Author

admin

Browsing

It’s happening: Southwest Airlines will start charging passengers to check bags for the first time.

It’s a stunning reversal that shows the low-cost pioneer is willing to part with a customer perk executives have said set it apart from rivals in more than half a century of flying in hopes of increasing revenue.

Southwest’s changes come after months of pressure from activist Elliott Investment Management. The firm took a stake in the airline last year and won five board seats as it pushed for quick changes at the company, which held on for decades — until now — to perks such as free checked bags, changeable tickets and open seating.

For tickets purchased on or after May 28, Southwest customers in all but the top tier-fare class will have to pay to check bags, though there will be exceptions. Elite frequent flyers who hold “A-List Preferred” status will still get two bags and A-List level members will get one free checked bag. Southwest credit card holders will also get one free checked bag.

“Two bags fly free” is a registered trademark on Southwest’s website. But its decision to about-face on what executives long cast as a sacrosanct passenger perk brings the largest U.S. domestic carrier in line with its rivals, which together generated $5.5 billion from bag fees last year, according to federal data.

Southwest executives have long said they didn’t plan to charge for bags, telling Wall Street analysts that it was a major reason why customers chose the airline.

“After fare and schedule, bags fly free is cited as the No. 1 issue in terms of why customers choose Southwest,” CEO Bob Jordan said on an earnings call last July.

But Southwest has changed its tune.

“What’s changed is that we’ve come to realize that we need more revenue to cover our costs,” COO Andrew Watterson said in an interview with CNBC about the baggage fee changes. “We think that these changes that we’re announcing today will lead to less of that share shift than would have been the case otherwise.”

In September, Southwest’s then-chief transformation officer, Ryan Green, told analysts that its analysis showed Southwest would lose more money from passengers defecting to rivals if it started charging for bags than it would make from the fees.

“The fact that free bags is a key driver of choice creates the risk that customers may choose the competition if we change the policy,” he said.

Southwest said last month that it had parted ways with Green.

The airline also said Tuesday that it will launch a new, basic economy fare, something rivals have offered for years.

Southwest, in addition, will change the way customers earn Rapid Rewards: Customers will earn more of the frequent flyer miles depending on how much they pay. Redemption rates will vary depending on flight demand, a dynamic pricing model competitors use.

And flight credits for tickets for tickets purchased on or after May 28 will expire one year, or earlier, depending on the type of fare purchased.

It’s the latest in a string of massive strategy changes at Southwest as its performance has fallen behind rivals.

Last July, Southwest shocked passengers when it announced it would ditch its open seating model for assigned seats and add “premium” extra legroom options, ending decades of an single-class cabin.

The airline is also looking to slash its costs. Higher expenses coming out of the pandemic have taken a bite out of airline margins.

Last month, Southwest announced its first mass layoff, cutting about 1,750 jobs roughly 15% of its corporate staff, many of them at its headquarters, a decision CEO Jordan called “unprecedented” in the carrier’s more than 53 years of flying.

“We are at a pivotal moment as we transform Southwest Airlines into a leaner, faster, and more agile organization,” he said last month.

Earlier this year, Southwest announced the retirement of its longtime finance chief, Tammy Romo, who was replaced by Breeze executive Tom Doxey, and its chief administrative officer, Linda Rutherford. Both executives worked at Southwest for more than 30 years.

Southwest has also cut unprofitable routes, summer internships and employee teambuilding events its held for decades.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Dick’s Sporting Goods on Tuesday said it’s expecting 2025 profits to be far lower than Wall Street anticipated, making it the latest retailer to forecast a rocky year ahead as consumers contend with tariffs, inflation and fears around a potential recession. 

In an interview with CNBC, Executive Chairman Ed Stack said the company’s exposure to China, Mexico and Canada for sourcing is very small, but it recognizes that falling consumer confidence could impact spending.

“I do think it’s just a bit of an uncertain world out there right now,” said Stack. “What’s going to happen from a tariff standpoint? You know, if tariffs are put in place and prices rise the way that they might, what’s going to happen with the consumer?”

On a call with analysts, CEO Lauren Hobart insisted the company is not seeing a weak consumer, and said its guidance is based on the overall uncertain environment.

“We definitely are feeling great about our consumer,” said Hobart. “We are just reflecting an appropriate level of caution given so much uncertainty out in the marketplace.”

Shares of the company opened about 2% lower.

Despite the weak guidance, the sporting goods retailer posted its best holiday quarter on record. Its comparable sales rose 6.4%, far ahead of the 2.9% growth that analysts expected, according to StreetAccount. 

Here’s how Dick’s did in its fiscal fourth quarter compared with what Wall Street was anticipating, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:

Earnings per share: $3.62 vs. $3.53 expected

Revenue: $3.89 billion vs. $3.78 billion expected

The company’s reported net income for the three-month period that ended Feb. 1 was $300 million, or $3.62 per share, compared with $296 million, or $3.57 per share, a year earlier.  

Sales rose to $3.89 billion, up about 0.5% from $3.88 billion a year earlier. Like other retailers, Dick’s benefited from an extra week in the year-ago period, which has skewed comparisons. But unlike many of its peers, Dick’s still managed to grow both sales and profits during the quarter, even with one less selling week. 

In the year ahead, Dick’s is expecting earnings per share to be between $13.80 and $14.40, well short of Wall Street estimates of $14.86, according to LSEG. It anticipates net sales will be between $13.6 billion and $13.9 billion, which at the high end is in line with estimates of $13.9 billion, according to LSEG. Dick’s expecting comparable sales to grow between 1% and 3%, compared with estimates of up 2.5%, according to StreetAccount. 

The gloomy earnings outlook comes after a wide array of other retailers gave weak forecasts for the current quarter or the year ahead amid concerns about sliding consumer confidence and the impact tariffs and inflation could have on spending. Kohl’s also offered a weak outlook for the year ahead on Tuesday, leading its shares to plummet 15%.

Some retailers blamed an unseasonably cool February for a weak start to the current quarter, but most recognized they’re also operating in a tough macroeconomic backdrop, and it’s harder than ever to forecast how consumers are holding up. In February, consumer confidence slid to its lowest levels since 2021, the jobs report came in weaker than expected and unemployment ticked up. Over the last few years, a strong job market has led many economists to brush away concerns about rising credit card delinquencies and debt, but those cracks could grow deeper if unemployment continues to rise. 

On Monday, some of those concerns triggered a stock market sell-off, extending losses after the S&P 500 posted three consecutive negative weeks. The Nasdaq Composite saw its worst day since September 2022, while the Dow lost nearly 900 points and closed below its 200-day moving average for the first time since Nov. 1, 2023.

Beyond the uncertain macroeconomic environment, Dick’s plans to invest more heavily in its “House of Sport” concept and e-commerce in the year ahead, which it also expects will weigh on profits. The massive, 100,000-square-foot stores are a growth area for the company and include features like rock climbing walls and running tracks. 

In the year ahead, Dick’s plans to spend $1 billion on a net basis building 16 additional House of Sport locations and 18 Field House locations, which take some of the experimental elements of the House of Sport but fit it into the size of a traditional Dick’s store. 

The strategy comes at a strong point for sports in the country, which is expected to be a tail wind for the business. The 2026 World Cup will be held in North America, women’s sports are more popular than ever, and consumers are increasingly focused on health and wellness. 

“We’re going to have a moment here in the next three or four years, from a sports standpoint, that I think is going to put sport on steroids,” said Stack. “We’re going into a sports moment right now, and we are investing very heavily into that sports moment over the next several years because this is going to last through [2030] and maybe beyond.”

— Additional reporting by CNBC’s Courtney Reagan.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Sector Shake-Up: Defensive Moves and Tech’s Tumble

Last week’s market volatility stirred up the sector rankings, with 6 out of 11 sectors changing positions. While the top three remain steady, we see a clear rotation from cyclical to more defensive sectors. Let’s dive into the details and see what the charts tell us.

The weekly sector ranking has undergone some significant changes. Communication Services (XLC) is holding firm. Financials (XLF) is maintaining position. Consumer discretionary remains steady, but is showing weakness. Consumer Staples (XLP) is the new entrant to the top 5, while Utilities (XLU) Holds its ground at #5.

The big story here is the rise of defensive sectors. Health Care (XLV) made a notable jump from 10th to 6th place, while Technology (XLK) took a nosedive from 4th to 10th. This shift is characteristic of the broader shift from cyclical to defensive plays.

The New Sector Lineup

  1. (1) Communication Services – (XLC)
  2. (2) Financials – (XLF)
  3. (3) Consumer Discretionary – (XLY)
  4. (6) Consumer Staples – (XLP)*
  5. (5) Utilities – (XLU)
  6. (10) Healthcare – (XLV)*
  7. (9) Real-Estate – (XLRE)*
  8. (7) Industrials – (XLI)*
  9. (8) Energy – (XLE)*
  10. (4) Technology – (XLK)*
  11. (11) Materials – (XLB)

Weekly RRG: A Tale of Two Sides

The weekly Relative Rotation Graph (RRG), printed above, paints an interesting picture. We see only three sectors on the right-hand side of the graph, with the rest clustered on the left. But their movements are telling:

  • XLC is in the leading quadrant, moving northeast — a positive sign.
  • XLF has turned back up into the leading quadrant, reinforcing its #2 spot.
  • XLY is in the weakening quadrant with a long tail, heading towards lagging — a potential red flag.

On the left side:

  • XLK’s rotation is clearly weak, pushing further into the lagging quadrant.
  • Meanwhile, XLP and XLU show strength, moving with positive RRG headings in the improving quadrant.

Daily RRG: Confirming the Weekly Story

When we look at the daily RRG, we get some additional context:

  • XLC has curled up in the weakening quadrant, supporting its positive weekly rotation.
  • XLF is confirming its positive move in the leading quadrant.
  • XLY is the outlier — its short tail in the lagging quadrant doesn’t bode well for maintaining its #3 position.
  • XLP shows the strongest RS ratio reading on the daily chart, complementing its positive weekly movement.
  • XLU has lost some relative momentum over the last day, but nothing too concerning at this point.

The Top Five Charts

Communication Services – XLC

XLC is playing around with its old resistance line, now expected to act as support. Monday’s price action shows a slight revival, but it’s too early to call. The relative strength remains robust, with a clear series of higher highs and higher lows on the raw RS line.

Financials – XLF

XLF has broken its rising support line and completed a toppish formation. We’re now eyeing the next support level, around $47.25. Despite this, XLF’s relative performance remains strong, with both RRG lines moving higher.

Consumer Discretionary – XLY

After completing a top formation, XLY is now testing support around 200. It appears to be moving back into its old rising channel — and if my rule holds true, we might see it test the lower boundary. This suggests significant downside risk for the sector.

Consumer Staples – XLP

XLP, the newcomer to the top 5, is pushing against overhead resistance in the $83.50-84 area. A break here could give the sector a significant boost. The improvement in relative strength is already evident, pulling both RRG lines higher.

Utilities – XLU

XLU remains in a sideways pattern, potentially settling into a narrower range between $75.50 and $80.50.

Its relative strength is also range-bound but still pulling both RRG lines up — enough to keep it in the top 5.

Portfolio Performance Update

The technology position was exited and swapped for the consumer staples position against Monday’s opening prices.

As of about 45 minutes after opening, the portfolio performance stands at -3.19% since inception, compared to the SPY benchmark at -3.39%. We’re about 20 basis points ahead — not making a big dent, but keeping pace with the S&P 500 for now.

Going forward, I’ll be including both the performance table and the list of open positions in these articles for better tracking.

Summary

The market’s rotation towards defensive sectors is becoming increasingly evident. Consumer discretionary looks vulnerable, while consumer staples and utilities show strength.

#StayAlert, –Julius


The market sell-off continued in earnest after a brief respite on Friday. Uncertainty of geopolitical tensions and tariff talk has spooked the market and given the weakness of mega-cap stocks, we are likely to see more downside before a snapback rally.

Carl was off today so Erin had the controls! She started off the trading room with a review of the DP Signal Tables to get a sense of market strength and weakness. She then analyzed indicator charts on the SPY and finished with a look at key areas of the market: Bitcoin, Dollar, Gold, Gold Miners, Yields, Bonds and Crude Oil.

After the market review Erin took a look at the Magnificent Seven daily and weekly charts. Not one of them were showing strength. Most had lost key support levels and were heading lower.

Erin then walked us through sector rotation. It is clear that the defensive sectors of the market are leading the way with the exception of Utilities which have been in a declining trend. Erin dove into the Energy sector, looking under the hood to determine if the current rally will continue.

She finished the trading room with a review of viewer symbol requests that included: PAYC, VLO and LLY among others.

Don’t forget that you can join us live in the trading room by registering once at this link: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_D6iAp-C1S6SebVpQIYcC6g#/registration

We love doing the trading room, but we do have to make a living! Come try out any of our subscriptions for two weeks free with our trial coupon code: DPTRIAL2. You’ll find our subscriptions here: https://www.decisionpoint.com/products.html

01:21 DP Signal Tables

04:44 Market Analysis

18:05 Questions

21:47 Magnificent Seven

32:39 Sector Rotation

38:08 Symbol Requests


The DP Alert: Your First Stop to a Great Trade!

Before you trade any stock or ETF, you need to know the trend and condition of the market. The DP Alert gives you all you need to know with an executive summary of the market’s current trend and condition. It not only covers the market! We look at Bitcoin, Yields, Bonds, Gold, the Dollar, Gold Miners and Crude Oil! Only $50/month! Or, use our free trial to try it out for two weeks using coupon code: DPTRIAL2. Click HERE to subscribe NOW!


Learn more about DecisionPoint.com:


Watch the latest episode of the DecisionPointTrading Room on DP’s YouTube channel here!


Try us out for two weeks with a trial subscription!

Use coupon code: DPTRIAL2 Subscribe HERE!


Technical Analysis is a windsock, not a crystal ball. –Carl Swenlin


(c) Copyright 2025 DecisionPoint.com


Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author, and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

DecisionPoint is not a registered investment advisor. Investment and trading decisions are solely your responsibility. DecisionPoint newsletters, blogs or website materials should NOT be interpreted as a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security or to take any specific action.


Helpful DecisionPoint Links:

Trend Models

Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO)

On Balance Volume

Swenlin Trading Oscillators (STO-B and STO-V)

ITBM and ITVM

SCTR Ranking

Bear Market Rules


“The trend is your friend, until the end when it bends.”

How often have you heard this adage? More importantly, how often do you follow it?

Chasing stocks, whether it’s one that was texted to you as the next high-flying AI stock, a popular meme stock, or the next hot IPO, can be tempting. If you’re lucky, the price moves in your favor, you get elated, and you throw one heck of a party. Alas, the story doesn’t always end this way. The stock market can catch you off guard. It gives you several opportunities, but also unexpectedly robs them from you. This is especially true during an overextended market.

Any negative news headlines make investors nervous, leading them to make irrational decisions. To avoid falling into the trap of buying and selling stocks at the wrong time, take the smart approach and set some basic rules to follow.

Rule 1: Determine the Market’s Long-term Trend

You want to trade in the direction of the long-term trend—buy when the trend is up and sell when it is down. Buying stocks when the overall trend is declining can be like catching a falling knife, while selling stocks when the trend is rising could mean missing sizable moves. To determine the overall direction of the stock market’s long-term trend, look at a chart of a benchmark index, such as the S&P 500 ($SPX), that covers at least one year.

We’ll examine the weekly chart of the S&P 500 (see below). Overall, the index has trended higher for the last five years, but there have been pullbacks, some longer and more severe than others (pink shaded areas). The index is going through a pullback now, although we won’t know the magnitude of it until it’s over.

FIGURE 1. WEEKLY CHART OF THE S&P 500. Overall, the trend in the benchmark has been bullish, although there have been periods of declines and pullbacks. The index is going through a decline.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

From January 2022 to October 2022, the S&P 500 declined over 20%. Many Wall Street analysts expected the decline to continue, but the S&P 500 recovered, ending 2023 with a 26.3% gain and 2024 with a 23.31% gain. There were a few minor pullbacks along the way, some more pronounced than others (end of 2023 and July to August 2024).

Nobody knows what the market will do, but, when you see a pullback forming—and it looks like one is forming—don’t plan on opening long positions. If you’re not convinced the market is pulling back, view a daily chart of the S&P 500 to see if it aligns with the weekly chart’s trend. If both indicate a downtrend or the two don’t align, you need to dig deeper.

Rule 2: Is Market Breadth Expanding or Contracting?

Market breadth is an effective method to uncover the percentage of stocks participating in the uptrend. The Bullish Percent Index (BPI) is one of several breadth indicators available in StockCharts and is available for indexes, sectors, and industry groups.

The chart below displays the BPI for the S&P 500 in the upper panel ($BPSPX) against the daily chart of the S&P 500 in the lower panel. When the BPI is above 50%, it indicates the bulls have an edge. When it’s below 50%, the bears have an edge.

FIGURE 2. DAILY CHART OF S&P 500 BULLISH PERCENT INDEX VS. S&P 500. Note the uptrends in the S&P 500 coincide with a BPI greater than 50. The downtrend in the S&P 500 coincides with an S&P 500 BPI of less than 50.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

In the last year, besides the pullback periods in the S&P 500, the bulls have had the upper hand. If you wanted to invest in an S&P 500 stock when the bulls were in control, your first task is to find one that aligns with the bullish move.

Rule 3: Buy on Up Days, Sell on Down Days

Let’s focus on the period between August 9, 2024, and December 18, 2024, to coincide with the period when the BPI was greater than 50 and examine a hollow candlestick chart of Apple, Inc. (AAPL), one of the top cap-weighted stocks in the S&P 500.

FIGURE 3. DAILY CHART OF APPLE STOCK. From August 9 to December 18, 2024, which coincides with the S&P 500 BPI > 50, the stock price trended higher, displaying a series of hollow green candles at the front and tail end of the period.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

Hollow candlestick charts are visually interesting and have the advantage of identifying a trend quickly. The upward movement began a few days before August 9, when there was a significant gap down in AAPL’s price. Even though it was a down day, the bar was hollow, which means the close was higher than the open.

Looking at all three charts, August 9 presented an opportune buy signal. It aligned with the bullish BPI and the long-term trend in the weekly and daily charts.

If you had hypothetically opened a long position, you could have exited your position on December 18, when the BPI turned bearish and made a decent return. You could have held on for a few more days, but the stock sold off quickly, so your exit would depend on how well your sell order got filled.

Regardless, you should have exited the position during the series of down days that started on December 27. If you hadn’t closed your position then and were still holding on to it, you would have been caught in the downward spiral that started when the S&P 500 BPI fell below 50 on February 27.


StockCharts Tip

Hollow candlestick charts differ from the traditional filled candlestick charts. To apply hollow candle charts, click the Hollow Candles button under Chart Attributes.


The Bottom Line

Given the erratic nature of the stock market, especially an over-extended one, a smart approach to investing requires following a set of rules. It doesn’t have to be complicated.

Identifying the long-term trend, checking the market’s breadth, and ensuring the trend of a stock you want to buy aligns with the overall market is a simple approach, but applying it successfully in real time takes practice. Practice applying the rules using a simulated account. There’s no better teacher than yourself.


Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

The next time you hear someone, anyone, from college sports complain about a lack of revenue, laugh in their face. 

They’ll have you believe those mean, greedy players have sidetracked an amateur sports world of faithful and loyal do-gooders, and ransacked it for every dollar it’s worth.

If I had $1,000 for every time a college football coach declared the current world of college sports “unsustainable,” I could pay Luka Doncic’s contract extension. 

And speaking of extension, that’s where this story turns to the absurd. Late last week, Oregon decided to extend coach Dan Lanning, who was last seen on the big stage trailing 34-0 in the College Football Playoff Rose Bowl quarterfinal — as the nation’s No.1 ranked team. 

That’s nearly $11 million per over six years for Lanning – and $60.4 million guaranteed – who has lost too many games of significance as a head coach.

I don’t blame Lanning for his agent getting everything he can out of Oregon. I blame Oregon, and the 69 other Power Four schools that include Oregon State and Washington State, who have claimed poverty since the NCAA in 2021 decided to open up a can of NIL and free player movement — at the same damn time. 

(To this day, the dumbest move in a long, long line of dumb NCAA moves).

I blame the entire 70 schools that – are you ready for this? – will make an estimated $7.4 billion in fiscal year 2025-26, and as much as $10.5 billion by 2034-35, according to a declaration filed last week in support of the multi-billion dollar House settlement. 

And still can’t figure out how to pay players without claiming the world is coming to an end. 

SPRING POWER RANKINGS: Big Ten | SEC | ACC | Big 12

LOOKING AHEAD: Our way-too-early college football Top 25 for 2025

Without adding more games to a postseason that already is competing with the NFL for television eyes. Without eating one of its own (RIP, Pac-12), and leaving two others (ACC, Big 12) scrambling for crumbs. 

The NCAA and attorneys representing players are awaiting final approval of the House case settlement – which would officially approve, in essence, pay for play through NIL – from U.S. District Court judge Claudia Wilken. It should come as no surprise that Wilkin will hold a hearing on April 7, which just so happens to coincide with the Final Four national championship game. 

The very tournament the NCAA earns an average of $1.1 billion annually over the course of an eight-year contract with media rights partners CBS and Turner.

You can’t make this up, people.

The declaration filed last week by economics expert Dan Rascher – who has served as the NCAA’s numbers cruncher in just about every antitrust lawsuit against the association – admitted the exorbitant cash flow through the 70 Power conference schools. But here’s where it gets a little tricky, so stay with me. 

The House settlement player pool (see: salary cap) is based on a percentage of eight revenue streams, including but not limited to media rights, ticket sales and bowl/playoff games. But the settlement numbers aren’t based off the entire athletic department revenue.

For example, Texas’ total operating athletic revenue for the 2024 fiscal year was $331.9 million, but its figure for the eight categories used for the pool calculation was $172.1 million. Cincinnati’s pool calculation was $38.8 million.

Under the terms of the agreement, the total of the eight revenue streams from the 70 power conference schools is pooled together, and the players would receive a percentage of that revenue that is expected to be between $20-23 million per school for the first year after the settlement. That number is guaranteed to increase by at least 4% in each of the two years.

The goal of equalizing the number for all schools is to prevent programs like Texas from spend more money on players than smaller programs like Cincinnati. Remember, the $20-23 million is what schools are allowed to spend on players in all the men’s and women’s programs for the use of their NIL — if they choose to.

This takes us all the way back to Lanning and every other coach and assistant coach who signed mega deals this offseason. Steve Sarkisian got a pay raise to $10.8 million annually, and Bill Belichick got $10 million annually to become North Carolina football coach.

Jim Knowles got $3.1 million annually to leave Ohio State and become Penn State’s defensive coordinator, a salary greater than 74 FBS head coaches had last season.

Yet here we go again, coaches and athletic directors and conference commissioners complaining about an “unsustainable” environment in college athletics.

Imagine an association of 70 schools, who have willingly pulled away from the rest of college sports – with a combined budget of $7.4 billion for the academic year – making player salaries the financial boogeyman.

Maybe, just maybe, stop increasing debt service with “facility improvements.” Or if you simply must have new stadiums and arenas and ballparks, and new stand-alone football and basketball facilities because recruits just need that new bling, stop paying coaches to not coach.

Stop paying millions to high school players who have never taken a snap of college football. Stop paying general managers for a job that can (and should) be done by the head coach and athletic director.

Stop paying for a staff of 40, or millions upon millions in recruiting budgets. Stop paying for coaches to take a helicopter to a high school game, so he looks different from every other coach there — to impress a 17-year-old kid.

And college sports has no idea why it finds itself in this predicament.

Lanning is 3-4 vs. rivals Washington and Oregon State, 1-1 in conference championship games and 0-1 in CFP games. And just got $60 million — no matter what happens over the next six seasons.

There’s your unsustainable, everyone. 

And it’s nothing to laugh about.

Matt Hayes is the senior national college football writer for USA TODAY Sports Network. Follow him on X at @MattHayesCFB.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

INDIANAPOLIS — Have fun with this, selection committee.

Chaos reigned in the major women’s conference tournaments, just as it did in the final weeks of the regular season. Three of the No. 1 seeds in the NCAA’s last projection lost, with Notre Dame not even getting to the ACC title game. Two of the No. 2 seeds also went down. Unranked teams wreaked havoc on the top 25.

It’s glorious! Just glorious. Except for those trying to determine the 68-team tournament field and their seeds, that is.

But this kind of mayhem is further sign of the growth of the women’s game. Gone are the days of one or two schools dominating. There’s at least six teams that can make a legitimate case for winning the national title, and just as many who have serious bracket-busting potential.

So, yeah, ought to be a fun week for the selection committee before the NCAA field is announced Sunday.

Here are the winners and losers from the major conference tournaments: 

WINNERS

Big Ten

USC and UCLA have drawn much of the attention in the Big Ten, and rightfully so. UCLA spent much of the season as the country’s No. 1 team and won the conference tournament Sunday while USC won the regular-season title.

But don’t sleep on the rest of the conference. Particularly the teams in the second tier. The Big Ten could get a dozen teams in the NCAA tournament, and anyone drawing Michigan, Iowa, Nebraska or Indiana is not going to be happy.

“The fact that we have teams that are 10, 11, 12 seeds here who might be a better seed in the national tournament is wild,” USC coach Lindsay Gottlieb said after the Trojans held off Indiana 84-79 in the quarterfinals.

Michigan had USC on its heels for much of their semifinal game Saturday night. The Trojans ultimately prevailed, thanks to both Kiki Iriafen’s big third quarter and the Wolverines’ foul trouble, but Michigan showed it can play with anybody.

Iowa has won 10 of its last 13 games, and those three losses were by a total of 11 points and to ranked teams. Indiana gave USC a scare until JuJu Watkins did JuJu things. And Nebraska freshman Britt Prince showed she’s more than ready for the big time, matching her career-high with 24 against UCLA in the quarterfinals.

“The Big Ten has a lot of great teams, and I think just throughout the season we’ve gotten a lot better handling the really good teams. Especially the new additions,” Prince said after the Cornhuskers fell 85-74 in the quarterfinals.

“Being this close to UCLA, they’re one of the top teams in the country, and I think we showed how we can hang with them. I think that’s really important for us, and a big momentum booster heading into the rest of the season.”

Paige Bueckers

It takes a lot to set yourself apart at UConn, but Paige Bueckers has managed to do it.

Bueckers was named Most Outstanding Player of the Big East tournament Monday, making her the first player to win it three times. Bueckers had 24 points, eight rebounds, three assists, two blocks and two steals in UConn’s 70-50 win over Creighton.

‘You work entirely for this moment,’ Bueckers said.

Bueckers was the first to win national Player of the Year honors as a freshman, when she also led UConn to the Final Four. Injuries derailed her next two seasons, and she played just 17 games. But she has been outstanding the last two years, leading UConn back to the Final Four last year and putting them in position to make another deep run this year.

‘It was a dream since I was a kid, and it’s been everything I could dream of,’ Bueckers said of her UConn career. ‘I can’t be grateful enough.’

LSU

LSU caught a break when Aneesah Morrow’s injury wasn’t as bad as initially feared.

Morrow couldn’t put weight on her foot and had to be helped off the floor after getting hurt in the third quarter of LSU’s SEC tournament semifinal loss to Texas. But coach Kim Mulkey said afterward that Morrow had aggravated the foot sprain she’s been dealing with the last few weeks.

“She can go for the (NCAA) tournament. Everything is good,’ Mulkey said, adding that Morrow was lobbying the training staff to go back in the game against the Longhorns.

Morrow has often worn a walking boot since spraining her foot in the Feb. 16 game against Texas. But she’s continued to play, and the Tigers need her if they hope to make a run in the NCAA tournament. Morrow is LSU’s top rebounder, with 13.6 boards a game, and the Tigers’ second-leading scorer with 18.5 points a game.

Mulkey also said leading scorer Flau’jae Johnson, who missed the SEC tournament with a shin injury, will be ready for the NCAA tournament. 

Arkansas State and George Mason

What turnarounds Arkansas State and George Mason have made, resulting in first-ever trips to the NCAA tournament for each school.

Arkansas State was picked to finish 13th in the 14-team Sun Belt Conference. But it won 21 games and on Monday upset James Madison in overtime to win the Sun Belt tournament title. James Madison came into the championship game with a 20-game winning streak, including a perfect 18-0 record in conference play.

George Mason was winless in the Atlantic 10 four years ago. On Sunday, the Patriots beat St. Joseph’s to win the conference tournament. It also was George Mason’s 28th win, extending the program’s single-season record.

“We asked these players, four years ago, to believe in something that was nowhere near present,” Patriots coach Vanessa Blair-Lewis said, according to The Washington Post.

North Carolina

The whole state is dancing! OK, maybe not the whole state. But a whole lot of it.

There’s still a chance another North Carolina school could to join the party, too. North Carolina A&T won the regular-season Coastal Athletic Association title and is the top seed for this week’s conference tournament.

LOSERS

Notre Dame

Was it really only three weeks ago that the Irish were atop the rankings and in line for a No. 1 seed in the NCAA tournament? My, how times have changed.

Notre Dame skids into the NCAA tournament having lost three of its last five games, including a 61-56 loss to Duke in the ACC tournament semifinals. It was a season-low in points for the Fighting Irish.

“Defensively we’ve been lacking,” coach Niele Ivey said Saturday night. “Just having that intensity defensively is part of the reason for the last three losses, and that’s frustrating because that’s something we work on every day; it’s something we’ve been working towards the entire season.”

Saint Joseph’s

Despite 23 wins in the regular season, it was always going to be an uphill battle for Saint Joseph’s to make the NCAA tournament.

After finishing fourth in the Atlantic-10, with six losses, the Hawks needed to win the conference tournament. They came close, upsetting regular-season champ Richmond in the semifinals. But they lost to George Mason in Sunday’s final, and are projected among the first four teams left out.

Tennessee

Tennessee’s hopes of playing the early rounds at home ended in the SEC tournament.

The Lady Vols were a No. 3 seed in the NCAA’s last projection, which would have meant they’d host first- and second round games. (Unlike in the men’s tournament, which uses neutral sites for all games, the women play first- and second-round games at campus sites.)

But a loss to Georgia at home in the regular-season finale dropped Tennessee out of that group of top four seeds, and it needed to make a run in the SEC tournament to get back in there. That did not happen, with the Lady Vols losing to Vanderbilt in the second round.

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Kirk Cousins needs to take a seat on the bench and count his cash.

Sure, that’s counterintuitive for a competitive, 36-year-old quarterback whose clock is ticking to, well, bolster his resume with (maybe) a second career playoff victory.

But facts are facts. A year ago, the Atlanta Falcons christened the NFL’s free agency market by signing Cousins to a four-year, $180 million contract that guaranteed a whopping $100 million. In stripping Cousins of the starting job that now belongs to Michael Penix, Jr., the Falcons are still on the hook for all that money.

Yet they don’t owe him any special favors.

Never mind that Cousins met with Falcons owner Arthur Blank last week and apparently tried to lay the tracks for a ticket out of town.

The answer should be not here, not now. Not for what he’s already cost.

Memo to Falcons: Do what’s best for your team.

Barring a release or a trade, Cousins will become the most expensive backup quarterback in NFL history. That sounds less stunning when you consider in these times, with another record salary cap ($279.2 million), pretty much everything is the most.

Unless Falcons GM Terry Fontenot can get some crazy return in a trade package (yeah, right, at 3 million-to-1 odds), it makes more sense for them to hang on to the demoted quarterback for another year than to cut bait. That’s what’s best for the Falcons right now, even when considering results that saw Cousins tie for the league lead with 16 interceptions in 2024. It’s NFL Moneyball, silly.

Cousins – who faded as last season progressed with less-than-transparent shoulder and elbow injuries in the mix — is already guaranteed $27.5 million for the 2025 season. And if he’s still on the roster at the beginning of next week, he’s due another $10 million. Last year, he was paid $62.5 million. There’s your $100 mil.

If they part ways now with Cousins, they can save $10 million – and count $90 million for one stinking season.

So, $90M for one year or $100M for two years?

With the latter option, at least coach Raheem Morris & Co. will have a layer of insurance for a year against a Penix injury.

Besides, they already made the mistake of overpaying for an aging quarterback with limited mobility, and one coming off a torn Achilles tendon. That money has already been spent. So, the Falcons need to, well, learn from the exchange.

The issue with Cousins hardly compares with the case of Grady Jarrett, the veteran D-tackle who was cut by the Falcons on Monday. Jarrett was entering the final year of a three-year deal that averaged nearly $17 million per year. They’ll take a $4.125 million cap hit for the cut. Maybe if they weren’t so over-invested in Cousins, they wouldn’t had to cut their popular defensive leader. But they were.

Cousins, meanwhile, counts for about 15% against the Falcons’ cap ledger, according to Spotrac.com, while Penix counts for less than 2%. If there’s ever a time to have an expensive backup, it’s while the starting QB is playing on a rookie contract. It’s not like the Falcons can just flip the Cousins money to Penix.

NFLPA head Lloyd Howell on 18-game season: It’s just talk (for now).

Still, Cousins, who threw his 16 picks in 14 games (Baker Mayfield, meanwhile, threw his 16 INTs in 17 games and led the Bucs to another NFC South crown), knows there’s still a market for him as a potential starter or even a bridge quarterback. Look at Cleveland, Tennessee, Seattle, Indianapolis and New Orleans as possibilities. With the Falcons’ blessing, Cousins’ crafty agent, Mike McCartney, could surely swing some sort of deal. The Browns, saddled with the Deshaun Watson guaranteed cash ($230 million), would likely salivate for a chance to land Cousins for some basement-bargain price where the Falcons pay the bulk of the contract, ala the break the Steelers got last year when Denver was willing to pay big in ridding themselves of Wilson.

It’s just too bad for Cousins that it doesn’t make sense for the Falcons.

No need for pity. Remember, no one has worked the NFL market over the past decade like Cousins, who has made more than $400 million since his rookie deal paid all of $643,000 over his first four seasons.

He was franchise-tagged twice by Washington (totaling nearly $44 million), landed a fully-guaranteed, three-year, $84 million deal from the Vikings. He re-upped twice over three years in Minnesota ($66 million, $35 million). Then he got his most valuable contract yet from the Falcons, months after tearing at Achilles tendon.

Along the way, Cousins has won just one playoff game in his career and earned a reputation for being magnificently inconsistent.

The Falcons, desperate to become a contender, went with fool’s gold. They thought they were getting a difference-maker and it turned out they missed the playoffs (again) and couldn’t even get a full season from Cousins before turning to Penix.

Now it’s time to grin and bear it with Cousins. And time for Cousins to do likewise.

If not, it would go completely against the grain of his rep. Cousins doesn’t strike me as the type who would create a locker room distraction while serving as Penix’s backup. He’d surely have to swallow some more pride in being the good teammate and ready-in-case-of-emergency backup. But who knows? Maybe he handles it differently this time, having to take a back seat to a young quarterback while his career clock ticks.

Pete Carroll is 73 and can beat you in the 40-yard dash. But can he still coach?

Then again, at this point – and with more than $400 million already earned – it’s not about the money. Maybe it’s about feeling entitled to have another shot, ASAP. Certainly, aging QBs Aaron Rodgers and Russell Wilson can relate.

It’s striking, though, that Cousins’ deal with the Falcons included a no-trade clause. And now he wants the chance to trade places.

No, this Atlanta saga has not worked out. Shortly after the Cousins signing, the NFL opened an investigation into tampering, which spun out of the quarterback casually mentioning during his introductory press conference that he talked to Falcons staff members before the free agency period officially. Combined with apparent violations that involved fellow free agent signees Darnell Mooney and Charlie Woerner, it wound up costing Atlanta a fifth-round pick and $250,000 fine, on top of a $50,000 fine for Fontenot.

Then came the shocking move to draft Penix with the eighth pick overall, which Cousins didn’t know until the Falcons were on the clock. Months later, as Cousins fizzled, the Falcons worked the succession plan sooner than first envisioned.

A few weeks ago, Cousins maintained that he played with shoulder and elbow injuries last season. Funny, though, he was listed on the injury report just once, which is probably why Morris publicly pushed back on the quarterback’s claim – which would also subject the Falcons to more NFL scrutiny related to Cousins, this time linked to the injury policy.

Yes, it’s been a mess. And one way or another, it’s not over yet.

Follow Jarrett Bell on social media: @JarrettBell

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

PHOENIX – Los Angeles Dodgers manager Dave Roberts privately worried about his job last fall, wondering if he would be fired if they suffered another first-round exit in October.

They were down two games to one to the San Diego Padres in the best-of-five NL Division Series.

They had no starter in Game 4, and were forced to go with a bullpen game. All-Star first baseman Freddie Freeman couldn’t play because of a badly sprained ankle. And shortstop Miguel Rojas, who injured his groin, tearfully had to inform Roberts that he couldn’t play either.

“I woke up that day feeling really bad, and I couldn’t play,’’ Rojas told USA TODAY Sports on Monday. “I told him, ‘Doc, I’m really sorry man, but I can’t play today. I can’t really walk.’ He texted me right back.

“’Miggy, we’re going to win the World Series this year, and we’re going to win it next year together.’ That was really special because we were one game away from not even making out of the NLDS, and he’s got the confidence on his team that we were going to win.’ You read the message, and you don’t believe it until it’s starting to happen.’’

The Dodgers, having to rely on an eight-reliever bullpen game in Game 4, won 8-0 at Petco Park, and again 2-0 in Game 5 at Dodger Stadium. They wound up winning 10 of their last 13 postseason games and cruised to the World Series title in five games over the New York Yankees. They relied on only three starters and used four bullpen games throughout the postseason.

And there was Roberts on Monday, signing a four-year, $32.4 million contract extension through 2029, a person with direct knowledge of the negotiations told USA TODAY Sports. The person spoke only on the condition of anonymity because the contract is scheduled to be announced Tuesday.

“I can’t talk about it so much, but obviously there’s some closure,’’ Roberts said. “I’m excited. This is the place where I always wanted to be. I just love what we’re doing. This is pretty special. …

“There’s obviously things off the field that are important. I try to make sure that my focus stays on the players, the game, the Dodgers organization. I think I’ve done a good job.

“But the other part of that stuff is just part of the job and I’m looking forward to some closure for sure.’’

Roberts was in the final year of his three-year contract extension that paid him $4 million this season and now doubles his contract, making him the highest-paid manager on an annual average value basis.

Roberts, who has won two World Series titles and has the highest winning percentage (.627) of any manager in MLB history outside the Negro Leagues, will be paid less overall than Chicago Cubs manager Craig Counsell’s five-year, $40 million contract of a year ago. But Counsell was a free agent. Roberts was not interested in testing the market for the potential of a larger contract.

“You guys all know this is where I want to be,’’ Roberts, 52, said this spring. “I just think it all comes down to value. And I think whatever anyone does, they want their value ….

“I do my job because I love baseball, I love the Dodgers and I love the players. But I do feel the body of work is pretty dang good.”

Indeed, Roberts, who was hired after the 2015 season to replace Don Mattingly, has led the Dodgers to four National League pennants, eight division titles and nine postseason berths in his nine years, winning 907 regular-season and postseason games.

The Dodgers have won at least 100 regular-season games in five of the last six full seasons. The only season they didn’t win the NL West under Roberts was in 2021 when they won 106 games, but finished second in the NL West race to the Giants with 107 victories.

“We’re all excited,’’ Dodgers third baseman Max Muncy said. “I couldn’t be happier for him. I already told him that dinner is on him.’’

Still, if they not gotten past the Padres in that first round, who knows what would have happened to Roberts’ job security?

“I do think that if we didn’t win that game it would have become very noisy,’’ Roberts said this spring. “A team that was obviously super-talented to lose three years in a row in the first round, albeit it takes all of us to win and lose, but I do think that calls for my job would have been heightened.”

We’ll never know for sure what would have happened to Roberts, but on Monday, his players appeared more genuinely excited for him than Roberts himself.

“He deserves this so much,’’ Rojas said. “He’s put in the time. He’s been through a lot, you know. He’s always mentioned how special it’s been for him to be the manager of this ballclub, and how special it is to be in front of this clubhouse and this franchise.

“He embodies what it means to be a good leader. And that’s what I really care about, the personality, the character and always communicating with everybody.

“That’s why I gave him a big hug today because I know how hard it’s been.’’

The Dodgers’ World Series title was their first in a full season since 1988, making Roberts only the third Dodgers manager to win more multiple World Series titles.

“It’s interesting where you don’t win a series and you can feel calls for your job,’’ Roberts said in February. “But you win the World Series and now people are saying you’re going to Cooperstown.”

The only active managers who have won multiple World Series titles are Bruce Bochy of the Texas Rangers (four) and the Cincinnati Reds’ Terry Francona (two), each of whom are considered locks for the Hall of Fame.

Roberts will be one of only seven managers this century who will have managed one team for at least 10 years, joining Mike Scioscia (2000-2018 with the Angels), Ron Gardenhire (2002-2014 with the Twins), Bochy (2007-2019 with the Giants), Joe Girardi (2008-2017 with the Yankees), Bob Melvin (2012-2021 with the A’s), Francona (2013-2023 with the Guardians) and Kevin Cash 2015-2025 with the Rays).

The Dodgers, who had only two managers in 43 years with Alston and Lasorda from 1954-1996, now continue the tradition with Roberts.

“It couldn’t happen,’’ Rojas said, “to a better person.’’

Follow Nightengale on X @Bnightengale

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Florida Panthers defenseman Aaron Ekblad has been suspended for 20 games for violating the NHL’s performance-enhancing substances program, the league announced Monday.

That will cost him the final 18 games of the regular season and the first two games of the playoffs as the Panthers prepare to defend their Stanley Cup title.

He is being referred to the NHL/NHLPA Program for Substance Abuse and Behavioral Health for evaluation and possible treatment.

‘The news that I had failed a random drug test was a shock,’ Ekblad, 29, said in a statement released through the NHL Players’ Association. ‘Ultimately, I made a mistake by taking something to help me recover from recent injuries without first checking with proper medical and team personnel.’

PANTHERS: Brad Marchand bears no ill will after Bruins trade him

Ekblad, who missed eight games in January, has averaged a team-best 23:31 in ice time, and his 33 points lead Panthers defensemen. He had six points in 24 games during Florida’s playoff run in 2024.

His absence will give more ice time to newly acquired Seth Jones, a fellow right-shot defenseman. The Panthers had traded for Jones to boost their defense after Brandon Montour and Oliver Ekman-Larsson left in free agency last summer.

‘I have let my teammates, the Panthers organization and our great fans down,’ said Ekblad, who’s in the final year of his eight-year contract. ‘For that, I am truly sorry. I have accepted responsibility for my mistake and will be fully prepared to return to my team when my suspension is over. I have learned a hard lesson and cannot wait to be back with my teammates.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY