Author

admin

Browsing

Technical analysts Kevin Wadsworth and Patrick Karim of NorthstarBadcharts.com share an update on the capital rotation process that they see unfolding, and explain what it means for precious metals, as well as the US stock market and Bitcoin.

They also talk about the opportunity they see in oil and how to get exposure to the market.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Statistics Canada released its December data for gross domestic product (GDP) by industry on Friday (February 27).

While overall GDP increased 0.2 percent, the figures showed a broad 0.9 percent decline in the mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction sector, reversing a 0.1 percent increase in November. In real dollars, the sector contributed C$119.62 billion in the month, just shy of C$120.76 billion in November.

The decrease was due to a 1.1 percent contraction in the oil and gas subsector and a 1.4 percent decline in the mining and quarrying subsector. However, the fall off was slightly offset by a 1.6 percent increase in sector support activities.

The Canadian reporting agency also released its annual mineral production survey on Wednesday (February 25).

The data showed that 2025’s production and shipment numbers increased nearly across the board for copper, silver and gold.

In terms of production, copper output climbed to 499,896 metric tons, beating the 444,587 metric tons in 2024. The quantity of silver produced also rose significantly to 356,052 kilograms in 2025 from 331,965 kilograms. Gold also increased, though narrowly, to 186,923 kilograms from 185,555 kilograms the previous year.

As for shipments, copper climbed to 480,100 metric tons from 437,861 metric tons in 2024, while silver shipments increased to 344,133 kilograms from 325,705 kilograms. Of the three metals, only gold saw a decline, with shipments falling slightly to 184,456 kilograms from 185,376 kilograms a year earlier.

Several other resources, including cobalt and nickel, also saw sizeable jumps last year.

For more on what’s moving markets this week, check out our top market news round-up.

Markets and commodities react

Canadian equity markets were positive this week.

The S&P/TSX Composite Index (INDEXTSI:OSPTX) gained 2.3 percent over the week to close Friday (February 27) at 34,339.99, while the S&P/TSX Venture Composite Index (INDEXTSI:JX) rose 8.4 percent to 1,107.60.

The CSE Composite Index (CSE:CSECOMP) gained 4.02 percent to 174.55.

The gold price gained 1.36 percent to close at US$5,261.19 per ounce on Friday at 4:00 p.m. EST. The silver price fared better, closing the week up 6.55 percent at US$93.66 on Friday.

In base metals, the Comex copper price recorded a 3.24 percent increase this week to US$6.05.

The S&P Goldman Sachs Commodities Index (INDEXSP:SPGSCI) was up 2 percent to end Friday at 610.89.

Top Canadian mining stocks this week

How did mining stocks perform against this backdrop?Take a look at this week’s five best-performing Canadian mining stocks below.

Stocks data for this article was retrieved at 4:00 p.m. EST on Friday using TradingView’s stock screener. Only companies trading on the TSX, TSXV and CSE with market caps greater than C$10 million are included. Mineral companies within the non-energy minerals, energy minerals, process industry and producer manufacturing sectors were considered.

1. Adex Mining (TSXV:ADE)

Weekly gain: 171.43 percent
Market cap: C$27.09 million
Share price: C$0.095

Adex Mining is an exploration company that holds a 100 percent stake in the Mount Pleasant project in Southwest New Brunswick, Canada. The property contains two main deposits: the Fire Tower zone, which hosts tungsten and molybdenum mineralization, and the North zone, which hosts tin, zinc and indium.

The asset consists of 102 mineral claims covering 1,600 hectares, as well as equipment and facilities from historic mining operations conducted by BHP (ASX:BHP,NYSE:BHP,LSE:BHP) between 1983 and 1985.

According to its most recent investor presentation released on June 11, the property hosts the world’s largest indium reserve and North America’s largest tin deposit. Indicated resources for the North zone demonstrate contained metal values of 47 million kilograms of tin, and 789,000 kilograms of indium from 12.4 million metric tons with average grades of 0.38 percent tin and 64 parts per million indium.

Adex Mining has not released news since it published its interim management discussion and analysis on November 18.

The increase in Adex’s share price this week comes ahead of the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada convention, which is taking place in Toronto, Ontario, from March 1 to 4.

In a mid-February interview, New Brunswick Natural Resources Minister John Herron revealed that a deal “is due imminently with a well-known company in the Canadian mining community” for Adex’s Mount Pleasant project.

Additionally, he said the provincial government plans to introduce its new minerals strategy at PDAC on March 2. According to Herron, New Brunswick will adopt a one project, one process framework to quickly advance critical minerals projects.

2. US Copper (TSXV:USCU)

Weekly gain: 100 percent
Market cap: C$37.17 million
Share price: C$0.28

US Copper is an exploration company working to advance its Moonlight-Superior project in Northeast California, United States.

The project covers approximately 13 square miles of patented and unpatented federal mining claims in the Lights Creek Copper District, near the Nevada border.

A preliminary economic assessment released on January 6, 2025, demonstrated a post-tax net present value of US$1.08 billion with an internal rate of return of 23 percent and a payback period of 5.3 years, assuming a copper price of US$4.15 per pound.

The included mineral resource estimate shows a total indicated resource of 2.5 billion pounds of copper, 21.7 million ounces of silver and 140,042 ounces of gold from 402.83 million metric tons of ore with a grade of 0.31 percent copper, 1.85 parts per million (ppm) silver and 0.012 ppm gold. The majority is hosted at its Moonlight and Superior deposits.

The company has not released any news since December 15, when it announced that it had staked 54 additional claims, totalling 1,104 acres near Moonlight-Superior, that US Copper intends to use for the project’s infrastructure development.

The company also stated that it had begun metallurgical testing, which it expected to be completed in April 2026, with the release of partial results starting in February 2026.

3. Doubleview Gold (TSXV:DBG)

Weekly gain: 95.62 percent
Market cap: C$27.09 million
Share price: C$2.68

Doubleview Gold is an exploration company working to advance its Hat copper-gold project in Northwestern British Columbia, Canada.

The project is located within BC’s Golden Triangle, an area that hosts numerous active mines and development projects. The property consists of 19 mineral tenures covering an area of 18,000 hectares.

On February 25, Doubleview released an updated mineral resource estimate for its Hat project, reporting copper equivalent resources of 5.82 billion pounds in the measured and indicated categories and 4.57 billion pounds in the inferred category.

The measured and indicated resource includes 2.42 billion pounds of copper, 3.22 million ounces of gold, 80.1 million pounds of cobalt and 5.05 million ounces of silver from 609 million metric tons of ore with average grades of 0.21 percent copper, 0.18 grams per metric ton (g/t) gold, 0.008 percent cobalt and 0.38 g/t silver.

Additionally, the MRE reported a recoverable measured and indicated scandium oxide resource of 2,415 metric tons, grading 28.77 g/t.

Doubleview’s president and CEO stated that exploration of the property has increased the deposit’s size over the years, with it now covering an area of about 1.6 kilometers by 1.6 kilometers. He also noted that the company discovered additional elements within the deposit that it plans to unveil soon.

4. BP Silver (TSXV:BPAG)

Weekly gain: 62.16 percent
Market cap: C$35.9 million
Share price: C$1.20

BP Silver is an exploration company focused on its flagship Cosuño project in Bolivia.

The property covers approximately 3,375 hectares and hosts a 10.5 square kilometer alteration zone within an underexplored jurisdiction. To date, the company has identified four primary targets in the southern project area.

On February 27, the company announced assay results from the final eight holes of the 11 hole drill program at Cosuño.

Exploration encountered several zones of silver mineralization at the Pocañita Chica target. One hole delivered high grades of 600.4 g/t silver over 5 meters, which included an intersection of 1,655 g/t over 1 meter.

The company said it achieved its main goal of “confirming mineralization within the lithocap beneath surface geochemical anomalies,” which it said de-risks the project.

Additionally, BP Silver stated the drill program confirmed a silver and polymetallic mineralized system along a 2.7 kilometer long corridor that remains open in all directions.

5. Tsodilo Resources (TSXV:TSD)

Weekly gain: 61.29 percent
Market cap: C$21.75 million
Share price: C$0.25

Tsodilo Resources is a metals exploration company advancing its Gcwihaba polymetallic project in Northwest Botswana, which hosts the C26 and C27 rare earth skarn anomalies. It also owns the Xaudum iron formation project in the country.

At Gcwihaba, Tsodilo has identified a conceptual exploration target of skarn ore in the 81 million to 97 million metric ton range with grades of 0.05 and 1.49 percent total rare earth oxides (TREO).

The company originally identified the C26 and C27 targets through ground magnetic and gravity surveys, with drilling confirming mineralization at depths of 20 to 50 meters below surface.

Tsodilo plans to perform 15,000 meters of drilling in 2026, with a focus on defining high-grade REE zones, while also evaluating the system’s overall polymetallic potential.

The most recent news from the company came on February 2, when it reported that it had closed a C$742,095 private placement by issuing 4.95 million shares. Proceeds from the financing will be used to advance its projects in Botswana.

FAQs for Canadian mining stocks

What is the difference between the TSX and TSXV?

The TSX, or Toronto Stock Exchange, is used by senior companies with larger market caps, and the TSXV, or TSX Venture Exchange, is used by smaller-cap companies. Companies listed on the TSXV can graduate to the senior exchange.

How many mining companies are listed on the TSX and TSXV?

As of December 2025, 898 mining companies and 71 oil and gas companies are listed on the TSXV, combining for more than 60 percent of the 1,531 total companies listed on the exchange.

As for the TSX, it is home to 175 mining companies and 51 oil and gas companies. The exchange has 2,089 companies listed on it in total.

Together, the TSX and TSXV host around 40 percent of the world’s public mining companies.

How much does it cost to list on the TSXV?

There are a variety of different fees that companies must pay to list on the TSXV, and according to the exchange, they can vary based on the transaction’s nature and complexity. The listing fee alone will most likely cost between C$10,000 to C$70,000. Accounting and auditing fees could rack up between C$25,000 and C$100,000, while legal fees are expected to be over C$75,000 and an underwriters’ commission may hit up to 12 percent.

The exchange lists a handful of other fees and expenses companies can expect, including but not limited to security commission and transfer agency fees, investor relations costs and director and officer liability insurance.

These are all just for the initial listing, of course. There are ongoing expenses once companies are trading, such as sustaining fees and additional listing fees, plus the costs associated with filing regular reports.

How do you trade on the TSXV?

Investors can trade on the TSXV the way they would trade stocks on any exchange. This means they can use a stock broker or an individual investment account to buy and sell shares of TSXV-listed companies during the exchange’s trading hours.

Article by Dean Belder; FAQs by Lauren Kelly.

Securities Disclosure: I, Dean Belder, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

Securities Disclosure: I, Lauren Kelly, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

We also break down next week’s catalysts to watch to help you prepare for the week ahead.

In this article:

    This week’s tech sector performance

    Tariff concerns sent global stocks drifting on Monday (February 23), with US futures pointing lower at the start of the week even though the Nasdaq Composite (INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC) ended a three week losing streak the previous week.

    Additionally, a Citrini Research report published on Sunday (February 22) projects that the dominance of artificial intelligence (AI) could lead to the collapse of the “human-centric consumer economy” and cause widespread unemployment, adding to the growing anxiety around AI-induced displacement.

    Markets had a subdued reaction to Anthropic’s announcement ⁠of 10 new AI tools on Tuesday (February 24), including plugins that could help with investment banking tasks, private equity engineering and design.

    Mohit Kumar, chief Europe economist at Jefferies Financial Group (NYSE:JEF), noted that, although AI disruption will remain a market theme for the foreseeable future, the company’s emphasis on “partnership rather than displacement” may have spurred a software sector rally in Tuesday afternoon trading.

    Also aiding the software recovery was a handful of experts pushing back against the Citrini report, including a response published by Citadel Securities’ Frank Flight, who said the thesis is far-fetched at best.

    On Wednesday (February 25), ahead of NVIDIA’s (NASDAQ:NVDA) much-anticipated earnings report, tech stocks boosted indexes in North America, Europe and Asia, with the S&P/TSX Composite Index (INDEXTSI:OSPTX) seeing advances in AI-related software and diversified tech amid positive quarterly reports from Canada’s main financial institutions; meanwhile, semiconductor companies led gains on Wall Street.

    While positive sentiment lifted Canada’s main index to a new record on Thursday (February 26), the US had a weaker session after investors were unimpressed with NVIDIA’S results.

    Although NVIDIA beat expectations, guidance shows deceleration. A 3.2 percent drop in the PHLX Semiconductor Sector (INDEXNASDAQ:SOX) index dragged the Nasdaq down to close 1.2 percent lower.

    Indexes in Canada and the US slipped on Friday (February 27) as renewed positive sentiment from earlier in the week ultimately gave way to concerns over AI-led disruptions.

    3 tech stocks moving markets this week

    1. NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

    NVIDIA, which makes up almost 8 percent of the S&P 500 (INDEXSP:.INX), was up on Wednesday ahead of its Q4 earnings report, which showed US$68.1 billion in revenue, an increase of 73 percent. Net income was up 94 percent to US$42.9 billion, and the company generated US$96.6 billion in free cashflow for the year.

    The results exceeded analysts’ estimates, but shares were flat in after-hours trading, despite CEO Jensen Huang’s claim of “skyrocketing” AI agent adoption and sales growth of 78 percent for the current quarter.

    2. Salesforce (NYSE:CRM)

    Salesforce rose modestly intraday ahead of its Q4 earnings release on Wednesday, which showed revenue growth of 12 percent year-on-year, beating analysts’ estimates at US$11.2 billion. Full-year revenue was at US$41.5 billion, up 10 percent, with the company reporting remaining performance obligations of US$72.4 billion, a 14 percent increase.

    Annual recurring revenue from the company’s AI agent platform, Agentforce, led quarterly gains, reaching US$800 million, up 169 percent. Despite CEO Marc Benioff’s revenue projection of US$63 billion by the 2030 fiscal year, 2027 fiscal year guidance of US$45.8 billion to US$46.2 billion was below the consensus estimate of US$46.06 billion, which sent shares down around 5 percent in after-hours trading. The company also said it anticipates a slowdown in core business expansion, projecting organic growth of only 7 to 8 percent for the upcoming fiscal year.

    2. Dell Technologies (NYSE:DELL)

    Dell Technologies was trading higher ahead of its Q4 earnings. The firm delivered revenue of US$33.4 billion, beating estimates, and full-year revenue of a record US$113.5 billion.

    Sales of AI servers hit US$9.8 billion, up 100 percent year-on-year, with a US$64 billion AI pipeline and US$43 billion backlog. Earnings per share topped estimates of US$2.36, coming in at US$2.86.

    Momentum continued after hours following CEO Mike Dell’s comments on “skyrocketing” hyperscaler demand for AI infrastructure despite some margin pressure, with Dell’s share price soaring about 11 percent.

    Top tech news of the week

                Tech ETF performance

                Tech exchange-traded funds (ETFs) track baskets of major tech stocks, meaning their performance helps investors gauge the overall performance of the niches they cover.

                This week, the iShares Semiconductor ETF (NASDAQ:SOXX) advanced by 1.83 percent, while the Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (NASDAQ:SOXQ) advanced by 1.77 percent.

                The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (NASDAQ:SMH) also increased by 1.76 percent.

                Tech news to watch next week

                Next week there will be light earnings, with results expected from MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB), Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO); however, macro data alongside speeches from US Federal Reserve presidents will dominate alongside tariff developments and AI CAPEX and inflation concerns.

                Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

                This post appeared first on investingnews.com

                Forward Taj Gibson, 40, has agreed to a deal to join the Memphis Grizzlies, his agent told ESPN’s Shams Charania on Feb. 26.

                It will be the 17th season for the USC product. He’s played with seven different NBA teams during his professional career, including last season with the Charlotte Hornets. He started 11 of the 37 games he played in.

                He can play as a power forward and center.

                Gibson adds a veteran voice to a Grizzlies’ roster that was among the youngest in the league to start the season.

                The Grizzlies and forward Kyle Anderson also reached a buyout agreement, according to Charania.

                How old is Taj Gibson?

                Gibson is 40 years old and will turn 41 on June 24.

                If he plays for Memphis, he will become the 35th player in the league’s history to play in an NBA game after turning 40.

                Taj Gibson stats

                Gibson has averaged 8.4  points, 5.7 rebounds and 0.9 assists per game in 1,002 games played.

                This post appeared first on USA TODAY

                • Deion Sanders questioned the timing of a racial slur yelled at the BAFTA Film Awards.
                • Sanders suggested the slur must be ‘already in you’ to be part of an involuntary outburst.
                • The man who yelled the slur, John Davidson, said he felt shame and that it was one of several tics he had that night.

                Colorado football coach Deion Sanders expressed dismay about the recent controversy at the BAFTA Film Awards in which a man with Tourette’s syndrome yelled out a racial slur at two Black actors during a telecast on the BBC.

                Sanders was asked about it on his weekly talk show on Tubi with co-host Rocsi Diaz in the episode that aired Feb. 26. Diaz questioned why the slur wasn’t edited out by the BBC and discussed the subject with Sanders, who said he had a previous experience with someone with Tourette’s. Symptoms of it can include involuntary outbursts with profane language known as “tics.”

                Sanders, who is Black, called for prayers for people who have such tics but questioned the timing of the slur.

                “How can that word come out at that time?” Sanders asked on the show, entitled ‘We Got Time Today.’ He said that slur must be “already in you” and learned if it’s in a person’s vocabulary.

                Sanders then added another observation.

                “The part two of this is, it conveniently came out when two African-Americans were at the podium,” Sanders said.

                Deion Sanders discussed timing of the slur

                Famed Black actors Michael B. Jordan and Delroy Lindo were on the stage at the awards show Feb. 22 when Tourette’s advocate John Davidson yelled out the slur. Davidson was there as the subject of the BAFTA-nominated biopic ‘I Swear” and was diagnosed with Tourette’s at age 25. Davidson since said in an interview with Variety that he felt “shame” about what happened.

                “The most offensive word that I ticked at the ceremony, for example, is a word I would never use and would completely condemn if I did not have Tourette’s,” Davidson said in the interview.

                On the Tubi show, Diaz also questioned the timing.

                 “But do you think it would be triggered if he saw two white people at the podium, though?” she asked.

                Sanders responded that what made the situation especially concerning was that it was “with two brothers at the podium and it’s Black History Month.”

                Davidson had other outbursts at the BAFTA show

                Diaz asked Sanders what he would do if he were on stage at the moment when Davidson yelled the slur.

                “I would have made a joke out of it and said, “God bless you’ or something and said, ‘God is good,’” Sanders replied. “Black History Month and that happens to come out? God bless you. sir.”

                It was not the only time Davidson made an outburst that night. Davidson noted this in his interview with Variety.

                ‘I would appreciate reports of the event explaining that I ticked perhaps 10 different offensive words on the night of the awards,’ he said in Variety. ‘The (racial slur) was one of these, and I completely understand its significance in history and in the modern world, but most articles are giving the impression I shouted one single slur on Sunday.’

                Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

                This post appeared first on USA TODAY

                USA TODAY Sports has live coverage of the 2026 NFL Scouting Combine from Indianapolis. Follow along here for updates.

                Hundreds of college football standouts are in Indianapolis for the 2026 NFL Scouting Combine. The week of action began on Tuesday with coach and general manager media availability.

                Thursday brought the main reason for fans to tune in: on-field drills and testing. Measurements came in for those linebacker and defensive line prospects, as well.

                That data provided plenty more information on the draft class as a whole. We now have a wider understanding of prospects at linebacker, defensive line and kicker.

                Scouts, analysts, fans and front offices tuned in for Ohio State’s dynamic duo of Arvell Reese and Sonny Styles, who stole the show. Texas Tech’s David Bailey also crashed the party and made a case as a potential top-3 selection come April.

                On the first big day of action from Indianapolis, who were some big winners and losers? Here’s our choices from Thursday’s combine action:

                Winner: DT Caleb Banks

                Banks made his case Thursday to be the first defensive tackle selected in the 2026 NFL Draft. He measured in as the tallest (6-foot-6) and third-heaviest (327 pounds) defensive tackle in the group with the longest arms (35 inches).

                His athletic testing numbers were an important, especially in the jumps. His broad jump was tied for second among all defensive tackles at 9 feet, 6 inches and he hit 32 inches in the vertical jump. He had to call his day early due to his cleats irritating his feet, but he made an impression.

                Loser: Edge Rueben Bain Jr.

                There’s no way around it: Bain’s arm length was a question coming into the week. He was surprised by it being such a topic of conversation but his arms measured in at under 31 inches – some of the shortest arms for the position in recent years.

                The film says Bain relies more on powerful moves that belie his short arms. He knows how to work around those limitations effectively; you don’t lead the FBS in pressures on accident.

                Winner: LB Sonny Styles

                Thanks to his teammate Reese’s rise during the 2025 season, Styles lost his status as LB1 in this class. Some fans are warming up to the Buckeyes linebacker and he showed off on testing day.

                First, he measured in bigger than his teammate Reese at 6-foot-5, 244 pounds and 32 ½-inch long arms. He was expected to test well and he backed that up on the field.

                He started things off with a 43 ½-inch in the vertical jump, a record for someone who hits both his height and weight measurements. He hit 11 feet, 2 inches in the broad jump to lead the position in both events. He put a bow on the performance with a 4.47 40-yard dash, tied for the best at the position.

                Loser: Edge Cashius Howell

                Luckily for Howell, Bain’s arm length took the headlines. But Howell’s arms were even shorter at 30 ¼ inches – putting him among the shortest arms for the edge position of the last decade.

                Howell’s game is more built on bend and burst than power like Bain. That makes his measurements more concerning. If he’s able to be long-armed by most tackles in the NFL, it shrinks the ways he can be effective as an edge rusher. It’s a harsh truth teams will have to reckon with when considering whether or not to draft him in the first round.

                Winner: DT DeMonte Capehart

                The 2025 Clemson Tigers defense will have many draft picks come April. Cornerback Avieon Terrell, defensive tackle Peter Woods and edge rusher T.J. Parker could all be off the board by the end of Round 1.

                Capehart proved today that there are other talents worth considering as well.

                He measured in at 6-foot-5 and 313 pounds with 33 ⅞ inch arms. That’s the kind of size teams like to see at the position because it offers alignment versatility. Then, he stepped onto the field for drills.

                Capehart ran 4.85 seconds in the 40-yard dash, the fourth-fastest time of the day at the position. Everyone faster than him were at least 15 pounds lighter than him. He then hit 33 ½ inches in the vertical jump and looked light on his feet during drills.

                This post appeared first on USA TODAY

                The NFL scouting combine has a way of changing things. What it alters, however, might be perception more so than actual draft boards.

                The annual summit in Indianapolis holds a special place on the league’s offseason calendar, marking a two-month march to the start of the 2026 NFL draft itself. For front offices, a bulk of the evaluation work has already been completed, with multiple general managers this week reinforcing that the combine merely serves as one form of a check on a much larger process. But while teams prioritize the information gleaned from medical updates and meetings with prospects, that behind-the-scenes fodder gets overshadowed by the fanfare of on-field work and testing.

                As workouts begin Feb. 26, here’s our latest NFL mock draft first-round projection:

                2026 NFL mock draft

                1. Las Vegas Raiders – Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana

                No combine workout for the obvious choice for the top spot – and none is necessary. Mendoza cleared nearly every bar he faced en route to winning the Heisman Trophy and leading the Hoosiers to a national title, and an on-field session would do little to address his most prominent ding: a shortage of resourcefulness when things break down. Circle his pro day if you really must see him throw again in an exhibition setting, but his spot atop the draft is seemingly secure.

                2. New York Jets – Arvell Reese, LB/DE, Ohio State

                Maybe the projection to full-time edge rusher could be a little more complicated than some are willing to admit, with Reese still having considerable work to do to become a preeminent threat in that phase. Still, even in an off-ball role, Reese gets wherever he needs to be in a hurry, demonstrating a punishing punch before harnessing an impressive finishing touch. It’s a nice bonus to this pre-draft process that he’ll test alongside others.

                3. Arizona Cardinals – Spencer Fano, OT Utah

                There’s a compelling case to be made here for Arizona to focus on one of the draft’s top edge rushers, who could team with Josh Sweat to create the level of havoc necessary to slow the rest of the NFC West competition. But one glance at the free agency crop reinforces that any team looking to repair its offensive tackle outlet probably will have to do so through the draft – and early on in the order. With Fano, the Cardinals could set the table for a potential changing of the guard behind center as the Mike LaFleur era kicks off.

                4. Tennessee Titans – Rueben Bain Jr., DE, Miami (Fla.)

                Robert Saleh surely doesn’t want to be forced to test the bounds of his creativity in conjuring a pass rush again after last season’s experience as defensive coordinator for the injury-hampered San Francisco 49ers. And general manager Mike Borgonzi doesn’t seem inclined to put his new coach in a similar spot of desperation, either. Saleh on Tuesday spoke about the importance of arm length in his defensive scheme, which might indicate to some that the Titans might look past Bain and his truncated build. But Saleh also called Bain’s tape ‘undeniable’ and said that he plays with ‘incredible violence.’

                5. New York Giants – Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State

                WR2 for the Buckeyes is starting to look a lot like WR1 in this class. Tate has played alongside some greats at Ohio State, and he is now poised to be the next pass catcher to raise the floor considerably for his future quarterback. He’d not only change the skill-position landscape beyond Malik Nabers for Jaxson Dart in Year 2 for the quarterback, but also amplify one of the signal-caller’s best traits in his downfield passing prowess.

                6. Cleveland Browns – Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami (Fla.)

                Andrew Berry and new coach Todd Monken sure could use a similar return on investment this April to the one they struck with last year’s draft class – only with a heavier skew toward the offensive side of the ball this time around. Mauigoa seems like the kind of consistent, stabilizing presence that could do wonders for Cleveland at perhaps its biggest area of concern.

                7. Washington Commanders – David Bailey, OLB, Texas Tech

                Dan Quinn’s defense needs playmakers in whatever form they come. Maybe that necessitates a long look at Caleb Downs despite questions of positional value for a safety in the top 10. Bailey, however, would give Washington the consistent disruption off the edge that has been absent in Quinn and Adam Peters’ time at the helm.

                8. New Orleans Saints – Jeremiah Love, RB, Notre Dame

                Despite having little reason to do so, the top back in this year’s class will run the 40 and go through a workout. That might serve as a bit of a tease for what he can offer teams as a big-play weapon out of the backfield, but the real showcase came in the last two years, when he ripped off 35 touchdowns on the ground for the Fighting Irish. The surging Saints still have plenty of holes and might be indulging in a bit of a luxury with this pick, but the bones are there for New Orleans to build an explosive attack around Tyler Shough.

                9. Kansas City Chiefs – Makai Lemon, WR, USC

                It feels like a big swing or two could be coming for a Kansas City team intent on recapturing its status as the AFC’s leading contender. Perhaps one will take place in free agency if the team strikes out for a running back to repair a rudderless rushing attack that too often left everything squarely on the shoulders of Patrick Mahomes. But the receiving corps is also in need of reinforcements, and Lemon’s knack for generating rapid separation would add a new flavor to the group.

                10. Cincinnati Bengals – Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State

                In what feels like a fairly straightforward start to the draft, Cincinnati feels like a possible wild card, especially if it zeroes in on an offensive line choice outside of the top three edge rushers. In this scenario, however, there’s no reason to go bold. Downs would be a sensible selection for any defense in search of a tone-setter in the secondary, but particularly for a Bengals defense that was repeatedly burned down the seam last season and allowed the second-most yards per carry (5.2) in the league.

                11. Miami Dolphins – Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU

                A cornerback with middling traits might not be the most scintillating way to kick off a new era in Miami. But don’t let the raw physical attributes overshadow the overall picture with Delane. The Virginia Tech transfer put the clamps on every receiver he faced last season, and his advanced approach to coverage should allow him to make a smooth transition for a secondary that has been on shaky ground for some time.

                12. Dallas Cowboys – Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee

                One year after rolling the dice on a cornerback with medical concerns in third-rounder Shavon Revel Jr., Jerry Jones does so again with much higher stakes. McCoy sat out all last season after suffering a torn anterior cruciate ligament in January, but his coverage credentials are unimpeachable.

                13. Los Angeles Rams (from Atlanta Falcons) – Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State

                How’s this for a way for Los Angeles to make the most of Matthew Stafford’s remaining years? While cornerback looks like a pressing problem, Les Snead shouldn’t force the issue here with the top two options off the board. Tyson could feast in the Rams’ aerial attack as a third option and provide some long-term comfort with Davante Adams turning 34 this year.

                14. Baltimore Ravens – Olaivavega Ioane, G, Penn State

                It might be a period of upheaval for the Ravens’ interior line, which could be poised to lose All-Pro center Tyler Linderbaum in free agency despite general manager Eric DeCosta saying the team had made a ‘market-setting offer.’ One step toward stability would be importing Ioane, who could make a legitimate claim as being the best blocker in this class.

                15. Tampa Bay Buccaneers – Sonny Styles, LB, Ohio State

                If Jason Licht returns to the Ohio State well one year after hitting it big with Emeka Egbuka, there would be plenty of alignment between player and team once again. Styles would serve Tampa Bay’s defense extremely well with his reliable run fits and substantial upside in coverage, and the Bucs figure to be drawn to his leadership. This might represent his floor, however, as he could end up in the conversation to go even earlier with a potentially dazzling combine performance.

                16. New York Jets – Denzel Boston, WR, Washington

                Unless Gang Green finds a solution behind center in free agency or via the trade market, the quarterback question could hang over the team for some time – possibly into 2027. Rather than reach for someone like Alabama’s Ty Simpson here, the Jets could set their aerial attack up for long-term success by bringing aboard Boston, a contested catch maestro who would pair well with Garrett Wilson.

                17. Detroit Lions – Akheem Mesidor, DE, Miami (Fla.)

                Yes, he’ll be 25 years old as a rookie. Brad Holmes and Dan Campbell might be able to look past that to Mesidor’s relentless approach as a rusher. Between his hard-charging style and advanced arsenal of moves, the 6-3, 265-pounder would fit well along a Lions line looking for a long-term running mate for Aidan Hutchinson.

                18. Minnesota Vikings – Peter Woods, DT, Clemson

                After the preseason talk of a potential top-five spot fizzled out, Woods sizes up as one of the more difficult prospects to peg in this class. Landing in Minnesota and leading the charge up front for Brian Flores’ defense, however, could help the immensely talented interior disruptor get off to a strong start in the pros.

                19. Carolina Panthers – Keldric Faulk, DE, Auburn

                Like Woods, the 6-6, 285-pound defensive lineman might have a bit of volatility to his stock after he didn’t make the leap many envisioned for him before the season. Finding the right schematic fit will be essential to his development, but Faulk could flourish under Panthers defensive coordinator Ejiro Evero.

                20. Cowboys (from Green Bay Packers) – Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, S, Toledo

                New defensive coordinator Christian Parker made clear last week that he wanted to let the talent on hand determine the outline of a scheme. With McNeil-Warren patrolling the back end, however, there would be plenty of options at Dallas’ disposal. His physical demeanor when working downhill against the run should make him a favorite of Jones, and he can be a similarly punishing presence in coverage.

                21. Pittsburgh Steelers – Omar Cooper Jr., WR, Indiana

                Surprised? Cooper hasn’t been the mainstay of the first-round conversations like the other receivers here, but his skill set would go a long way toward curing the Steelers’ ills. A bull with the ball in his hands, he can do plenty of heavy lifting in the short-to-intermediate area and as a run-after-catch threat.

                22. Los Angeles Chargers – Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon

                Jim Harbaugh showed off his innovative streak by hiring Mike McDaniel as offensive coordinator. In Sadiq, the Chargers would find a weapon that could satisfy the preferences of both their head coach and their new play-caller. Mismatches would be sure to follow in the passing game, but the hybrid threat also can make serious waves as a run blocker.

                23. Philadelphia Eagles – Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia

                When I projected Freeling to the Eagles here in my last mock draft, it felt as though I was going out on a limb. Now, this might be too late of a spot for the ascendant protector. Lane Johnson is back for another year at right tackle, and the pass rush might need significant resources if Philadelphia doesn’t retain Jaelan Phillips. But Howie Roseman still might feel a pull to get a key part of his front’s long-term future sorted out.

                24. Browns (from Jacksonville Jaguars) – KC Concepcion, WR, Texas A&M

                The Browns might mirror several quarterback-deficient teams on this list in being better positioned to put the bones of a competent passing attack in place before identifying a worthwhile trigger man. Concepcion would certainly enliven the perimeter for Cleveland with his field-stretching flair.

                25. Chicago Bears – Caleb Banks, DT, Florida

                At 6-6 and 335 pounds with more than enough quickness to make himself a fixture in opposing backfields, Banks stands out a good bit in a class filled with mostly pocket pushers at defensive tackle. He doesn’t dispatch blockers as quickly as one might like to see from a player with his physical capabilities, and finishing plays remains somewhat of an adventure for him. Still, the potential is there for Banks to go considerably higher than this, so Chicago might have to leap at the opportunity to electrify its interior.

                26. Buffalo Bills – T.J. Parker, DE/OLB, Clemson

                There will be ample pressure here for Brandon Beane to make a significant upgrade to Josh Allen’s weaponry after his previous insistence that there was nothing wrong with the composition of the receiver room. Landing a target capable of changing the complexion of the group, however, might require moving up in the order, as the top options look liable to be gone by this point. Beane can address another point of unease by selecting the powerful Parker to give new defensive coordinator Jim Leonhard a more settled edge rush.

                27. San Francisco 49ers – Caleb Lomu, OT, Utah

                One of the NFL’s more well-stocked rosters could experience a dose of urgency if the reports of stalled contract negotiations with 12-time Pro Bowl left tackle Trent Williams come to a head. San Francisco could have several different directions to turn, but Lomu might represent the most promising potential solution. Though underdeveloped, the 6-6, 308-pounder is an easy mover with considerable room for growth upon some technical refinement and strength gains.

                28. Houston Texans – Blake Miller, OT, Clemson

                Even with the strides made in pass protection last year, the Texans still seem at least a little unsettled up front. Keeping Tytus Howard at left guard might be the optimal route for Houston, but doing so would create some uncertainty at right tackle. The ultra-reliable Miller, who started for four years at Clemson, could step in as the final piece of the puzzle.

                29. Rams – Avieon Terrell, CB, Clemson

                At 5-11 and 180 pounds, Terrell wouldn’t bulk up the undersized back end of the Rams’ defense. Yet his fluidity and versatility could help Los Angeles patch up the various big-play leaks that sprang up repeatedly down the stretch for the unit.

                30. Denver Broncos – CJ Allen, LB, Georgia

                The more modestly built Allen (6-1, 235 pounds) takes a backseat to Styles but few others among off-ball linebackers. Though he might not string together many splash plays, the Georgia product can be counted on to get himself and his teammates in the right spots. That’s a distinctly valuable asset for a Denver defense that could be in additional turbulence at the second level if Alex Singleton and/or Justin Strnad depart in free agency.

                31. New England Patriots – Cashius Howell, OLB, Texas A&M

                Patriots personnel chief Eliot Wolf said Feb. 24 at the NFL scouting combine that to be a successful pass rusher, ‘you can’t just be a run-around-the-hoop guy at this level.’ That mindset could point him toward Howell, who mitigates concerns about his power and frame (6-2, 248 pounds) by deploying a solid set of moves, including some feisty inside counters.

                32. Seattle Seahawks – Brandon Cisse, CB, South Carolina

                Out goes one extremely athletic cornerback, in comes another? The Seahawks might lose Riq Woolen – and possibly Josh Jobe, too – in free agency, but they could find his replacement in the draft with Cisse, who’s still mastering the finer points of the position but would form a scintillating tandem with Devon Witherspoon on the outside.

                This post appeared first on USA TODAY

                Minnesota Timberwolves’ guard Anthony Edwards has been fined $25,000 by the NBA for throwing the game ball ‘with force’ into the stands during halftime of Minnesota’s 124-121 road win over the Portland Trail Blazers on Tuesday.

                The incident occurred at the end of the second quarter, when Edwards snagged a rebound off a Portland miss, then faked a heave to end the half. After the buzzer had already sounded, Edwards launched the ball toward the basket and struck someone standing nearby.

                Edwards did not throw the ball out of anger or frustration, but the ball did clearly hurt the bystander.

                WATCH: The heave that cost Edwards $25K

                You can watch the full video of the incident here, on nba.com.

                Has Edwards been fined before?

                He’s certainly no stranger to fines. Last year, Edwards was fined $420,000 across eight transgressions, mostly for foul language used in interviews with the press following games.

                Has anyone else been fined for similar actions?

                Funny enough, Orlando Magic guard Desmond Bane was also fined $25K for throwing a ball into the stands ‘with force’ during the team’s Tuesday night win against the Los Angeles Lakers. Bane’s incident occurred at the end of the game.

                You can watch that incident here.

                This post appeared first on USA TODAY

                (TheNewswire)

                Secures Equity, Cash, and Ongoing Upside Exposure

                Vancouver, British Columbia, February 26th, 2025 TheNewswire – Prismo Metals Inc. (‘Prismo’ or the ‘Company’) (CSE: PRIZ,OTC:PMOMF) (OTCQB: PMOMF) is pleased to announce that it has entered into a definitive  assignment agreement (the ‘Agreement’) with Blade Resources Inc. (‘Blade’) pursuant to which Prismo has agreed to assign all of its rights, interests and obligations in the Hot Breccia copper project, located  in the heart of the Arizona copper belt (the ‘Transaction’), to Blade. The Transaction is expected to close on or about March 2, 2026, or such other date as the Company and Blade may agree.

                In consideration for the Transaction, Prismo will be issued 6,755,000 common shares of Blade and will receive a cash payment of $185,000. Following completion of the Transaction, Prismo will own approximately 24% of Blade’s issued and outstanding shares and will be Blade’s largest single shareholder (see additional early warning disclosure below).

                Alain Lambert, CEO of Prismo, commented: ‘In our opinion, Hot Breccia is one of the best copper exploration opportunities in North America. Since optioning the project in January 2023, we have remained committed to advancing it toward drilling. After carefully evaluating our options – including funding a drill program internally, partnering with a major, or joining forces with like-minded explorers – we have concluded that the best way forward for Prismo is the latter hence this partnership with Blade.’ He added: ‘The principals and financial backers of Blade have a long history and strong track record in raising significant capital for exploration programs of the scale required at Hot Breccia.’

                Strategic Rationale

                The Transaction provides several strategic benefits:

                Value Creation: Prismo is leveraging its investments in Hot Breccia into a significant stake in a company dedicated to advancing the Hot Breccia project.

                Access to Capital with Limited Dilution: The structure provides enhanced access to capital for the Hot Breccia drill program through Blade, without direct dilution to Prismo shareholders.

                Strategic Focus: Prismo will focus on advancing its remaining Arizona projects — Silver King and Ripsey Gold — while Blade dedicates its efforts to advancing Hot Breccia.

                Enhanced Attractiveness to Strategic Partners: With the potential for 100% ownership of Hot Breccia, Blade will be in a better position to possibly attract majors or strategic buyers.

                Prismo’s Investment in Blade

                Regarding Prismo’s investment in Blade, Mr. Lambert said: ‘We see several potential pathways for our investment: holding it long term, monetizing a portion to fund other projects, distributing shares to our shareholders, or a combination of these last two approaches. At this time, we are entering this transaction with a long-term perspective. Successful development at Hot Breccia would have meaningful implications for shareholder value.’

                Additional Prismo Rights under the Transaction

                Under the terms of the Transaction:

                • Prismo has the right to nominate one representative to Blade’s board of directors. The Company has not yet determined its initial nominee. 

                • Blade has granted Prismo participation rights in future equity offerings, allowing Prismo to subscribe for shares on substantially the same terms as other investors in order to maintain its undiluted ownership percentage in Blade. 

                Dr. Linus Keating, manager of Walnut Mines LLC, the underlying landowner of Hot Breccia enthusiastically commented: Walnut Mines strongly supports any initiative that advances Hot Breccia toward a serious drill program. We are optimistic that this transaction will help achieve that objective in 2026. In our view, this property continues to represent an excellent copper exploration opportunity in North America.

                Early Warning Disclosure

                This news release is issued in accordance with National Instrument 62-103 – The Early Warning System and Related Take-Over Bid and Insider Reporting Issues. Prior to the Transaction, Prismo did not own any common shares of Blade. The common shares of Blade will be acquired by Prismo for a total consideration of $2,364,250 and will be acquired for investment purposes with a view to Blade’s potential listing on a Canadian stock exchange.

                Except as described in this news release, Prismo has no present plans or intentions that relate to or would result in any of the matters enumerated in paragraphs (a) through (k) of Item 5 of Form 62-103F1.

                Prismo will file an early warning report in accordance with applicable securities laws, which will be available under Blade’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca . A copy of the early warning report may be obtained by contacting Gordon Aldcorn at the contact details below.

                About the Hot Breccia Project

                The Hot Breccia project lies at the heart of the Arizona Copper Belt, which hosts several globally significant porphyry copper deposits.  Examples of these significant deposits are Freeport McMoRan’s Miami-Inspiration mining complex, BHP’s San Manuel mine, Rio Tinto and BHP’s Resolution deposit and others (see Figure 1).  

                Figure 1. Location of the Hot Breccia Project in the Arizona Copper Belt.

                Note that the Company and its qualified person have not been able to independently verify the information on these producing mines, and that the information is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization on the Hot Breccia project.

                About Prismo Metals Inc.

                Prismo (CSE: PRIZ,OTC:PMOMF, OTCQB: PMOMF) is a mining exploration company focused on advancing its Silver King, Ripsey and Hot Breccia projects in Arizona and its Palos Verdes silver project in Mexico.

                About Blade Resources Inc.

                Blade Resources is a private mining exploration company focused on development of North American copper and precious metals projects.

                Please follow @PrismoMetals on , , , Instagram, and

                Prismo Metals Inc.

                1100 – 1111 Melville St., Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 3V6  Phone: (416) 361-0737

                Contact:

                Alain Lambert, Chief Executive Officer alain.lambert@prismometals.com

                Gordon Aldcorn, President gordon.aldcorn@prismometals.com

                Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

                This release includes certain statements and information that may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking information relates to future events or future performance and reflect the expectations or beliefs of management of the Company regarding future events. Generally, forward-looking statements and information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as intends’ or anticipates‘, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results may’, could’, should’, would’ or occur’. This information and these statements, referred to herein as ‘forward‐looking statements’, are not historical facts, are made as of the date of this news release and include without limitation, statements regarding discussions of future plans, estimates and forecasts and statements as to management’s expectations and intentions with respect to, among other things: the anticipated closing and closing date of the Transaction; the strategic rationale and potential upside of the transaction with Blade,  the future development of the Hot Breccia project and Blade’s ability of Blade to successfully implement its strategic and business objectives, including potentially attracting majors or strategic buyers; and the ability of Prismo to fund its exploration activities on its other projects.

                These forward‐looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties, and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things: that the Transaction may not close as anticipated, or at all; delays incurred by Blade in obtaining or failure to obtain appropriate funding to finance the exploration program at Hot Breccia; the inability of Blade to successfully acquire a 100% interest on the Hot Breccia project; delays incurred by the Company in obtaining or failure to obtain appropriate funding to finance exploration programs for its other projects; the risk that mineralization will not be as anticipated at the Hot Breccia project or at the Company’s other projects; metal prices; market uncertainty; and other risks and uncertainties application to exploration activities and the Company’s business as set forth in the Company’s disclosure documents available for viewing under the Company’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.

                In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Company has applied several material assumptions, including without limitation, that: the timeline for closing the Transaction will be as anticipated; the Transaction will close; the ability to raise capital to fund exploration programs at Hot Breccia or on the Company’s other projects, and the timing of such exploration programs; the ability of Blade to complete the option to acquire a 100% interest in the Hot Breccia project and to successfully carry out its business and strategic objectives following completion of the transaction; and that the Hot Breccia project and the Company’s other projects will have the anticipated mineralization and other qualities.

                Although management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements or forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and forward-looking information. Readers are cautioned that reliance on such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, forward-looking information or financial out-look that are incorporated by reference herein, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. We seek safe harbor.

                Copyright (c) 2026 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

                News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

                This post appeared first on investingnews.com