF, OTCQB: PMOMF) is a mining exploration company focused on advancing its Silver King, Ripsey and Hot Breccia projects in Arizona and its Palos Verdes silver project in Mexico.

About Blade Resources Inc.

Blade Resources is a private mining exploration company focused on development of North American copper and precious metals projects.

Please follow @PrismoMetals on , , , Instagram, and

Prismo Metals Inc.

1100 – 1111 Melville St., Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 3V6  Phone: (416) 361-0737

Contact:

Alain Lambert, Chief Executive Officer alain.lambert@prismometals.com

Gordon Aldcorn, President gordon.aldcorn@prismometals.com

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This release includes certain statements and information that may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking information relates to future events or future performance and reflect the expectations or beliefs of management of the Company regarding future events. Generally, forward-looking statements and information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as intends’ or anticipates‘, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results may’, could’, should’, would’ or occur’. This information and these statements, referred to herein as ‘forward‐looking statements’, are not historical facts, are made as of the date of this news release and include without limitation, statements regarding discussions of future plans, estimates and forecasts and statements as to management’s expectations and intentions with respect to, among other things: the anticipated closing and closing date of the Transaction; the strategic rationale and potential upside of the transaction with Blade,  the future development of the Hot Breccia project and Blade’s ability of Blade to successfully implement its strategic and business objectives, including potentially attracting majors or strategic buyers; and the ability of Prismo to fund its exploration activities on its other projects.

These forward‐looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties, and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things: that the Transaction may not close as anticipated, or at all; delays incurred by Blade in obtaining or failure to obtain appropriate funding to finance the exploration program at Hot Breccia; the inability of Blade to successfully acquire a 100% interest on the Hot Breccia project; delays incurred by the Company in obtaining or failure to obtain appropriate funding to finance exploration programs for its other projects; the risk that mineralization will not be as anticipated at the Hot Breccia project or at the Company’s other projects; metal prices; market uncertainty; and other risks and uncertainties application to exploration activities and the Company’s business as set forth in the Company’s disclosure documents available for viewing under the Company’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.

In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Company has applied several material assumptions, including without limitation, that: the ability to raise capital to fund exploration programs at Hot Breccia or on the Company’s other projects, and the timing of such exploration programs; the ability of Blade to complete the option to acquire a 100% interest in the Hot Breccia project and to successfully carry out its business and strategic objectives following completion of the transaction; and that the Hot Breccia project and the Company’s other projects will have the anticipated mineralization and other qualities.

Although management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements or forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and forward-looking information. Readers are cautioned that reliance on such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, forward-looking information or financial out-look that are incorporated by reference herein, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. We seek safe harbor.

Copyright (c) 2026 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Investor Insight

Oreterra Metals is focused on the discovery of large-scale porphyry copper-gold systems in Canada and the US, led by a management team with a proven track record delivering multi-million dollar exits in the same world-class mining jurisdictions.

Overview

Oreterra Metals (TSXV:OTMC) is a focused mineral exploration company dedicated to delivering for its shareholders large-scale discoveries and the capital gains opportunities that typically come with such discoveries. The company’s strategy centers on copper-gold porphyry systems in North America, chosen for their scale, relatively low finding and resource proving costs in relation to high grade vein systems, and their high attractiveness to major mining operators as potential long-life mines. Oreterra emerged early in February 2026 following the comprehensive restructuring and rebranding of its predecessor company, a restructuring warranted by the exceptional prospectivity of the Trek South prospect.

Oreterra’s flagship asset is the wholly owned Trek South porphyry copper-gold prospect, located on the 6,379-hectare Trek property situated in the heart of British Columbia’s Golden Triangle. Effectively new to modern geological science, the prospect has emerged due to rapid glacial ice retreat. First identified in 2019, all of the work required to reveal it as a highly prospective porphyry copper-gold prospect and to bring it to drill-ready status has occurred only in the period since 2021.

The company is led by a veteran management team with over 100 combined years of experience in mineral exploration, finance, and corporate governance. With a lean share structure and strong institutional support following its recent $9.7 million financing, Oreterra is fully funded and ideally positioned to test its high-conviction targets, starting with the first-ever drill of Trek South commencing in the approaching 2026 field season.

Company Highlights

  • Fully Funded for 2026 Exploration: Recently completed a massively oversubscribed $9.7 million financing to support the first-ever drilling this summer of the wholly owned, large-scale Trek South prospect, only recently revealed by glacial ice melt.
  • Drill‑Ready Flagship: The Trek South target has everything one seeks in a new porphyry copper-gold discovery prospect: i.e. large scale, terrific rock exposure, intense porphyry-style changes and metal values on surface in those rocks, and stacked (coincident), strongly positive, magnetic and geophysical anomalies directly below.
  • Infrastructure Advantage: The Trek South prospect is just 3 kilometres up-slope from the nearest work camp, bridges and road presently under construction by the Teck/Newmont GCMC joint venture, and 12 kilometers from their proposed mill site.
  • Proven Management: Led by CEO Kevin Keough, founding CEO of GT Gold Corp. which delivered the Saddle North porphyry copper-gold discovery (Dec. 13, 2017), later sold to Newmont for $523 million cash in current dollars following just $16.7 million of exploration outlays (Saddle North only).
  • Asset Portfolio: Beyond the flagship, Oreterra holds high-grade gold and porphyry copper-gold assets in Nevada and Ontario.

Key Projects

Trek Project – Golden Triangle, British Columbia

Potential for a Major Discovery in the First Few Drill Holes

A large-scale porphyry copper-gold prospect ready for its first-ever drilling, in 2026

The wholly owned Trek property spans 6,379 hectares in the heart of BC’s Golden Triangle, one of North America’s geologically most fertile copper‑gold-silver belts. Within the property, the Trek South target represents a very large, entirely new, porphyry system identified in the period since 2021 by mapping, sampling and geophysical programs.

Strategically positioned approximately 10 km from Teck–Newmont’s rich Galore Creek porphyry copper-gold project and just 3 km up slope from partially completed road access, Trek South is poised for its maiden drilling program in 2026. The project is supported by a National Instrument 43‑101 technical report delivered on January 20, 2026.

The property also hosts additional exploration targets that provide district‑scale upside under a single land package.

Kinkaid Project – Nevada

An Emerging Porphyry Copper-Gold Project on a Proven Nevada Mining Trend

Kinkaid comprises 131 claims covering 1,101 hectares in Mineral County, Nevada, an attractive mining jurisdiction with established infrastructure. The project is subject to a 2% net smelter returns royalty. Exploration has identified two distinct mineralization styles: epithermal to mesothermal veins, and garnet skarns, with evidence for buried porphyry centres.

Oreterra is planning further exploration at Kinkaid, including both airborne and ground geophysical surveys. These programs are intended to refine drill targets ahead of planned diamond drilling on the most prospective areas of the property.

Lundmark Project – Ontario

Emerging copper-gold in northwestern Ontario and an extensive drilling-defined mineral system

The 5,386‑hectare Lundmark property adjoins the Musselwhite gold mine in northwestern Ontario and is subject to a 3 percent NSR royalty. Drilling since 2019 has outlined a significant volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) system characterized by multiple mineralizing events.

These include individual high-grade gold-bearing quartz–pyrrhotite veins, broad zones of stockwork-style copper–gold vein mineralization, and three VMS-style gold–silver–enriched base metal zones. In total, the alteration and mineralization system identified to date now extends for approximately 11 kilometres along strike.

Scossa Project – Nevada

Scossa, a 541‑hectare property, encompasses the historic high‑grade Scossa gold mine, active in the 1930s and 1940s. The epithermal gold system features five known veins, with historical mining limited to the 400‑foot level. Exceptional grades from historical records and previous drilling by the company in the 2003 timeframe, indicates meaningful potential remains.

Management Team

Kevin M. Keough — Chief Executive Officer & Director

A geologist by training, Mr. Keough brings 45 years global exploration, corporate leadership, and capital markets experience, and has founded and led exploration companies that delivered major discoveries of the type Oreterra seeks, later sold for considerable profit.

Stephen Burega — President & Director

With 25+ years in mining and resources, Mr. Burega specializes in corporate development, fundraising, and stakeholder engagement and played an instrumental role in Oreterra’s strategic repositioning.

Brian Crawford — Chief Financial Officer

A chartered professional accountant with deep public company finance and governance experience, Mr. Crawford has co‑founded several TSXV and CSE‑listed companies and continues to support growth‑stage exploration entities.

John Biczok — Vice‑President, Exploration

A professional geologist with over 45 years of field and discovery experience, Mr. Biczok has been involved in significant discoveries globally and brings robust technical leadership to Oreterra’s exploration programs.

Ashley Nadon — Corporate Secretary

Ashley Nadon, a Chartered Professional Accountant, supports governance and financial reporting with a depth of expertise in public company compliance.

Get access to more exclusive Gold Investing Stock profiles here

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Oreterra Metals (TSXV:OTMC) is a mineral exploration company focused on delivering large-scale discoveries and the shareholder value that typically follows. Its strategy targets copper-gold porphyry systems in North America, selected for their scale, comparatively lower discovery costs versus high-grade vein systems, and strong appeal to major mining companies as potential long-life operations. The company emerged in February 2026 following the restructuring and rebranding of its predecessor, driven by the exceptional potential of the Trek South prospect.

Oreterra’s flagship asset is the wholly owned Trek South copper-gold porphyry prospect on the 6,379-hectare Trek property in British Columbia’s Golden Triangle. The prospect has only recently become accessible due to glacial retreat and remains effectively new to modern geological exploration. First identified in 2019, work conducted since 2021 has advanced the project to drill-ready status.

A large-scale porphyry copper-gold prospect ready for its first-ever drilling, in 2026

The company is led by a veteran management team with more than 100 years of combined experience in exploration, finance, and governance. Following a recent $9.7 million financing and supported by a lean share structure, Oreterra is fully funded to test its high-conviction targets, with the first-ever drill program at Trek South planned for the 2026 field season.

Company Highlights

  • Fully Funded for 2026 Exploration: Recently completed a massively oversubscribed $9.7 million financing to support the first-ever drilling this summer of the wholly owned, large-scale Trek South prospect, only recently revealed by glacial ice melt.
  • Drill‑Ready Flagship: The Trek South target has everything one seeks in a new porphyry copper-gold discovery prospect: i.e. large scale, terrific rock exposure, intense porphyry-style changes and metal values on surface in those rocks, and stacked (coincident), strongly positive, magnetic and geophysical anomalies directly below.
  • Infrastructure Advantage: The Trek South prospect is just 3 kilometres up-slope from the nearest work camp, bridges and road presently under construction by the Teck/Newmont GCMC joint venture, and 12 kilometers from their proposed mill site.
  • Proven Management: Led by CEO Kevin Keough, founding CEO of GT Gold Corp. which delivered the Saddle North porphyry copper-gold discovery (Dec. 13, 2017), later sold to Newmont for $523 million cash in current dollars following just $16.7 million of exploration outlays (Saddle North only).
  • Asset Portfolio: Beyond the flagship, Oreterra holds high-grade gold and porphyry copper-gold assets in Nevada and Ontario.

This Oreterra Metals profile is part of a paid investor education campaign.*

Click here to connect with Oreterra Metals (TSXV:OTMC) to receive an Investor Presentation

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

College football lost a legendary coach when Lou Holtz, most known as a former Notre Dame coach in addition to preeminent college football pundit, died on Wednesday, March 4.

Holtz, 89, died after being placed in hospice care on Thursday, Jan. 29. He will be remembered most recently for being an analyst on ESPN for college football.

But for older college football fans, he will be remembered for coaching the storied Fighting Irish to their last national championship, coming in 1988.

Here’s a look at highlights from Holtz’s Hall of Fame College Football coaching career:

Lou Holtz hired at William & Mary

After helping Ohio State win a national championship as an assistant coach in 1968, Holtz landed his first head coaching job. He was hired by William & Mary in 1969.

He led the then-Indians (now the Tribe) to a Southern Conference title in 1970 and a berth in the Tangerine Bowl. Overall, he had a 13-20 record with William & Mary, including a 9-4 record in conference play.

North Carolina State

Following his successful stint with William & Mary, Holtz earned his first FBS job when he was hired by NC State in 1972. After winning just three games in three consecutive seasons, Holtz led the Wolf Pack to three straight top 20 rankings, which included a top-10 finish in the Coaches poll in 1974.

Overall, he achieved a 33-12-3 record, with a 16-5-2 record in ACC play, including the ACC championship in 1973. His teams went 2-1-1 in bowl games.

New York Jets, NFL

On Feb. 10, 1976, Holtz made a move to the pros, taking a job as the head coach of the New York Jets. However, his one-and-only year in the NFL did not go well. He led the Jets to a 3-10 record, resigning with one game left in the season.

Upon his departure from New York, Holtz commented: ‘God did not put Lou Holtz on this earth to coach in the pros.’

Hired at Arkansas, wins Paul ‘Bear’ Bryant Coach of Year Award

Holtz’s departure from college coaching was a brief one. After one season in the NFL, he was hired by Arkansas in 1977. He coached the Razorbacks to a 60-21-2 record over seven seasons, including a berth in six bowl games.

In his very first season, Holtz led Arkansas to a 31-6 win over Oklahoma in the 1978 Orange Bowl. In 1979, Holtz was a candidate to replace Woody Hayes as the Ohio State head coach, but ultimately turned it down, not wanting to follow Hayes.

Following a 6-5 record in 1983, Holtz was fired by the Razorbacks.

Hired at Minnesota

In 1984, one year after his firing from Arkansas, Minnesota hired Holtz before the 1984 season. The Golden Gophers were coming off a one-win season in 1983. In Holtz’s first year, they won four games, including three in Big Ten play.

Holtz led Minnesota to an Independence Bowl berth in 1984. However, Holtz did not coach in that game, as he had at the time already accepted the job to become the next Notre Dame football head coach.

Lou Holtz hired at Notre Dame

Holtz was hired by Notre Dame in 1986 following a 30-26-1 mark under Gerry Faust between 1981-85. Holtz removed the names from the back of the Notre Dame uniforms to emphasize teamwork over individuals.

He led the Fighting Irish to a 5-6 record in 1986, but five of the six losses came within a combined 14 points. They ended the season with a 38-37 comeback win over USC, which saw them down by as many as 17 points in the fourth quarter.

The team went 8-4 in 1987, earning a berth in the Cotton Bowl. That set the stage for the 1988 season.

1988 national championship

Holtz’s signature season as a head coach came in 1988, leading Notre Dame to a 34-21 win over West Virginia in the Fiesta Bowl, to claim the program’s 11th national championship.

On Oct. 15, 1988, the Fighting Irish defeated Miami to end their 36-game winning streak. That game is remembered as the ‘Catholics vs. Convicts’ game in pop culture today. The Hurricanes were the defending national champions and ranked No. 1 at the time.

Notre Dame also had wins over No. 9 Michigan, No. 2 USC and No. 3 West Virginia en route to the 12-0 national championship season.

Retirement from Notre Dame

Following an 11-year run with Notre Dame, Holtz announced his retirement from coaching after the 1996 season. He finished his career with the Fighting Irish with a 100-32-2 record. Particularly, he posted a 64-9-1 record between 1988 and 1993. Overall, Holtz led Notre Dame to nine consecutive bowls, which is still the school record.

Notre Dame began the 1989 season with 11 straight wins before losing to Miami in the regular-season finale. The 23 wins in a row are a school record. The Fighting Irish defeated Colorado 21-6 in the Orange Bowl to finish second in the polls. They also finished second in the polls in 1993, behind Florida State.

Out of retirement to coach South Carolina

Following a two-year stint with CBS Sports as a commentator, Holtz decided to come out of retirement in 1999 and was hired by South Carolina. He had served as an assistant coach for the Gamecocks in the 1960s.

Holtz and the Gamecocks went 0-11 in 1999 in his first season, but the program had just one win in 1998. He led USC to a 19-7 combined record in 2000 and 2001, including back-to-back wins in the Outback Bowl.

Second retirement from South Carolina

The Gamecocks went 5-7 in consecutive seasons in 2002 and 2003 before Holtz ended his tenure with a winning 6-5 record in 2004. A major brawl with Clemson broke out in Holtz’s final game with South Carolina.

In 2005, the NCAA put South Carolina on probation for three years after 10 admitted violations under Holtz, including five of which were considered to be major.

‘There was no money involved. No athletes were paid. There were no recruiting inducements. No cars. No jobs offered. No ticket scandal, etc,’ Holtz said after the sanctions were handed down.

‘There were five major violations, and four of them involved our academic office. Concerning these four violations, you will have to consult the university.

Elected to College Football Hall of Fame

Holtz was inducted into the College Football Hall of Fame in 2008. Along with the 1988 national championship, he finished his coaching career with 249 wins over 35 years with six different schools.

He was joined by Billy Cannon and Troy Aikman in the 15-person calls in 2008.

Lou Holtz awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom

On Dec. 3, 2020, Preisdent Dondald Trump awarded Holtz the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

‘America recognizes Lou Holtz as one of the greatest football coaches of all time for his unmatched accomplishments on the gridiron, but he is also a philanthropist, author, and true American patriot,’ the White House press release said. After growing up in a small town in West Virginia, Holtz attended Kent State University, becoming the first member of his family to enroll in college. At Kent State, Holtz played football, studied history, and joined the Army Reserve Officers’ Training Corps.

‘For the next 7 years, he honorably served as an Officer in the United States Army Reserves. When asked about his service during an interview with the American Legion, Holtz said, “I was taught at an early age that I had an obligation to serve my country.”

Lou Holtz beef with Ryan Day

In 2023, ahead of an Ohio State-Notre Dame matchup, Holtz called the Buckeyes and their head coach Ryan Day, ‘too soft.’

“He has lost to Alabama, Georgia, Clemson, Michigan twice — and everybody who beats them does so because they’re more physical than Ohio State,” Holtz said in 2023. “I think Notre Dame will take that same approach.”

Ohio State, of course, earned a 17-14 win over Notre Dame, and Day was quick to call out Holtz after the game.

“I’d like to know where Lou Holtz is right now,” Day said postgame to NBC Sports. “What he said about our team, I cannot believe. This is a tough team right here. We’re proud to be from Ohio. It’s always been Ohio against the world, and it’ll continue to be Ohio against the world.’

Lou Holtz coaching career record

  • 1969: William & Mary, 3-7
  • 1970: William & Mary, 5-7
  • 1971: William & Mary, 5-6
  • 1972: NC State, 8-3-1
  • 1973: NC State, 9-3
  • 1974: NC State, 9-2-1
  • 1975: NC State, 7-4-1
  • 1977: Arkansas, 11-1
  • 1978: Arkansas, 9-2-1
  • 1979: Arkansas, 10-2
  • 1980: Arkansas, 7-5
  • 1981: Arkansas, 8-4
  • 1982: Arkansas: 9-2-1
  • 1983: Arkansas, 6-5
  • 1984: Minnesota, 4-7
  • 1985: Minnesota, 6-5
  • 1986: Notre Dame, 5-6
  • 1987: Notre Dame, 8-4
  • 1988: Notre Dame, 12-0
  • 1989: Notre Dame, 12-1
  • 1990: Notre Dame, 9-3
  • 1991: Notre Dame, 10-3
  • 1992: Notre Dame: 10-1-1
  • 1993: Notre Dame, 11-1
  • 1994: Notre Dame: 6-5-1
  • 1995: Notre Dame, 9-3
  • 1996: Notre Dame, 8-3
  • 1999: South Carolina, 0-11
  • 2000: South Carolina, 8-4
  • 2001: South Carolina, 9-3
  • 2002: South Carolina, 5-7
  • 2003: South Carolina, 5-7
  • 2004: South Carolina, 6-5
  • TOTAL: 33 seasons, 249-132-7 (.651)
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Wednesday, March 4, was a day for defensemen to change teams.

Tyler Myers got the ball rolling by accepting a trade from the Vancouver Canucks to the Dallas Stars. The 6-foot-8 Houston native will be playing in his home state on the same team as 6-foot-7 defenseman Liam Bischel.

Nick Blankenburg also moved from the Nashville Predators to the Colorado Avalanche for a 2027 fifth-round pick.

But the biggest move of the day was the Utah Mammoth acquiring defenseman MacKenzie Weegar from the Calgary Flames.

“Acquiring MacKenzie solidifies our back end as we continue to push towards the playoffs, and he will be a great addition to our team on and off the ice,” Mammoth general manager Bill Armstrong said.

Here are the details and grades on the MacKenzie Weegar trade:

MacKenzie Weegar trade details

The Utah Mammoth acquire defenseman MacKenzie Weegar from the Calgary Flames for defenseman Olli Määttä, forward Jonathan Castagna and three 2026 second-round picks (Utah’s own and others previously acquired from the Ottawa Senators and New York Rangers). Both players had to waive their no-trade clauses for the deal to go through.

Utah Mammoth trade grade: A-

Armstrong has been aggressively remaking the defense since the team moved to Utah in 2024. He added Mikhail Sergachev, John Marino and Ian Cole that first season and Stanley Cup winner Nate Schmidt last summer. Weegar gives the Mammoth a solid top four as they try to hold onto their wild-card position. And the Mammoth landed him without trading Tij Iginla, who would seem a natural to be part of a trade to Calgary, where his father Jarome had starred.

Calgary Flames trade grade: B-

Considering that Weegar is signed through 2031, it’s surprising that the Flames didn’t pry away a first-round pick. But three second-rounders are good in what’s expected to be a deep draft. Olli Määttä is a pending unrestricted free agent and Castagna, a third-round pick, is averaging a point a game in his third season at Cornell.

When is the NHL trade deadline?

The NHL trade deadline is at 3 p.m. ET on Friday, March 6.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

It’s almost dancing time.

As everyone flips their calendars to March, the countdown to women college basketball’s 2026 NCAA Tournament is officially on. Before March Madness begins on March 18, the participants must be determined. And the first spots are up for grabs as conference tournaments kick off around the nation on Wednesday.

South Carolina (SEC), UCLA (Big Ten), Duke (ACC) and TCU (Big 12) each earned No. 1 seeds and double-byes in their respective conferences and have the easiest path to winning their postseason tournaments. All four teams won their conference tournament last season and are looking to repeat.

The winners of the conference tournaments earn an automatic bid into March Madness. Every other team will have to sweat it out on Selection Sunday on March 15 to see if they received at-large bid.

USA TODAY Sports is following along with the Power Four conference tournaments. Follow along for live updates, highlights and results here:

Final: Kansas 56, UCF 35

Kansas is moving on to the second round after a blowout win over UCF, which didn’t score more than 10 points in any frame in the game.

Jaliya Davis led Kansas with 10 points, while Lily Meister and Elle Evans added eight points each. Jacorriah Bracey of UCF had 10 points in the loss.

Final: Oregon 82, Purdue 64

Oregon built up a 23-point lead in the first half and never surrendered. Purdue attempted to mount a comeback in the second half, getting the deficit down to 12 points in the fourth quarter, but it wasn’t enough.

Purdue and Oregon each had 25 made field goals in the game, and the Boilermakers had eight 3-pointers compared to the Ducks’ five.  What put Oregon over the edge was the free throw disparity: Oregon went 27-of-29 from the line, accounting for one-third of its points, while Purdue went just 6-of-13. Three Boilermakers fouled out in the fourth quarter.

Katie Fiso led Oregon with 20 points on 7-of-14 shooting, including a 6-of-7 from the free throw line. Ehis Etute had a double-double for the Ducks, putting up 16 points and 12 rebounds.

No. 11 Oregon will advance to play No. 6 Maryland on Thursday at approximately 9 p.m.

Final: Alabama 65, Missouri 48

Ace Austin scored 14 points and was one of four Alabama players to score in double figures as the No. 11 Crimson Tide beat the No. 14 Tigers on Wednesday night at the SEC Tournament in Greenville, South Carolina.

Alabama (22-9) also got 13 points from Diana Collins, 12 points from Ta’Mia Scott and 10 points from Essence Cody. Karly Weathers also grabbed a game-high 16 rebounds.

Jordana Reisma paced Missouri (16-16) with 15 points, while Grace Slaughter had a double-double of 11 points and 11 rebounds.

Alabama grabbed 14 offensive rebounds and turned them into 23 points. The Crimson Tide outscored the Tigers 24-11 in the fourth quarter to pull away.

The Crimson Tide will face No. 6 Tennessee at 8:30 p.m. ET on Thursday on the SEC Network. −Mitchell Northam

Halftime: Kansas 27, UCF 19

Kansas women’s basketball has a 10-point lead over UCF heading into halftime.

The Jayhawks’ bench has kept Kansas in the driver’s seat, outscoring the starters 16-11. Brittany Harshaw has six points off the bench, while Jaliya Davis added six points and two assists.

UCF shot 26% from the field and was kept off the free throw line in the first half. Jacorriah Bracey has a team-high six points for UCF. − Cydney Henderson

No. 11 Kansas vs. No. 14 UCF , 9 p.m. | (ESPN+)

UCF starting lineup

Head coach: Sytia Messer

  • 2 Kristol Ayson | G 5’9 – Senior
  • 3 Jacorriah Bracey | G 5’9 – Senior
  • 13 Summer Yancy | G/F 5’11 – Sophomore
  • 33 Mahogany Chandler-Roberts | F 6’2 – Sophomore
  • 35 Khyala Ngodu | C 6’3 – Junior

Kansas starting lineup

Head coach: Brandon Schneider

12 S’Mya Nichols | G 6’0 – Junior

13 Libby Fandel | G 6-1 – Freshman

22 Sania Copeland | G 5-7 – Senior

25 Jaliya Davis | F 6-2 – Freshman

52 Lilly Meister | F 6-3 – Senior

Halftime: Alabama 31, Missouri 20

Behind 10 points from Essence Cody, the No. 11 Crimson Tide led the No. 14 Tigers at the break in the final game on the opening day of the SEC Tournament in Greenville, South Carolina.

Alabama knocked down five 3-pointers in the first half, and turned six offensive rebounds into nine second-chance points. Sitting courtside supporting the Crimson Tide is Sarah Ashlee Barker, a former two-time All-SEC selection who was picked in the first round of the WNBA Draft last spring by the LA Sparks.

The winner of this game will face No. 6 Tennessee at 8:30 p.m. ET on Thursday on the SEC Network. −Mitchell Northam

Halftime: Oregon 47, Purdue 24

Oregon methodically built up its lead in the second quarter, outscoring Purdue 26-12 to go into halftime with a 23-point advantage. Oregon finished the second quarter on a 6-0 run, holding Purdue to a two-minute scoring drought.

The Ducks have dominated inside, with 22 points in the paint and 16 second-chance points off seven offensive rebounds. Purdue has eight offensive rebounds, but hasn’t been able to capitalize with seven second-chance points. 

Ehis Etute is leading Oregon with 12 points and eight rebounds in just 11 minutes of play. − Chloe Henderson

Final: Arizona State 54, Arizona 51

The victory marked the third time the Sun Devils have defeated the Wildcats this season.

Heloisa Carrera has 16 points for the Sun Devils, who got points from every one of the nine players that saw the court. Arizona State shot 40% from the field and dominated the paint, outscoring Arizona 36-18.

Daniah Trammell and Sumayah Sugapong each had 12 points for Arizona.

It wasn’t a clean game by either team. Arizona State (20) and Arizona (18) combined for 38 turnovers. — Cydney Henderson

#14 Missouri vs. #11 Alabama, 8:30 p.m. ET | SEC Network

Missouri starting lineup

Head coach: Kelli Harper

  • 10 Jordana Reisma | F 6-3 Senior
  • 22 Chloe Sotell | G 6-0 Sophomore
  • 1 Shannon Dowell | G 5-10 Junior
  • 23 Abbey Schreacke | G 6-0 Junior
  • 0 Grace Slaughter | G 6-2 Junior

Alabama starting lineup

Head coach: Kristy Curry

  • 21 Essence Cody | F 6-4 Junior
  • 20 Diana Collins | G 5-9 Junior
  • 15 Ta’Mia Scott | G 6-0 Senior
  • 22 Karly Weathers | G 5-11 Senior
  • 23 Jessica Timmons | G 5-8 Senior

No. 11 Oregon vs. No. 14 Purdue | 8:30 p.m., Peacock

Oregon starting lineup

Head coach: Kelly Graves

  • 2 Katie Fiso | G 5-11 Sophomore
  • 14 Ari Long | G  6-0 Junior
  • 3 Sofia Bell | G 6-0 Junior
  • 1 Mia Jacobs | F 6-2 Senior
  • 35 Ehis Etute | F 6-0 Freshman

Purdue starting lineup

Head coach: Katie Gearlds

  • 3 Nya Smith | G 5-9 Sophomore
  • 11 McKenna Layden | G 6-2 Junior
  • 23 Kiki Smith | G 5-7 Junior
  • 44 Tara Daye | G 5-10 Junior
  • 22 Kendall Puryear | F 6-3 Sophomore

Final: Auburn 50, Texas A&M 49

Khady Leye’s layup with 5.3 seconds to play lifted No. 15 Auburn to an upset win over No. 10 Texas A&M in the opening round of the SEC Tournament on Wednesday night in Greenville, South Carolina.

Leye finished with 11 points and a career-high 15 rebounds in the first SEC Tournament victory for the Tigers (15-16) under first-year coach Larry Vickers. Kaitlyn Duhon added 14 points for Auburn, while Harissoum Coulibaly chipped in 11.

Ny’Ceara Pryor powered the Aggies (14-12) with 25 points and four assists. The loss for Texas A&M snaps a five-game winning streak and likely ends their hopes of making the NCAA Tournament under fourth-year coach Joni Taylor.

The Aggies lost leading rebounder Fatmata Janneh to an apparent right knee injury just before halftime when she hit the floor hard after a foul. Janneh did not return to the game, but was seen near the Aggies bench in the fourth quarter using crutches.

Auburn will face No. 7 Ole Miss on Thursday at 6 p.m. ET on the SEC Network. −Mitchell Northam

Final: Illinois 82, Wisconsin 70

Illinois controlled from the beginning, and an early 10-0 run helped the Illini keep a safe distance from its border rival for the entire game.

Illinois heavily benefitted from the free throw line, going 24-of-29. That helped the Illini overcome a dismal 2-of-19 shooting from the 3-point line. Destiny Jackson led Illinois with 21 points on 5-of-8 shooting, including an 11-of-13 from the free throw line.

Wisconsin made 7 of its 11 shots from the free throw line and 8 of 21 free throws, but that wasn’t enough for the Badgers. Gift Uchenna led the Badgers with 26 points.

Illinois will advance the second round and play No. 7 Michigan on Thursday. −Chloe Peterson

Halftime: Arizona State 29, Arizona 28

Arizona State has a one-point advantage over Arizona heading into halftime of the first round matchup at the Big 12 women’s basketball tournament.

Buckets are hard to come by in the physical battle. The Sun Devils are shooting 13-of-29 from the field and have an edge in the paint, outscoring the Wildcats 18-6. Heloisa Carrera and Marley Washenitz each have eight points for Arizona State.

The Wildcats are shooting 11-of-30 from the field. Sumayah Sugapong leads Arizona with 10 points and three rebounds.

Arizona vs. Arizona State: Flagrant 1 foul called

Things are getting chippy between the in-state rivals. Arizona forward Nora Francois was called for a Flagrant 1 foul on Arizona State guard Marley Washenitz on a rebound attempt. Referees determined the contact was excessive, hard and unnecessary.

Wisconsin starter Destiny Howell leaves game with injury

Destiny Howell left the Wisconsin-Illinois game with an apparent leg injury in the third quarter. Howell was helped off the floor by Wisconsin’s trainers, briefly sat at the end of the bench, then walked to the locker room under her own power. She then returned to the bench later in the quarter.

Howell averages 14.1 points per game for the Badgers. She had four points on 1-of-5 shooting, along with three rebounds and two assists, at the time of her injury on Wednesday night. She returned to the game with five minutes left in the third quarter. −Chloe Peterson

Arizona State goes on 9-0 run vs. Arizona

A lot is riding on this matchup for Arizona State. The Sun Devils need a win to keep their March Madness hopes alive as one of the first four out in USA TODAY Sports latest bracketology. With the stakes high, Arizona State appeared to have early jitters. They started the game 2-of-7 from the field with four turnovers and quickly found themselves in 10-2 hole early against Arizona. But Arizona State went on a 9-0 run to take a 11-10 lead over Arizona. − Cydney Henderson

Texas A&M’s leading rebounder goes down with apparent knee injury

Seven seconds before halftime of Texas A&M’s opening round SEC Tournament game against Auburn, junior forward Fatmata Janneh was fouled and hit the floor hard. Bon Secours Wellness Arena went quiet as Janneh grabbed her right knee and screamed in pain.

Texas A&M head coach Joni Taylor and the team’s trainer rushed to the floor to console a visibly emotional Janneh. After a few minutes, Aggies assistant coach Darius Taylor and another staffer helped the 6-foot-2 forward off the floor, keeping her from putting any weight on her right leg.

At halftime, Texas A&M trailed 23-21 with Janneh contributing two points and three rebounds. On the season, the transfer from Saint Peter’s is averaging 12 points and 10.2 rebounds per game — one of five SEC players averaging a double-double this season. — Mitchell Northam

Halftime: No. 10 Illinois 41, No. 15 Wisconsin 33

Illinois used an early 10-0 run in the first quarter to take the lead two minutes into the game, and hasn’t relinquished it since. Berry Wallace is leading the Illini with 11 points.

Wisconsin has had trouble taking care of the ball, turning it over 12 times in the first half. That has led to 13 Illinois points off of those turnovers. — Chloe Peterson

No. 10 Arizona State vs. No. 15 Arizona

How to watch Arizona State vs. Arizona

The Battle of the desert tips off at 4:30 ET on ESPN+

Arizona State starting lineup

Head coach: Molly Miller

  • 0 Gabby Elliott | G 5-10 – Senior
  • 11 Marley Washenitz | G 5-7 – Senior
  • 13 Last-Tear Poa |  G 5-11 – Senior
  • 14 Heloisa Carrera | F 6-2 – Sophomore
  • 21 McKinna Brackens | F 6-1 – Junior

Arizona Wildcats starting lineup

Head coach: Becky Burke

  • 3 Sumayah Sugapong | F 5-7 – Junior
  • 4 Noelani Cornfield | G 5-6 – Senior
  • 11 Tanyuel Welch | G 5-10 – Junior
  • 13 Nora Francois | F 6-2 – Senior
  • 33 Daniah Trammell | F 6-1 – Freshman

Colorado extends coach JR Payne through 2031

Colorado enters the Big 12 Tournament this week hoping to secure the wins necessary to make what would be its fourth NCAA Tournament trip in five years. And the Buffs will keep around the coach that has guided them to the Big Dance for the long term.

JR Payne received a contract extension through 2031, Colorado announced Wednesday afternoon. Already in her 10th season at the helm of the Buffs, she is the second-longest tenured coach in program history.

Payne — who grew up in Vancouver, played at Saint Mary’s, and previously coached at Southern Utah and Santa Clara — took over at Colorado in 2016. She’s had just two losing seasons and has won at least 20 games in each of the last five years. With Jaylyn Sherrod leading the way, the Buffs went to the Sweet 16 in 2023 and 2024, snapping a two-decade drought for the program of not making the second weekend of March Madness.

Colorado will face the winner of UCF and Kansas in the Big 12 Tournament on Thursday night at 8 p.m. ET in Kansas City. — Mitchell Northam

No. 15 Auburn vs No. 10 Texas A&M

How to watch Auburn vs Texas A&M

The first-round matchup between Auburn and Texas A&M tips off 6 p.m. ET on SEC Network.

Auburn Tigers starting lineup

Head coach: Larry Vickers

  • 1 Mya Petticord | G 5-9 Senior
  • 2 Ja’Mia Harris | G 5-11 Junior
  • 3 Harissoum Coulibaly | G 5-10 Freshman
  • 4 Kaitlyn Duhon | G 5-10 Junior
  • 6 Khady Leye | F 6-2 Sophomore

Texas A&M Aggies starting lineup

Head coach: Joni Taylor

  • 1 Ny’Ceara Pryor | G 5-3 Senior
  • 10 Lemyah Hylton | G 5-11 Senior
  • 20 Janae Kent | G 6-1 Junior
  • 32 Lauren Ware | F 6-5 Graduate
  • 44 Fatmata Janneh | F 6-2 Junior

Final: Georgia Tech 72, Florida State 60

Georgia Tech moves on to the second round of the ACC tournament after a 72-60 win over Florida State. The Yellow Jackets will face No. 6 Virginia Tech on Thursday. Georgia Tech, who was led by La’Nya Foster and her 18 points, shot 47% from the field. In addition to Foster’s contributions, it was sophomore guard Erica Moon who made several clutch baskets in the fourth quarter to help seal the win.

Florida State scored 21 points off 16 Yellow Jacket turnovers and had 34 bench points to Georgia Tech’s eight, but ultimately, the Yellow Jackets were too much for the team. Florida State, which finished the Wednesday match shooting 37%, was led by Sydney Bowles. Bowles was the lone player in double figures with 16 points.

Final: Indiana 72, Nebraska 69

Nebraska dominated early, using a 29-15 first quarter to stretch its double-digit lead into the third.

But the Hoosiers weren’t phased. Indiana, down 18 with five minutes left in the third quarter, went on a 10-0 run over three minutes. The Hoosiers took their first lead with less than one minute left in the game, then fended off multiple last-second Nebraska attempts to steal the game.

Indiana will play No. 5 Ohio State on Thursday at around 2:30 p.m. for a chance to advance to the quarterfinals. — Chloe Peterson

Indiana women’s basketball making a push

Indiana is making a late push against Nebraska in the fourth. The Hoosiers were down by as many as 15 points in the second quarter, but they’ve cut that deficit to as little as three points with six minutes left in the game.

Indiana has been able to limit Amiah Hargrove, who had 19 points in the first half but just two so far in the second, and Britt Prince, who has just five second-half points after 13 in the first half. — Chloe Peterson

Halftime: Nebraska 45, Indiana 28

Nebraska ran away early in this game, outscoring Indiana 29-15 in the first quarter. Indiana spent much of the second quarter trying to play catchup.

But the Hoosiers have been hampered by early foul trouble to three starters, as Shay Ciezki and Maya Makalusky each picked up two fouls in the first quarter. Ciezki led the Hoosiers with 11 points in the first half, while no other Indiana player had more than six.

Nebraska, on the other hand, has been firing on all cylinders. Amiah Hargrove had 19 points on 8-of-9 shooting in the first half, and Britt Prince had 13 points on 5-of-9 shooting. — Chloe Peterson

No. 12 Nebraska vs. No. 13 Indiana starting lineups

Nebraska starting lineup

Head coach: Amy Williams

  • 2 Logan Nissley | G
  • 14 Callin Hake | G
  • 23 Britt Prince | G
  • 4 Petra Bozan | F
  • 33 Amiah Hargrove | F

Indiana starting lineup

Head coach: Teri Moren

  • 2 Nevaeh Caffey | G
  • 5 Lenee Beaumont | G
  • 10 Shay Ciezki | G
  • 3 Maya Makalusky | F
  • 8 Edessa Noyan | F

Iowa hopes Hannah Stuelke can return

Iowa senior Hannah Stuelke, who missed the Hawkeyes’ win over Wisconsin on March 1 after suffering an elbow injury against Illinois three days prior, could return for the postseason. But Stuelke will have to clear a few hurdles.

‘It’s a pretty severe elbow injury — the torque of it, the swelling, the range of motion, the pain, the length of time that what really takes an injury like this one to feel better, better,’ Jensen told the Des Moines Register on Wednesday, two days before Iowa’s Big Ten Tournament opener. ‘So she has not practiced. We’re trying to figure out when to try it.

‘If she can go, I think she’ll go through that with some adrenaline. But it’s her strong hand, her dominant arm. So we’re just trying to give it as much rest to see what it feels like. But there’s a lot more than just the pain tolerance. If it can’t move, it can’t move. You can do some things with it. So we’re just trying to give it every minute.’ — Heather Burns

Georgia Tech goes coast-to-coast

Junior guard D’Asia Thomas-Harris built upon the Yellow Jackets’ promising outing against Florida State with a nifty steal-and-score that extended the team’s third-quarter lead to 14. — Meghan L. Hall

Halftime: Georgia Tech 39, Florida State 29

Georgia Tech leads Florida State, 39-29, after two quarters. Despite missing six players for Wednesday’s matchup, the Yellow Jackets have played with plenty of pace and space. They’re crashing the boards as they typically do and haven’t lost a step offensively despite some pressing defense from Florida State.

The Yellow Jackets shot 46% from the field, and on the other end of the ball, held Florida State to 35% shooting and just eight percent (1-of-12) from 3-point range. Georgia Tech also 80% from the line, while Florida State didn’t take or make a single free throw in the half.

The Yellow Jackets are led by La’Nya Foster, who has 13 points and five rebounds at the half. Sydney Bowles has 7 points for Florida State. — Meghan L. Hall

Cal coach gets 100th career win at ACC Tournament

During the first round of the ACC Tournament, Cal coach Charmin Smith earned her 100th career win after a 75-52 victory over Wake Forest

‘Really proud of our group today,’ Smith said postgame. ‘We settled in in the second quarter and were able to get a convincing win. All we want to do is just try to stay in Atlanta as long as possible. It’s a good day for the Bears.’ — Meghan L. Hall

Final: BYU 76, Houston 66

The game was tied at halftime, but BYU came out the locker room motivated and outscored Houston 27-15 in the third quarter to take a double-digit lead into the fourth quarter. BYU was able to hold off Houston for the win.

Olivia Hamlin led the way or BYU with 16 points off the bench, while Delaney Gibb and Lara Rohkohl each added 15 points. Meanwhile, Shun’teria Anumele had a game-high 17 points in the loss. — Cydney Henderson

No. 9 BYU vs. No. 16 Houston

BYU starting lineup

Head coach: Lee Cummard

  • 2 Sydney Benally | G 5-9 – Freshman
  • 11 Delaney Gibb | G 5-10 – Sophomore
  • 13 Lara Rohkohl | F 6-3 – Senior
  • 14 Kambree Barber | G 6-0 – Sophomore
  • 24 Brinley Cannon | G/F 6-1 -Sophomore

Houston Cougars starting lineup

Head coach: Matthew Mitchell

  • 26 Jorynn Ross | F 6-3 – Junior
  • 0 TK Pitts | G 6-1 – Senior
  • 1 Briana Peguero | G 5-7 – Senior
  • 7 Kyndall Hunter | G 5-7 – Senior
  • 14 Jade Jones | F 5-10 – Freshman

Big 12 court has flaw

The Big 12 women’s basketball tournament is being played on ASB GlassFloor LED court at the T-Mobile Center in Kansas City, Missouri. The state-of-the-art LED court, the same one used during 2024 NBA All-Star Game events, features visual effects, including dynamic court design, shot charts and immersive animations.

“Our team had the opportunity to practice on it back in November, and it was an incredible experience for our players,’ Baylor Women’s head coach Nicki Collen said in a statement.’The court is not only visually impressive, but it plays well and represents where our sport is headed.’

However, some eagle-eyed viewers have noticed at least one flaw. The half-court line is hard to see on the court due to the design. — Cydney Henderson

No. 10 Illinois women’s basketball vs. No. 15 Wisconsin

Illinois starting lineup

Head coach: Shauna Green

  • 1 Aaliyah Guyon | G 5-7 Sophomore
  • 2 Destiny Jackson | G 5-6 Freshman
  • 8 Jasmine Brown-Hagger | G 5-9 Junior
  • 23 Berry Wallace | F 6-1 Sophomore
  • 30 Cearah Parchment | F 6-3 Freshman

Wisconsin starting lineup

Head coach:Robin Pingeton

  • 1 Destiny Howell | G 6-0 Graduate Student
  • 13 Ronnie Porter | G 5-2 Senior
  • 15 Gift Uchenna | F 6-3 Senior
  • 20 Kyrah Daniels | G 6-0 Junior
  • 24 Laci Steele | G 5-11 Junior

Georgia Tech center splashes 3-pointer

Georgia Tech center Ariadna Termis showed no fear when she was passed the ball. Termis sank a beautiful 3-pointer in the first quarter, something you don’t see as often from those who play the position. — Meghan L. Hall

Georgia Tech injury report

Georgia Tech will be without six players when it takes on Florida State during the first round of the ACC Tournament later Wednesday. The following players are out:

  • #1 McKayla Taylor | C 6-1 – Freshman
  • #4 Leyre Urdiain | G 5-11 – Freshman
  • #12 Jada Crawshaw | F 6-0 – Junior
  • #13 Deborah Mukeba | C 6-5 – Sophomore
  • #22 Ines Noguero | G 5-11 – Senior
  • #33 Savannah Samuel | G 6-1 – Senio

UCLA’s Lauren Betts performs halftime show

UCLA women’s basketball doesn’t tip off its postseason until the Big Ten Tournament quarterfinal round on Friday, but some players are already dancing.

Charlisse Leger-Walker, Lauren Betts and Gabriela Jaquez joined UCLA cheerleaders for a special halftime performance to Tate McRae’s ‘Just Keep Watching’ during UCLA men’s 72-52 win over Nebraska on Tuesday.

— Cydney Henderson

Wake Forest ‘nervous’ in Cal matchup

Wednesday’s matchup against the Cal Golden Bears did not go as Wake Forest hoped. The Deamon Deacons fell 75-52. Head coach Megan Gebbia said postgame she believed nerves played a factor.

Wake Forest only has one player on its roster who had been to the ACC Tournament before this season, plus four transfers, including Cal Poly’s Mary Carter. On Wednesday, Carter led Wake Forest with 13 points.

‘I felt like we were a little nervous early on. I had to go in at halftime and say, ‘Shoot when you’re open,” Gebbia said. ‘As a coach, you don’t want to have to say that at halftime to some of the players that I felt were playing a little tentative. You have to come out with a lot of energy and a lot of effort and just confidence in yourself.’It’s unfortunate that it had to be this type of loss I would have liked for it to be a little bit closer, but the lesson is it’s a 40-minute game.’ — Meghan L. Hall

Final: Florida 86, Mississippi State 68

Me’Arah O’Neal and Liv McGill each scored 22 points apiece as the Gators kept their postseason alive with a win over the Bulldogs on Wednesday in the opening round of the SEC Tournament in Greenville, South Carolina.

It’s the fifth time O’Neal, a sophomore and the daughter of NBA legend Shaquille O’Neal, has scored north of 20 points. She also added four rebounds for Florida (18-14), while McGill had seven rebounds and 10 assists.

Destiney McPhaul and Favour Nwaedozi paced Mississippi State (18-13) with 12 points apiece in the fifth consecutive loss for the Bulldogs. Sam Purcell’s team is now at the mercy of the NCAA Tournament Selection Committee when it comes to March Madness inclusion. The Bulldogs end the regular season with a 2-9 record in Quad 1 games and a 1-3 record in Quad 2 games.

Florida will face No. 6 Oklahoma on Thursday at 1:30 p.m. ET on the SEC Network. — Mitchell Northam

Final: California 75, Wake Forest 52

Cal led 32-21 in the first half and outscored Wake Forest 29-12 in the third period and ran away with the win. By the time the fourth quarter arrived, the lead had ballooned to as high as 29 points. Cal will play No. 7 Syracuse in the second round of the ACC Tournament.

The Golden Bears shot 44% from the field and held the lead for 35 minutes, 46 seconds. Calwas led by Sakima Walker, who finished her day with 17 points and 10 rebounds. The Golden Bears also added 19 points from their bench on Wednesday, which is noteworthy.

Wake Forest, which shot 38% from the field, was led by Mary Carter. Carter was one of two Demon Deacons who finished in double figures The Wake Forest guard finished with 13 points and five rebounds. — Meghan L. Hall

8 players ejected at Sun Belt Tournament

Eight players were ejected from a second round game in the Sun Belt Women’s Basketball Tournament in Pensacola, Florida, on Wednesday afternoon after a fight broke out between No. 9 Coastal Carolina and No. 12 South Alabama.

South Alabama led by nine points with about 5:39 remaining in the fourth quarter when a scuffle ensued between Cordasia Harris of South Alabama and Tracey Hueston of Coastal Carolina. Coaches and players from the benches spilled out onto the floor and one referee was caught in the crossfire, hitting the floor after taking a hit from a player. Read more here. — Mitchell Northam

Halftime: BYU 29, Houston 29

The first-round matchup between BYU and Houston, the Battle of the Cougars, has proved to be a low-scoring affair so far and we’re all tied up at halftime. 

Neither team is shooting particularly well. BYU is 9-of-23 (39%) from the field, while Houston is 10-of-33 (30%) from the field.

BYU’s Delaney Gibb leads all scorers with 11 points and four rebounds. Sydney Benally has five points, while Lara Rohkohl has four points. However, BYU has given up 15 turnovers that have kept Houston in the game. 

Jade Jones and Kierra Merchant each have seven points for Houston. — Cydney Henderson

Halftime: Florida 46, Mississippi State 30

Me’Arah O’Neal — yes, the daughter of NBA legend Shaquille O’Neal — is powering the Gators in the first half with 15 points on 5-of-10 shooting from the floor and 3-of-5 from 3-point land. Florida has also scored 14 points off 12 turnovers by the Bulldogs, while Mississippi State has two points from nine turnovers by the Gators.

NCAA Tournament hopes for both teams hinge on the outcome of this game. Mississippi State is in a better position on the bubble currently with a NET of 39, but would feel more optimistic about its prospects of cracking the field of 68 with a win here. Florida likely needs to win multiple games in Greenville, South Carolina this week to get in a bubble position. Mitchell Northam

Cal forward exits with injury

Cal forward Claudia Langarita, a starter for the Golden Bears, exited the second quarter of Wednesday’s matchup with Wake Forest with 9:41 remaining in the period. It’s unclear how Langarita was hurt, but she went down and stayed down for several moments before being helped off the court by nearby training staff.

Langarita attempted to stretch her out to the side, but she ultimately went back to the locker room. The Cal forward had a visible limp and appeared to be rubbing her right hip.

Langaratia emerged from the locker room minutes later, standing behind the Cal bench with a heat wrap on her back. She eventually sat down on the bench with just under three minutes left in the period, but did not return to action before the half. — Meghan L. Hall

Wake Forest and Cal struggle to score

In the opening quarter of Wake Forest and Cal’s matchup, neither team could get many shots to fall. Wake Forest shot 31% from the field and Cal shot 24%. Both teams made four field goals. Cal leads 11-10 over Wake Forest. — Meghan L. Hall

Final: Kansas State 91, Cincinnati 66

No. 12 Kansas State cruised to the second round of the Big 12 women’s basketball tournament following a dominant 25-point win over No. 13 Cincinnati, where the Wildcats shot a whopping 53% from the 3-point line.

Taryn Sides (20 pts) and Jordan Speiser (20) combined for eleven of Kansas State’s 17 made 3-pointers, which set a Big 12 Tournament record. Nastja Claessens made five 3-pointers and finished with 18 points in the win.

Mya Perry led Cincinnati with 23 points (7-of-19 FG, 4-of-7) and was in tears when she checked out of the final game of her college career. Perry put her jersey over her face as head coach Katrina Merriweather tried to console her.

Florida out in front early

The Gators are off to a quick and balanced start with four of their five starters scoring to build a 10-4 lead halfway through the first quarter.

Neither team is shooting particularly well with Mississippi State hitting 33% of its shots from the field and Florida 30%.

No. 13 Mississippi State vs. No. 12 Florida

Mississippi State Bulldogs starting lineup

Head coach: Sam Purcell

  • 4 Tryanna Crisp | G 5-8 – Senior
  • 5 Chandler Prater | G/F 5-10 – Senior
  • 25 Favour Nwaedozi | F 6-3 – Junior
  • 33 Kharyssa Richardson | F 6-2 Senior
  • 40 Madison Francis | F 6-2 – Freshman

Florida Gators starting lineup

Head coach: Kelly Rae Finley

  • 13 Laila Reynolds | G 6-1 – Junior
  • 23 Liv McGill | G 5-9 – Sophomore
  • 8 Me’Arah O’Neal | F 6-4 – Sophomore
  • 9 Alexa Dizeko | F 5-111- Senior
  • 14 Caterina Piatti | F 6-4 – Freshman

No. 12 Miami vs No. 13 Stanford

Final: Miami 83, Stanford 76 (OT)

Stanford tried to continue its push in overtime, but ultimately ran out of steam. Miami moves on into the second round of the ACC Tournament with an 83-76 win. The Hurricanes will play No. 5 Notre Dame next.

Miami finished shooting 51% from the field, with three scorers in double digits, including Ra Shaya Kyler, who had a double-double with 24 points and 11 rebounds, and Gal Raviv, who had 20 points, six rebounds and six assists.

Stanford shot 43% from the field and 44% from deep behind 12 3-pointers.. Courtney Ogden led the Cardinal with 22 points. — Meghan L. Hall

Stanford and Miami go to overtime

Miami led 65-52 after three quarters (and by as much as eight in the waning minutes of the fourth), but Stanford forced several Hurricane turnovers that helped the Cardinal climb back into the game. Stanford switched to a zone defense and that made the difference.

Stanford’s Courtney Ogden cashed in on five straight points with less than a minute remaining to tie the game up at 70 and force overtime. Ogden has 22 points on the day.

Miami pulling away

With about five minutes left in the third quarter, the game was tied at 49. However, Miami turned up the heat. The Hurricanes finished the period on a 16-3 run, punctuated by a deep 3-pointer from Natalie Wetzel to close the quarter. Wetzel’s 3-pointer pushed Miami’s lead to 13.

Stanford and Miami trading baskets

At the halfway point of the third quarter, the Cardinal and Hurricanes are trading 3-pointers and baskets in the paint. The defense has intensified and so has the scoring.

Stanford has a 51-49 lead with 4:49 left in the third, led by 14 points from Hailee Swain. Ra Shaya Kyle has 17 for Miami.

Halftime: Stanford 39, Miami 37

With Stanford’s season and NCAA Tournament dreams seemingly hanging in the balance against Miami, the Cardinal survived an early surge from the Hurricanes. After a 19-10 first quarter from Miami, it was all Stanford in the second quarter. The Cardinal took the period 29-18.

Miami’s Gal Raviv leads all scorers with 12 points. Hailee Swain and Courtney Ogden both have 11 points for Stanford. — Meghan L. Hall

Stanford on an 18-11 run

After trailing 19-10 after the first quarter, Stanford went on an 18-11 run to cut Miami’s nine-point lead to 2 points with 3:39 remaining in the half. Courtney Ogden leads Stanford with 11 points. The Cardinal have NCAA Tournament hopes hanging in the balance as one of the first four out in USA TODAY Sports latest bracketology. — Meghan L. Hall

Miami Hurricanes starting lineup

Head coach: Tricia Cullop

  • 0 Ra Shaya Kyle | C 6-5 – Senior
  • 33 Amarachi Kimpson | G 5-8 – Junior
  • 12 Natalie Wetzel | F 6-3 – Freshman
  • 5 Ahnay Adams | G 5-6 – Sophomore
  • 14 Gal Raviv | G 5-9 – Sophomore

Stanford Cardinal starting lineup

Head coach: Kate Paye

  • 2 Hailee Swain | G 5-11 – Freshman
  • 6 Shay Ijiwoye | G 5-6 – Sophomore
  • 40 Courtney Ogden | F 6-1 – Junior
  • 12 Lara Somfai | F 6-3 – Freshman
  • 3 Nunu Agara | F 6’2 – Junior

No. 12 Kansas State vs. No. 13 Cincinnati

Halftime: Kansas State 40, Cincinnati 29

It’s raining 3-pointers in Kansas City. Kansas State (8-of-15) and Cincinnati (4-of-8) are shooting over 50% from beyond the arc in the first round of the Big 12 Tournament, but the Wildcats have an eleven-point edge heading into halftime.

Nastja Claessens (12 points) and Taryn Sides (11 points) combined for six of Kansas State’s eight 3-pointers.

Cincinnati is outrebounding Kansas State 27-18, including 10 offensive rebounds, yet find themselves down double-digits because of turnovers. The Bearcats have given up 13 turnovers, which Kansas State converted to nine points. Mya Perry has a team-high nine points (3-of-5 from 3) for Cincinnati. — Cydney Henderson

Kansas State Wildcats starting lineup

Head coach: Jeff Mittie

  • 3 Brandie Harrod | G 6-1 – Freshman
  • 4 Nastja Claessens | F 6-1 – Junior
  • 6 Gina Garcia | G 5-10 – Freshman
  • 11 Taryn Sides  | G 5-7 – Junior
  • 34 Tess Heal | G 5-10 – Senior

Cincinnati Bearcats starting lineup

Head coach: Katrina Merriweather

  • 1 Mya Perry | G 5-11 – Senior
  • 3 Reagan Jackson | G 5-8 – Junior
  • 4 Caliyah DeVillasee | G 5-8 – Freshman
  • 10 Kylie Torrence | F 6-2 – Freshman
  • 32 Destiny Thomas | C 6-4 -Junior

No. 16 Arkansas vs. No. 9 Kentucky

Final: Kentucky 94, Arkansas 64

The Wildcats outscored the Razorbacks 29-10 in the third quarter and never looked back. Kentucky outrebounded Arkansas 35-20 and outscored them in the paint 40-30.

Although the Razorbacks were perfect on 10 3s, the Wildcats were 16 for 22 from behind the arc to keep pace.

Kentucky had six players in double figures including all of their starters. Carla Strack had a double-double with 20 points and 13 rebounds. Amelia Hassett added 18 points on 6-of-11 from behind the arc.

Kentucky faces Georgia in the tournament quarterfinals at 11 a.m. ET on Thursday (SEC Network).

Tonie Morgan pacing Kentucky run

Tonie Morgan has more points than the entire Arkansas team in the third quarter. The senior has scored 12 with six rebounds. The Wildcats now have four players in double figures and lead 70-43. The Razorbacks season looks to be coming to an end.

Kentucky taking charge

The Wildcats have gone on a 12-2 run to start the third quarter and their lead has ballooned back to 19 points. Amelia Hassett made her fifth 3-pointer to trigger an Arkansas timeout. Clara Strack has a double-double for Kentucky with 14 points and 11 rebounds.

Halftime: Kentucky 42, Arkansas 33

The Razorbacks closed out the first half on a 15-4 run to get back within single digits of the No. 19-ranked Wildcats. Arkansas is outscoring Kentucky 18-12 in the paint. Taleyah Jones has 12 points to lead the Razorbacks.

Amelia Hassett has 12 points and Clara Strack 11 points and eight rebounds for Kentucky, which had led by as many as 20 points. — Heather Burns

Arkansas trying to claw back

The Razorbacks have outscored the Wildcats 23-13 in the second quarter. Emily Robinson has eight points including two 3-pointers. Taleyah Jones has 12 points, two rebounds and two assists.

Kentucky on a 7-0 run

The Wildcats have jumped out to a 16-4 lead early after a 7-0 run against Arkansas. Asia Boone leads Kentucky with six points on a pair of 3-pointers. — Heather Burns

Arkansas Razorbacks starting lineup

Head coach: Kelsi Musick

  • 11 Wyette Mayberry | G 5-7 – Senior
  • 22 Bonnie Deas | G 5-9 – Freshman
  • 10 Taleyah Jones | G 5-10 – Senior
  • 21 Ashlynn Chlarson | C 6-3 – Junior
  • 23 Emily Robinson | G 5-10 – Junior

Kentucky starting lineup

Head coach: Kenny Brooks

  • 5 Tonie Morgan | G 5-9 – Senior
  • 7 Teonnie Key | F 6-5 – Senior
  • 8 Asia Boone | G 5-8 – Junior
  • 13 Clara Strack | C 6-5 – Junior
  • 32 Amelia Hassett | F 6-4 -Senior

SEC women’s basketball tournament bracket

Women’s college basketball bracketology

Conference tournaments begin Wednesday in women’s college basketball for a handful of leagues, including the ACC, SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, Big East, Atlantic 10 and Summit.

It’s possible a lot of the projections will change by the time USA Today Sports rolls out another bracketology next week as teams will play in high-stakes games against marquee in-conference opponents on neutral courts. Up for grabs are a few undecided spots in the top 16 and positioning on the bubble. Read more.

Big 12 women’s basketball tournament schedule today

All times Eastern

Wednesday, March 4

First Round

  • Game 1: No. 12 Kansas State 91, No. 13 Cincinnati 66
  • Game 2: No. 9 BYU 76, No. 16 Houston 66
  • Game 3: No. 10 Arizona State vs. No. 15 Arizona | 6:30 p.m. (ESPN+)
  • Game 4: No. 11 Kansas vs. No. 14 UCF | 9 p.m. (ESPN+)

Big 12 women’s basketball tournament bracket

SEC women’s basketball tournament schedule today

All times Eastern

Wednesday, March 4 – First round

  • Game 1: #16 Arkansas vs. #9 Kentucky | 11 a.m. ET (SEC Network)
  • Game 2: #13 Mississippi State vs. #12 Florida | 1:30 p.m. ET (SEC Network)
  • Game 3: #15 Auburn vs. #10 Texas A&M | 6 p.m. ET (SEC Network)
  • Game 4: #14 Missouri vs. #11 Alabama | 8:30 p.m. ET (SEC Network)

SEC women’s basketball tournament bracket

Ranking March Madness top players

The 2025-26 women’s college basketball regular season is over for the Power 4 conferences and a handful of players rose to the top ahead of the 2026 NCAA Tournament.

UConn’s Sarah Strong and Azzi Fudd are among the top players set to tipoff March Madness later this month. USA TODAY Sports ranked the top 10 players in women’s college basketball ahead of the conference tournaments that begin Wednesday, March 4, for the Power 4. Read more.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast. Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

NEW YORK — Two looks, and they both hit rim.

After clawing back from an eight-point deficit with just fewer than three minutes to play in the fourth quarter, the New York Knicks got a pair of clean looks with seconds left in their game against the Oklahoma City Thunder.

Yet, in what could be a potential NBA Finals preview, it was the Thunder who escaped Wednesday, March 4 with a 103-100 victory to improve their record to 49-15, the best mark in the NBA.

Thunder forward Chet Holmgren led all players with 28 points, 22 of which came in the first half.

Reigning NBA MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander dropped 26 points and 8 assists, extending his streak of consecutive games with at least 20 points scored to 124.

Throughout the game, the Knicks tried to force the ball out of Gilgeous-Alexander’s hands, and he repeatedly made the right pass to open Thunder players.

The Knicks had six players reach double figures, with Karl-Anthony Towns leading the way with 17 points on 7-of-8 shooting. He also hauled in a game-high 17 rebounds, though he fouled out late in the game.

The Knicks fell to 40-23.

USA TODAY Sports provided updates and highlights from Wednesday night’s Oklahoma City Thunder-New York Knicks game:

Thunder vs. Knicks highlights

End Q4: Thunder 103, Knicks 100

They got two open looks to tie the game, but both rimmed out.

Coach Mike Brown drew up a play that got Jalen Brunson an open look at a would-be game-tying 3 in the left corner. Brunson put up the shot but it bounced off the rim. The ball was tipped out to Knicks forward OG Anunoby near the top of the key. Anunoby scooped the ball, stepped back, but the shot fell short and bounced off front rim.

Simply put, the Knicks went cold at the wrong time. New York, which entered the fourth quarter with a three-point lead, shot just 33.3% in the final period, eventually ceding the lead to the Thunder.

Oklahoma City capitalized and attacked the paint, with Shai Gilgeous-Alexander hitting a few big baskets late, none other than a stepback 3, Oklahoma City’s final bucket.

Knicks down 3 with 6.0 seconds left to play

New York has battled back and has the chance to tie the game at 103. Coach Mike Brown called a timeout to draw up a play. Both teams are in the bonus, so the Thunder may opt to put New York on the line.

Thunder reclaim lead

After getting a quick blow on the bench, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander has returned for Oklahoma City, which is now up 91-86, with 6:33 left to play in the game.

Gilgeous-Alexander, who has 21 points, extended his streak of consecutive games with at least 20 points to 124, which is just two behind Wilt Chamberlain’s record of 126.

Josh Hart returns to the floor

After leaving the game early in the third quarter with an apparent back injury, Knicks forward Josh Hart has returned to the game.

End Q3: Knicks 80, Thunder 77

It’s not that the Thunder shot poorly in the third quarter — they converted their attempts at a 46.7% clip — it’s that they took seven fewer shots than the Knicks did.

And with those attempts, New York capitalized. The Knicks shot 14-of-22 (63.6%) from the floor in the third quarter to erase a 10-point deficit at the start of the quarter. And with the final shot of the third, a corner 3 from Mikal Bridges, the Knicks took their first lead since very early in the second quarter. Five different Knicks are scoring double figures, with Karl-Anthony Towns — who remains a perfect 6-of-6 from the floor — leading the team with 15 points.

For the Thunder, turnovers were the main issue in the third. After Chet Holmgren dropped 22 points in the first half, he failed to score a single point in the third. He continues to lead the team, though Shai Gilgeous-Alexander has added 19 points and 7 assists.

Knicks tie it up

The New York run in the third quarter has continued. The Thunder have committed several turnovers in the period, and a Jalen Brunson 3 that clanked off the rim before caroming off the backboard and through the net tied the game at 72 apiece with 2:56 left in the third quarter.

Alex Caruso heads to locker room

After taking a hard fall when attempting to haul in a rebound, Alex Caurso fell onto the court and immediately grabbed at his leg. He was slow to get up and trudged toward the bench, where he spoke briefly with a trainer. The two went into the locker room, though Caruso reemerged shortly after.

Knicks close the gap

New York has gone on an 11-4 run to close the deficit to 6 points with 5:28 left in the third quarter. Landry Shamet has come off the bench to spark the run with a couple of scoop layups, while Mikale Bridges and Karl-Anthony Towns have also added baskets.

The Thunder are up 67-61.

Josh Hart heads to locker room

After airballing a corner 3 with 10:50 to play in the third quarter, Knicks forward Josh Hart immediately clutched at his lower back in apparent discomfort. At the next whistle, Hart took himself out of the game and headed into the New York locker room with a trainer.

After several minutes, Hart reemerged and took his spot on the bench, still grimacing. A trainer placed a black band around his chest and back.

Knicks post their lowest scoring first half of the season

New York, which shot just 35.6% from the floor in the first half, scored just 40 points before intermission, marking its lowest scoring first half of the 2025-26 season so far. The previous low was 42 points, which came Feb. 6 in an eventual 38-point loss against the Pistons.

End Q2: Thunder 50, Knicks 40

Although both these teams are playing the second legs of back-to-backs that started in different cities, it was the Knicks who displayed that more in the first half.

New York struggled to find the bottom of the net in the second period, shooting just 7-of-22 (31.8%) Oklahoma City emphasized closing out, contesting New York’s perimeter shots and rarely giving away an open look.

Jalen Brunson shot just 1-of-8 in the half for 2 points, while center Karl-Anthony Towns attempted just 4 shots, though he made each one, scoring 9 points. Mohamed Diawara also has a team-high 9 points.

The Thunder, meanwhile, are playing in control. They’re shooting a reasonable 46.3% from the floor, but they’re merely looking for the best shot available. As the Knicks have thrown bodies at Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, the ball has swung around to find the open player. More often than not, that has been Chet Holmgren, who leads all players with 22 points on 8-of-11 shooting, including a blistering 6-of-8 (75%) from 3-point range.

Gilgeous-Alexander has added 11 points, but has a team-high 7 assists.

The Knicks’ plan for SGA

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander has started this game extremely well. He has been an efficient 4-of-7 from the floor — with no 3 pointers attempted — for 9 points. But the Knicks are closing his lanes to penetrate as soon as he attacks the paint. This is not at all dissimilar from the way other teams defend SGA, but he’s quickly getting the ball out of his hands to find open teammates.

And, if they’re not immediately open, OKC players have swung the ball around to find that open look. Gilgeous-Alexander leads all Thunder players with 5 assists.

As the Thunder have settled, they’ve also opened their biggest lead of the game, 13 points, at 44-31.

End Q1: Thunder 25, Knicks 23

In many ways, this was a quarter the Knicks should’ve lost by a lot more.

They shot just 39.1% from the floor, and All-Star point guard Jalen Brunson finished the period just 1-of-5 for 2 points. They lost the rebounding battle by four. Yet, New York overcame early shooting struggles to get key stops on the Thunder late in the first to keep things manageable.

Chet Holmgren was the star for Oklahoma City, leading all players with 14 points. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander chipped in 9 on 4-of-5 shooting and added 2 assists.

The Knicks, meanwhile, have Mohamed Diawara to thank for this not being out of hand. He came off the bench and instantly drained a pair of 3s and also swiped the ball out of Jared McCain’s hands for a steal that led to a Landry Shamet bucket. His play seemed to invigorate the Knicks, who had six different players score at least one point in the first quarter. Diawara and OG Anunoby tied for a team-high 6 points in the period.

Knicks coach Mike Brown was also called for a technical foul after he argued a non-call on a Shai Gilgeous-Alexander drive, when Brown thought that Jalen Brunson had drawn a charge. Brown appeared to make like contact with the official, who only assessed the one tech.

Chet Holmgren comes out aggressive

As Oklahoma City has moved the ball around, it has often found forward Chet Holmgren, who has started the game 5-of-7 (including 4-of-6 from 3) for a game-high 14 points.

In fact, with 3:32 left to play in the period, he has outscored the Knicks entire team, which is 5-of-17.

Thunder vs. Knicks is underway

The Thunder came out strong and dictated pace, draining five of their first six field goal attempts. OKC pushed pace and moved the ball around to compromise New York’s defense, which was slow to help.

The Knicks, however, made their first shot before having their following five clank out. New York is getting quality looks, they’re just not dropping, particularly from 3; the Knicks have started the game just 1-of-6 (16.7%) from beyond the arc.

Despite that, New York is only down 17-10 midway through the period.

The MVP shows up to MSG dressed to the nines

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and the Thunder, similar to many teams who get hyped up to play in this iconic venue, tend to play well here. It’s the one trip Gilgeous-Alexander and the Thunder will make here this season — barring any potential matchup in the NBA Finals.

In case this is indeed his one trip here, SGA made it count with his pre-game look.

Thunder vs. Knicks starting lineups

Oklahoma City Thunder

  • Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
  • Luguentz Dort
  • Cason Wallace
  • Chet Holmgren
  • Isaiah Hartenstein

New York Knicks

  • Jalen Brunson
  • Mikal Bridges
  • OG Anunoby
  • Josh Hart
  • Karl-Anthony Towns

Thunder vs. Knicks injury report

After missing Tuesday night’s game against the Bulls, reigning NBA MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is not on the injury report and is expected to play.

Oklahoma City Thunder

  • Branden Carlson, out (lower back strain)
  • Ajay Mitchell, out (left ankle sprain)
  • Thomas Sorber, out (ACL)
  • Nikola Topic, out (G League)
  • Jalen Williams, out (right hamstring strain)

New York Knicks

  • Pacome Dadiet, questionable (G League)
  • Trey Jemison III, questionable (two-way)
  • Dillon Jones, questionable (two-way)
  • Miles McBride, out (core muscle surgery)
  • Kevin McCullar Jr., questionable (two-way)
  • Mitchell Robinson, out (left ankle)

Thunder vs. Knicks odds

  • Spread: Thunder by 4.5 (-110)
  • Over/Under: 222.5 (O/U -114)
  • Moneyline: Thunder -184, Knicks +150

How to watch Thunder vs. Knicks: TV channel, live stream

  • Start time: 7 p.m. ET
  • Location: Madison Square Garden (New York)
  • TV channel: ESPN
  • Live stream: ESPN, Fubo
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Australia pulled away late to produce a 3-0 victory over Chinese Taipei in the 2026 World Baseball Classic opener at the Tokyo Dome.

Catcher Robbie Perkins led Australia with a two-run home run to break a scoreless tie in the bottom of the fifth inning. Travis Bazzana added an insurance run in the bottom of the seventh inning with a solo home run.

Perkins worked with three different pitchers including Alex Wells, who pitched three scoreless innings as the starter and struck out six. He threw 28 strikes on 46 pitches.

Chinese Taipei struggled to produce any offense throughout the game. The team had a chance at the end, managing to get a pair of runners on base before Australia secured the final out.

‘Growing up, I always looked ahead and kind of had a vision of things I wanted to do in this game, and this was a big part of it,’ Bazzana, the top pick in the 2024 MLB Draft, said leading up to the opener. ‘Young me would be dreaming of (this) and now it’s here. Just got to make the most of it.’

Check out highlights from the contest:

Final: Australia 3, Chinese Taipei 0

Chinese Taipei managed to get runners on first and second base in the ninth inning but were unable to get the runners home to tie the game.

Australia pitcher Jon Kennedy caught the bouncing ball and made a running attempt toward first base, where he nearly stumbled but tossed the ball to record the final out.

It was just the second shutout victory for Australia in WBC play.

Australia adds to lead in seventh

Travis Bazzana hits a solo home run in the bottom of the seventh inning to increase Australia’s lead to 3-0. Bazzana sent the ball 383 feet to right field.

Bazzana was the first overall pick in the 2024 MLB Draft by the Cleveland Guardians.

Australia takes first lead against Chinese Taipei

Robbie Perkins put Australia on the board with a homer, taking a 2-0 lead against Chinese Taipei in the bottom of the fifth inning against pitcher Po-Yu Chen.

Chinese Taipei records first hit after Australia’s pitching change

Yu Chang produced Chinese Taipei’s first hit of the game in the third inning against Australia pitcher Jack O’Loughlin.

O’Loughlin was called out of the bullpen to replace Alex Wells. Wells struck out six and allowed just one walk on 46 pitches (28 strikes).

Chinese Taipei and Australia scoreless through two innings

Australia pitcher Alex Wells has not allowed a hit through the first two innings of play. He has struck out three while allowing just one walk. He has thrown 33 pitches.

Jo-Hsi Hsu of Chinese Taipei did not allow a hit in the second inning. Hsu had 21 of his first 27 pitches result in a strike. He has struck out two batters.

Chinese Taipei and Australia remain scoreless after first inning

The two teams remain scoreless after the first inning of play to open the World Baseball Classic. Chinese Taipei pitcher Jo-Hsi Hsu produced the third out to end the inning after striking out Alex Hall of Australia. Curtis Mead recorded the only hit of the inning against Hsu.

Australia pitcher Alex Wells produced one strikeout and a walk against Chinese Taipei in the first inning.

How to watch Chinese Taipei vs Australia: TV channel, stream

  • Matchup: Chinese Taipei vs. Australia
  • Time: 10 p.m.
  • Location: Tokyo (Tokyo Dome)
  • TV: FS1
  • Streaming: FOX One App

Stream the World Baseball Classic on Fubo

Why is Stuart Fairchild playing for Chinese Taipei?

Stuart Fairchild will serve as the leadoff batter for Chinese Taipei in World Baseball Classic action against Australia.

Fairchild is eligible to play for Chinese Taipei because his mother is Taiwanese.

He credits catcher Lyle Lin for recruiting him to the Chinese Taipei roster, according to Taiwan’s Overseas Community Affairs Council.

Chinese Taipei’s starting lineup vs. Australia

CF – Stuart Fairchild

DH – An-Ko Lin

RF – Chen Chieh-hsien

3B – Yu Chang

1B – Nien-ting Wu

SS – Kun-yu Chiang

2B – Tzu-wei Lin

C – Shao-Hung Chiang

LF – Chen-wei Chen

Australia’s starting lineup vs. Chinese Taipei

2B – Travis Bazzana

3B – Curtis Mead

CF – Aaron Whitefield

DH – Alex Hall

SS – Jarryd Dale

1B – Rixon Wingrove

C – Robbie Perkins

LF – Chris Burke

RF – Tim Kennelly

Who is Australia’s WBC starting pitcher vs. Chinese Taipei?

Alex Wells will serve as Australia’s starting pitcher on Wednesday against Chinese Taipei. Wells previously played for the Baltimore Orioles in 2021 and 2022.

He started eight of the 13 games he played in, allowing 58 hits and 34 earned runs while striking out 32 in 46.1 innings pitched.

Who is Chinese Taipei’s WBC starting pitcher vs. Australia?

Jo-Hsi Hsu will serve as the starting pitcher for Chinese Taipei on Wednesday against Australia. He does not have any MLB experience.

Hsu spent the past four years in the CPBL. He has a 16-18 record, starting in 60 of the 64 games he played in. He’s allowed 229 hits, 82 earned run and nine home runs while striking out 349 in 305 innings pitched.

Australia WBC roster 2026

Pitchers

  • Kieren Hall (RHP) – Perth Heat
  • Ky Hampton (RHP) – Adelaide Giants
  • Josh Hendrickson (LHP) – Adelaide Giants
  • Sam Holland (RHP) – Brisbane Bandits
  • Jon Kennedy (LHP) – Brisbane Bandits
  • Connor MacDonald (RHP) – Brisbane Bandits
  • Cooper Morgan (LHP) – Adelaide Giants
  • Mitch Neunborn (RHP) – Philadelphia Phillies org
  • Jack O’Loughlin (LHP) – Adelaide Giants
  • Warwick Saupold (RHP) – Perth Heat
  • Blake Townsend (LHP) – Texas Rangers org
  • Todd Van Steensel (RHP) – Adelaide Giants
  • Alex Wells (LHP) – Sydney Blue Sox
  • Lachlan Wells (LHP) – LG Twins (KBO)
  • Coen Wynne (RHP) – Sydney Blue Sox

Catchers

  • Mitchell Edwards – Adelaide Giants
  • Alex Hall – Perth Heat
  • Robbie Perkins – Brisbane Bandits

Infielders

  • Travis Bazzana – Cleveland Guardians org
  • George Callil – Brisbane Bandits
  • Jarryd Dale – KIA Tigers (KBO)
  • Robbie Glendinning – Adelaide Giants
  • Curtis Mead – Chicago White Sox
  • Logan Wade – Brisbane Bandits
  • Rixon Wingrove – Brisbane Bandits

Outfielders

  • Ulrich Bojarski – Melbourne Aces
  • Chris Burke – Melbourne Aces
  • Max Durrington – Oakland Athletics org
  • Tim Kennelly – Perth Heat
  • Aaron Whitefield – Melbourne Aces

Chinese Taipei WBC roster 2026

  • Pitchers: Hsu Jo-hsi, Gu Lin Ruei-yang, Lin Yu-min, Lin Wei-en, Po-Yu Chen, Zhuang Chen Zhong-Ao, Sha Tzu-chen, Sun Yi-lei, Tseng Jyun-yue, Lin Kai-wei, Lin Shi-xiang, Chang Yi, Chen Kuan-yu, Hu Chih-wei, Cheng Hao-chun, and Zhang Jun-wei.
  • Catchers: Kungkuan Giljegiljaw, Lyle Lin (Lin Chia-cheng) and Jiang Shao-hong.
  • Infielders: Yu Chang, Tsung-Che Cheng, Lee Hao-yu, Chiang Kun-yu, Wu Nien-ting and Lin Tzu-wei.
  • Outfielders: Stuart Fairchild, Chen Chieh-hsien (Captain), Lin An-ko and Chen Chen-wei.

What WBC pool are Chinese Taipei and Australia in?

Chinese Taipei and Australia are two of the five teams playing in Pool C of the World Baseball Classic. The rest of the group includes Japan, Korea and Czechia.

World Baseball Classic Pool C schedule

  • March 5: Chinese Taipei vs. Australia
  • March 5: Czechia vs. South Korea
  • March 6: Australia vs. Czechia
  • March 6: Japan vs. Chinese Taipei
  • March 7: Chinese Taipei vs. Czechia
  • March 7: South Korea vs. Japan
  • March 8: Chinese Taipei vs. South Korea
  • March 8: Australia vs. Japan
  • March 9: South Korea vs. Australia
  • March 10: Czechia vs. Japan
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

First Majestic Silver (TSX:AG,NYSE:AG) CEO Keith Neumeyer’s silver price prediction of over US$100 per ounce came true in 2026. When will silver prices make a more lasting hold in triple digit territory?

The silver price was up over 189 percent year-on-year as of March 2, 2026, on the back of economic uncertainty and ongoing geopolitical tensions, as well as support from long-term demand fundamentals.

The silver price broke through its previous all-time high in October 2025, blasting through the US$50 per ounce mark. From then, it rallied to new highs again and again.

Only a few weeks into 2026, the price of silver finally hit triple digits when it overtook the US$100 level. It went on to rise to its latest all-time high of US$121.62, which it set on January 29, 2026.

The catalysts for silver’s price surge above the critical US$100 level included the trade tensions between the US and Europe following US President Donald Trump’s renewed bid for Greenland; Trump’s public statements about possible military airstrikes on Iran; and a significant structural supply deficit exacerbated by increased institutional investment demand.

Well-known figure Keith Neumeyer, CEO of First Majestic, had frequently said he believes the white metal could hit the US$100 mark or even reach as high as US$130 per ounce.

Neumeyer has voiced this opinion often over the past decade. He put up a US$130 price target in a November 2017 interview with Palisade Radio, when silver was just US$17 per ounce. He reiterated his triple-digit silver price forecast in multiple interviews with Kitco over the years, including one in March 2023.

In 2024, Neumeyer made his US$100 silver call in a conversation with ITM Trading’s Daniela Cambone at the Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) convention, and in April of that year he acknowledged his reputation as the ‘triple-digit silver guy’ on the Todd Ault Podcast.

Speaking with Chris Marcus of Arcadia Economics on January 16, 2026, a day after the price of silver had broken through US$93 per ounce for the first time, Neumeyer stated that “triple digits is definitely on its way.” He was finally proven right less than two weeks later.

At times Neumeyer has been even bolder, suggesting in 2016 that silver could reach US$1,000 if gold were to hit US$10,000.

In order to better understand where Neumeyer’s opinion comes from and why a triple-digit silver price finally materialized, it’s important to take a look at the factors that affect the metal’s movements, as well as where prices have been in the past and where other industry insiders think silver could be headed.

First, let’s dive a little deeper into Neumeyer’s US$100 silver prediction.

In this article

    Why has Neumeyer called for a US$100 silver price?

    Neumeyer’s belief that silver could hit US$100 is based on a variety of factors, including its consistent deficit, its industrial demand and how undervalued it is compared to gold.

    When he first made the prediction more than a decade ago, there was significant distance for silver to go before it could reach the success Neumeyer had boldly predicted.

    Neumeyer expected a triple-digit silver price in part because he believed the market cycle could be compared to the year 2000, when investors were sailing high on the dot-com bubble and the mining sector was down. He believed it was only a matter of time before the market corrected, like it did in 2001 and 2002, and commodities would see a big rebound in pricing. It was during 2000 that Neumeyer himself invested heavily in mining stocks and came out on top.

    “I’ve been calling for triple-digit silver for a few years now, and I’m more enthused now,” Neumeyer said at an event in January 2020, noting that there are multiple factors behind his reasoning. “But I’m cautiously enthused because, you know, I thought it would have happened sooner than it currently is happening.”

    Another factor driving Neumeyer’s position is his belief that the silver market is in a deficit at a time when demand is rising from new industrial sectors. In a December 2023 interview with Kitco, Neumeyer stressed that silver is more than just a poor man’s gold and he spoke to silver’s important role in electric vehicles and solar cells.

    In line with this view on silver, First Majestic is a member of a consortium of silver producers that in January 2024 sent a letter to the Canadian government urging that silver be recognized as a critical mineral.

    Silver’s inclusion on the list would allow silver producers to accelerate the development of strategic projects with financial and administrative assistance from the government.

    In this 2024 PDAC interview, Neumeyer once again highlighted what he says is a sizable imbalance in the silver’s supply-demand picture. “We’re six years into this deficit. The deficit in 2024 looks like it’s gonna be bigger than 2023, and why is that? Because miners aren’t producing enough silver for the needs of the human race,” he said.

    More controversially, Neumeyer is of the opinion that the white metal will eventually become uncoupled from its sister metal gold, and should be seen as a strategic metal due to its necessity in many everyday appliances, from computers to electronics, as well as the technologies mentioned above. He has also stated that silver production has gone down in recent years, meaning that contrary to popular belief, he believes the metal is actually a rare commodity.

    Neumeyer’s March 2023 triple-digit silver call was a long-term call, and he explained that while he believed gold would break US$3,000 that year, he thought silver will only reach US$30. However, once the gold-silver ratio is that unbalanced, he believes that silver will begin to take off, and it would just need a catalyst.

    ‘It could be Elon Musk taking a position in the silver space,’ Neumeyer said. ‘There’s going to be a catalyst at some time, and headlines in the Wall Street Journal might talk about the silver supply deficit … I don’t know what the catalyst will be, but investors and institutions will wake up to the fundamentals of the metal, and that’s when it will start to move.’

    In 2024, gold experienced a resurgence in investor attention as the potential for US Federal Reserve interest rate cuts came into view. In an interview with Cambone at PDAC 2024, Neumeyer countered that perception, stating, “There’s a rush into gold because of the de-dollarization of the world. It has nothing to do with the interest rates.”

    In an April 2025 Money Metals podcast, Neumeyer reiterated his belief that silver is in an extreme supply deficit and that eventually silver prices will have to rise in order to incentivize silver miners to dig up more of the metal.

    ‘You need triple-digit silver just to motivate the mining companies to start investing again because the mining companies aren’t going to make the investment because there’s just so much risk in it,’ he said.

    After the price of silver surged from the US$50 level up into more than US$70 per ounce in late December 2025, Neumeyer actually cautioned investors not to get too excited about a potential quick run to US$100 during an interview with The Deep Dive.

    “I’m crossing my fingers that it doesn’t go to US$100 on this move. I don’t think that would be particularly healthy at all. I would prefer to see it start to slow down here and chalk a little bit sideways for two to three months and find a level that people can get use to. It’s going to take sometime for people to get used to US$70 silver,” he advised.

    While he admitted high silver prices are great for silver producers such as First Majestic and their shareholders, he said “personally, I’d rather see some stability,” and have silver reach triple digits in 12 to 24 months out so that the mining sector has more time to react and better take advantage of higher silver prices.

    A month later, when silver was above US$100 per ounce, during an interview with Kitco at the 2026 Vancouver Resource Investment Conference (VRIC), Neumeyer said, “calling triple digit silver and it’s actually happening is pretty interesting,” but he believes it’s still early stages in this new bull market and he’s done predicting metals prices.

    “What we do know is that we’ve created a new pricing paradigm, we’re not going back to the old pricing that we’re all used to over the past 20 or 30 years,” he added.

    What factors affect the silver price?

    In order to glean a better understanding of the precious metal’s chances of breaching the US$100 range again, it’s important to examine the elements that could push it to that level or pull it further away.

    The strength of the US dollar and Fed rate changes are factors that will continue to affect the precious metal, as are geopolitical issues and supply and demand dynamics.

    Although Neumeyer believes that the ties that bind silver to gold need to be broken, the reality is that most of the same factors that shape the price of gold also move silver.

    For that reason, it’s helpful to look at gold price drivers when trying to understand silver’s price action. Silver is, of course, the more volatile of the two precious metals, but nevertheless it often trades in relative tandem with gold.

    First, it’s useful to understand that higher interest rates are generally negative for gold and silver, while lower rates tend to be positive. That’s because when rates are higher, investment demand shifts to products that can accrue interest.

    The Fed’s rate moves have played a key role in pumping up silver prices over the past year. However, Trump doesn’t think Fed Chair Jerome Powell is lowering rates fast enough.

    Trump’s feud with the Fed over interest rates escalated in early January 2026 when the US Department of Justice served the Fed with grand jury subpoenas targeting Powell with a criminal indictment. The uncertainty over Fed independence is driving gold prices higher as investors expect a weaker dollar.

    While central bank actions are important for gold, and by extension silver, another key price driver lately has been geopolitical uncertainty. The past decade has been filled with major geopolitical events such as the Israel-Hamas conflict, the Russia-Ukraine war, and rising tensions between the US and other countries including Russia, China and Iran, and more recently Venezuela, Canada and Denmark.

    Trump’s tariffs have also rattled stock markets and ratcheted up the level of economic uncertainty pervading the landscape in 2025 and continuing into this year. This has proved price positive for gold and silver, with silver outperforming gold in the last year.

    However, silver’s industrial side can not be ignored. In an economically uncertain environment, the industrial case of silver could weaken in the short term, but in the longer term silver’s demand side is still highly prospective for larger gains.

    Samuelson explained in March 2025 that silver is particularly vulnerable to a supply shock as the London Bullion Market Association’s physical silver supplies had already decreased by 30 to 40 percent, while gold had only lost 3 to 4 percent.

    The next month, Smirnova explained that silver has been in a supply deficit of 150 million to 200 million ounces annually, but production has been stagnant or declining over the past decade.

    Looking at the runup in silver prices into the triple digits that occurred in late 2025 to early 2026, this structural supply-demand deficit, magnified by an explosion in industrial demand for solar energy and AI data centers, played an outsized role. Further adding fuel to the fire was record-low physical inventory levels in COMEX and Shanghai vaults, which caused a shift from ‘paper’ silver to physical hoarding.

    Higher industrial demand from emerging sectors due to factors like the transition to renewable energy and the emergence of AI technology will be highly supportive for the metal over the next few years. Solar panels are an especially exciting sector as manufacturers have found increasing the silver content increases energy efficiency.

    Frank Holmes of US Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) said in a December interview that silver’s “ability to be a transformative part of renewable energy,” particularly in solar panels, is an outsized factor in the latest run in the silver price. “And I don’t think that is going to go away,” he added.

    Could silver hit US$100 per ounce again?

    It seems likely that we will reach a US$100 per ounce silver price again in 2026 as there is plenty of support for Neumeyer’s belief that the metal is undervalued and that “ideal conditions are present for silver prices to rise.”

    For much of 2025, silver and gold rose higher on factors including persistent inflationary pressures brought on by Trump’s aggressive tariff announcements and the ongoing geopolitical risks in the Middle East. The commodity’s price uptick also came on the back of very strong silver investment demand.

    In the fourth quarter, silver rapidly outpaced gold’s gains, and by early January silver reached US$95, more than doubling in value from its Q3 close of US$46. It continued higher to breach US$120 by the end of the month.

    While silver and gold prices both pulled back significantly over the following days, silver spent February consolidating and stabilized above the US$80 mark in the second half of the month.

    On March 1, the silver price once again approached the US$100 mark as the US started a war with Iran, peaking at US$96.40 before seeing a smaller pull back.

    As silver’s momentum continues upwards and the price stabilizes at these higher values, silver market experts are agreeing with Neumeyer’s triple-digit silver hypothesis that the price of silver still has further room to grow.

    “You know, whether in the short term or the long term, one way or another, we’re going to run into a supply demand brick wall. And when that day happens, we could see triple-digit silver prices in a very, very short period of time,” he said. “I figure it’s going to be US$200 to US$400 an ounce, at least, before this is all over.”

    This set up bodes well for those not only invested in physical silver, but in silver mining stocks as well.

    “I have to be honest, I was not necessarily expecting triple-digit silver this quite this fast,” he said. “I was saying, if and when we break through US$54 silver, then the path of least resistance becomes a conservative, measured move target of US$96 or within a few pennies … So, I’m not really surprised at all, and in fact, I think we’re headed higher in the fullness of time.’

    Penny sees Fed policy actions as a potential catalyst for silver’s next leg up.

    “I think it’ll be the Fed’s response to the next crisis that causes the big move, the 1979 moment where you go up,” he explained, noting that in 1979, the price of silver went up 700 percent in 12 months. “I think that that moment still lies ahead. It’ll be the Fed’s response to the next crisis that is the catalyst for that huge move.”

    Eugenia Mykuliak, founder and executive director of B2PRIME Group, shared another reason she believes Fed rate cuts are bullish for silver.

    In late January, Citigroup (NYSE:C) analysts upgraded their silver forecast to US$150 per ounce in the second quarter of 2026. ‘We expect the bullish factors to stay intact in the very near term, supporting strong investment/speculation demand and likely leading to further physical tightening in major ex-US trading hubs,’ said the firm.

    FAQs for silver

    Why is silver so cheap?

    The primary reason that silver is sold at a significant discount to gold is supply and demand, with more silver being mined annually. While silver does have both investment and industrial demand, the global focus on gold as an investment vehicle, including countries stockpiling gold, can overshadow silver.

    Additionally, jewelry alone is a massive force for gold demand.

    There is an abundance of silver — according to the US Geological Survey, to date 1,740,000 metric tons (MT) of silver have been discovered, while only 244,000 MT of gold have been found, a ratio of about 1 ounce of gold to 7.1 ounces of silver. In terms of output, 26,000 MT of silver were mined in 2025 compared to 3,300 MT for gold.

    Looking at these numbers, that puts gold and silver production at about a 1:7.88 ratio last year, while the price ratio on March 3, 2026, was around 1:62 — a huge disparity.

    Can silver hit $1,000 per ounce?

    As things are now, it seems unlikely, and at the same time almost a possibility, that silver will ever reach highs of US$1,000 per ounce, which Keith Neumeyer predicted in 2016 could happen if gold ever climbed to US$10,000 per ounce.

    This is related to the gold to silver production ratio discussed above. At the time of the 2016 prediction, this ratio was around 1 ounce of gold to 9 ounces of silver, or 1:9.

    If silver was priced according to production ratio today, when gold is at US$5,000 per ounce, then silver should be around US$555. However, the gold to silver pricing ratio today is around 1:62, although that’s a bit lower than the typical range of 1:70 to 1:90. In early March 2026, gold is trading around US$5,100 per ounce and silver is about US$82 per ounce.

    Is silver really undervalued?

    Many experts believe that silver is undervalued compared to fellow currency metal gold. As discussed, their production and price ratios are currently incredibly disparate.

    While investment demand is higher for gold, silver has seen increasing time in the limelight in recent years, including a 2021 silver squeeze that saw new entrants to the market join in.

    Another factor that lends more intrinsic value to silver is that it’s an industrial metal as well as a precious metal. It has applications in technology and batteries — both growing sectors that will drive demand higher.

    Silver’s two sides have remained prominent as the market navigates persistent supply shortages and shifting investor sentiment. Following a record high in 2022, according to data from the Silver Institute, silver demand reached 1.16 billion ounces in 2024, supported by a fourth consecutive year of record industrial fabrication at 680.5 million ounces. However, total 2024 demand saw a 3 percent decline due to a 22 percent drop in physical investment, which hit a five-year low as Western investors took profits at higher prices.

    Is silver better than gold?

    There are merits for both metals, especially as part of a well-balanced portfolio. As many analysts point out, silver has been known to outperform its sister metal gold during times of economic prosperity and expansion.

    On the other hand, during economic uncertainty silver values are impacted by declines in fabrication demand.

    Silver’s duality as a precious and industrial metal also provides price support. As a report from the CPM Group notes, “it can be seen that silver in fact almost always (but not always) out-performs gold during a gold bull market.”

    At what price did Warren Buffet buy silver?

    Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A) bought up 37 percent of global silver supply between 1997 and 2006. Silver ranged from US$4 to US$10 during that period.

    In fact, between July 1997 and January 1998 alone, the company bought about 129 million ounces of the metal, much of which was for under US$5. Adjusted for inflation, the company’s purchases in that window cost about US$8.50 to US$11.50.

    How to invest in silver?

    There are a variety of ways to get into the silver market. For example, investors may choose to put their money into silver-focused stocks by buying shares of companies focused on silver mining and exploration, or even precious metals royalty stocks. As a by-product metal, investors can also gain exposure to silver through some gold companies.

    There are also silver exchange-traded funds that give broad exposure to silver companies and the metal itself, while more experienced traders may be interested in silver futures. And of course, for those who prefer a more tangible investment, purchasing physical bullion in silver bar and silver coin form is also an option.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Modern society has a metals problem. The demands of modern consumer culture, the energy transition and the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics have created a dilemma.

    As demand rises, the supply of many metals is at a bottleneck brought about by a number of factors, from government red tape to civil unrest, as well as lack of capital expenditures leading to fewer new discoveries and mines.

    On top of this, mining companies focused on essential metals like copper are facing additional challenges, as in many cases the easy discoveries have already been made and existing mines are seeing declining grades, causing further constraints to supply.

    BHP (ASX:BHP,NYSE:BHP,LSE:BHP) Digital Officer Mikko Tepponen suggests that the very technologies that rely on metals and mining can be the answer in his presentation at the 2026 Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada conference.

    Addressing data fragmentation in exploration

    Once companies open up capital expenditures to the exploration side of the mining sector, several questions arise, most notably: Where are the minerals?

    At its core, exploration relies on the geosciences, with a geologist in the field, sampling rocks, conducting surveys and using the data gathered to estimate where the best place is to put a drill for a look below the surface.

    Mining is a data-driven enterprise, and depending on the project, the information can come from a range of methods, from modern techniques to historic observations, meaning the data is fragmented across a variety of sources and formats.

    AI and machine learning can be good at processing and interpolating large quantities of information. However, data accessibility creates another roadblock.

    “Across our industry, vast volumes of exploration data are sealed in archive rooms, and legacy systems can’t read through third-party data sets,” Tepponen said. “That data is neither structured, searchable nor interoperable. That means AI cannot make easy sense of it, and in many cases, that data was never extracted.”

    For Tepponen, one of the challenges the mining industry needs to overcome is data fragmentation. Without enough data or proper information, there is an increased risk of making the wrong exploration decisions.

    “Time matters because capital is finite. Drill meters are expensive, and decisions about capital allocation have multi-year impacts down the line,” he said.

    The way BHP has implemented a data-centric approach is building a central data platform that integrates the decades of exploration data, standardizes it and makes it accessible through a central team within the company.

    Tepponen says the platform supports 52 standardized core geoscience types, backed by more than 100 years of data, helping its exploration teams save months of time.

    “Our geoscientists can access more than 4 million drill hole cores and 9,000 geophysical surveys through one portal,” he added.

    Using BHP’s in-house AI extraction tool, one team of geoscientists obtained data from thousands of drill holes from 30,000 legacy document records. They then used the central data platform to combine that with modern drilling data.

    According to Tepponen, the team completed the work in a few hours, while doing so manually would have taken months, and results were higher quality than the previous method.

    However, he stressed that the integration of AI into its workflow wasn’t about replacing geoscience teams, but about “amplifying the work of geoscientists by creating a digital tool that enables them to focus on higher value.”

    Additionally, the information in the platform is not limited to BHP’s data. Tepponen explained that the entire system is built on an open-source database designed to break down data silos and enable cross-sector collaboration.

    Using targeted optimizations to avoid disruptions

    While exploration poses a bottleneck to the development of new projects for future supply, disruptions to existing operations significantly impact current output.

    It’s often impossible to predict major events like extreme weather, civil unrest or regulatory changes. However, operators can foresee some disruptions that result in hundreds of hours of downtime throughout the industry every year.

    Tepponen outlined one persistent problem: oversized rocks and foreign objects making their way through processing plants.

    “If an uncrushable rock or piece of metal gets into the crusher, it can cause blockages, damage belts and create significant downtime,” he said. “If it travels downstream, it can damage equipment and create critical bottlenecks.”

    In Western Australia, BHP employs a hub-and-spoke model that connects five mines to a central processing facility. If one of the hazards disrupts operations at the facility, it can affect operations at the mines connected to it.

    Additionally, fixing these issues exposes maintenance teams to higher-risk tasks, so eliminating the problem in the first place improves both productivity and safety.

    Tepponen explained that historically, workers would be used to identify the hazards before they were loaded onto the truck, but once they reached the conveyor, they became much harder to remove.

    The company now employs a real-time monitoring system that detects objects, alerts controllers and can automatically stop the conveyor.

    “These are actually very simple technologies available commercially off the shelf. Cameras and machine learning control systems applied to a real world operational constraint,” he said.

    In the prior three years, these incidents had caused over 1,000 hours of downtime, according to Tepponen. However, since it installed the monitoring system, the company hasn’t experienced any major disruptions or destruction events caused by oversized rocks, a change that he said amounts to hundreds of thousands of metric tons per year of increased processing.

    “It’s a small system-level optimization that can deliver outsized returns on the AI journey. This is not a massive program. This is identifying simple constraints, applying proven technology,” he said, and emphasized the process of controlled testing, iteration and then deploying at scale. ‘That’s how systematic innovation actually happens.’

    Testing scenarios with digital twin simulations

    In his third use case example, he turned to BHP’s semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill at its Escondida operation in Chile, at which differing particle size and hardness in ore feed was impacting production.

    The company used AI to create a digital twin of the value chain, which included everything that was known about the operation, such as ore body knowledge, processing behavior and operational constraints.

    “That digital simulation enabled scenario testing and gave us the ability to inform blasting and blending strategies to predict granularity,” Tepponen said, noting that monthly production losses attributed to the problem fell by around 70 percent.

    “The lesson, when the ore body knowledge is connected directly to the processing decisions, the system becomes more stable and predictable.”

    BHP has since applied the approach to other operations, including ones in Australia and Chile.

    “The Gen AI integration is multicultural, so non-technical users and the technical users can run scenarios in their first language,” he said, an aspect that he said is very important for the local companies at its operations.

    Building foundations, collaboration key to AI usefulness

    Tepponen was emphatic that AI alone wasn’t a “superhero.” BHP needed to specifically design these AI platforms in order to achieve these results.

    “One of the most important lessons we have learned is we don’t actually get value from AI by starting with AI. The value comes from the foundations, consistent data standards, interoperability. You need to start at the bottom and make your way to the top.”

    Tepponen also stressed the value of collaboration, noting that companies tend to be protective of their intellectual property, but opportunities are being missed that could be mutually beneficial.

    “The hard truth is, no company can solve this problem of data fragmentation and system integration,” he said, and the industry would benefit from a collaborative approach on standards, interoperability and data throughout the value chain.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Dean Belder, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com