Author

admin

Browsing

Wednesday, March 4, was a day for defensemen to change teams.

Tyler Myers got the ball rolling by accepting a trade from the Vancouver Canucks to the Dallas Stars. The 6-foot-8 Houston native will be playing in his home state on the same team as 6-foot-7 defenseman Liam Bischel.

Nick Blankenburg also moved from the Nashville Predators to the Colorado Avalanche for a 2027 fifth-round pick.

But the biggest move of the day was the Utah Mammoth acquiring defenseman MacKenzie Weegar from the Calgary Flames.

“Acquiring MacKenzie solidifies our back end as we continue to push towards the playoffs, and he will be a great addition to our team on and off the ice,” Mammoth general manager Bill Armstrong said.

Here are the details and grades on the MacKenzie Weegar trade:

MacKenzie Weegar trade details

The Utah Mammoth acquire defenseman MacKenzie Weegar from the Calgary Flames for defenseman Olli Määttä, forward Jonathan Castagna and three 2026 second-round picks (Utah’s own and others previously acquired from the Ottawa Senators and New York Rangers). Both players had to waive their no-trade clauses for the deal to go through.

Utah Mammoth trade grade: A-

Armstrong has been aggressively remaking the defense since the team moved to Utah in 2024. He added Mikhail Sergachev, John Marino and Ian Cole that first season and Stanley Cup winner Nate Schmidt last summer. Weegar gives the Mammoth a solid top four as they try to hold onto their wild-card position. And the Mammoth landed him without trading Tij Iginla, who would seem a natural to be part of a trade to Calgary, where his father Jarome had starred.

Calgary Flames trade grade: B-

Considering that Weegar is signed through 2031, it’s surprising that the Flames didn’t pry away a first-round pick. But three second-rounders are good in what’s expected to be a deep draft. Olli Määttä is a pending unrestricted free agent and Castagna, a third-round pick, is averaging a point a game in his third season at Cornell.

When is the NHL trade deadline?

The NHL trade deadline is at 3 p.m. ET on Friday, March 6.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

NEW YORK — Two looks, and they both hit rim.

After clawing back from an eight-point deficit with just fewer than three minutes to play in the fourth quarter, the New York Knicks got a pair of clean looks with seconds left in their game against the Oklahoma City Thunder.

Yet, in what could be a potential NBA Finals preview, it was the Thunder who escaped Wednesday, March 4 with a 103-100 victory to improve their record to 49-15, the best mark in the NBA.

Thunder forward Chet Holmgren led all players with 28 points, 22 of which came in the first half.

Reigning NBA MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander dropped 26 points and 8 assists, extending his streak of consecutive games with at least 20 points scored to 124.

Throughout the game, the Knicks tried to force the ball out of Gilgeous-Alexander’s hands, and he repeatedly made the right pass to open Thunder players.

The Knicks had six players reach double figures, with Karl-Anthony Towns leading the way with 17 points on 7-of-8 shooting. He also hauled in a game-high 17 rebounds, though he fouled out late in the game.

The Knicks fell to 40-23.

USA TODAY Sports provided updates and highlights from Wednesday night’s Oklahoma City Thunder-New York Knicks game:

Thunder vs. Knicks highlights

End Q4: Thunder 103, Knicks 100

They got two open looks to tie the game, but both rimmed out.

Coach Mike Brown drew up a play that got Jalen Brunson an open look at a would-be game-tying 3 in the left corner. Brunson put up the shot but it bounced off the rim. The ball was tipped out to Knicks forward OG Anunoby near the top of the key. Anunoby scooped the ball, stepped back, but the shot fell short and bounced off front rim.

Simply put, the Knicks went cold at the wrong time. New York, which entered the fourth quarter with a three-point lead, shot just 33.3% in the final period, eventually ceding the lead to the Thunder.

Oklahoma City capitalized and attacked the paint, with Shai Gilgeous-Alexander hitting a few big baskets late, none other than a stepback 3, Oklahoma City’s final bucket.

Knicks down 3 with 6.0 seconds left to play

New York has battled back and has the chance to tie the game at 103. Coach Mike Brown called a timeout to draw up a play. Both teams are in the bonus, so the Thunder may opt to put New York on the line.

Thunder reclaim lead

After getting a quick blow on the bench, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander has returned for Oklahoma City, which is now up 91-86, with 6:33 left to play in the game.

Gilgeous-Alexander, who has 21 points, extended his streak of consecutive games with at least 20 points to 124, which is just two behind Wilt Chamberlain’s record of 126.

Josh Hart returns to the floor

After leaving the game early in the third quarter with an apparent back injury, Knicks forward Josh Hart has returned to the game.

End Q3: Knicks 80, Thunder 77

It’s not that the Thunder shot poorly in the third quarter — they converted their attempts at a 46.7% clip — it’s that they took seven fewer shots than the Knicks did.

And with those attempts, New York capitalized. The Knicks shot 14-of-22 (63.6%) from the floor in the third quarter to erase a 10-point deficit at the start of the quarter. And with the final shot of the third, a corner 3 from Mikal Bridges, the Knicks took their first lead since very early in the second quarter. Five different Knicks are scoring double figures, with Karl-Anthony Towns — who remains a perfect 6-of-6 from the floor — leading the team with 15 points.

For the Thunder, turnovers were the main issue in the third. After Chet Holmgren dropped 22 points in the first half, he failed to score a single point in the third. He continues to lead the team, though Shai Gilgeous-Alexander has added 19 points and 7 assists.

Knicks tie it up

The New York run in the third quarter has continued. The Thunder have committed several turnovers in the period, and a Jalen Brunson 3 that clanked off the rim before caroming off the backboard and through the net tied the game at 72 apiece with 2:56 left in the third quarter.

Alex Caruso heads to locker room

After taking a hard fall when attempting to haul in a rebound, Alex Caurso fell onto the court and immediately grabbed at his leg. He was slow to get up and trudged toward the bench, where he spoke briefly with a trainer. The two went into the locker room, though Caruso reemerged shortly after.

Knicks close the gap

New York has gone on an 11-4 run to close the deficit to 6 points with 5:28 left in the third quarter. Landry Shamet has come off the bench to spark the run with a couple of scoop layups, while Mikale Bridges and Karl-Anthony Towns have also added baskets.

The Thunder are up 67-61.

Josh Hart heads to locker room

After airballing a corner 3 with 10:50 to play in the third quarter, Knicks forward Josh Hart immediately clutched at his lower back in apparent discomfort. At the next whistle, Hart took himself out of the game and headed into the New York locker room with a trainer.

After several minutes, Hart reemerged and took his spot on the bench, still grimacing. A trainer placed a black band around his chest and back.

Knicks post their lowest scoring first half of the season

New York, which shot just 35.6% from the floor in the first half, scored just 40 points before intermission, marking its lowest scoring first half of the 2025-26 season so far. The previous low was 42 points, which came Feb. 6 in an eventual 38-point loss against the Pistons.

End Q2: Thunder 50, Knicks 40

Although both these teams are playing the second legs of back-to-backs that started in different cities, it was the Knicks who displayed that more in the first half.

New York struggled to find the bottom of the net in the second period, shooting just 7-of-22 (31.8%) Oklahoma City emphasized closing out, contesting New York’s perimeter shots and rarely giving away an open look.

Jalen Brunson shot just 1-of-8 in the half for 2 points, while center Karl-Anthony Towns attempted just 4 shots, though he made each one, scoring 9 points. Mohamed Diawara also has a team-high 9 points.

The Thunder, meanwhile, are playing in control. They’re shooting a reasonable 46.3% from the floor, but they’re merely looking for the best shot available. As the Knicks have thrown bodies at Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, the ball has swung around to find the open player. More often than not, that has been Chet Holmgren, who leads all players with 22 points on 8-of-11 shooting, including a blistering 6-of-8 (75%) from 3-point range.

Gilgeous-Alexander has added 11 points, but has a team-high 7 assists.

The Knicks’ plan for SGA

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander has started this game extremely well. He has been an efficient 4-of-7 from the floor — with no 3 pointers attempted — for 9 points. But the Knicks are closing his lanes to penetrate as soon as he attacks the paint. This is not at all dissimilar from the way other teams defend SGA, but he’s quickly getting the ball out of his hands to find open teammates.

And, if they’re not immediately open, OKC players have swung the ball around to find that open look. Gilgeous-Alexander leads all Thunder players with 5 assists.

As the Thunder have settled, they’ve also opened their biggest lead of the game, 13 points, at 44-31.

End Q1: Thunder 25, Knicks 23

In many ways, this was a quarter the Knicks should’ve lost by a lot more.

They shot just 39.1% from the floor, and All-Star point guard Jalen Brunson finished the period just 1-of-5 for 2 points. They lost the rebounding battle by four. Yet, New York overcame early shooting struggles to get key stops on the Thunder late in the first to keep things manageable.

Chet Holmgren was the star for Oklahoma City, leading all players with 14 points. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander chipped in 9 on 4-of-5 shooting and added 2 assists.

The Knicks, meanwhile, have Mohamed Diawara to thank for this not being out of hand. He came off the bench and instantly drained a pair of 3s and also swiped the ball out of Jared McCain’s hands for a steal that led to a Landry Shamet bucket. His play seemed to invigorate the Knicks, who had six different players score at least one point in the first quarter. Diawara and OG Anunoby tied for a team-high 6 points in the period.

Knicks coach Mike Brown was also called for a technical foul after he argued a non-call on a Shai Gilgeous-Alexander drive, when Brown thought that Jalen Brunson had drawn a charge. Brown appeared to make like contact with the official, who only assessed the one tech.

Chet Holmgren comes out aggressive

As Oklahoma City has moved the ball around, it has often found forward Chet Holmgren, who has started the game 5-of-7 (including 4-of-6 from 3) for a game-high 14 points.

In fact, with 3:32 left to play in the period, he has outscored the Knicks entire team, which is 5-of-17.

Thunder vs. Knicks is underway

The Thunder came out strong and dictated pace, draining five of their first six field goal attempts. OKC pushed pace and moved the ball around to compromise New York’s defense, which was slow to help.

The Knicks, however, made their first shot before having their following five clank out. New York is getting quality looks, they’re just not dropping, particularly from 3; the Knicks have started the game just 1-of-6 (16.7%) from beyond the arc.

Despite that, New York is only down 17-10 midway through the period.

The MVP shows up to MSG dressed to the nines

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and the Thunder, similar to many teams who get hyped up to play in this iconic venue, tend to play well here. It’s the one trip Gilgeous-Alexander and the Thunder will make here this season — barring any potential matchup in the NBA Finals.

In case this is indeed his one trip here, SGA made it count with his pre-game look.

Thunder vs. Knicks starting lineups

Oklahoma City Thunder

  • Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
  • Luguentz Dort
  • Cason Wallace
  • Chet Holmgren
  • Isaiah Hartenstein

New York Knicks

  • Jalen Brunson
  • Mikal Bridges
  • OG Anunoby
  • Josh Hart
  • Karl-Anthony Towns

Thunder vs. Knicks injury report

After missing Tuesday night’s game against the Bulls, reigning NBA MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is not on the injury report and is expected to play.

Oklahoma City Thunder

  • Branden Carlson, out (lower back strain)
  • Ajay Mitchell, out (left ankle sprain)
  • Thomas Sorber, out (ACL)
  • Nikola Topic, out (G League)
  • Jalen Williams, out (right hamstring strain)

New York Knicks

  • Pacome Dadiet, questionable (G League)
  • Trey Jemison III, questionable (two-way)
  • Dillon Jones, questionable (two-way)
  • Miles McBride, out (core muscle surgery)
  • Kevin McCullar Jr., questionable (two-way)
  • Mitchell Robinson, out (left ankle)

Thunder vs. Knicks odds

  • Spread: Thunder by 4.5 (-110)
  • Over/Under: 222.5 (O/U -114)
  • Moneyline: Thunder -184, Knicks +150

How to watch Thunder vs. Knicks: TV channel, live stream

  • Start time: 7 p.m. ET
  • Location: Madison Square Garden (New York)
  • TV channel: ESPN
  • Live stream: ESPN, Fubo
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

It’s almost dancing time.

As everyone flips their calendars to March, the countdown to women college basketball’s 2026 NCAA Tournament is officially on. Before March Madness begins on March 18, the participants must be determined. And the first spots are up for grabs as conference tournaments kick off around the nation on Wednesday.

South Carolina (SEC), UCLA (Big Ten), Duke (ACC) and TCU (Big 12) each earned No. 1 seeds and double-byes in their respective conferences and have the easiest path to winning their postseason tournaments. All four teams won their conference tournament last season and are looking to repeat.

The winners of the conference tournaments earn an automatic bid into March Madness. Every other team will have to sweat it out on Selection Sunday on March 15 to see if they received at-large bid.

USA TODAY Sports is following along with the Power Four conference tournaments. Follow along for live updates, highlights and results here:

Final: Kansas 56, UCF 35

Kansas is moving on to the second round after a blowout win over UCF, which didn’t score more than 10 points in any frame in the game.

Jaliya Davis led Kansas with 10 points, while Lily Meister and Elle Evans added eight points each. Jacorriah Bracey of UCF had 10 points in the loss.

Final: Oregon 82, Purdue 64

Oregon built up a 23-point lead in the first half and never surrendered. Purdue attempted to mount a comeback in the second half, getting the deficit down to 12 points in the fourth quarter, but it wasn’t enough.

Purdue and Oregon each had 25 made field goals in the game, and the Boilermakers had eight 3-pointers compared to the Ducks’ five.  What put Oregon over the edge was the free throw disparity: Oregon went 27-of-29 from the line, accounting for one-third of its points, while Purdue went just 6-of-13. Three Boilermakers fouled out in the fourth quarter.

Katie Fiso led Oregon with 20 points on 7-of-14 shooting, including a 6-of-7 from the free throw line. Ehis Etute had a double-double for the Ducks, putting up 16 points and 12 rebounds.

No. 11 Oregon will advance to play No. 6 Maryland on Thursday at approximately 9 p.m.

Final: Alabama 65, Missouri 48

Ace Austin scored 14 points and was one of four Alabama players to score in double figures as the No. 11 Crimson Tide beat the No. 14 Tigers on Wednesday night at the SEC Tournament in Greenville, South Carolina.

Alabama (22-9) also got 13 points from Diana Collins, 12 points from Ta’Mia Scott and 10 points from Essence Cody. Karly Weathers also grabbed a game-high 16 rebounds.

Jordana Reisma paced Missouri (16-16) with 15 points, while Grace Slaughter had a double-double of 11 points and 11 rebounds.

Alabama grabbed 14 offensive rebounds and turned them into 23 points. The Crimson Tide outscored the Tigers 24-11 in the fourth quarter to pull away.

The Crimson Tide will face No. 6 Tennessee at 8:30 p.m. ET on Thursday on the SEC Network. −Mitchell Northam

Halftime: Kansas 27, UCF 19

Kansas women’s basketball has a 10-point lead over UCF heading into halftime.

The Jayhawks’ bench has kept Kansas in the driver’s seat, outscoring the starters 16-11. Brittany Harshaw has six points off the bench, while Jaliya Davis added six points and two assists.

UCF shot 26% from the field and was kept off the free throw line in the first half. Jacorriah Bracey has a team-high six points for UCF. − Cydney Henderson

No. 11 Kansas vs. No. 14 UCF , 9 p.m. | (ESPN+)

UCF starting lineup

Head coach: Sytia Messer

  • 2 Kristol Ayson | G 5’9 – Senior
  • 3 Jacorriah Bracey | G 5’9 – Senior
  • 13 Summer Yancy | G/F 5’11 – Sophomore
  • 33 Mahogany Chandler-Roberts | F 6’2 – Sophomore
  • 35 Khyala Ngodu | C 6’3 – Junior

Kansas starting lineup

Head coach: Brandon Schneider

12 S’Mya Nichols | G 6’0 – Junior

13 Libby Fandel | G 6-1 – Freshman

22 Sania Copeland | G 5-7 – Senior

25 Jaliya Davis | F 6-2 – Freshman

52 Lilly Meister | F 6-3 – Senior

Halftime: Alabama 31, Missouri 20

Behind 10 points from Essence Cody, the No. 11 Crimson Tide led the No. 14 Tigers at the break in the final game on the opening day of the SEC Tournament in Greenville, South Carolina.

Alabama knocked down five 3-pointers in the first half, and turned six offensive rebounds into nine second-chance points. Sitting courtside supporting the Crimson Tide is Sarah Ashlee Barker, a former two-time All-SEC selection who was picked in the first round of the WNBA Draft last spring by the LA Sparks.

The winner of this game will face No. 6 Tennessee at 8:30 p.m. ET on Thursday on the SEC Network. −Mitchell Northam

Halftime: Oregon 47, Purdue 24

Oregon methodically built up its lead in the second quarter, outscoring Purdue 26-12 to go into halftime with a 23-point advantage. Oregon finished the second quarter on a 6-0 run, holding Purdue to a two-minute scoring drought.

The Ducks have dominated inside, with 22 points in the paint and 16 second-chance points off seven offensive rebounds. Purdue has eight offensive rebounds, but hasn’t been able to capitalize with seven second-chance points. 

Ehis Etute is leading Oregon with 12 points and eight rebounds in just 11 minutes of play. − Chloe Henderson

Final: Arizona State 54, Arizona 51

The victory marked the third time the Sun Devils have defeated the Wildcats this season.

Heloisa Carrera has 16 points for the Sun Devils, who got points from every one of the nine players that saw the court. Arizona State shot 40% from the field and dominated the paint, outscoring Arizona 36-18.

Daniah Trammell and Sumayah Sugapong each had 12 points for Arizona.

It wasn’t a clean game by either team. Arizona State (20) and Arizona (18) combined for 38 turnovers. — Cydney Henderson

#14 Missouri vs. #11 Alabama, 8:30 p.m. ET | SEC Network

Missouri starting lineup

Head coach: Kelli Harper

  • 10 Jordana Reisma | F 6-3 Senior
  • 22 Chloe Sotell | G 6-0 Sophomore
  • 1 Shannon Dowell | G 5-10 Junior
  • 23 Abbey Schreacke | G 6-0 Junior
  • 0 Grace Slaughter | G 6-2 Junior

Alabama starting lineup

Head coach: Kristy Curry

  • 21 Essence Cody | F 6-4 Junior
  • 20 Diana Collins | G 5-9 Junior
  • 15 Ta’Mia Scott | G 6-0 Senior
  • 22 Karly Weathers | G 5-11 Senior
  • 23 Jessica Timmons | G 5-8 Senior

No. 11 Oregon vs. No. 14 Purdue | 8:30 p.m., Peacock

Oregon starting lineup

Head coach: Kelly Graves

  • 2 Katie Fiso | G 5-11 Sophomore
  • 14 Ari Long | G  6-0 Junior
  • 3 Sofia Bell | G 6-0 Junior
  • 1 Mia Jacobs | F 6-2 Senior
  • 35 Ehis Etute | F 6-0 Freshman

Purdue starting lineup

Head coach: Katie Gearlds

  • 3 Nya Smith | G 5-9 Sophomore
  • 11 McKenna Layden | G 6-2 Junior
  • 23 Kiki Smith | G 5-7 Junior
  • 44 Tara Daye | G 5-10 Junior
  • 22 Kendall Puryear | F 6-3 Sophomore

Final: Auburn 50, Texas A&M 49

Khady Leye’s layup with 5.3 seconds to play lifted No. 15 Auburn to an upset win over No. 10 Texas A&M in the opening round of the SEC Tournament on Wednesday night in Greenville, South Carolina.

Leye finished with 11 points and a career-high 15 rebounds in the first SEC Tournament victory for the Tigers (15-16) under first-year coach Larry Vickers. Kaitlyn Duhon added 14 points for Auburn, while Harissoum Coulibaly chipped in 11.

Ny’Ceara Pryor powered the Aggies (14-12) with 25 points and four assists. The loss for Texas A&M snaps a five-game winning streak and likely ends their hopes of making the NCAA Tournament under fourth-year coach Joni Taylor.

The Aggies lost leading rebounder Fatmata Janneh to an apparent right knee injury just before halftime when she hit the floor hard after a foul. Janneh did not return to the game, but was seen near the Aggies bench in the fourth quarter using crutches.

Auburn will face No. 7 Ole Miss on Thursday at 6 p.m. ET on the SEC Network. −Mitchell Northam

Final: Illinois 82, Wisconsin 70

Illinois controlled from the beginning, and an early 10-0 run helped the Illini keep a safe distance from its border rival for the entire game.

Illinois heavily benefitted from the free throw line, going 24-of-29. That helped the Illini overcome a dismal 2-of-19 shooting from the 3-point line. Destiny Jackson led Illinois with 21 points on 5-of-8 shooting, including an 11-of-13 from the free throw line.

Wisconsin made 7 of its 11 shots from the free throw line and 8 of 21 free throws, but that wasn’t enough for the Badgers. Gift Uchenna led the Badgers with 26 points.

Illinois will advance the second round and play No. 7 Michigan on Thursday. −Chloe Peterson

Halftime: Arizona State 29, Arizona 28

Arizona State has a one-point advantage over Arizona heading into halftime of the first round matchup at the Big 12 women’s basketball tournament.

Buckets are hard to come by in the physical battle. The Sun Devils are shooting 13-of-29 from the field and have an edge in the paint, outscoring the Wildcats 18-6. Heloisa Carrera and Marley Washenitz each have eight points for Arizona State.

The Wildcats are shooting 11-of-30 from the field. Sumayah Sugapong leads Arizona with 10 points and three rebounds.

Arizona vs. Arizona State: Flagrant 1 foul called

Things are getting chippy between the in-state rivals. Arizona forward Nora Francois was called for a Flagrant 1 foul on Arizona State guard Marley Washenitz on a rebound attempt. Referees determined the contact was excessive, hard and unnecessary.

Wisconsin starter Destiny Howell leaves game with injury

Destiny Howell left the Wisconsin-Illinois game with an apparent leg injury in the third quarter. Howell was helped off the floor by Wisconsin’s trainers, briefly sat at the end of the bench, then walked to the locker room under her own power. She then returned to the bench later in the quarter.

Howell averages 14.1 points per game for the Badgers. She had four points on 1-of-5 shooting, along with three rebounds and two assists, at the time of her injury on Wednesday night. She returned to the game with five minutes left in the third quarter. −Chloe Peterson

Arizona State goes on 9-0 run vs. Arizona

A lot is riding on this matchup for Arizona State. The Sun Devils need a win to keep their March Madness hopes alive as one of the first four out in USA TODAY Sports latest bracketology. With the stakes high, Arizona State appeared to have early jitters. They started the game 2-of-7 from the field with four turnovers and quickly found themselves in 10-2 hole early against Arizona. But Arizona State went on a 9-0 run to take a 11-10 lead over Arizona. − Cydney Henderson

Texas A&M’s leading rebounder goes down with apparent knee injury

Seven seconds before halftime of Texas A&M’s opening round SEC Tournament game against Auburn, junior forward Fatmata Janneh was fouled and hit the floor hard. Bon Secours Wellness Arena went quiet as Janneh grabbed her right knee and screamed in pain.

Texas A&M head coach Joni Taylor and the team’s trainer rushed to the floor to console a visibly emotional Janneh. After a few minutes, Aggies assistant coach Darius Taylor and another staffer helped the 6-foot-2 forward off the floor, keeping her from putting any weight on her right leg.

At halftime, Texas A&M trailed 23-21 with Janneh contributing two points and three rebounds. On the season, the transfer from Saint Peter’s is averaging 12 points and 10.2 rebounds per game — one of five SEC players averaging a double-double this season. — Mitchell Northam

Halftime: No. 10 Illinois 41, No. 15 Wisconsin 33

Illinois used an early 10-0 run in the first quarter to take the lead two minutes into the game, and hasn’t relinquished it since. Berry Wallace is leading the Illini with 11 points.

Wisconsin has had trouble taking care of the ball, turning it over 12 times in the first half. That has led to 13 Illinois points off of those turnovers. — Chloe Peterson

No. 10 Arizona State vs. No. 15 Arizona

How to watch Arizona State vs. Arizona

The Battle of the desert tips off at 4:30 ET on ESPN+

Arizona State starting lineup

Head coach: Molly Miller

  • 0 Gabby Elliott | G 5-10 – Senior
  • 11 Marley Washenitz | G 5-7 – Senior
  • 13 Last-Tear Poa |  G 5-11 – Senior
  • 14 Heloisa Carrera | F 6-2 – Sophomore
  • 21 McKinna Brackens | F 6-1 – Junior

Arizona Wildcats starting lineup

Head coach: Becky Burke

  • 3 Sumayah Sugapong | F 5-7 – Junior
  • 4 Noelani Cornfield | G 5-6 – Senior
  • 11 Tanyuel Welch | G 5-10 – Junior
  • 13 Nora Francois | F 6-2 – Senior
  • 33 Daniah Trammell | F 6-1 – Freshman

Colorado extends coach JR Payne through 2031

Colorado enters the Big 12 Tournament this week hoping to secure the wins necessary to make what would be its fourth NCAA Tournament trip in five years. And the Buffs will keep around the coach that has guided them to the Big Dance for the long term.

JR Payne received a contract extension through 2031, Colorado announced Wednesday afternoon. Already in her 10th season at the helm of the Buffs, she is the second-longest tenured coach in program history.

Payne — who grew up in Vancouver, played at Saint Mary’s, and previously coached at Southern Utah and Santa Clara — took over at Colorado in 2016. She’s had just two losing seasons and has won at least 20 games in each of the last five years. With Jaylyn Sherrod leading the way, the Buffs went to the Sweet 16 in 2023 and 2024, snapping a two-decade drought for the program of not making the second weekend of March Madness.

Colorado will face the winner of UCF and Kansas in the Big 12 Tournament on Thursday night at 8 p.m. ET in Kansas City. — Mitchell Northam

No. 15 Auburn vs No. 10 Texas A&M

How to watch Auburn vs Texas A&M

The first-round matchup between Auburn and Texas A&M tips off 6 p.m. ET on SEC Network.

Auburn Tigers starting lineup

Head coach: Larry Vickers

  • 1 Mya Petticord | G 5-9 Senior
  • 2 Ja’Mia Harris | G 5-11 Junior
  • 3 Harissoum Coulibaly | G 5-10 Freshman
  • 4 Kaitlyn Duhon | G 5-10 Junior
  • 6 Khady Leye | F 6-2 Sophomore

Texas A&M Aggies starting lineup

Head coach: Joni Taylor

  • 1 Ny’Ceara Pryor | G 5-3 Senior
  • 10 Lemyah Hylton | G 5-11 Senior
  • 20 Janae Kent | G 6-1 Junior
  • 32 Lauren Ware | F 6-5 Graduate
  • 44 Fatmata Janneh | F 6-2 Junior

Final: Georgia Tech 72, Florida State 60

Georgia Tech moves on to the second round of the ACC tournament after a 72-60 win over Florida State. The Yellow Jackets will face No. 6 Virginia Tech on Thursday. Georgia Tech, who was led by La’Nya Foster and her 18 points, shot 47% from the field. In addition to Foster’s contributions, it was sophomore guard Erica Moon who made several clutch baskets in the fourth quarter to help seal the win.

Florida State scored 21 points off 16 Yellow Jacket turnovers and had 34 bench points to Georgia Tech’s eight, but ultimately, the Yellow Jackets were too much for the team. Florida State, which finished the Wednesday match shooting 37%, was led by Sydney Bowles. Bowles was the lone player in double figures with 16 points.

Final: Indiana 72, Nebraska 69

Nebraska dominated early, using a 29-15 first quarter to stretch its double-digit lead into the third.

But the Hoosiers weren’t phased. Indiana, down 18 with five minutes left in the third quarter, went on a 10-0 run over three minutes. The Hoosiers took their first lead with less than one minute left in the game, then fended off multiple last-second Nebraska attempts to steal the game.

Indiana will play No. 5 Ohio State on Thursday at around 2:30 p.m. for a chance to advance to the quarterfinals. — Chloe Peterson

Indiana women’s basketball making a push

Indiana is making a late push against Nebraska in the fourth. The Hoosiers were down by as many as 15 points in the second quarter, but they’ve cut that deficit to as little as three points with six minutes left in the game.

Indiana has been able to limit Amiah Hargrove, who had 19 points in the first half but just two so far in the second, and Britt Prince, who has just five second-half points after 13 in the first half. — Chloe Peterson

Halftime: Nebraska 45, Indiana 28

Nebraska ran away early in this game, outscoring Indiana 29-15 in the first quarter. Indiana spent much of the second quarter trying to play catchup.

But the Hoosiers have been hampered by early foul trouble to three starters, as Shay Ciezki and Maya Makalusky each picked up two fouls in the first quarter. Ciezki led the Hoosiers with 11 points in the first half, while no other Indiana player had more than six.

Nebraska, on the other hand, has been firing on all cylinders. Amiah Hargrove had 19 points on 8-of-9 shooting in the first half, and Britt Prince had 13 points on 5-of-9 shooting. — Chloe Peterson

No. 12 Nebraska vs. No. 13 Indiana starting lineups

Nebraska starting lineup

Head coach: Amy Williams

  • 2 Logan Nissley | G
  • 14 Callin Hake | G
  • 23 Britt Prince | G
  • 4 Petra Bozan | F
  • 33 Amiah Hargrove | F

Indiana starting lineup

Head coach: Teri Moren

  • 2 Nevaeh Caffey | G
  • 5 Lenee Beaumont | G
  • 10 Shay Ciezki | G
  • 3 Maya Makalusky | F
  • 8 Edessa Noyan | F

Iowa hopes Hannah Stuelke can return

Iowa senior Hannah Stuelke, who missed the Hawkeyes’ win over Wisconsin on March 1 after suffering an elbow injury against Illinois three days prior, could return for the postseason. But Stuelke will have to clear a few hurdles.

‘It’s a pretty severe elbow injury — the torque of it, the swelling, the range of motion, the pain, the length of time that what really takes an injury like this one to feel better, better,’ Jensen told the Des Moines Register on Wednesday, two days before Iowa’s Big Ten Tournament opener. ‘So she has not practiced. We’re trying to figure out when to try it.

‘If she can go, I think she’ll go through that with some adrenaline. But it’s her strong hand, her dominant arm. So we’re just trying to give it as much rest to see what it feels like. But there’s a lot more than just the pain tolerance. If it can’t move, it can’t move. You can do some things with it. So we’re just trying to give it every minute.’ — Heather Burns

Georgia Tech goes coast-to-coast

Junior guard D’Asia Thomas-Harris built upon the Yellow Jackets’ promising outing against Florida State with a nifty steal-and-score that extended the team’s third-quarter lead to 14. — Meghan L. Hall

Halftime: Georgia Tech 39, Florida State 29

Georgia Tech leads Florida State, 39-29, after two quarters. Despite missing six players for Wednesday’s matchup, the Yellow Jackets have played with plenty of pace and space. They’re crashing the boards as they typically do and haven’t lost a step offensively despite some pressing defense from Florida State.

The Yellow Jackets shot 46% from the field, and on the other end of the ball, held Florida State to 35% shooting and just eight percent (1-of-12) from 3-point range. Georgia Tech also 80% from the line, while Florida State didn’t take or make a single free throw in the half.

The Yellow Jackets are led by La’Nya Foster, who has 13 points and five rebounds at the half. Sydney Bowles has 7 points for Florida State. — Meghan L. Hall

Cal coach gets 100th career win at ACC Tournament

During the first round of the ACC Tournament, Cal coach Charmin Smith earned her 100th career win after a 75-52 victory over Wake Forest

‘Really proud of our group today,’ Smith said postgame. ‘We settled in in the second quarter and were able to get a convincing win. All we want to do is just try to stay in Atlanta as long as possible. It’s a good day for the Bears.’ — Meghan L. Hall

Final: BYU 76, Houston 66

The game was tied at halftime, but BYU came out the locker room motivated and outscored Houston 27-15 in the third quarter to take a double-digit lead into the fourth quarter. BYU was able to hold off Houston for the win.

Olivia Hamlin led the way or BYU with 16 points off the bench, while Delaney Gibb and Lara Rohkohl each added 15 points. Meanwhile, Shun’teria Anumele had a game-high 17 points in the loss. — Cydney Henderson

No. 9 BYU vs. No. 16 Houston

BYU starting lineup

Head coach: Lee Cummard

  • 2 Sydney Benally | G 5-9 – Freshman
  • 11 Delaney Gibb | G 5-10 – Sophomore
  • 13 Lara Rohkohl | F 6-3 – Senior
  • 14 Kambree Barber | G 6-0 – Sophomore
  • 24 Brinley Cannon | G/F 6-1 -Sophomore

Houston Cougars starting lineup

Head coach: Matthew Mitchell

  • 26 Jorynn Ross | F 6-3 – Junior
  • 0 TK Pitts | G 6-1 – Senior
  • 1 Briana Peguero | G 5-7 – Senior
  • 7 Kyndall Hunter | G 5-7 – Senior
  • 14 Jade Jones | F 5-10 – Freshman

Big 12 court has flaw

The Big 12 women’s basketball tournament is being played on ASB GlassFloor LED court at the T-Mobile Center in Kansas City, Missouri. The state-of-the-art LED court, the same one used during 2024 NBA All-Star Game events, features visual effects, including dynamic court design, shot charts and immersive animations.

“Our team had the opportunity to practice on it back in November, and it was an incredible experience for our players,’ Baylor Women’s head coach Nicki Collen said in a statement.’The court is not only visually impressive, but it plays well and represents where our sport is headed.’

However, some eagle-eyed viewers have noticed at least one flaw. The half-court line is hard to see on the court due to the design. — Cydney Henderson

No. 10 Illinois women’s basketball vs. No. 15 Wisconsin

Illinois starting lineup

Head coach: Shauna Green

  • 1 Aaliyah Guyon | G 5-7 Sophomore
  • 2 Destiny Jackson | G 5-6 Freshman
  • 8 Jasmine Brown-Hagger | G 5-9 Junior
  • 23 Berry Wallace | F 6-1 Sophomore
  • 30 Cearah Parchment | F 6-3 Freshman

Wisconsin starting lineup

Head coach:Robin Pingeton

  • 1 Destiny Howell | G 6-0 Graduate Student
  • 13 Ronnie Porter | G 5-2 Senior
  • 15 Gift Uchenna | F 6-3 Senior
  • 20 Kyrah Daniels | G 6-0 Junior
  • 24 Laci Steele | G 5-11 Junior

Georgia Tech center splashes 3-pointer

Georgia Tech center Ariadna Termis showed no fear when she was passed the ball. Termis sank a beautiful 3-pointer in the first quarter, something you don’t see as often from those who play the position. — Meghan L. Hall

Georgia Tech injury report

Georgia Tech will be without six players when it takes on Florida State during the first round of the ACC Tournament later Wednesday. The following players are out:

  • #1 McKayla Taylor | C 6-1 – Freshman
  • #4 Leyre Urdiain | G 5-11 – Freshman
  • #12 Jada Crawshaw | F 6-0 – Junior
  • #13 Deborah Mukeba | C 6-5 – Sophomore
  • #22 Ines Noguero | G 5-11 – Senior
  • #33 Savannah Samuel | G 6-1 – Senio

UCLA’s Lauren Betts performs halftime show

UCLA women’s basketball doesn’t tip off its postseason until the Big Ten Tournament quarterfinal round on Friday, but some players are already dancing.

Charlisse Leger-Walker, Lauren Betts and Gabriela Jaquez joined UCLA cheerleaders for a special halftime performance to Tate McRae’s ‘Just Keep Watching’ during UCLA men’s 72-52 win over Nebraska on Tuesday.

— Cydney Henderson

Wake Forest ‘nervous’ in Cal matchup

Wednesday’s matchup against the Cal Golden Bears did not go as Wake Forest hoped. The Deamon Deacons fell 75-52. Head coach Megan Gebbia said postgame she believed nerves played a factor.

Wake Forest only has one player on its roster who had been to the ACC Tournament before this season, plus four transfers, including Cal Poly’s Mary Carter. On Wednesday, Carter led Wake Forest with 13 points.

‘I felt like we were a little nervous early on. I had to go in at halftime and say, ‘Shoot when you’re open,” Gebbia said. ‘As a coach, you don’t want to have to say that at halftime to some of the players that I felt were playing a little tentative. You have to come out with a lot of energy and a lot of effort and just confidence in yourself.’It’s unfortunate that it had to be this type of loss I would have liked for it to be a little bit closer, but the lesson is it’s a 40-minute game.’ — Meghan L. Hall

Final: Florida 86, Mississippi State 68

Me’Arah O’Neal and Liv McGill each scored 22 points apiece as the Gators kept their postseason alive with a win over the Bulldogs on Wednesday in the opening round of the SEC Tournament in Greenville, South Carolina.

It’s the fifth time O’Neal, a sophomore and the daughter of NBA legend Shaquille O’Neal, has scored north of 20 points. She also added four rebounds for Florida (18-14), while McGill had seven rebounds and 10 assists.

Destiney McPhaul and Favour Nwaedozi paced Mississippi State (18-13) with 12 points apiece in the fifth consecutive loss for the Bulldogs. Sam Purcell’s team is now at the mercy of the NCAA Tournament Selection Committee when it comes to March Madness inclusion. The Bulldogs end the regular season with a 2-9 record in Quad 1 games and a 1-3 record in Quad 2 games.

Florida will face No. 6 Oklahoma on Thursday at 1:30 p.m. ET on the SEC Network. — Mitchell Northam

Final: California 75, Wake Forest 52

Cal led 32-21 in the first half and outscored Wake Forest 29-12 in the third period and ran away with the win. By the time the fourth quarter arrived, the lead had ballooned to as high as 29 points. Cal will play No. 7 Syracuse in the second round of the ACC Tournament.

The Golden Bears shot 44% from the field and held the lead for 35 minutes, 46 seconds. Calwas led by Sakima Walker, who finished her day with 17 points and 10 rebounds. The Golden Bears also added 19 points from their bench on Wednesday, which is noteworthy.

Wake Forest, which shot 38% from the field, was led by Mary Carter. Carter was one of two Demon Deacons who finished in double figures The Wake Forest guard finished with 13 points and five rebounds. — Meghan L. Hall

8 players ejected at Sun Belt Tournament

Eight players were ejected from a second round game in the Sun Belt Women’s Basketball Tournament in Pensacola, Florida, on Wednesday afternoon after a fight broke out between No. 9 Coastal Carolina and No. 12 South Alabama.

South Alabama led by nine points with about 5:39 remaining in the fourth quarter when a scuffle ensued between Cordasia Harris of South Alabama and Tracey Hueston of Coastal Carolina. Coaches and players from the benches spilled out onto the floor and one referee was caught in the crossfire, hitting the floor after taking a hit from a player. Read more here. — Mitchell Northam

Halftime: BYU 29, Houston 29

The first-round matchup between BYU and Houston, the Battle of the Cougars, has proved to be a low-scoring affair so far and we’re all tied up at halftime. 

Neither team is shooting particularly well. BYU is 9-of-23 (39%) from the field, while Houston is 10-of-33 (30%) from the field.

BYU’s Delaney Gibb leads all scorers with 11 points and four rebounds. Sydney Benally has five points, while Lara Rohkohl has four points. However, BYU has given up 15 turnovers that have kept Houston in the game. 

Jade Jones and Kierra Merchant each have seven points for Houston. — Cydney Henderson

Halftime: Florida 46, Mississippi State 30

Me’Arah O’Neal — yes, the daughter of NBA legend Shaquille O’Neal — is powering the Gators in the first half with 15 points on 5-of-10 shooting from the floor and 3-of-5 from 3-point land. Florida has also scored 14 points off 12 turnovers by the Bulldogs, while Mississippi State has two points from nine turnovers by the Gators.

NCAA Tournament hopes for both teams hinge on the outcome of this game. Mississippi State is in a better position on the bubble currently with a NET of 39, but would feel more optimistic about its prospects of cracking the field of 68 with a win here. Florida likely needs to win multiple games in Greenville, South Carolina this week to get in a bubble position. Mitchell Northam

Cal forward exits with injury

Cal forward Claudia Langarita, a starter for the Golden Bears, exited the second quarter of Wednesday’s matchup with Wake Forest with 9:41 remaining in the period. It’s unclear how Langarita was hurt, but she went down and stayed down for several moments before being helped off the court by nearby training staff.

Langarita attempted to stretch her out to the side, but she ultimately went back to the locker room. The Cal forward had a visible limp and appeared to be rubbing her right hip.

Langaratia emerged from the locker room minutes later, standing behind the Cal bench with a heat wrap on her back. She eventually sat down on the bench with just under three minutes left in the period, but did not return to action before the half. — Meghan L. Hall

Wake Forest and Cal struggle to score

In the opening quarter of Wake Forest and Cal’s matchup, neither team could get many shots to fall. Wake Forest shot 31% from the field and Cal shot 24%. Both teams made four field goals. Cal leads 11-10 over Wake Forest. — Meghan L. Hall

Final: Kansas State 91, Cincinnati 66

No. 12 Kansas State cruised to the second round of the Big 12 women’s basketball tournament following a dominant 25-point win over No. 13 Cincinnati, where the Wildcats shot a whopping 53% from the 3-point line.

Taryn Sides (20 pts) and Jordan Speiser (20) combined for eleven of Kansas State’s 17 made 3-pointers, which set a Big 12 Tournament record. Nastja Claessens made five 3-pointers and finished with 18 points in the win.

Mya Perry led Cincinnati with 23 points (7-of-19 FG, 4-of-7) and was in tears when she checked out of the final game of her college career. Perry put her jersey over her face as head coach Katrina Merriweather tried to console her.

Florida out in front early

The Gators are off to a quick and balanced start with four of their five starters scoring to build a 10-4 lead halfway through the first quarter.

Neither team is shooting particularly well with Mississippi State hitting 33% of its shots from the field and Florida 30%.

No. 13 Mississippi State vs. No. 12 Florida

Mississippi State Bulldogs starting lineup

Head coach: Sam Purcell

  • 4 Tryanna Crisp | G 5-8 – Senior
  • 5 Chandler Prater | G/F 5-10 – Senior
  • 25 Favour Nwaedozi | F 6-3 – Junior
  • 33 Kharyssa Richardson | F 6-2 Senior
  • 40 Madison Francis | F 6-2 – Freshman

Florida Gators starting lineup

Head coach: Kelly Rae Finley

  • 13 Laila Reynolds | G 6-1 – Junior
  • 23 Liv McGill | G 5-9 – Sophomore
  • 8 Me’Arah O’Neal | F 6-4 – Sophomore
  • 9 Alexa Dizeko | F 5-111- Senior
  • 14 Caterina Piatti | F 6-4 – Freshman

No. 12 Miami vs No. 13 Stanford

Final: Miami 83, Stanford 76 (OT)

Stanford tried to continue its push in overtime, but ultimately ran out of steam. Miami moves on into the second round of the ACC Tournament with an 83-76 win. The Hurricanes will play No. 5 Notre Dame next.

Miami finished shooting 51% from the field, with three scorers in double digits, including Ra Shaya Kyler, who had a double-double with 24 points and 11 rebounds, and Gal Raviv, who had 20 points, six rebounds and six assists.

Stanford shot 43% from the field and 44% from deep behind 12 3-pointers.. Courtney Ogden led the Cardinal with 22 points. — Meghan L. Hall

Stanford and Miami go to overtime

Miami led 65-52 after three quarters (and by as much as eight in the waning minutes of the fourth), but Stanford forced several Hurricane turnovers that helped the Cardinal climb back into the game. Stanford switched to a zone defense and that made the difference.

Stanford’s Courtney Ogden cashed in on five straight points with less than a minute remaining to tie the game up at 70 and force overtime. Ogden has 22 points on the day.

Miami pulling away

With about five minutes left in the third quarter, the game was tied at 49. However, Miami turned up the heat. The Hurricanes finished the period on a 16-3 run, punctuated by a deep 3-pointer from Natalie Wetzel to close the quarter. Wetzel’s 3-pointer pushed Miami’s lead to 13.

Stanford and Miami trading baskets

At the halfway point of the third quarter, the Cardinal and Hurricanes are trading 3-pointers and baskets in the paint. The defense has intensified and so has the scoring.

Stanford has a 51-49 lead with 4:49 left in the third, led by 14 points from Hailee Swain. Ra Shaya Kyle has 17 for Miami.

Halftime: Stanford 39, Miami 37

With Stanford’s season and NCAA Tournament dreams seemingly hanging in the balance against Miami, the Cardinal survived an early surge from the Hurricanes. After a 19-10 first quarter from Miami, it was all Stanford in the second quarter. The Cardinal took the period 29-18.

Miami’s Gal Raviv leads all scorers with 12 points. Hailee Swain and Courtney Ogden both have 11 points for Stanford. — Meghan L. Hall

Stanford on an 18-11 run

After trailing 19-10 after the first quarter, Stanford went on an 18-11 run to cut Miami’s nine-point lead to 2 points with 3:39 remaining in the half. Courtney Ogden leads Stanford with 11 points. The Cardinal have NCAA Tournament hopes hanging in the balance as one of the first four out in USA TODAY Sports latest bracketology. — Meghan L. Hall

Miami Hurricanes starting lineup

Head coach: Tricia Cullop

  • 0 Ra Shaya Kyle | C 6-5 – Senior
  • 33 Amarachi Kimpson | G 5-8 – Junior
  • 12 Natalie Wetzel | F 6-3 – Freshman
  • 5 Ahnay Adams | G 5-6 – Sophomore
  • 14 Gal Raviv | G 5-9 – Sophomore

Stanford Cardinal starting lineup

Head coach: Kate Paye

  • 2 Hailee Swain | G 5-11 – Freshman
  • 6 Shay Ijiwoye | G 5-6 – Sophomore
  • 40 Courtney Ogden | F 6-1 – Junior
  • 12 Lara Somfai | F 6-3 – Freshman
  • 3 Nunu Agara | F 6’2 – Junior

No. 12 Kansas State vs. No. 13 Cincinnati

Halftime: Kansas State 40, Cincinnati 29

It’s raining 3-pointers in Kansas City. Kansas State (8-of-15) and Cincinnati (4-of-8) are shooting over 50% from beyond the arc in the first round of the Big 12 Tournament, but the Wildcats have an eleven-point edge heading into halftime.

Nastja Claessens (12 points) and Taryn Sides (11 points) combined for six of Kansas State’s eight 3-pointers.

Cincinnati is outrebounding Kansas State 27-18, including 10 offensive rebounds, yet find themselves down double-digits because of turnovers. The Bearcats have given up 13 turnovers, which Kansas State converted to nine points. Mya Perry has a team-high nine points (3-of-5 from 3) for Cincinnati. — Cydney Henderson

Kansas State Wildcats starting lineup

Head coach: Jeff Mittie

  • 3 Brandie Harrod | G 6-1 – Freshman
  • 4 Nastja Claessens | F 6-1 – Junior
  • 6 Gina Garcia | G 5-10 – Freshman
  • 11 Taryn Sides  | G 5-7 – Junior
  • 34 Tess Heal | G 5-10 – Senior

Cincinnati Bearcats starting lineup

Head coach: Katrina Merriweather

  • 1 Mya Perry | G 5-11 – Senior
  • 3 Reagan Jackson | G 5-8 – Junior
  • 4 Caliyah DeVillasee | G 5-8 – Freshman
  • 10 Kylie Torrence | F 6-2 – Freshman
  • 32 Destiny Thomas | C 6-4 -Junior

No. 16 Arkansas vs. No. 9 Kentucky

Final: Kentucky 94, Arkansas 64

The Wildcats outscored the Razorbacks 29-10 in the third quarter and never looked back. Kentucky outrebounded Arkansas 35-20 and outscored them in the paint 40-30.

Although the Razorbacks were perfect on 10 3s, the Wildcats were 16 for 22 from behind the arc to keep pace.

Kentucky had six players in double figures including all of their starters. Carla Strack had a double-double with 20 points and 13 rebounds. Amelia Hassett added 18 points on 6-of-11 from behind the arc.

Kentucky faces Georgia in the tournament quarterfinals at 11 a.m. ET on Thursday (SEC Network).

Tonie Morgan pacing Kentucky run

Tonie Morgan has more points than the entire Arkansas team in the third quarter. The senior has scored 12 with six rebounds. The Wildcats now have four players in double figures and lead 70-43. The Razorbacks season looks to be coming to an end.

Kentucky taking charge

The Wildcats have gone on a 12-2 run to start the third quarter and their lead has ballooned back to 19 points. Amelia Hassett made her fifth 3-pointer to trigger an Arkansas timeout. Clara Strack has a double-double for Kentucky with 14 points and 11 rebounds.

Halftime: Kentucky 42, Arkansas 33

The Razorbacks closed out the first half on a 15-4 run to get back within single digits of the No. 19-ranked Wildcats. Arkansas is outscoring Kentucky 18-12 in the paint. Taleyah Jones has 12 points to lead the Razorbacks.

Amelia Hassett has 12 points and Clara Strack 11 points and eight rebounds for Kentucky, which had led by as many as 20 points. — Heather Burns

Arkansas trying to claw back

The Razorbacks have outscored the Wildcats 23-13 in the second quarter. Emily Robinson has eight points including two 3-pointers. Taleyah Jones has 12 points, two rebounds and two assists.

Kentucky on a 7-0 run

The Wildcats have jumped out to a 16-4 lead early after a 7-0 run against Arkansas. Asia Boone leads Kentucky with six points on a pair of 3-pointers. — Heather Burns

Arkansas Razorbacks starting lineup

Head coach: Kelsi Musick

  • 11 Wyette Mayberry | G 5-7 – Senior
  • 22 Bonnie Deas | G 5-9 – Freshman
  • 10 Taleyah Jones | G 5-10 – Senior
  • 21 Ashlynn Chlarson | C 6-3 – Junior
  • 23 Emily Robinson | G 5-10 – Junior

Kentucky starting lineup

Head coach: Kenny Brooks

  • 5 Tonie Morgan | G 5-9 – Senior
  • 7 Teonnie Key | F 6-5 – Senior
  • 8 Asia Boone | G 5-8 – Junior
  • 13 Clara Strack | C 6-5 – Junior
  • 32 Amelia Hassett | F 6-4 -Senior

SEC women’s basketball tournament bracket

Women’s college basketball bracketology

Conference tournaments begin Wednesday in women’s college basketball for a handful of leagues, including the ACC, SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, Big East, Atlantic 10 and Summit.

It’s possible a lot of the projections will change by the time USA Today Sports rolls out another bracketology next week as teams will play in high-stakes games against marquee in-conference opponents on neutral courts. Up for grabs are a few undecided spots in the top 16 and positioning on the bubble. Read more.

Big 12 women’s basketball tournament schedule today

All times Eastern

Wednesday, March 4

First Round

  • Game 1: No. 12 Kansas State 91, No. 13 Cincinnati 66
  • Game 2: No. 9 BYU 76, No. 16 Houston 66
  • Game 3: No. 10 Arizona State vs. No. 15 Arizona | 6:30 p.m. (ESPN+)
  • Game 4: No. 11 Kansas vs. No. 14 UCF | 9 p.m. (ESPN+)

Big 12 women’s basketball tournament bracket

SEC women’s basketball tournament schedule today

All times Eastern

Wednesday, March 4 – First round

  • Game 1: #16 Arkansas vs. #9 Kentucky | 11 a.m. ET (SEC Network)
  • Game 2: #13 Mississippi State vs. #12 Florida | 1:30 p.m. ET (SEC Network)
  • Game 3: #15 Auburn vs. #10 Texas A&M | 6 p.m. ET (SEC Network)
  • Game 4: #14 Missouri vs. #11 Alabama | 8:30 p.m. ET (SEC Network)

SEC women’s basketball tournament bracket

Ranking March Madness top players

The 2025-26 women’s college basketball regular season is over for the Power 4 conferences and a handful of players rose to the top ahead of the 2026 NCAA Tournament.

UConn’s Sarah Strong and Azzi Fudd are among the top players set to tipoff March Madness later this month. USA TODAY Sports ranked the top 10 players in women’s college basketball ahead of the conference tournaments that begin Wednesday, March 4, for the Power 4. Read more.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast. Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

First Majestic Silver (TSX:AG,NYSE:AG) CEO Keith Neumeyer’s silver price prediction of over US$100 per ounce came true in 2026. When will silver prices make a more lasting hold in triple digit territory?

The silver price was up over 189 percent year-on-year as of March 2, 2026, on the back of economic uncertainty and ongoing geopolitical tensions, as well as support from long-term demand fundamentals.

The silver price broke through its previous all-time high in October 2025, blasting through the US$50 per ounce mark. From then, it rallied to new highs again and again.

Only a few weeks into 2026, the price of silver finally hit triple digits when it overtook the US$100 level. It went on to rise to its latest all-time high of US$121.62, which it set on January 29, 2026.

The catalysts for silver’s price surge above the critical US$100 level included the trade tensions between the US and Europe following US President Donald Trump’s renewed bid for Greenland; Trump’s public statements about possible military airstrikes on Iran; and a significant structural supply deficit exacerbated by increased institutional investment demand.

Well-known figure Keith Neumeyer, CEO of First Majestic, had frequently said he believes the white metal could hit the US$100 mark or even reach as high as US$130 per ounce.

Neumeyer has voiced this opinion often over the past decade. He put up a US$130 price target in a November 2017 interview with Palisade Radio, when silver was just US$17 per ounce. He reiterated his triple-digit silver price forecast in multiple interviews with Kitco over the years, including one in March 2023.

In 2024, Neumeyer made his US$100 silver call in a conversation with ITM Trading’s Daniela Cambone at the Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) convention, and in April of that year he acknowledged his reputation as the ‘triple-digit silver guy’ on the Todd Ault Podcast.

Speaking with Chris Marcus of Arcadia Economics on January 16, 2026, a day after the price of silver had broken through US$93 per ounce for the first time, Neumeyer stated that “triple digits is definitely on its way.” He was finally proven right less than two weeks later.

At times Neumeyer has been even bolder, suggesting in 2016 that silver could reach US$1,000 if gold were to hit US$10,000.

In order to better understand where Neumeyer’s opinion comes from and why a triple-digit silver price finally materialized, it’s important to take a look at the factors that affect the metal’s movements, as well as where prices have been in the past and where other industry insiders think silver could be headed.

First, let’s dive a little deeper into Neumeyer’s US$100 silver prediction.

In this article

    Why has Neumeyer called for a US$100 silver price?

    Neumeyer’s belief that silver could hit US$100 is based on a variety of factors, including its consistent deficit, its industrial demand and how undervalued it is compared to gold.

    When he first made the prediction more than a decade ago, there was significant distance for silver to go before it could reach the success Neumeyer had boldly predicted.

    Neumeyer expected a triple-digit silver price in part because he believed the market cycle could be compared to the year 2000, when investors were sailing high on the dot-com bubble and the mining sector was down. He believed it was only a matter of time before the market corrected, like it did in 2001 and 2002, and commodities would see a big rebound in pricing. It was during 2000 that Neumeyer himself invested heavily in mining stocks and came out on top.

    “I’ve been calling for triple-digit silver for a few years now, and I’m more enthused now,” Neumeyer said at an event in January 2020, noting that there are multiple factors behind his reasoning. “But I’m cautiously enthused because, you know, I thought it would have happened sooner than it currently is happening.”

    Another factor driving Neumeyer’s position is his belief that the silver market is in a deficit at a time when demand is rising from new industrial sectors. In a December 2023 interview with Kitco, Neumeyer stressed that silver is more than just a poor man’s gold and he spoke to silver’s important role in electric vehicles and solar cells.

    In line with this view on silver, First Majestic is a member of a consortium of silver producers that in January 2024 sent a letter to the Canadian government urging that silver be recognized as a critical mineral.

    Silver’s inclusion on the list would allow silver producers to accelerate the development of strategic projects with financial and administrative assistance from the government.

    In this 2024 PDAC interview, Neumeyer once again highlighted what he says is a sizable imbalance in the silver’s supply-demand picture. “We’re six years into this deficit. The deficit in 2024 looks like it’s gonna be bigger than 2023, and why is that? Because miners aren’t producing enough silver for the needs of the human race,” he said.

    More controversially, Neumeyer is of the opinion that the white metal will eventually become uncoupled from its sister metal gold, and should be seen as a strategic metal due to its necessity in many everyday appliances, from computers to electronics, as well as the technologies mentioned above. He has also stated that silver production has gone down in recent years, meaning that contrary to popular belief, he believes the metal is actually a rare commodity.

    Neumeyer’s March 2023 triple-digit silver call was a long-term call, and he explained that while he believed gold would break US$3,000 that year, he thought silver will only reach US$30. However, once the gold-silver ratio is that unbalanced, he believes that silver will begin to take off, and it would just need a catalyst.

    ‘It could be Elon Musk taking a position in the silver space,’ Neumeyer said. ‘There’s going to be a catalyst at some time, and headlines in the Wall Street Journal might talk about the silver supply deficit … I don’t know what the catalyst will be, but investors and institutions will wake up to the fundamentals of the metal, and that’s when it will start to move.’

    In 2024, gold experienced a resurgence in investor attention as the potential for US Federal Reserve interest rate cuts came into view. In an interview with Cambone at PDAC 2024, Neumeyer countered that perception, stating, “There’s a rush into gold because of the de-dollarization of the world. It has nothing to do with the interest rates.”

    In an April 2025 Money Metals podcast, Neumeyer reiterated his belief that silver is in an extreme supply deficit and that eventually silver prices will have to rise in order to incentivize silver miners to dig up more of the metal.

    ‘You need triple-digit silver just to motivate the mining companies to start investing again because the mining companies aren’t going to make the investment because there’s just so much risk in it,’ he said.

    After the price of silver surged from the US$50 level up into more than US$70 per ounce in late December 2025, Neumeyer actually cautioned investors not to get too excited about a potential quick run to US$100 during an interview with The Deep Dive.

    “I’m crossing my fingers that it doesn’t go to US$100 on this move. I don’t think that would be particularly healthy at all. I would prefer to see it start to slow down here and chalk a little bit sideways for two to three months and find a level that people can get use to. It’s going to take sometime for people to get used to US$70 silver,” he advised.

    While he admitted high silver prices are great for silver producers such as First Majestic and their shareholders, he said “personally, I’d rather see some stability,” and have silver reach triple digits in 12 to 24 months out so that the mining sector has more time to react and better take advantage of higher silver prices.

    A month later, when silver was above US$100 per ounce, during an interview with Kitco at the 2026 Vancouver Resource Investment Conference (VRIC), Neumeyer said, “calling triple digit silver and it’s actually happening is pretty interesting,” but he believes it’s still early stages in this new bull market and he’s done predicting metals prices.

    “What we do know is that we’ve created a new pricing paradigm, we’re not going back to the old pricing that we’re all used to over the past 20 or 30 years,” he added.

    What factors affect the silver price?

    In order to glean a better understanding of the precious metal’s chances of breaching the US$100 range again, it’s important to examine the elements that could push it to that level or pull it further away.

    The strength of the US dollar and Fed rate changes are factors that will continue to affect the precious metal, as are geopolitical issues and supply and demand dynamics.

    Although Neumeyer believes that the ties that bind silver to gold need to be broken, the reality is that most of the same factors that shape the price of gold also move silver.

    For that reason, it’s helpful to look at gold price drivers when trying to understand silver’s price action. Silver is, of course, the more volatile of the two precious metals, but nevertheless it often trades in relative tandem with gold.

    First, it’s useful to understand that higher interest rates are generally negative for gold and silver, while lower rates tend to be positive. That’s because when rates are higher, investment demand shifts to products that can accrue interest.

    The Fed’s rate moves have played a key role in pumping up silver prices over the past year. However, Trump doesn’t think Fed Chair Jerome Powell is lowering rates fast enough.

    Trump’s feud with the Fed over interest rates escalated in early January 2026 when the US Department of Justice served the Fed with grand jury subpoenas targeting Powell with a criminal indictment. The uncertainty over Fed independence is driving gold prices higher as investors expect a weaker dollar.

    While central bank actions are important for gold, and by extension silver, another key price driver lately has been geopolitical uncertainty. The past decade has been filled with major geopolitical events such as the Israel-Hamas conflict, the Russia-Ukraine war, and rising tensions between the US and other countries including Russia, China and Iran, and more recently Venezuela, Canada and Denmark.

    Trump’s tariffs have also rattled stock markets and ratcheted up the level of economic uncertainty pervading the landscape in 2025 and continuing into this year. This has proved price positive for gold and silver, with silver outperforming gold in the last year.

    However, silver’s industrial side can not be ignored. In an economically uncertain environment, the industrial case of silver could weaken in the short term, but in the longer term silver’s demand side is still highly prospective for larger gains.

    Samuelson explained in March 2025 that silver is particularly vulnerable to a supply shock as the London Bullion Market Association’s physical silver supplies had already decreased by 30 to 40 percent, while gold had only lost 3 to 4 percent.

    The next month, Smirnova explained that silver has been in a supply deficit of 150 million to 200 million ounces annually, but production has been stagnant or declining over the past decade.

    Looking at the runup in silver prices into the triple digits that occurred in late 2025 to early 2026, this structural supply-demand deficit, magnified by an explosion in industrial demand for solar energy and AI data centers, played an outsized role. Further adding fuel to the fire was record-low physical inventory levels in COMEX and Shanghai vaults, which caused a shift from ‘paper’ silver to physical hoarding.

    Higher industrial demand from emerging sectors due to factors like the transition to renewable energy and the emergence of AI technology will be highly supportive for the metal over the next few years. Solar panels are an especially exciting sector as manufacturers have found increasing the silver content increases energy efficiency.

    Frank Holmes of US Global Investors (NASDAQ:GROW) said in a December interview that silver’s “ability to be a transformative part of renewable energy,” particularly in solar panels, is an outsized factor in the latest run in the silver price. “And I don’t think that is going to go away,” he added.

    Could silver hit US$100 per ounce again?

    It seems likely that we will reach a US$100 per ounce silver price again in 2026 as there is plenty of support for Neumeyer’s belief that the metal is undervalued and that “ideal conditions are present for silver prices to rise.”

    For much of 2025, silver and gold rose higher on factors including persistent inflationary pressures brought on by Trump’s aggressive tariff announcements and the ongoing geopolitical risks in the Middle East. The commodity’s price uptick also came on the back of very strong silver investment demand.

    In the fourth quarter, silver rapidly outpaced gold’s gains, and by early January silver reached US$95, more than doubling in value from its Q3 close of US$46. It continued higher to breach US$120 by the end of the month.

    While silver and gold prices both pulled back significantly over the following days, silver spent February consolidating and stabilized above the US$80 mark in the second half of the month.

    On March 1, the silver price once again approached the US$100 mark as the US started a war with Iran, peaking at US$96.40 before seeing a smaller pull back.

    As silver’s momentum continues upwards and the price stabilizes at these higher values, silver market experts are agreeing with Neumeyer’s triple-digit silver hypothesis that the price of silver still has further room to grow.

    “You know, whether in the short term or the long term, one way or another, we’re going to run into a supply demand brick wall. And when that day happens, we could see triple-digit silver prices in a very, very short period of time,” he said. “I figure it’s going to be US$200 to US$400 an ounce, at least, before this is all over.”

    This set up bodes well for those not only invested in physical silver, but in silver mining stocks as well.

    “I have to be honest, I was not necessarily expecting triple-digit silver this quite this fast,” he said. “I was saying, if and when we break through US$54 silver, then the path of least resistance becomes a conservative, measured move target of US$96 or within a few pennies … So, I’m not really surprised at all, and in fact, I think we’re headed higher in the fullness of time.’

    Penny sees Fed policy actions as a potential catalyst for silver’s next leg up.

    “I think it’ll be the Fed’s response to the next crisis that causes the big move, the 1979 moment where you go up,” he explained, noting that in 1979, the price of silver went up 700 percent in 12 months. “I think that that moment still lies ahead. It’ll be the Fed’s response to the next crisis that is the catalyst for that huge move.”

    Eugenia Mykuliak, founder and executive director of B2PRIME Group, shared another reason she believes Fed rate cuts are bullish for silver.

    In late January, Citigroup (NYSE:C) analysts upgraded their silver forecast to US$150 per ounce in the second quarter of 2026. ‘We expect the bullish factors to stay intact in the very near term, supporting strong investment/speculation demand and likely leading to further physical tightening in major ex-US trading hubs,’ said the firm.

    FAQs for silver

    Why is silver so cheap?

    The primary reason that silver is sold at a significant discount to gold is supply and demand, with more silver being mined annually. While silver does have both investment and industrial demand, the global focus on gold as an investment vehicle, including countries stockpiling gold, can overshadow silver.

    Additionally, jewelry alone is a massive force for gold demand.

    There is an abundance of silver — according to the US Geological Survey, to date 1,740,000 metric tons (MT) of silver have been discovered, while only 244,000 MT of gold have been found, a ratio of about 1 ounce of gold to 7.1 ounces of silver. In terms of output, 26,000 MT of silver were mined in 2025 compared to 3,300 MT for gold.

    Looking at these numbers, that puts gold and silver production at about a 1:7.88 ratio last year, while the price ratio on March 3, 2026, was around 1:62 — a huge disparity.

    Can silver hit $1,000 per ounce?

    As things are now, it seems unlikely, and at the same time almost a possibility, that silver will ever reach highs of US$1,000 per ounce, which Keith Neumeyer predicted in 2016 could happen if gold ever climbed to US$10,000 per ounce.

    This is related to the gold to silver production ratio discussed above. At the time of the 2016 prediction, this ratio was around 1 ounce of gold to 9 ounces of silver, or 1:9.

    If silver was priced according to production ratio today, when gold is at US$5,000 per ounce, then silver should be around US$555. However, the gold to silver pricing ratio today is around 1:62, although that’s a bit lower than the typical range of 1:70 to 1:90. In early March 2026, gold is trading around US$5,100 per ounce and silver is about US$82 per ounce.

    Is silver really undervalued?

    Many experts believe that silver is undervalued compared to fellow currency metal gold. As discussed, their production and price ratios are currently incredibly disparate.

    While investment demand is higher for gold, silver has seen increasing time in the limelight in recent years, including a 2021 silver squeeze that saw new entrants to the market join in.

    Another factor that lends more intrinsic value to silver is that it’s an industrial metal as well as a precious metal. It has applications in technology and batteries — both growing sectors that will drive demand higher.

    Silver’s two sides have remained prominent as the market navigates persistent supply shortages and shifting investor sentiment. Following a record high in 2022, according to data from the Silver Institute, silver demand reached 1.16 billion ounces in 2024, supported by a fourth consecutive year of record industrial fabrication at 680.5 million ounces. However, total 2024 demand saw a 3 percent decline due to a 22 percent drop in physical investment, which hit a five-year low as Western investors took profits at higher prices.

    Is silver better than gold?

    There are merits for both metals, especially as part of a well-balanced portfolio. As many analysts point out, silver has been known to outperform its sister metal gold during times of economic prosperity and expansion.

    On the other hand, during economic uncertainty silver values are impacted by declines in fabrication demand.

    Silver’s duality as a precious and industrial metal also provides price support. As a report from the CPM Group notes, “it can be seen that silver in fact almost always (but not always) out-performs gold during a gold bull market.”

    At what price did Warren Buffet buy silver?

    Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A) bought up 37 percent of global silver supply between 1997 and 2006. Silver ranged from US$4 to US$10 during that period.

    In fact, between July 1997 and January 1998 alone, the company bought about 129 million ounces of the metal, much of which was for under US$5. Adjusted for inflation, the company’s purchases in that window cost about US$8.50 to US$11.50.

    How to invest in silver?

    There are a variety of ways to get into the silver market. For example, investors may choose to put their money into silver-focused stocks by buying shares of companies focused on silver mining and exploration, or even precious metals royalty stocks. As a by-product metal, investors can also gain exposure to silver through some gold companies.

    There are also silver exchange-traded funds that give broad exposure to silver companies and the metal itself, while more experienced traders may be interested in silver futures. And of course, for those who prefer a more tangible investment, purchasing physical bullion in silver bar and silver coin form is also an option.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Australia pulled away late to produce a 3-0 victory over Chinese Taipei in the 2026 World Baseball Classic opener at the Tokyo Dome.

    Catcher Robbie Perkins led Australia with a two-run home run to break a scoreless tie in the bottom of the fifth inning. Travis Bazzana added an insurance run in the bottom of the seventh inning with a solo home run.

    Perkins worked with three different pitchers including Alex Wells, who pitched three scoreless innings as the starter and struck out six. He threw 28 strikes on 46 pitches.

    Chinese Taipei struggled to produce any offense throughout the game. The team had a chance at the end, managing to get a pair of runners on base before Australia secured the final out.

    ‘Growing up, I always looked ahead and kind of had a vision of things I wanted to do in this game, and this was a big part of it,’ Bazzana, the top pick in the 2024 MLB Draft, said leading up to the opener. ‘Young me would be dreaming of (this) and now it’s here. Just got to make the most of it.’

    Check out highlights from the contest:

    Final: Australia 3, Chinese Taipei 0

    Chinese Taipei managed to get runners on first and second base in the ninth inning but were unable to get the runners home to tie the game.

    Australia pitcher Jon Kennedy caught the bouncing ball and made a running attempt toward first base, where he nearly stumbled but tossed the ball to record the final out.

    It was just the second shutout victory for Australia in WBC play.

    Australia adds to lead in seventh

    Travis Bazzana hits a solo home run in the bottom of the seventh inning to increase Australia’s lead to 3-0. Bazzana sent the ball 383 feet to right field.

    Bazzana was the first overall pick in the 2024 MLB Draft by the Cleveland Guardians.

    Australia takes first lead against Chinese Taipei

    Robbie Perkins put Australia on the board with a homer, taking a 2-0 lead against Chinese Taipei in the bottom of the fifth inning against pitcher Po-Yu Chen.

    Chinese Taipei records first hit after Australia’s pitching change

    Yu Chang produced Chinese Taipei’s first hit of the game in the third inning against Australia pitcher Jack O’Loughlin.

    O’Loughlin was called out of the bullpen to replace Alex Wells. Wells struck out six and allowed just one walk on 46 pitches (28 strikes).

    Chinese Taipei and Australia scoreless through two innings

    Australia pitcher Alex Wells has not allowed a hit through the first two innings of play. He has struck out three while allowing just one walk. He has thrown 33 pitches.

    Jo-Hsi Hsu of Chinese Taipei did not allow a hit in the second inning. Hsu had 21 of his first 27 pitches result in a strike. He has struck out two batters.

    Chinese Taipei and Australia remain scoreless after first inning

    The two teams remain scoreless after the first inning of play to open the World Baseball Classic. Chinese Taipei pitcher Jo-Hsi Hsu produced the third out to end the inning after striking out Alex Hall of Australia. Curtis Mead recorded the only hit of the inning against Hsu.

    Australia pitcher Alex Wells produced one strikeout and a walk against Chinese Taipei in the first inning.

    How to watch Chinese Taipei vs Australia: TV channel, stream

    • Matchup: Chinese Taipei vs. Australia
    • Time: 10 p.m.
    • Location: Tokyo (Tokyo Dome)
    • TV: FS1
    • Streaming: FOX One App

    Stream the World Baseball Classic on Fubo

    Why is Stuart Fairchild playing for Chinese Taipei?

    Stuart Fairchild will serve as the leadoff batter for Chinese Taipei in World Baseball Classic action against Australia.

    Fairchild is eligible to play for Chinese Taipei because his mother is Taiwanese.

    He credits catcher Lyle Lin for recruiting him to the Chinese Taipei roster, according to Taiwan’s Overseas Community Affairs Council.

    Chinese Taipei’s starting lineup vs. Australia

    CF – Stuart Fairchild

    DH – An-Ko Lin

    RF – Chen Chieh-hsien

    3B – Yu Chang

    1B – Nien-ting Wu

    SS – Kun-yu Chiang

    2B – Tzu-wei Lin

    C – Shao-Hung Chiang

    LF – Chen-wei Chen

    Australia’s starting lineup vs. Chinese Taipei

    2B – Travis Bazzana

    3B – Curtis Mead

    CF – Aaron Whitefield

    DH – Alex Hall

    SS – Jarryd Dale

    1B – Rixon Wingrove

    C – Robbie Perkins

    LF – Chris Burke

    RF – Tim Kennelly

    Who is Australia’s WBC starting pitcher vs. Chinese Taipei?

    Alex Wells will serve as Australia’s starting pitcher on Wednesday against Chinese Taipei. Wells previously played for the Baltimore Orioles in 2021 and 2022.

    He started eight of the 13 games he played in, allowing 58 hits and 34 earned runs while striking out 32 in 46.1 innings pitched.

    Who is Chinese Taipei’s WBC starting pitcher vs. Australia?

    Jo-Hsi Hsu will serve as the starting pitcher for Chinese Taipei on Wednesday against Australia. He does not have any MLB experience.

    Hsu spent the past four years in the CPBL. He has a 16-18 record, starting in 60 of the 64 games he played in. He’s allowed 229 hits, 82 earned run and nine home runs while striking out 349 in 305 innings pitched.

    Australia WBC roster 2026

    Pitchers

    • Kieren Hall (RHP) – Perth Heat
    • Ky Hampton (RHP) – Adelaide Giants
    • Josh Hendrickson (LHP) – Adelaide Giants
    • Sam Holland (RHP) – Brisbane Bandits
    • Jon Kennedy (LHP) – Brisbane Bandits
    • Connor MacDonald (RHP) – Brisbane Bandits
    • Cooper Morgan (LHP) – Adelaide Giants
    • Mitch Neunborn (RHP) – Philadelphia Phillies org
    • Jack O’Loughlin (LHP) – Adelaide Giants
    • Warwick Saupold (RHP) – Perth Heat
    • Blake Townsend (LHP) – Texas Rangers org
    • Todd Van Steensel (RHP) – Adelaide Giants
    • Alex Wells (LHP) – Sydney Blue Sox
    • Lachlan Wells (LHP) – LG Twins (KBO)
    • Coen Wynne (RHP) – Sydney Blue Sox

    Catchers

    • Mitchell Edwards – Adelaide Giants
    • Alex Hall – Perth Heat
    • Robbie Perkins – Brisbane Bandits

    Infielders

    • Travis Bazzana – Cleveland Guardians org
    • George Callil – Brisbane Bandits
    • Jarryd Dale – KIA Tigers (KBO)
    • Robbie Glendinning – Adelaide Giants
    • Curtis Mead – Chicago White Sox
    • Logan Wade – Brisbane Bandits
    • Rixon Wingrove – Brisbane Bandits

    Outfielders

    • Ulrich Bojarski – Melbourne Aces
    • Chris Burke – Melbourne Aces
    • Max Durrington – Oakland Athletics org
    • Tim Kennelly – Perth Heat
    • Aaron Whitefield – Melbourne Aces

    Chinese Taipei WBC roster 2026

    • Pitchers: Hsu Jo-hsi, Gu Lin Ruei-yang, Lin Yu-min, Lin Wei-en, Po-Yu Chen, Zhuang Chen Zhong-Ao, Sha Tzu-chen, Sun Yi-lei, Tseng Jyun-yue, Lin Kai-wei, Lin Shi-xiang, Chang Yi, Chen Kuan-yu, Hu Chih-wei, Cheng Hao-chun, and Zhang Jun-wei.
    • Catchers: Kungkuan Giljegiljaw, Lyle Lin (Lin Chia-cheng) and Jiang Shao-hong.
    • Infielders: Yu Chang, Tsung-Che Cheng, Lee Hao-yu, Chiang Kun-yu, Wu Nien-ting and Lin Tzu-wei.
    • Outfielders: Stuart Fairchild, Chen Chieh-hsien (Captain), Lin An-ko and Chen Chen-wei.

    What WBC pool are Chinese Taipei and Australia in?

    Chinese Taipei and Australia are two of the five teams playing in Pool C of the World Baseball Classic. The rest of the group includes Japan, Korea and Czechia.

    World Baseball Classic Pool C schedule

    • March 5: Chinese Taipei vs. Australia
    • March 5: Czechia vs. South Korea
    • March 6: Australia vs. Czechia
    • March 6: Japan vs. Chinese Taipei
    • March 7: Chinese Taipei vs. Czechia
    • March 7: South Korea vs. Japan
    • March 8: Chinese Taipei vs. South Korea
    • March 8: Australia vs. Japan
    • March 9: South Korea vs. Australia
    • March 10: Czechia vs. Japan
    This post appeared first on USA TODAY

    Modern society has a metals problem. The demands of modern consumer culture, the energy transition and the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics have created a dilemma.

    As demand rises, the supply of many metals is at a bottleneck brought about by a number of factors, from government red tape to civil unrest, as well as lack of capital expenditures leading to fewer new discoveries and mines.

    On top of this, mining companies focused on essential metals like copper are facing additional challenges, as in many cases the easy discoveries have already been made and existing mines are seeing declining grades, causing further constraints to supply.

    BHP (ASX:BHP,NYSE:BHP,LSE:BHP) Digital Officer Mikko Tepponen suggests that the very technologies that rely on metals and mining can be the answer in his presentation at the 2026 Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada conference.

    Addressing data fragmentation in exploration

    Once companies open up capital expenditures to the exploration side of the mining sector, several questions arise, most notably: Where are the minerals?

    At its core, exploration relies on the geosciences, with a geologist in the field, sampling rocks, conducting surveys and using the data gathered to estimate where the best place is to put a drill for a look below the surface.

    Mining is a data-driven enterprise, and depending on the project, the information can come from a range of methods, from modern techniques to historic observations, meaning the data is fragmented across a variety of sources and formats.

    AI and machine learning can be good at processing and interpolating large quantities of information. However, data accessibility creates another roadblock.

    “Across our industry, vast volumes of exploration data are sealed in archive rooms, and legacy systems can’t read through third-party data sets,” Tepponen said. “That data is neither structured, searchable nor interoperable. That means AI cannot make easy sense of it, and in many cases, that data was never extracted.”

    For Tepponen, one of the challenges the mining industry needs to overcome is data fragmentation. Without enough data or proper information, there is an increased risk of making the wrong exploration decisions.

    “Time matters because capital is finite. Drill meters are expensive, and decisions about capital allocation have multi-year impacts down the line,” he said.

    The way BHP has implemented a data-centric approach is building a central data platform that integrates the decades of exploration data, standardizes it and makes it accessible through a central team within the company.

    Tepponen says the platform supports 52 standardized core geoscience types, backed by more than 100 years of data, helping its exploration teams save months of time.

    “Our geoscientists can access more than 4 million drill hole cores and 9,000 geophysical surveys through one portal,” he added.

    Using BHP’s in-house AI extraction tool, one team of geoscientists obtained data from thousands of drill holes from 30,000 legacy document records. They then used the central data platform to combine that with modern drilling data.

    According to Tepponen, the team completed the work in a few hours, while doing so manually would have taken months, and results were higher quality than the previous method.

    However, he stressed that the integration of AI into its workflow wasn’t about replacing geoscience teams, but about “amplifying the work of geoscientists by creating a digital tool that enables them to focus on higher value.”

    Additionally, the information in the platform is not limited to BHP’s data. Tepponen explained that the entire system is built on an open-source database designed to break down data silos and enable cross-sector collaboration.

    Using targeted optimizations to avoid disruptions

    While exploration poses a bottleneck to the development of new projects for future supply, disruptions to existing operations significantly impact current output.

    It’s often impossible to predict major events like extreme weather, civil unrest or regulatory changes. However, operators can foresee some disruptions that result in hundreds of hours of downtime throughout the industry every year.

    Tepponen outlined one persistent problem: oversized rocks and foreign objects making their way through processing plants.

    “If an uncrushable rock or piece of metal gets into the crusher, it can cause blockages, damage belts and create significant downtime,” he said. “If it travels downstream, it can damage equipment and create critical bottlenecks.”

    In Western Australia, BHP employs a hub-and-spoke model that connects five mines to a central processing facility. If one of the hazards disrupts operations at the facility, it can affect operations at the mines connected to it.

    Additionally, fixing these issues exposes maintenance teams to higher-risk tasks, so eliminating the problem in the first place improves both productivity and safety.

    Tepponen explained that historically, workers would be used to identify the hazards before they were loaded onto the truck, but once they reached the conveyor, they became much harder to remove.

    The company now employs a real-time monitoring system that detects objects, alerts controllers and can automatically stop the conveyor.

    “These are actually very simple technologies available commercially off the shelf. Cameras and machine learning control systems applied to a real world operational constraint,” he said.

    In the prior three years, these incidents had caused over 1,000 hours of downtime, according to Tepponen. However, since it installed the monitoring system, the company hasn’t experienced any major disruptions or destruction events caused by oversized rocks, a change that he said amounts to hundreds of thousands of metric tons per year of increased processing.

    “It’s a small system-level optimization that can deliver outsized returns on the AI journey. This is not a massive program. This is identifying simple constraints, applying proven technology,” he said, and emphasized the process of controlled testing, iteration and then deploying at scale. ‘That’s how systematic innovation actually happens.’

    Testing scenarios with digital twin simulations

    In his third use case example, he turned to BHP’s semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill at its Escondida operation in Chile, at which differing particle size and hardness in ore feed was impacting production.

    The company used AI to create a digital twin of the value chain, which included everything that was known about the operation, such as ore body knowledge, processing behavior and operational constraints.

    “That digital simulation enabled scenario testing and gave us the ability to inform blasting and blending strategies to predict granularity,” Tepponen said, noting that monthly production losses attributed to the problem fell by around 70 percent.

    “The lesson, when the ore body knowledge is connected directly to the processing decisions, the system becomes more stable and predictable.”

    BHP has since applied the approach to other operations, including ones in Australia and Chile.

    “The Gen AI integration is multicultural, so non-technical users and the technical users can run scenarios in their first language,” he said, an aspect that he said is very important for the local companies at its operations.

    Building foundations, collaboration key to AI usefulness

    Tepponen was emphatic that AI alone wasn’t a “superhero.” BHP needed to specifically design these AI platforms in order to achieve these results.

    “One of the most important lessons we have learned is we don’t actually get value from AI by starting with AI. The value comes from the foundations, consistent data standards, interoperability. You need to start at the bottom and make your way to the top.”

    Tepponen also stressed the value of collaboration, noting that companies tend to be protective of their intellectual property, but opportunities are being missed that could be mutually beneficial.

    “The hard truth is, no company can solve this problem of data fragmentation and system integration,” he said, and the industry would benefit from a collaborative approach on standards, interoperability and data throughout the value chain.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Dean Belder, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Sranan Gold Corp. (CSE: SRAN,OTC:SRANF) (OTCQB: SRANF) (‘Sranan’ or the ‘Company’) continues to work towards the filing of its annual audited financial statements, management’s discussion and analysis, and CEO and CFO certifications for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2025 (the ‘Required Filings’). The Company has obtained approval from the Alberta Securities Commission to extend the Management Cease Trade Order (‘MCTO’) under National Policy 12-203 Management Cease Trade Orders (‘NP 12-203’) until March 15, 2026.

    The additional delay in filing is attributable to the timing of certain outstanding third-party confirmations, including from an international vendor and the Company’s bank in Suriname, which were received later than anticipated. As a result, completion of the audit was deferred by approximately one week. The audit is now in its final stages, with only minor outstanding items remaining. Sranan remains in ongoing communication with its auditor to confirm any remaining documentation requirements and has committed to providing any outstanding materials promptly upon request. Sranan anticipates that the Required Filings will be completed on or before March 13, 2026. The interim first-quarter financial statements are expected to be filed within 48 hours thereafter, and in any event no later than March 15, 2026.

    The Required Filings were due to be filed by January 28, 2026. In connection with the anticipated delays in making the Required Filings, the Company made an application for a Management Cease Trade Order (‘MCTO‘) under National Policy 12-203 Management Cease Trade Orders (‘NP 12-203‘) to the Alberta Securities Commission, as principal regulator for the Company, and the MCTO was issued on January 29, 2026. The MCTO restricts all trading by the Company’s CEO and CFO in securities of the Company, whether direct or indirect. The issuance of the MCTO does not affect the ability of persons who are not directors, officers or insiders of the Company to trade their securities. The MCTO will remain in effect until the Required Filings are filed or until it is revoked or varied.

    Both the Company and its auditors are working diligently towards the completion and filing of the Required Filings, and the Company will provide additional updates.

    The Company confirms that it intends to satisfy the provisions of the alternative information guidelines described in NP 12-203 by issuing bi-weekly default status reports in the form of a news release until it meets the Required Filings requirement. The Company has not taken any steps towards any insolvency proceeding and the Company has no material information relating to its affairs that has not been generally disclosed.

    For further information with respect to the MCTO, please refer to the Company’s news releases dated January 21, 2026, February 4, 2026, and February 18, 2026, available for viewing on the Company’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca.

    About Sranan Gold
    Sranan is engaged in the business of mineral exploration and the acquisition of mineral property assets in Suriname. The Company’s flagship Tapanahony Project covers 29,000 hectares in one of Suriname’s most prolific artisanal gold mining districts and Sranan recently announced the acquisition of the 18,468-hectare Lawatino Project situated in southeastern Suriname along the Central Guiana Shear Zone.

    For more information, please visit http://www.sranangold.com.

    For further information, please contact:
    Oscar Louzada, CEO
    +31 6 25438975

    THE CANADIAN SECURITIES EXCHANGE HAS NOT APPROVED NOR DISAPPROVED THE CONTENT OF THIS PRESS RELEASE.

    Forward-looking statements
    Certain statements made and information contained herein may constitute ‘forward-looking information’ and ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian and United States securities legislation. These statements and information are based on facts currently available to Sranan and there is no assurance that the actual results will meet management’s expectations. Forward-looking statements and information may be identified by such terms as ‘anticipates,’ ‘believes,’ ‘targets,’ ‘estimates,’ ‘plans,’ ‘expects,’ ‘may,’ ‘will,’ ‘could’ or ‘would.’

    This news release contains forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements regarding management’s expectations about obtaining the MCTO and completing the Required Filings within the anticipated timeline. Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Sranan does not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements or information, except as required by applicable securities laws. For more information on the Company, investors should review the Company’s continuous disclosure filings that are available at www.sedarplus.ca.

    To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/286289

    News Provided by TMX Newsfile via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    The Justice Department’s endeavor to break up Live Nation, Ticketmaster’s parent company, has officially made its way to the courtroom.

    The antitrust case, which began with jury selection Monday, is unfolding in federal court in New York. Opening statements are scheduled to start Tuesday, with the trial expected to last six weeks.

    The lawsuit, filed in 2024 by the Justice Department and dozens of state attorneys general, as well as Washington, D.C., alleges that Live Nation has illegally dominated the live concert industry by monopolizing ticketing, concert booking, venues and promotions.

    The complaint, which was filed in the Southern District of New York, accuses the company of engaging in ‘anticompetitive conduct’ that leads fans to pay more in fees, artists to get fewer opportunities to play concerts and venues to have limited choices for ticketing services.

    Ticketmaster has for years been the target of scrutiny by music fans who reported frustrations with buying tickets through the platform.

    Live Nation directly manages more than 400 musical artists and owns or controls more than 265 concert venues in North America. And through Ticketmaster, the lawsuit says, it controls around 80% of major concert venues’ ticketing — as well as a growing share of the resale market.

    “Through interconnected agreements associated with Live Nation’s various roles as ticketer, promoter, artist manager, and venue owner,” the complaint says, “Live Nation has created a feedback loop that pushes ticketing and ancillary fees higher while allowing Live Nation to be on all sides of numerous transactions and thereby double-dip from the pockets of fans, artists, and venues.”

    Here’s what else to know.

    Attempts to advocate for ticketing reform have spanned decades. The rock band Pearl Jam tried to push the issue forward 30 years ago when its members testified before Congress, saying Ticketmaster had refused to agree to low concert ticket prices and fees. The case was dismissed a year later, and Ticketmaster’s dominance has persisted over the decades that followed.

    But frustration over Ticketmaster began to boil over when it incurred the wrath of one of the country’s largest fan bases: Swifties, aka followers of Taylor Swift.

    In late 2022, overloaded presale queues for the domestic leg of Swift’s 2023 Eras Tour caused the site to crash and led Ticketmaster to cancel the sale. The fiasco even drew the attention of Swift herself, who called it “excruciating” to watch.

    Soon afterward, in January 2023, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing examining Ticketmaster’s dominance in the industry. During the bipartisan hearing, which probed whether Ticketmaster’s outsize control has unfairly hurt customers, even senators couldn’t refrain from making references to Swift.

    The Swifties also brought their own lawsuits against Ticketmaster in December 2022. One class-action suit was dropped by the end of 2023, while another suit, filed together by 355 individual ticket buyers, still awaits trial.

    Live Nation Entertainment has denied that it’s a monopoly.

    The company has told NBC News that the Justice Department’s lawsuit “won’t solve the issues fans care about relating to ticket prices, service fees, and access to in-demand shows.”

    “Calling Ticketmaster a monopoly may be a PR win for the DOJ in the short term, but it will lose in court because it ignores the basic economics of live entertainment, such as the fact that the bulk of service fees go to venues, and that competition has steadily eroded Ticketmaster’s market share and profit margin,” the company said.

    Last week, Live Nation asked U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian to pause the case so it could appeal his decision denying the case’s dismissal.

    Subramanian, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, declined to delay the trial and ruled to allow the Justice Department’s claims to proceed.

    Potential witnesses for the trial include: musician Kid Rock (whose real name is Robert Ritchie), Minnesota Timberwolves CEO Matthew Caldwell, Roc Nation CEO Desiree Perez, Live Nation Entertainment CEO Michael Rapino and Mumford & Sons keyboardist Ben Lovett.

    Kid Rock is expected to testify about ‘competitive conditions for concert promotions and primary ticketing, including the impact of Defendants’ actions on artists and fans,’ according to the potential witness list provided by the plaintiffs’ attorneys. In January, he told the Senate Commerce Committee at a hearing that the ticketing industry is ‘full of greedy snakes and scoundrels.’ (It appears Kid Rock is still partnering with Live Nation for his “Freedom 250” tour, with tickets currently being sold exclusively through the platform.)

    Lovett’s testimony, meanwhile, would be likely to address ‘artist preferences and competitive dynamics associated with the promotions and amphitheaters markets,’ according to the plaintiffs’ potential witness list document. He’s also listed on the defendants’ potential witness list document.

    Live Nation CEO Michael Rapino and former Ticketmaster CEO Irving Azoff are also expected to take the stand. They were instrumental figures in the 2010 merger.

    Azoff, who represents major artists such as Harry Styles, is ‘likely to testify about industry trends, dynamics, and competition, the selection of live event promotion companies, and tour and show routing and venue selection, as well as ticketing provider preferences,’ according to the potential witness list provided by the defendants’ attorneys.

    Rapino’s expected testimony would focus on ‘the company’s business, its corporate structure, strategy, and finances, including the different lines of business and how they interact, as well as industry trends, dynamics, and competition.’ The defendants’ attorneys also said he would be likely to ‘rebut the plaintiff’s allegations of misconduct and anticompetitive effects.’

    Last year, the Federal Trade Commission separately sued Live Nation and Ticketmaster over allegations of illegal and deceptive business practices that it says caused consumers to pay ‘significantly more’ than the face value of a ticket.

    Seven states — Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Nebraska, Tennessee, Utah and Virginia — joined the FTC’s suit, which was filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

    This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

    Jurickson Profar upended his career and the Atlanta Braves’ season for a second consecutive year after testing positive for a banned substance, a second offense that will result in a 162-game ban for the 2026 season, Major League Baseball announced March 3.

    Profar tested positive for exogenous testosterone, MLB said, a performance-enhancing substance banned from Olympic competition since 1976 and classified as a steroid in the U.S. since 1990, according to the National Institutes of Health.

    Profar, 33, was entering the first season of a three-year, $42 million contract when he was suspended March 31, 2025, just four games into last season, after a positive test for a fertility drug classified as a performing-enhancing substance. He was suspended 80 games and returned July 2, hitting 14 homers with a .787 OPS over the remaining 80 games.

    This suspension will be far more costly.

    Profar will lose his entire 2026 salary of $15 million, bringing his docked pay for his two positive tests to around $21 million over two seasons. He’s also ineligible to represent the Netherlands in the upcoming World Baseball Classic.

    Profar was entering his 13th major league season after debuting as a 19-year-old in 2012. He earned his first All-Star appearance in 2024 for the San Diego Padres, establishing career bests in home runs (24) and OPS (.839), prompting the Braves to sign him as their left fielder entering 2025.

    Now, he won’t be seen on the Truist Field diamond until 2027.

    Profar joins five other players to earn at least a 162-game ban under MLB’s policy, most notably Robinson Cano, who earned two suspensions amid a $240 million contract he originally signed with Seattle, the bans sidetracking what looked like a Hall of Fame career.

    For the Braves, the timing is certainly suboptimal though not as bad as last season, when the season had started and they scrambled to fill Profar’s absence, eventually signing free agent Alex Verdugo. This year, they can roll out Mike Yastrzemski in an enhanced role, but Profar’s absence will hamper their depth significantly.

    This post appeared first on USA TODAY