Breaking
True Market Story
Author

admin

Browsing
3 Mins Read

Woman granted protective order against Chiefs’ Xavier Worthy

A woman has filed for a protective order against Kansas City Chiefs wide receiver Xavier Worthy following a domestic dispute that resulted in Worthy’s arrest earlier this month.

The woman was granted a temporary ex-parte protective order against Worthy in a Williamson County District Court on Wednesday, according to court records obtained by the Austin American-Statesman. A temporary ex-parte protective order can last up to 20 days, Williamson County states.

‘Today, (the woman) filed an application for a protective order against Xavier Worthy, based (on) his violent actions against her culminating on the night of March 7, 2025,’ the woman’s lawyer said Wednesday in a statement to the Statesman. ‘Based upon the truthful information provided… a judge has granted a temporary protective order on her behalf. She is fully cooperating with law enforcement as they continue to actively investigate the violence that occurred that night.’

The order was granted nearly a week after Worthy was arrested and charged with assault against a family or household member by impeding their breathing or circulation in Williamson County, Texas. Williamson County District Attorney Shawn Dick declined to press charges at the time after speaking with multiple witnesses, although his office reserves the right to file charges at a later time, if warranted.

XAVIER WORTHY: Chiefs rookie arrested on assault charge; authorities decline to press charges

‘We will continue to evaluate the case,’ Dick’s office said at the time. ‘As is our practice with all declines, should you develop additional information indicative of probable cause in this case, our office will consider that information and may present the case at that time to a Williamson County Grand Jury.”

It is not immediately clear if the temporary ex-parte protective order against Worthy will lead to any criminal charges. Dick declined to comment on the matter, instead telling the Statesman on Wednesday: “Our office will continue to work through with the Sheriff’s Office on the follow up of their continued investigation.’

Worthy’s lawyers called the allegations against their client ‘baseless.’ His lawyers said Worthy was involved in a dispute with a woman who refused to leave his home and accused her of scratching his face and property damage. Worthy, via his lawyers, maintained his innocence on Wednesday.

“We are aware of the civil court (not criminal court) filing by (the alleged victim) and her criminal defense team. Mr. Worthy denies each of the allegations,’ his lawyers told the Statesman on Wednesday. ‘Unfortunately, false allegations continue to be made, this time in civil court. Today the accuser returned items stolen from Mr. Worthy’s residence while he was in jail and there are items still missing from when he was incarcerated. Mr. Worthy maintains his innocence and stands by the conclusions of the District Attorney after law enforcement’s review of (the woman’s) unfounded allegations.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Keep Reading
By
6 Mins Read

Someone finally tells the truth about Shedeur Sanders smear campaign

Sometimes, in a world full of lies, you will get the occasional kernel of truth. That’s what happened when ESPN analyst Louis Riddick was asked about a smear campaign against Shedeur Sanders.

Sanders, the University of Colorado quarterback, will likely be a first round pick and could go in the top five in the upcoming NFL draft. There’s been persistent talk that Sanders is brash or arrogant. Some of this reportedly came from an anonymous NFL quarterbacks coach. The talk has become so loud that various people in the media began addressing it. Before Riddick talked about this issue on the ‘Dan Patrick Show’ this week, Josina Anderson, one of the most respected NFL insiders in the business, addressed it as well.

“I am disappointed to hear that a quarterbacks coach from a team drafting in the top 7 referred to Shedeur Sanders as coming off ‘brash’ and ‘arrogant’ in his team interview and making his assessment known to a number of people, per source,” Anderson wrote on X on March 3.

“This coach’s personal assessment is the direct opposite from how Sanders came across to many reporters in his press conference with the media at the Combine,” Anderson wrote. “Sanders appeared to go out of his way to acknowledge multiple media members, regardless if they were recognizable or not. He seemed cordial, polite, witty, thoughtful along with being confident (as many athletes are).”

“According to league sources, said QB coach seems to have issue with ‘the culture’ of athletes who have broad fame and financial success before entering the NFL, and in their opinions, appears to them to have a problem certain athletes — I’ll leave it at that,” Anderson wrote.

This is where Riddick comes in with a remarkable piece of truth.

“Are you sold that Shedeur Sanders is a first-round quarterback?” Patrick asked.

“He’s a top-half of the first round player,” Riddick said.

“Where is this negativity coming from?” Patrick said. “It feels like it was a smear campaign.’

“People have been at this game … trying to talk certain prospects down for years,” Riddick said. “Deion is a lightning rod. That’s where it starts — it doesn’t even start with Shedeur, this starts with his father and then it just trickles down to him.

“It’s been that way since I played with Deion back in 1992. People don’t like flashy guys like that who can back it up. They just don’t. With Deion, he’s always been a polarizing player to the people who don’t know him. With Shedeur, he has some of his father in him, there’s no question. How could he not? He’s the man’s son.

“A lot of it comes from who he is and what his last name is.”

Ding.

Ding.

Ding.

That is where this is all coming from. It emerges from a dislike of Deion and that dislike is transferred down to his son.

Riddick is a greatly respected NFL presence. He’s a former player, former team executive and longtime analyst. When he speaks, you listen.

Deion hasn’t always been likeable. When he dumped water on the head of analyst Tim McCarver, well, that wasn’t cool. Deion has said things I don’t agree with.

But Deion has also proven to be an exemplary coach and leader. His son is professional, smart and tough. There is literally no rational reason now not to like Shedeur. None. Zero.

This story is of course layered. Some people may genuinely dislike Shedeur as a player. They may believe he’s not as good as others think. That’s all fine. But as Riddick points out there are other factors here as well.

Also, to be sure, some of the disinformation is a smokescreen. It’s extremely common for teams to lie about prospects in order to drive down their value, so they can get them later in the draft. This rarely works but that doesn’t stop teams from trying. This is why draft season is called ‘lying season.’

There’s also the fact that this type of thing has happened historically to Black draft prospects. This was a point ESPN analyst and former NFL player Ryan Clark said on ‘First Take.’

‘They plant these certain reports, and you do hear these certain things, and you hear the word ‘arrogant.’ Why is he arrogant? Because he won’t walk into the meeting and bend the knee, or he won’t sit in the meeting and question himself or his abilities or his knowledge and experience in the game?’ Clark said. ‘I don’t believe that’s arrogance – I want a quarterback that’s self-assured. I want a quarterback that can cut the film on, and when you ask him a certain question about ‘why did you make this mistake’ or ‘why did you make this throw’ or ‘why was this the right read,’ I want him to be able to regurgitate that to me like he’s in the play at the moment the same way a coach or offensive coordinator would, because that’s what he’s gonna have he to do. I’ve had conversations with Shedeur Sanders, and he can do that.’

Clark added: ‘It’s not just about him being Deion Sanders’ son. It’s about the bravado he carries. It’s about the fact that he looks a certain way. It is about the fact that the color of his skin sometimes at the position can be questioned. And I believe Shedeur Sanders is going to have to deal with that until he gets on the field.’

What’s also clear is that Shedeur has a number of allies. One of them is Patrick.

“Shedeur Sanders hasn’t thrown a football, hasn’t played a game in a couple of months. But you’re starting to get the feeling, I don’t want to say ‘smear campaign,’ but it does feel like you start to pile on,” Patrick said. “And sometimes, the insiders are following insiders, and they want to make sure that they don’t miss on this. And it’s an echo chamber, it’s a circle. Now you start to hear, ‘hey nobody’s sold necessarily on Shedeur Sanders being a first-round draft pick.’ Where did that come from? That was quick.”

‘Show me a quarterback who’s not arrogant,’ said NFL analyst Mark Schlereth on FS1. ‘You ever sit with a guy who’s going to be a star quarterback? Most of them are arrogant. Most of them have a lot of belief in what they do.’

‘He’s incredibly accurate,’ Schlereth continued. ‘He really understands not only offensive football, but he understands what you’re doing as a defense. So he’ll pick you apart that way. He processes quickly. Like, all those things to me are big-time attributes.’

Yes, it’s lying season.

But Riddick told the truth.

This story was updated with new information.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Keep Reading
By
6 Mins Read

Best coaching job of Calipari’s career? Arkansas set for tourney run

It has become fashionable to say that Arkansas surging from 0-5 in the SEC to an almost certain NCAA Tournament constitutes one of the best coaching jobs in John Calipari’s 33-year career, which is the kind of thing you’d put out into the world only if you have the memory of a firefly or a desperate need to defend something that never should have happened in the first place. 

Here in the land of reality, Arkansas needing to beat South Carolina in the Wednesday lunchtime game at the SEC tournament to lock up an at-large bid is not much to brag about. Given the millions upon millions of dollars Arkansas spent to hire Calipari and then load up his roster with impact transfers and blue-chip freshmen, it should have never been in doubt. 

But all that said, let’s fast forward to Selection Sunday. If you’re the fan of a No. 6 seed and you see Arkansas pop up as your first-round opponent? We’re not going to judge you for whatever swear words come out of your mouth. 

Because even though Arkansas isn’t exactly a good team — and we saw why in its bizarre 72-68 win over South Carolina — there may not be a double-digit seed in the field with the potential to be as dangerous for any given 40-minute period. 

It’s the frontcourt size that can beat you up on the boards. 

It’s the ability to get downhill off the dribble with athletic wings.

It’s the experience of a few key players, including one who’s been in a Final Four and another who played in last year’s Elite Eight. 

And let’s face it: It’s Calipari, who is in the rare position of entering an NCAA Tournament with nothing to lose. 

Remember the last time that happened? It was 2014, when Kentucky left the SEC tournament as an underwhelming No. 8 seed and played for a national title three weeks later. 

With the caveat that anything can happen in March, this Arkansas team doesn’t seem built for that kind of run. 

Not only have the Razorbacks struggled to compete with the SEC’s top-tier teams this year outside of one magical night in Calipari’s homecoming to Kentucky, you need offense to go deep in the tournament. The reality is this Razorbacks team will statistically be one of the most inefficient in the entire NCAA field. Even against South Carolina on Wednesday, it went through a second half stretch of nearly 12 minutes without making a basket and almost blew the game. The next time the Razorbacks do something like that, their season will be over. 

But if a few shots go down next week, Arkansas could absolutely be a surprise Sweet 16 team — which is kind of what they were supposed to be all along. 

Despite the revisionist history around this Arkansas season, Calipari did not bring in players like Johnell Davis from Florida Atlantic, Jonas Aidoo from Tennessee and his Kentucky trio of D.J. Wagner, Adou Thiero and Zvonimir Ivisic just to squeak into the tournament. 

This is a serious roster, including one key holdover in skilled big man Trevon Brazile and three freshmen who could have gone just about anywhere. 

It didn’t come cheap, either. Though nobody but folks at Arkansas know the real numbers, the Razorbacks are believed to have spent more in NIL to put this team together than all but a handful of teams in the country. 

Everyone can judge for themselves whether it should be considered a success for that group to get its act together after starting 0-5 in SEC play and get on the right side of the bubble late in the season.

It’s certainly better than the alternative. But when you’re talking about one of the most successful coaches of the modern era who has had some truly incredible coaching years at UMass, Memphis and Kentucky, we can go ahead and dispense with the fiction that this was one of them. 

But now that the Razorbacks are in, it only takes two or three tournament wins for the narrative to flip entirely. That’s how the tournament goes. And that’s why Calipari, for all the times he underwhelmed in March, is not the coach you want to see when he’s on this side of it. 

Because the one thing Calipari has always known is that the odds usually favor talent in this sport. When Arkansas shows up in the NCAA Tournament next week, it’s highly likely Calipari will have the more talented team — regardless of what the seeding says. 

“Everyone put us in a coffin after 0-5, they just forgot the nails,” Calipari said on his postgame radio show last Saturday after beating Mississippi State.

Not only is it a great quote, it represents his greatest gift. No matter what, he fights, and his team usually follows. 

If you really want to dig through the records and find Calipari’s best coaching jobs, it’s willing UMass from nowhere to the national spotlight. It’s going to an Elite Eight at Memphis with a team that didn’t have a single first-round draft pick. It might be his second year at Kentucky when he did not have a great roster by Kentucky standards and upset Ohio State and North Carolina to get to a Final Four. 

That’s the stuff people don’t remember. They think about the dominant teams, some of whom got tripped up in March when it seemed like the path was clear. But it’s an entirely differently mindset for him in a situation like this where it’s practically a free roll in the NCAA Tournament and there’s no real consequence to losing early. 

That’s not to say Arkansas is primed to do something special next week. This is a deeply flawed team, and it hasn’t shown the ability all season to beat elite teams despite having a lot of opportunities to do just that in the SEC. 

But it’s still a group with more talent than similarly seeded teams and a coach who has pulled off some pretty impressive stuff before in March. Whoever draws the Razorbacks in the first round shouldn’t be happy about it. 

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast. Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Keep Reading
By
1 Min Read

Brian Leni: Latest Mining Stock Wins and How I’m Deploying Cash Now

Brian Leni, founder of Junior Stock Review, runs through his investment strategy, saying he’s looking for stocks with an ‘X factor’ that’s being overlooked.

Watch the interview above for more of this thoughts.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Keep Reading
By
1 Min Read

John Feneck: Gold Landscape Never Better, Plus 9 Stocks on My Radar Now

John Feneck, portfolio manager and consultant at Feneck Consulting, shares his updated outlook for gold, saying that the yellow metal still has space to run.

He also discusses nine gold and ‘special situations’ companies that are on his radar.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Keep Reading
By
8 Mins Read

Quimbaya Gold Completes Final Payment on Four Tahami Contract Concessions and Announces Warrant Extension

Quimbaya Gold Inc. (CSE: QIM) (OTCQB: QIMGF) (FSE: K05) (‘Quimbaya Gold’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce that the Company has executed the final payment of 4 contract concessions totalling 1624 hectares in the Tahami project area. The company was able to amend the last payment terms of these concessions from $200,000 USD to $135,000 USD.

‘We are pleased that we were able to secure these important land packages with the final payments on our highly prospective Tahami area on amended terms that represented a 30% savings from the original last payments’, stated Alexandre P. Boivin, President and CEO.

The company also announces that it has extended the expiry date of an aggregate of 1,589,344 outstanding warrants of which 1,241,070 warrants were issued in connection with the closing of a non-brokered private placement on June 5, 2024 (the ‘June Warrants‘) and 348,274 warrants were issued in connection with the closing of a non-brokered private placement on November 1, 2024 (the ‘November Warrants‘).

The initial exercise price of the June Warrants and the November Warrants is $0.75 and remains unchanged. The June Warrants have an original expiration date of June 5, 2025 and the November Warrants have an original expiration date of November 1, 2025. The Company proposes to extend the expiration date of the June Warrants and November Warrants by one additional year to June 5, 2026 and November 1, 2026, respectively (the ‘Amendment’). All other terms and conditions of the June Warrants and the November Warrants will remain unchanged.

The Amendment is subject to final Canadian Securities Exchange (the ‘CSE‘) approval, as applicable. No action will be required on the part of the holders of the June Warrants and the November Warrants to give effect to the Amendment. In accordance with the requirements of the CSE, the terms of any warrants issued as compensation warrants or as finder warrants are not eligible for amendment.

528,570 of the June Warrants and 153,600 of the November Warrants are owned by insiders of the Company, representing 42.6% and 44.1%, respectively, of the aggregate number of warrants. As a portion of the June Warrants and the November Warrants are held by insiders of the Company, the Amendment may constitute a ‘related party transaction’ as defined under Multilateral Instrument 61-101 Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions (‘MI 61-101‘). A material change report will be filed with respect to the Amendment as it pertains to insiders. The Amendment are exempt from the formal valuation and minority shareholder approval requirements under MI 61-101 as neither the fair market value of the June Warrants and the November Warrants issued to insiders nor the cash consideration paid for such June Warrants and November Warrants exceeds 25% of the market capitalization of the Company.

About Quimbaya Gold

Quimbaya is active in the exploration and acquisition of mining properties in the prolific mining districts of Colombia. Managed by an experienced team in the mining sector, Quimbaya is focused on three projects in the regions of Segovia (Tahami Project), Puerto Berrio (Berrio Project), and Abejorral (Maitamac Project), all located in Antioquia Department, Colombia.

Contact Information

Alexandre P. Boivin, President and CEO apboivin@quimbayagold.com
Jason Frame, Manager of Communications jason.frame@quimbayagold.com

Quimbaya Gold Inc.
Follow on X @quimbayagoldinc
Follow on LinkedIn @quimbayagold
Follow on Instagram @quimbayagoldinc
Follow on Facebook @quimbayagoldinc

Cautionary Statements

This news release contains forward-looking statements and/or forward-looking information (collectively, ‘forward-looking statements’) within the meaning of applicable securities laws. When used in this release, such words as ‘would’, ‘will’, ‘anticipates’, believes’, ‘estimates’, ‘potential’, ‘explores’ ‘expects’ and similar expressions, as they relate to the Company, or its management, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements reflect the current views of the Company with respect to future events, and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Many factors could cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any expected future results, performance or achievement that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Certain information and statements contained in this news release constitute forward-looking statements, which reflects the Company’s current expectations regarding future events, including but not limited: the initial depth of the Initial Drilling Campaign, if any; the successful completion of the Initial Drilling Campaign program and any future drilling under the initial contract, should they proceed, if at all; the ability of the Company to finance and execute its planned and future exploration activities; the quality of service and reputation of the Drilling Providers; the effectiveness of any potential drilling results in defining mineral resources or leading to a commercial discovery; the timing and process for the release of escrowed Consideration Units to the Drilling Providers; the anticipated cost of the Initial Drilling Campaign, if any, which may be subject to overruns; the receipt of regulatory approvals; the obligation for future updates as it relates to the Initial Drilling Campaign or future campaigns; and the initial and the overall success and advancement of the Company’s projects.

Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: the high degree of uncertainties inherent to feasibility and economic studies which are based to a significant extent on various assumptions; variations in commodity prices and exchange rate fluctuations; variations in cost of supplies and labour; lack of availability of qualified personnel; the quality of word provided by the Drilling Providers, if any; the receipt of necessary approvals; availability of financing; uncertainties and risks with respect to exploration and drilling; general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties; certainty that finalized the commercial agreements will be successfully executed; risk of costs overruns with the Initial Drilling Campaign or future campaigns, if any, assurance that the final terms will align with those initially agreed upon or that the Initial Drilling Campaign will proceed as anticipated; timelines for drilling, if at all; obtaining required approvals of regulatory authorities; ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources; any assurances that the Company’s stock price will appreciate or maintain its current value; and the fact that the transaction will result in dilution to the Company’s existing shareholders, which may impact the market value of their holdings. The Company cautions that there is no guarantee that the planned Initial Drilling Campaign, if commenced, will yield successful results, identify mineral resources, or lead to further exploration or development. Exploration activities are inherently speculative, and drilling results may be inconclusive, insufficient, or unfeasible for further development. The cost estimates provided are subject to change, and the ability of the Company to continue exploration depends on factors such as market conditions, commodity prices, regulatory approvals, and access to additional funding. Additionally, the issuance of Consideration Units as compensation may remain subject to regulatory and exchange final approval, and there is no assurance that such approval will be obtained. The securities issued in connection with this transaction may be subject to resale restrictions under applicable securities laws and CSE policies. For a more fulsome additional list of risk factors please see the Company’s December 31, 2023, year-end Management Discussion and Analysis (‘MD&A’), 2024 third-quarter MD&A, available of SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

Management of the Company has included the above summary of assumptions and risks related to forward-looking statements provided in this release in order to provide shareholders with a more complete perspective on the Company’s current and future operations and such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements included in this news release should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

This news release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy the securities in any jurisdiction.

Neither CSE nor its Regulation Services Provider accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

NOT FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES OR THROUGH U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/244410

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Keep Reading
By
7 Mins Read

Red Metal Resources Commences Sampling and Mapping Program on its Carrizal IOCG Property

Red Metal Resources Ltd. (CSE: RMES) (OTC Pink: RMESF) (FSE: I660) (‘Red Metal’ or the ‘Company’)  is pleased to announce it has now commenced an extensive sampling and mapping work program to follow-up on and extend previously identified veins that make up approximately 15km of veining extending along strike from the historic Carrizal Alto mine.

This active 2025 work program will continue work delineating the vast vein system on Carrizal property and aid in refining future drill targets. All samples will be sent for assay and the Company expects a steady stream of assay results shortly.

Figure 1: Brecciated vein from Level 7 of artisanal workings

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/4932/244415_dd829b6cf4c73861_001full.jpg

Red Metal Resources President and CEO, Caitlin Jeffs stated,‘We are now underway with our 2025 work program and are excited to build on our previous discoveries of up to 5.77% Copper. We believe we are in the top of a large IOCG system and that we are in the early stages of showing its full potential.’

Figure 2: Overview of Farellon Project, Carrizal, Chile

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/4932/244415_dd829b6cf4c73861_002full.jpg

(1)Management cautions that prospecting surface rock samples and associated assays, as discussed herein, are selective by nature and represent a point location, and therefore may not necessarily be fully representative of the mineralized horizon sampled.

A 2022 work program focused on mapping veins along strike of, and to the east of the main Farellon structure with the goal of developing new drill targets. New veins mapped and sampled include the Gorda vein which was drilled in Hole FAR-22-020. The Gorda vein lies 250 metres east of the Farellon structure which was mapped and sampled along strike for a full kilometre. A further five veins were identified and sampled in detail to develop 2025 and future drill targets throughout the property.

Highlights

  • A high sample return of 5.77% Cu, 1.55% Co and 0.11 g/t Au two kilometres along strike to the north of the recent drilling on the Farellon structure
  • Three veins mapped, each demonstrating over a kilometre of prospective strike length with mineralized grab samples

Table 1: Grab Sample Highlights (1)(2)

Sample
Number		 Northing
UTM		 Easting
UTM		 Elevation
(asl)		 Weight of Sample
(Kg)		 Au g/t Co% Cu%
500818 6888943 309490 553 1.54 1.74 0.047 6.26
500902 6891077 310916 632 1.63 0.11 1.545 5.77
500832 6889540 311547 540 1.82 0.22 0.021 5.66
500895 6890377 310310 631 1.58 0.63 0.146 5.18
500887 6889724 311958 495 0.94 0.32 0.063 5.06
500803 6889197 309735 561 2.21 0.04 0.019 4.89
500822 6888323 309800 647 1.96 3.43 0.015 4.59
500830 6889441 311412 524 1.71 0.67 0.027 4.11
500827 6888543 310082 618 1.71 4.91 0.094 3.70
500894 6890373 310305 631 0.45 0.13 0.028 3.41
500844 6888968 310724 496 1.48 0.27 0.024 3.37
500854 6889477 310518 582 1.05 3.28 0.160 3.16
500837 6889267 311117 527 0.67 1.97 0.029 3.03
500814 6889114 309667 587 1.51 0.19 0.057 2.79
500858 6889836 310979 582 2.46 2.06 0.002 2.70
500834 6889309 312021 472 1.52 0.45 0.054 2.64
500824 6888423 309869 621 1.32 0.74 0.136 2.61
500833 6890107 311855 522 1.12 0.21 0.071 2.52
500820 6888717 309359 592 3.64 0.45 0.036 2.50
500831 6889472 311475 533 1.91 0.02 0.015 2.39
500859 6889807 310888 564 1.14 0.17 0.019 2.11
500840 6888767 310417 546 1.07 0.81 0.018 2.06
500850 6888284 310247 572 1.5 1.57 0.029 1.90
500816 6889020 309583 594 3.62 0.38 0.020 1.88
500868 6890705 311339 574 1.43 0.09 0.085 1.77
500886 6889679 312500 457 0.93 0.22 0.002 1.76
500806 6889420 309857 575 1.3 0.09 0.036 1.69
500819 6888717 309359 592 2.64 0.47 0.048 1.54
500855 6889630 310681 596 1.19 0.87 0.025 1.54
500852 6889527 310785 561 1.86 0.24 0.193 1.21
500829 6889352 311252 539 3.43 0.65 0.073 1.20
500856 6889748 310735 570 2.31 0.22 0.024 1.15
500835 6889244 311891 496 3.24 1.54 0.001 0.94
500838 6889227 311054 548 1.26 1.89 0.019 0.88
500892 6889011 312361 435 0.8 0.01 0.033 0.86
500826 6888696 310059 627 1.75 1.79 0.003 0.84
500801 6889269 309795 596 1.96 0.09 0.121 0.82
500823 6888344 309815 637 2.74 0.22 0.006 0.75
500853 6889444 310665 578 2.95 0.43 0.026 0.66
500802 6889233 309758 580 1.67 0.04 0.062 0.55
500825 6888485 309930 617 1.02 2.20 0.030 0.50

 

(1)Management cautions that prospecting surface rock samples and associated assays, as discussed herein, are selective by nature and represent a point location, and therefore may not necessarily be fully representative of the mineralized horizon sampled.
(2)This table represents a selection of highlights including 41 samples out of 102 samples taken

Qualified Person

The technical content of this news release has been reviewed and approved by Caitlin Jeffs, P. Geo, who is a Qualified Person (‘QP’) as defined in National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.

About Red Metal Resources Ltd.

Red Metal Resources is a mineral exploration company focused on growth through acquiring, exploring and developing clean energy and strategic minerals projects. The Company’s portfolio of projects include seven separate mineral claim blocks and mineral claim applications, highly prospective for Hydrogen, covering 172 mineral claims and totaling over 4,546 hectares, located in Ville Marie, Quebec and Larder Lake, Ontario, Canada. As well, the Company has a Chilean copper project, located in the prolific Candelaria iron oxide copper-gold (IOCG) belt of Chile’s coastal Cordillera. Red Metal is quoted on the Canadian Securities Exchange under the symbol RMES, on OTC Link alternative trading system on the OTC Pink marketplace under the symbol RMESF and on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol I660.

For more information, visit www.redmetalresources.com

Contact:
Red Metal Resources Ltd.
Caitlin Jeffs, President & CEO
1-866-907-5403
invest@redmetalresources.com
www.redmetalresources.com

Forward-Looking Statements – All statements in this press release, other than statements of historical fact, are ‘forward-looking information’ within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Red Metal provides forward-looking statements for the purpose of conveying information about current expectations and plans relating to the future and readers are cautioned that such statements may not be appropriate for other purposes. By its nature, this information is subject to inherent risks and uncertainties that may be general or specific and which give rise to the possibility that expectations, forecasts, predictions, projections or conclusions will not prove to be accurate, that assumptions may not be correct and that objectives, strategic goals and priorities will not be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to the ability to raise adequate financing, receipt of required approvals, as well as those risks and uncertainties identified and reported in Red Metal’s public filings under its SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca. Although Red Metal has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate as actual results, and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Red Metal disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise unless required by law.

Neither the Canadian Securities Exchange nor the Market Regulator (as that term is defined in the policies of the Canadian Securities Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/244415

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Keep Reading
By
4 Mins Read

Trump Threatens to Double Tariffs on Canadian Steel and Aluminum, Ford Mulls Energy Surcharge

In a dramatic escalation of trade tensions, US President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday (March 11) that tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum imports could be doubled to 50 percent.

The move came in response to Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s threat to impose a 25 percent surcharge on electricity exports to the US, a measure that would affect about 1.5 million homes in New York, Michigan and Minnesota.

Ford’s proposal was aimed at pressuring Trump to withdraw existing tariff threats against Canada.

Instead, the American leader ramped the situation up further.

Trump took to his Truth Social platform to confirm his directive to Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, stating that all imported steel and aluminum from Canada will now face 50 percent tariffs.

He reiterated his longstanding grievances over Canadian trade protections, particularly in the dairy and automotive sectors, and warned that auto tariffs will also increase unless Canada eliminates “other egregious, long-time tariffs.”

“Why would our Country allow another Country to supply us with electricity, even for a small area? Who made these decisions, and why?” Trump wrote, adding that Canada will pay a high financial price for its actions.

Ontario’s premier was defiant in the face of Trump’s retaliatory move.

Speaking to MSNBC, Ford said, “We will not back down. We will be relentless. I apologize to the American people that President Trump decided to have an unprovoked attack on our country.”

However, in a surprising turn of events, Ford announced the same evening that he would suspend the planned 25 percent surcharge on electricity exports to the US after discussions with Lutnick.

The two sides agreed to meet on Thursday (March 13), alongside members of the Office of the US Trade Representative, to discuss a renewal of the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement before the auto tariff deadline on April 2.

“In response, Ontario agreed to suspend its 25 percent surcharge on exports of electricity to Michigan, New York, and Minnesota,” Ford said in a statement posted on X, formerly Twitter.

Trump responded positively to the move and hinted at a potential softening of his stance on tariffs. “Probably so,” he told reporters when asked if he would consider lowering the 50 percent tariffs. “I’ll let you know.”

Following Ford’s announcement, major stock indexes rallied, reversing some of the day’s earlier losses.

The escalation comes at a precarious moment for Canada.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is in the process of stepping down, and while his successor Mark Carney is set to formally assume office this week, he has been unable to engage with Trump directly until officially sworn in.

Market and business fallout

Trump’s decision has already had far-reaching consequences in financial markets.

The S&P 500 (INDEXSP:.INX) slid more than 1 percent on Tuesday (March 11), while Canada’s S&P/TSX Composite Index (INDEXTSI:OSPTX) fell by 0.6 percent on the same day.

For its part, the Canadian dollar dropped to a one week low against the US dollar. Meanwhile, the price of aluminum in the US physical market soared to a record high above US$990 per metric ton in response to the tariffs.

Broader 25 percent tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports to the US from other countries will take effect on Wednesday (March 12). Additionally, Trump has threatened further tariffs on auto imports by April 2, creating significant uncertainty for manufacturers and businesses that rely on cross-border trade.

CEOs of major American firms were set to meet with Trump late on Tuesday, but it remains unclear whether they will challenge the president’s aggressive trade policies.

With negotiations set for later this week and further tariffs looming, the trade standoff between the US and Canada remains volatile. Whether the two sides can de-escalate tensions before the April 2 auto tariff deadline remains uncertain, but for now, businesses and consumers are bracing for further economic disruption.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Keep Reading
By
3 Mins Read

FTC asks to delay Amazon Prime deceptive practices case, citing staffing shortfalls

The Federal Trade Commission asked a judge in Seattle to delay the start of its trial accusing Amazon of duping consumers into signing up for its Prime program, citing resource constraints.

Attorneys for the FTC made the request during a status hearing on Wednesday before Judge John Chun in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. Chun had set a Sept. 22 start date for the trial.

Jonathan Cohen, an attorney for the FTC, asked Chun for a two-month continuance on the case due to staffing and budgetary shortfalls.

The FTC’s request to delay due to staffing constraints comes amid a push by the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency to reduce spending. DOGE, which is led by tech baron Elon Musk, has slashed the federal government’s workforce by more than 62,000 workers in February alone.

“We have lost employees in the agency, in our division and on our case team,” Cohen said.

Chun asked Cohen how the FTC’s situation “will be different in two months” if the agency is “in crisis now, as far as resources.” Cohen responded by saying that he “cannot guarantee if things won’t be even worse.” He pointed to the possibility that the FTC may have to move to another office “unexpectedly,” which could hamper its ability to prepare for the trial.

“But there’s a lot of reason to believe … we may have been through the brunt of it, at least for a little while,” Cohen said.

John Hueston, an attorney for Amazon, disputed Cohen’s request to push back the trial date.

“There has been no showing on this call that the government does not have the resources to proceed to trial with the trial date as presently set,” Hueston said. “What I heard is that they’ve got the whole trial team still intact. Maybe there’s going to be an office move. And by the way, both in government and private sector, I’ve never heard of an office move being more than a few days disruptive.”

The FTC sued Amazon in June 2023, alleging that the online retailer was deceiving millions of customers into signing up for its Prime program and sabotaging their attempts to cancel it.

“Amazon tricked and trapped people into recurring subscriptions without their consent, not only frustrating users but also costing them significant money,” former FTC Chair Lina Khan said at the time.

The FTC has also brought a separate case against Amazon, accusing it of wielding an illegal monopoly, in part by preventing sellers from offering cheaper prices elsewhere through its anti-discounting measures. That case, which the FTC filed in September 2023, is set to go to trial in October 2026.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Keep Reading
By
1 Min Read

5 Strong Stocks Defying the Bearish Market!

In this video, Dave analyzes the bearish rotation in his Market Trend Model, highlighting the S&P 500 breakdown below the 200-day moving average and its downside potential. He also identifies five strong stocks with bullish technical setups despite market weakness. Watch now for key technical analysis insights to navigate this volatile market!

This video originally premiered on March 10, 2025. Watch on StockCharts’ dedicated David Keller page!

Previously recorded videos from Dave are available at this link.

Keep Reading
By