Author

admin

Browsing

Here’s a quick recap of the crypto landscape for Monday (November 24) as of 9:00 p.m. UTC.

Get the latest insights on Bitcoin, Ether and altcoins, along with a round-up of key cryptocurrency market news.

Bitcoin and Ether price update

Bitcoin (BTC) was priced at US$89,102.53, up 1.9 percent in 24 hours.

The cryptocurrency is up after last week’s rout, which saw over US$1.2 billion in spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) outflows, marking the third consecutive week with over US$1 billion in outflows, as per SoSoValue.

Bitcoin price performance, November 24, 2025.

Chart via TradingView.

However, market sentiment remains cautious, with the Fear and Greed Index reading 12 at market close. Increased open interest and large short liquidations suggest potential volatility and possible rebound dynamics.

“In the short term, a rebound is highly likely, but if we fall again and lose the US$80,000 level, the probability of facing a much tougher period becomes significantly higher,” CryptoQuant said in a post on X.

Bitcoin’s relative strength index at 58.52 indicates moderately bullish momentum, but is still comfortably below overbought territory. A -0.005 funding rate shows traders are still somewhat bearish, although short liquidations may start to shift momentum upward. Economic data due later this week could lift markets higher if it reinforces expectations of an interest rate cut from the US Federal Reserve. Market odds for a December rate cut have risen recently, with many sources placing the probability at around 70 to 79 percent.

Meanwhile, ETH (ETH) was US$2,973.36, up by 5.1 percent in 24 hours. Liquidations of US$39.75 million, predominantly in short positions, may have fueled upward price pressure through a short squeeze.

Open interest rose 3.07 percent to US$35.93 billion, suggesting increasing trader engagement and speculative activity in Ether derivatives. A funding rate of zero reflects a balance between bullish and bearish sentiment among traders.

Altcoin price update

  • XRP (XRP) was priced at US$2.26, up by 9.2 percent over 24 hours.
  • Solana (SOL) was trading at US$138.82, up by 4.7 percent over 24 hours.

Today’s crypto news to know

Cardano chain split, Etherscan API outage highlight DeFi risks

Recent events in the crypto ecosystem have underscored the vulnerabilities and institutional challenges facing DeFi investors. On November 21, Cardano experienced an accidental chain split triggered by a malformed transaction, temporarily dividing the blockchain into two competing chains.

The disruption exposed weaknesses in network resilience and stake pool operations, causing lost block rewards and transaction irregularities in DeFi protocols dependent on Cardano’s network stability.

Then, Etherscan unexpectedly cut off API access to roughly 10 percent of its blockchains and networks. This sudden outage occurred during the DevConnect conference, impairing developers’ ability to manage smart contracts effectively, further revealing how dependent DeFi investors are on the reliability of ancillary infrastructure.

These events came amid growing tensions involving JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM).

The banking giant has drawn ire from the crypto community for reportedly influencing MSCI to exclude digital asset treasury companies holding more than 50 percent of their assets in cryptocurrencies.

JPMorgan’s research warns that the exclusion could trigger forced selloffs potentially totaling up to US$8.8 billion, with Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) alone possibly facing US$2.8 billion in outflows.

The final decision will be announced on January 15 ,with changes taking effect in February.

The bank then upgraded ratings on Monday for Bitcoin-mining companies Cipher Mining (NASDAQ:CIFR) and CleanSpark (NASDAQ:CLSK) to overweight from neutral, citing strong momentum in high-performance computing partnerships and long-term cloud and colocation deals that improve revenue visibility.

JPMorgan’s stance highlights the institutional and regulatory tensions complicating the interface between traditional finance and the fast-evolving crypto ecosystem.

Franklin Templeton, Grayscale launch XRP ETFs

The Franklin XRP ETF (ARCA:XRPZ) and the Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (ARCA:GXRP) both launched on Monday, providing new regulated investment options for XRP exposure.

Investor response was prompt, with early trading volumes indicating strong demand and positive sentiment around XRP’s future prospects as reflected in the market’s reception to both ETFs.

Market watchers see this dual launch as a major step toward integrating crypto assets like XRP into traditional finance frameworks, enhancing liquidity and investor confidence.

Ray Youssef, CEO of peer-to-peer crypto app NoOnes, said a wave of altcoin ETF launches could bring a much-needed dose of optimism back into the market if investors interpret new listings as implicit regulatory approval.

“As market sentiment has been so underwhelming in recent times, the ETF season hitting the market at its current condition may be when they can make the most significant contribution to the digital asset economy this year.”

Youssef added that the launch of altcoin ETFs is creating a steady flow of capital into the digital asset market, providing a liquidity buffer. This momentum could lead to an end-of-year rally for altcoins.

Burry debuts newsletter after Scion shutdown

Michael Burry, best known for his prescient bet against the US housing market in 2008, has launched a paid Substack newsletter not long after closing his hedge fund, Scion Asset Management.

In his introductory post, Burry emphasizes that the move does not mark a retirement, but rather a shift toward writing without the regulatory constraints that accompany professional money management.

Priced at US$39 per month, the newsletter has quickly drawn more than 21,000 subscribers.

Early essays revisit his trading history during the dot-com era and outline why he views today’s artificial intelligence boom as a supply-glutted bubble primed for correction.

With Scion now closed, Burry says the newsletter will become his primary outlet for analysis as he continues to track what he views as speculative excess building across technology markets.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The worst college football season of 2025 is complete.

Massachusetts lost to Bowling Green 45-14 on Tuesday, Nov. 25 to finish 0-12, the worst season in program history. After cutting the deficit to 28-14 before halftime, UMass was shut out in the second half to secure the winless season.

UMass will be the lone team in FBS to not win a game during the 2025 season.

The Minutemen have struggled as a football program ever since they made the jump to FBS in 2012, but the 2025 campaign hit a new low. It was the first season under coach Joe Harasymiak and UMass was playing its first season back in the MAC (it left the conference in 2015).

The 12 losses on the season included a 27-26 loss to FCS Bryant in Week 2 that ended on a last-second field goal. That game against the Bulldogs and the loss to Buffalo were the closest UMass got to winning – those were the only games it lost by single-digits. It lost all of its games by an average margin of 27.5 points.

UMass football struggles

The 2025 season continues what’s been a troubling trend for the Minutemen, as they have lost 16 consecutive games dating back to 2024. It last beat an FBS team on Oct. 28, 2023, when it beat Army.

UMass last went winless during the shortened 2020 season with an 0-4 record. However, there have only been a few wins in the past 15 years.

Since joining FBS, UMass has not won more than four games in a season, and has gone 1-11 in five seasons. Harasymiak is the fifth coach since 2012, and in that time, UMass has won just a total of 28 games.

Winless seasons in college football

This season marks the second straight season a team failed to win a game after Kent State went 0-12 in 2024.

Since 2012, there have been nine teams that went winless, excluding the 2020 season. In that COVID-shortened season, four teams didn’t win a game.

Here’s a look at recent winless squads:

  • 2025: UMass (0-12)
  • 2024: Kent State (0-12)
  • 2019: Akron (0-12)
  • 2017: UTEP (0-12)
  • 2015: UCF (0-12)
  • 2015: Kansas (0-12)
  • 2013: Miami Ohio (0-12)
  • 2013: Georgia State (0-12)
  • 2012: Southern Mississippi (0-12)
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

When all the top teams in the win or don’t play, there isn’t much mystery about the next College Football Playoff rankings release. But that doesn’t mean there wasn’t some things worth noting in the fourth reveal of the season after an uneventful Week 13.

First, let’s start with the obvious. Ohio State retained its position at No. 1 ahead of its matchup with Michigan. The Buckeyes must win to guarantee a spot in the Big Ten title game with the likely opponent being No. 2 Indiana, which has held that spot since the first rankings.

Texas A&M, the other remaining Bowl Subdivision unbeaten, remains third followed by Georgia and Texas Tech. The Aggies can lock up a spot in the SEC title game with a defeat of Texas.

The second part of the top 10 had one change. This group has some danger ahead of Week 14. No. 6 Oregon – up one spot – faces a tricky test at Washington. No. 7 Mississippi, which drops one spot, heads to rival Mississippi State and Oklahoma is eighth and must finish off its SEC gauntlet by beating LSU. Notre Dame and Alabama occupy the last two spots for at-large teams with the Crimson Tide also going on the road against its biggest rival – Auburn.

Lurking outside the top 10 are the next five of Brigham Young, Miami, Utah, Vanderbilt and Michigan. The Cougars can still control their destiny by winning the Big 12 while the others are poised to potentially join the field with some help in the final two weekends. It’s notable the Hurricanes are three spots behind Notre Dame – a team that they beat in the opener. A win against No. 22 Pittsburgh could boost Miami closer and possibly knock out the Fighting Irish.

There is more definition among how things stack up in the race for the automatic bid going to one champion of the Group of Five conferences. Tulane was the only team among the contenders ranked last week, and the Green Wave remained at No. 24. Nobody else joined them.

Tulane and North Texas will play for the American Conference title if both win this weekend, which would likely mean unranked James Madison is out of the picture without one of those teams losing. The Dukes will not face a ranked opponent in the Sun Belt title game.

The ranking is the fourth of five Thursday releases by the committee. The next one will come Dec. 2 after Week 14. The College Football Playoff field is revealed in the final ranking on Sunday, Dec. 7.

CFP rankings Top 25

  1. Ohio State (11-0)
  2. Indiana (11-0)
  3. Texas A&M (11-0)
  4. Georgia (10-1)
  5. Texas Tech (10-1)
  6. Oregon (10-1)
  7. Mississippi (10-1)
  8. Oklahoma (9-2)
  9. Notre Dame (9-2)
  10. Alabama (9-2)
  11. Brigham Young (10-1)
  12. Miami (9-2)
  13. Utah (9-2)
  14. Vanderbilt (9-2)
  15. Michigan (9-2)
  16. Texas (8-3)
  17. Southern California (8-3)
  18. Virginia (9-2)
  19. Tennessee (8-3)
  20. Arizona State (8-3)
  21. SMU (8-3)
  22. Pittsburgh (8-3)
  23. Georgia Tech (9-2)
  24. Tulane (9-2)
  25. Arizona (8-3)

How the College Football Playoff would look based on rankings

First round

No. 12 Tulane at No. 5 Texas Tech

No. 11 Miami at No. 6 Oregon

No. 10 Alabama at No. 7 Mississippi

No. 9 Notre Dame at No. 8 Oklahoma

Quarterfinals

No. 4 Georgia vs. Tulane-Texas Tech winner

No. 3 Texas A&M vs. Miami-Oregon winner

No. 2 Indiana vs. Alabama-Mississippi winner

No. 1 Ohio State vs. Notre Dame-Oklahoma winner

What is the College Football Playoff schedule?

The schedule for first-round games taking place on campus sites will see No. 5 hosting No. 12, No. 6 facing No. 11, No. 7 meeting No. 10 and No. 8 squaring off with No. 9.

Winners of those games will advance to the quarterfinals with the Cotton Bowl hosting its matchup on Dec. 31. The other three games of the round will be played Jan. 1 with the Orange Bowl starting the day followed by the Rose Bowl and Sugar Bowl. The Fiesta Bowl and Peach Bowl will host the semifinals on Jan. 8 and Jan. 9, respectively.

The championship game will be played on Jan. 19 in Miami Gardens, Florida, at Hard Rock Stadium.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

One of the bigger changes to the projected 12-team College Football Playoff bracket that came out of the fourth top 25 rankings reveal was Oregon moving ahead of Ole Miss.

However, the biggest takeaway from the CFP rankings reveal show was provided by CFP selection committee chair Hunter Yurachek.

In the process of responding to a question from Rece Davis about the Ducks swapping spots with the Rebels following a top-20-ranked win over USC, Yurachek, the athletic director at Arkansas, poorly broke out the ‘6-7’ joke trend, which created quite an awkward moment on television for all involved.

The ‘6-7’ trend dates back to the song ‘Doot Doot,’ released by rapper Skrilla in December 2024, and has become a TikTok viral trend in recent months. It was recently named as the ‘Word of the Year’ by Dictionary.com and means either ‘so-so’ or ‘maybe this, maybe that’ and is an example of ‘brainrot slang’ per Dictionary.com.

Now back to the CFP talk.

The Ducks picked up their biggest win of the season in the selection committee’s eyes in Week 12 with a 42-27 win over USC. The win for Dan Lanning’s squad not only keeps them in the mix for a spot in the Big Ten championship game but has them well-positioned to host a first-round home game in Eugene, regardless of whether they make a trip to Indiana to defend their Big Ten title.

Ole Miss dropped down a spot to the No. 7 seed despite being on bye. Both Ole Miss and Oregon have the same number of wins at 10, though the Ducks have one more ranked win than the Rebels at three, which includes their Sept. 27 win over then-No. 3 Penn State.

Yurachek was also asked whether the Rebels could be penalized depending on Lane Kiffin’s upcoming decision of whether he’s staying at Ole Miss after the 2025 season or leaving for LSU or one of the other open head coaching vacancies that are still open.

‘We didn’t have any discussion about Ole Miss and their coach, that was all about Oregon and their performance against USC. Their strength of schedule continues to climb but they’ve been dominant on the offense and defense side of the ball,(and are) really good on special teams,’ Yurachek said.

‘The committee had been waiting for them to have this signature win to really put in what we thought they deserve to be.’

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

New York’s mayor and the UFC’s CEO have different ideas about discipline following a recent brawl.

Dana White said MMA fighter Dillon Danis would be banned from future UFC events for his role in a brawl that erupted in Madison Square Garden on Nov. 15, during UFC 322. Afterward, White said, ‘So they called me from downstairs and they said, ‘We got him down here. Do you want to press charges and have him arrested?’ And I said, no, we don’t want to press charges. It’s the fight business, man.”

But New York Mayor Eric Adams indicated he has more extensive plans than White, the UFC’s CEO. The New York Police Department is involved, according to the outgoing mayor.

“These assaults at Madison Square Garden are completely unacceptable,’’ Adams wrote on his personal X account. “The NYPD is already conducting a full investigation, and everyone responsible will be held accountable.’’

Danis, a former teammate of Conor McGregor, was thought to have instigated the brawl that took place near the octagon before the main card started the night of UFC 322.

After the event, White said he was to blame. But Adams suggested the individuals who participated in the brawl will have to take responsibility.

On X, Adams shared video of the brawl that included Danis, who previously competed on the Bellator circuit, and members of Khabib Nurmagomedov’s team, according to MMAJunkie.

ESPN reported that multiple videos showed teammates of UFC welterweight champion Islam Makhachev also were involved.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

A rather quiet Week 13 in college football brought minimal change to the US LBM Coaches Poll and AP Top 25, with minimal major movement among the top 10 teams.

The same happens with the fourth unveiling of the College Football Playoff top 25 rankings reveal.

The top five seeds did not change from last week’s unveiling, as Ohio State, Indiana, Texas A&M, Georgia and Texas Tech stayed at No. 1 through No. 5, respectively. The biggest change came with the selection committee rewarding Oregon for its win over USC by bumping the Ducks to the No. 6 seed, which moved Ole Miss down to No. 7.

Stream CFP rankings release shows live with Fubo (free trial)

In the process of discussing the committee’s decision to swap the Ducks and the Rebels, CFP selection committee chair Hunter Yurachek poorly executed the ‘6-7’ trending joke in his response to Rece Davis, which created an awkward moment on television.

The representatives for the ACC and the Group of Five continue to be the most pressing question after the Nov. 25 rankings reveal. Miami remains the highest-ranked ACC team, though if the Hurricanes make the official CFP bracket, they will do so as an at-large, as Mario Cristobal’s squad needs a lot of things to go right in Week 14 to make the ACC championship game. This means whoever makes the ACC championship game will likely be penciled in at No. 11 in the bracket.

For the Group of Five, Tulane stayed in the field at No. 12 as the highest-ranked Group of Five team.

USA TODAY Sports brought you updates as the bracket is revealed on Nov. 25. Follow below:

CFP rankings reveal highlights

CFP bracket after Week 13

Here’s how the CFP bracket looks after Week 13’s top 25 release:

  1. Ohio State *
  2. Indiana
  3. Texas A&M *
  4. Georgia
  5. Texas Tech *
  6. Oregon
  7. Ole Miss
  8. Oklahoma
  9. Notre Dame
  10. Alabama
  11. Miami *
  12. Tulane *

* Denotes five highest ranked conference champions

CFP rankings after Week 13

  1. Ohio State (11-0)
  2. Indiana (11-0)
  3. Texas A&M (11-0)
  4. Georgia (10-1)
  5. Texas Tech (10-1)
  6. Oregon (10-1)
  7. Ole Miss (10-1)
  8. Oklahoma (9-2)
  9. Notre Dame (9-2)
  10. Alabama (9-2)
  11. BYU (10-1)
  12. Miami (9-2)
  13. Utah (9-2)
  14. Vanderbilt (9-2)
  15. Michigan (9-2)
  16. Texas (8-3)
  17. USC (8-3)
  18. Virginia (9-2)
  19. Tennessee (8-3)
  20. Arizona State (8-3)
  21. SMU (8-3)
  22. Pitt (8-3)
  23. Georgia Tech (9-2)
  24. Tulane (9-2)
  25. Arizona (8-3)

CFP bracket matchups after Week 13

College Football Playoff first round matchups

  • No. 12 Tulane vs. No. 5 Texas Tech
  • No. 11 Miami vs. No. 6 Oregon
  • No. 10 Alabama vs. No. 7 Ole Miss
  • No. 9 Notre Dame vs. No. 8 Oklahoma
  • Byes: No. 1 Ohio State, No. 2 Indiana, No. 3 Texas A&M and No. 4 Georgia

College Football playoff quarterfinal matchups

  • No. 4 Georgia vs. Winner of No. 5 Texas Tech/No. 12 Tulane
  • No. 1 Ohio State vs. Winner of No. 8 Oklahoma/No. 9 Notre Dame
  • No. 3 Texas A&M vs. Winner of No. 6 Oregon/No. 11 Miami
  • No. 2 Indiana vs. Winner of No. 7 Ole Miss/No. 10 Alabama

Oregon moves up to No. 6 seed

The CFP committee was impressed by Oregon’s win over USC in Week 13, as the Ducks were bumped up to the No. 6 seed in the 12-team CFP bracket. As a result of Oregon moving up, Ole Miss moved down a spot to the No. 7 seed despite being.

CFP rankings coming up

USC defeats Seton Hall in the Maui Invitational. CFP rankings show coming up!

Why is CFP rankings show delayed?

Due to the ongoing Seton Hall vs. USC men’s college basketball game at the Maui Invitational, the fourth unveiling of the College Football Playoff top 25 rankings has been delayed. The Pirates and Trojans have well over nine minutes left to play in the second half in Maui.

CFP bracket predictions

Here’s a look at CFP rankings for this week and final bracket predictions from experts from USA TODAY Sports:

Rankings predictions from Paul Myerberg, USA TODAY

  1. Ohio State
  2. Indiana
  3. Texas A&M
  4. Georgia
  5. Texas Tech
  6. Ole Miss
  7. Oregon
  8. Oklahoma
  9. Notre Dame
  10. Alabama
  11. BYU
  12. Miami
  1. Ohio State *
  2. Texas A&M *
  3. Indiana
  4. Georgia
  5. Texas Tech *
  6. Ole Miss
  7. Oregon
  8. Oklahoma
  9. Alabama
  10. Notre Dame
  11. SMU *
  12. Tulane *

* Denotes one of five highest-ranked conference champions

CFP rankings schedule, release times

Here’s a look at the remaining dates on when the College Football Playoff rankings will be released:

  • Tuesday, Nov. 25: 7 p.m. ET
  • Tuesday, Dec. 2: 7 p.m. ET
  • Sunday, Dec. 7: Noon ET

CFP bracket schedule 2025-26

Here’s a full breakdown of the 2025-26 College Football Playoff bracket schedule:

CFP First-Round

On campus sites

  • Friday, Dec. 19
    • Game 1: 8 p.m. ET
  • Saturday, Dec. 20
    • Game 2: Noon ET
    • Game 3: 3:30 p.m. ET
    • Game 4: 7:30 p.m. ET

CFP Quarterfinals

  • Wednesday, Dec. 31
    • Cotton Bowl (Game 5): 7:30 p.m. ET
  • Thursday, Jan. 1
    • Orange Bowl (Game 6): Noon ET
    • Rose Bowl (Game 7): 4 p.m. ET
    • Sugar Bowl (Game 8): 8 p.m. ET

CFP Semifinals

  • Thursday, Jan. 8
    • Fiesta Bowl (Game 9): 7:30 p.m. ET
  • Friday, Jan. 9
    • Peach Bowl (Game 10): 7:30 p.m. ET

CFP Championship

  • Monday, Jan. 19 at Hard Rock Stadium (Miami): 7:30 p.m. ET

When is the CFP national championship in 2026?

The national championship game of the 2025-25 College Football Playoff is set for Monday, Jan. 19 at 7:30 p.m. ET at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, Florida.

How to watch College Football Playoff rankings release

  • TV channel: ESPN
  • Livestream: ESPN app | Fubo (free trial)

ESPN will once again handle the broadcast of the College Football Playoff rankings reveal show. Streaming options for all CFP rankings release shows include the ESPN app (with a TV login) and Fubo, which carries the ESPN family of networks and offers a free trial to new subscribers.

What time does CFP rankings come out today?

  • Date: Tuesday, Nov. 25
  • Time: 7 p.m. ET

The fourth unveiling of the College Football Playoff rankings will be released on Tuesday, Nov. 25 at 7 p.m. ET. It is the second-to-last CFP top 25 rankings reveal before the official Selection Sunday one on Sunday, Dec. 8.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

This press release is issued pursuant to the requirements of National Instrument 62-103 – The Early Warning System and Related Take-Over Bid and Insider Reporting Issues

In accordance with the requirements of Section 3.1 of National Instrument 62-103 – The Early Warning System and Related Take-Over Bid and Insider Reporting Issues, Matthew J. Mason announces that, in connection with the closing of the Technology Licensing Agreement (the ‘Agreement’) with Stallion Uranium Corp. (TSXV: STUD,OTC:STLNF) (OTCQB: STLNF) (FSE: B76) (the ‘Issuer’), he has acquired 3,750,000 Common Shares of the Issuer at a deemed price of $0.12 per Common Share.

Immediately before the closing of the Agreement: (i) Mr. Mason held an aggregate of 20,825,000 Common Shares, representing approximately 17% of the Issuer’s issued and outstanding Common Shares on an undiluted basis; and (ii) assuming the exercise in full of all of the convertible securities of the Issuer held by Mr. Mason, being 15,137,500 Warrants to purchase an additional 15,137,500 Common Shares, Mr. Mason would have held an aggregate of 35,962,500 Common Shares, representing approximately 29% of the Issuer’s issued and outstanding Common Shares on a partially diluted basis.

Immediately after the closing of the Agreement: (i) Mr. Mason held an aggregate of 24,575,000 Common Shares, representing approximately 19% of the Issuer’s issued and outstanding Common Shares on an undiluted basis; and (ii) assuming the exercise in full of all of the convertible securities held by Mr. Mason, being 15,137,500 Warrants to purchase an additional 15,137,500 Common Shares, Mr. Mason would hold a total of 39,712,500 Common Shares, representing approximately 30% of the Issuer’s issued and outstanding Common Shares on a partially diluted basis.

Mr. Mason acquired such Common Shares for investment purposes and may, from time to time, acquire additional securities of the Issuer or dispose of such securities as he may deem appropriate, on the basis of his assessment of market conditions and in compliance with applicable securities regulatory requirements. A copy of the early warning report filed by Mr. Mason may be obtained on the Issuer’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca.

For more information, please contact the Acquiror at 925 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3L2.

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/275960

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The BRICS nations, originally composed of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, have had many discussions about establishing a new reserve currency backed by a basket of their respective currencies.

The creation of a potentially gold-backed currency, known as the ‘Unit,’ as a US dollar alternative is also under consideration by BRICS members. However, whether or not these countries can fully separate themselves from the ruling global currency is up for debate even amongst themselves.

At the 2024 BRICS Summit, the movement away from US dollar supremacy really came to a head when Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared on stage holding what appeared as a prototype of a possible BRICS banknote.

However, he soon backed away from his previous aggressive calls for de-dollarization, stating the goal of the BRICS member nations is not to move away from the US dollar-dominated SWIFT platform, but rather to deter the ‘weaponization’ of the US dollar by developing alternative systems for using local currencies in financial transactions between BRICS countries and with trading partners.

‘We are not refusing, not fighting the dollar, but if they don’t let us work with it, what can we do? We then have to look for other alternatives, which is happening,’ Putin told listeners.

A potential BRICS currency would allow these nations to assert their economic independence while competing with the existing international financial system. The current system is dominated by the US dollar, which accounts for about 89 percent of all currency trading. Traditionally, nearly 100 percent of oil trading was conducted in US dollars; however, in 2023, one-fifth of oil trades were reportedly made using non-US dollar currencies.

Central to this situation is the US trade war with China, as well as US sanctions on China and Russia. Should the BRICS establish a new reserve currency, it would likely significantly impact the US dollar, potentially leading to a decline in demand, or what’s known as de-dollarization. In turn, this would have implications for the US and global economies.

If BRICS watchers were hoping for more fireworks at the 2025 BRICS meeting held in Brazil this July, they were sorely disappointed. Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping were not in attendance, and talk of a BRICS currency was much more muted. On top of this, according to Modern Diplomacy, that topic may be even less of a concern at next year’s BRICS meeting; it will be held in India, which has sought to distance itself from a move away from the US dollar.

It’s still too hard to predict if and when a BRICS currency will be released, but it’s a good time to look at the potential for a BRICS currency and its possible implications for investors.

In this article

    Why do the BRICS nations want to create a new currency?

    The BRICS nations have a slew of reasons for wanting to set up a new currency, including recent global financial challenges and aggressive US foreign policies. They want to better serve their own economic interests while reducing global dependence on the US dollar and the euro.

    In recent years, the US has placed numerous sanctions on Russia and Iran. The two countries are working together to bring about a BRICS currency that would negate the economic impacts of such restrictions, as per Iranian Ambassador to Russia Kazem Jalal, speaking at a press conference during the Russia-Islamic World: KazanForum in May 2024.

    Some experts believe that a BRICS currency is a flawed idea, as it would unite countries with very different economies. There are also concerns that non-Chinese members might increase their dependence on China’s yuan instead. That said, when Russia demanded in October 2023 that India pay for oil in yuan as Russia is struggling to use its excess supply of rupees, India refused to use anything other than the US dollar or rupees to pay.

    When will a BRICS currency be released?

    There’s no definitive launch date as of yet, but the countries’ leaders have discussed the possibility at length.

    During the 14th BRICS Summit, held in mid-2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin said the BRICS countries plan to issue a ‘new global reserve currency,’ and are ready to work openly with all fair trade partners.

    In April 2023, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva showed support for a BRICS currency, commenting, “Why can’t an institution like the BRICS bank have a currency to finance trade relations between Brazil and China, between Brazil and all the other BRICS countries? Who decided that the dollar was the (trade) currency after the end of gold parity?”

    In the lead up to the 2023 BRICS Summit, there was speculation that an announcement of such a currency could be on the table. This proved to be wishful thinking, however. ‘The development of anything alternative is more a medium to long term ambition. There is no suggestion right now to creates a BRICS currency,’ Leslie Maasdorp, CFO of the New Development Bank, told Bloomberg at the time. The bank represents the BRICS bloc.

    Government officials in Brazil, which took the rotating presidency of the BRICS group for 2025, have said there are no plans to take any significant steps toward a BRICS currency.

    However, measures to reduce the reliance on the US dollar are very much on the table with cross-border payment systems, including exploring blockchain technology, a major theme at the 2025 BRICS summit, reported Reuters.

    As mentioned, in 2026, the BRICS Summit will be held in India, which earlier this year distanced itself from the idea of a move away from the US dollar. Speaking at an event in London in March 2025, India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar stated, ‘I don’t think there’s any policy on our part to replace the dollar. The dollar as the reserve currency is the source of global economic stability, and right now what we want in the world is more economic stability, not less. I don’t think there’s a unified BRICS position on this. I think BRICS members, and now that we have more members, have very diverse positions on this matter.’

    Which nations are members of BRICS?

    As of 2025, there are 10 BRICS member nations: Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This expanded group of 10 full member countries is sometimes referred to as BRICS+.

    The group was originally composed of the four nations of Brazil, Russia, India and China and called BRIC, which changed to BRICS when South Africa joined in 2010.

    At the 2023 BRICS Summit, six countries were invited to become BRICS members: Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. All countries but Argentina and Saudi Arabia officially joined the alliance in January 2024, and in 2025, Indonesia became the 10th full member of BRICS.

    Additionally, at the 2024 BRICS Summit, 13 nations signed on as BRICS partner countries, although they are not yet full-fledged members: Algeria, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Nigeria, Thailand, Turkey, Uganda, Vietnam and Uzbekistan.

    Saudi Arabia has seemingly been on the fence about joining the BRICS. The Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s November 19, 2025, announcement of a US$1 trillion investment in the US economy during a visit to the White House may signal something about the Middle Eastern country’s allegiance.

    What would the advantages of a BRICS currency be?

    A new currency could have several benefits for the BRICS countries, including more efficient cross-border transactions and increased financial inclusion. By leveraging blockchain technology, digital currencies and smart contracts, the currency could revolutionize the global financial system. Thanks to seamless cross-border payments, it could also promote trade and economic integration among the BRICS nations and beyond.

    A new BRICS currency would also:

    • Strengthen economic integration within the BRICS countries
    • Reduce the influence of the US on the global stage
    • Weaken the standing of the US dollar as a global reserve currency
    • Encourage other countries to form alliances to develop regional currencies
    • Mitigate risks associated with global volatility due to unilateral measures and the diminution of dollar dependence

    What is Donald Trump’s stance on a BRICS currency?

    Trump has not been shy about upping the ante on American protectionism with tariffs. During the first US presidential debate between him and Vice President Kamala Harris on September 10, 2024, Trump doubled down on his pledge to punish BRICS nations with strict tariffs if they seek to move away from the US dollar as the global currency.

    He originally took a particularly strong stance against China, threatening to implement 60 percent to 100 percent tariffs on Chinese imports, although these hefty tariffs would be paid by American companies and consumers purchasing Chinese products, not by China itself.

    In early December 2024, Trump posted an even more direct threat to BRICS nations on Truth Social:

    “We require a commitment from these countries that they will neither create a new Brics currency nor back any other currency to replace the mighty US dollar or they will face 100% tariffs and should expect to say goodbye to selling into the wonderful US economy.’

    In response to Trump demanding a ‘commitment’ from BRICS nations not to challenge the supremacy of the US dollar, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov sounded less than threatened.

    ‘More and more countries are switching to the use of national currencies in their trade and foreign economic activities,’ Peskov said, per Reuters. ‘If the U.S. uses force, as they say economic force, to compel countries to use the dollar it will further strengthen the trend of switching to national currencies (in international trade).’

    In July 2025, President Trump took it a step further by threatening to slap an extra 10 percent in tariffs on countries who side with BRICS policies, although this has not been implemented as of November 2025. ‘Any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy,’ he wrote in a social media post.

    This additional BRICS targeted tariff has not yet been implemented as of November 2025.

    How will Trump’s tariffs affect BRICS nations?

    If US President Donald Trump were to come through on his promise to enact 100 percent tariffs on BRICS nations the outcome could prove costly for all parties involved.

    “The action would result in slower growth and higher inflation than otherwise in the US and most of the targeted economies,” according to analysis by the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    China would likely experience the worst slowing of its GDP growth as the US is its largest trading partner. One silver lining for China is that its disciplined central bank will help to save it from accelerated inflation.

    While neither the 100 percent or 10 percent tariffs specifically targeting BRICS countries for their membership have been implemented, the countries still face many other tariffs from the US.

    Trump’s blanket 50 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, set on June 3, 2025, impact Brazil, China and the UAE. Brazil is a top three source for US steel imports, while China and the UAE are significant sources of US aluminum imports.

    In late July, Brazil was also saddled with a 50 percent tariff on a broader range of goods, which US President Donald Trump inflicted on the nation in response to the trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro for his alleged coup attempt.

    Trump’s tariffs could have a significant impact on Brazil’s economy, which is the largest in Latin America. However, most of the key trading sectors between the two nations are exempt from the tariff, including “civil aircraft, pig iron, precious metals, wood pulp, energy and fertilizers,” states Reuters.

    India is another BRICS nation facing 50 percent tariffs. The sectors targeted span from textiles, garments and footwear to food, leather goods, gems and automobiles. Key industries such as pharmaceuticals and computer chips.

    One of the major sticking points for the Trump administration is India continuing to purchase Russian oil. India and China are the two largest buyers of Russian oil, but the US has yet to punish China for purchasing oil from Russia.

    Although China is the US’s biggest economic rival on the global stage, Trump hit the pause button on the escalating tariff war between the two nations until November 10, 2026.

    In the meantime, the US’s 30 percent tariff on Chinese goods remains in place. Negotiations are underway, including on a proposed 245 percent tariff on Chinese electric vehicle imports.

    In July, the Trump Administration imposed 30 percent tariffs on South Africa, the US’s second biggest trading partner. The African nation’s agriculture, mining and manufacturing sector are at significant risk from the tariffs, but there are exceptions in place for “copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, some critical minerals, stainless steel scrap and energy products,” reports the BBC.

    How are BRICS nations responding to US tariffs?

    Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva convened an online BRICS summit on September 8, 2025, to address the threat of US trade policies and tariffs to member nations.

    “Tariff blackmail is being normalized as an instrument to seize markets and interfere in domestic affairs,” stated Lula, according to a prepared statement from the Brazilian government.

    “Our countries have become victims of unjustified and illegal trade practices.”

    Both Lula and Jinping called upon their BRICS peers to stand together and push back against unfair trade practices, and strengthen trade and cooperation between member nations.

    However, the South China Morning Post reports that summit attendees fell short of directly criticizing US President Donald Trump in a bid not to further stoke his ire. That may also be why most BRICS members are trying to negotiate with the US rather than fight back with retaliatory tariffs.

    Critics have suggested Trump’s tariffs are having the undesirable effect of driving major trading partners like Brazil, India and South Africa further into the arms of US rivals China and Russia.

    While currently only 9 percent of China’s exports are to other BRICS members, according to Reuters, trade between China and Russia reached a record US$244.8 billion in 2024.

    In addition, China is Brazil’s largest trading partner, importing 70 percent of its soybeans from the Latin American country. In fact, 28 percent of Brazil’s total exports go to China and 24 percent of its imports are from China.

    BRICS trade relations may strengthen as the bloc seeks to mitigate the economic impact of US tariffs.

    How would a new BRICS currency affect the US dollar?

    RomanR / Shutterstock

    For decades, the US dollar has enjoyed unparalleled dominance as the world’s leading reserve currency. According to the US Federal Reserve, between 1999 and 2019, the dollar was used in 96 percent of international trade invoicing in the Americas, 74 percent in the Asia-Pacific region and 79 percent in the rest of the world.

    According to the Atlantic Council, as of November 2025 the US dollar is used in approximately 89 percent of currency exchanges, and 56 percent of all foreign currency reserves held by central banks. Due to its status as the most widely used currency for conversion and its use as a benchmark in the forex market, almost all central banks worldwide hold dollars.

    Additionally, the dollar is used for the vast majority of oil trades.

    Although the dollar’s reserve currency share has decreased as the euro and yen have gained popularity, the dollar is still the most widely used reserve currency, followed by the euro, the yen, the pound and the yuan.

    The potential impact of a new BRICS currency on the US dollar remains uncertain, with experts debating its potential to challenge the dollar’s dominance. However, if a new BRICS currency was to stabilize against the dollar, it could weaken the power of US sanctions, leading to a further decline in the dollar’s value. It could also cause an economic crisis affecting American households. Aside from that, this new currency could accelerate the trend toward de-dollarization.

    Nations worldwide are seeking alternatives to the US dollar, with examples being China and Russia trading in their own currencies, and countries like India, Kenya and Malaysia advocating for de-dollarization or signing agreements with other nations to trade in local currencies or alternative benchmarks.

    While it is unclear whether a new BRICS currency would inspire the creation of other US dollar alternatives, the possibility of challenging the dollar’s dominance as a reserve currency remains.

    And, as countries continue to diversify their reserve holdings, the US dollar could face increasing competition from emerging currencies, potentially altering the balance of power in global markets.

    However, a study by the Atlantic Council’s GeoEconomics Center released in June 2024 shows that the US dollar is far from being dethroned as the world’s primary reserve currency. ‘The group’s ‘Dollar Dominance Monitor’ said the dollar continued to dominate foreign reserve holdings, trade invoicing, and currency transactions globally and its role as the primary global reserve currency was secure in the near and medium term,’ Reuters reported.

    Warwick J. McKibbin and Marcus Noland of the Peterson Institute for International Economics agree with this sentiment, writing in their analysis of the impacts of US tariffs on BRICS nations that ‘the BRICS pose no serious threat to the dollar’s dominance.’

    Ultimately, the impact of a new BRICS currency on the US dollar will depend on its adoption, its perceived stability and the extent to which it can offer a viable alternative to the dollar’s longstanding hegemony.

    Will the BRICS have a digital currency?

    BRICS nations do not as of yet have their own specific digital currency, but a BRICS blockchain-based payment system is in the works, according to Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov in March 2024.

    Known as the BRICS Bridge multi-sided payment platform, it would connect member states’ financial systems using payment gateways for settlements in central bank digital currencies. The planned system would serve as an alternative to the current international cross-border payment platform, the SWIFT system, which is dominated by US dollars.

    “We believe that creating an independent BRICS payment system is an important goal for the future, which would be based on state-of-the-art tools such as digital technologies and blockchain,’ Ushakov said in an interview with Russian news agency TASS, emphasizing that it should be convenient, as well as cost effective and free of politics.

    While development is underway, it has been a slow go and implementation isn’t likely before the end of the decade.

    Another dollar-alternative digital currency cross-border payment system in the works is Project mBridge, which is under development via a collaboration between the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the Bank of Thailand, the Digital Currency Institute of the People’s Bank of China and the Central Bank of the UAE. Saudi Arabia joined the project in 2024.

    The central bank digital currencies traded on the platform would be backed by gold and local currencies minted in member nations.

    In June 2024, Forbes reported that the mBridge platform had reached a significant milestone by completing its minimal viable product stage (MVP).

    ‘The MVP platform can undertake real-value transactions (subject to jurisdictional preparedness) and is compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), a decentralized virtual environment that executes code consistently and securely across all Ethereum nodes,’ the publication stated. ‘MVP thus is suitable as a testbed for new use cases and interoperability with other platforms.’

    How does the BRICS Unit relate to Project mBridge?

    Watch the full interview with Andy Schectman.

    ‘(New Development Bank President Dilma Rousseff) came out and publicly said that there has been an agreement in principle to use a new settlement currency called the Unit, which will be backed 40 percent by gold and 60 percent by the local currencies in the BRICS union — the BRICS+ countries. That gold will be in the form of kilo bars and will be deliverable or redeemable for those entities,’ Schectman said.

    ‘The basket of gold and the basket of currencies will be minted in the member countries … it will be put into an escrow account, taken off the ledger so to speak — off of their balance sheet and put onto the mBridge ledger, and held in an escrow account in their own borders. It doesn’t need to be sent to a central authority.’

    How would a BRICS currency impact the economy?

    A potential shift toward a new BRICS currency could have significant implications for the North American economy and investors operating within it. Some of the most affected sectors and industries would include:

    • Oil and gas
    • Banking and finance
    • Commodities
    • International trade
    • Technology
    • Tourism and travel
    • The foreign exchange market

    A new BRICS currency would also introduce new trading pairs, alter currency correlations and increase market volatility, requiring investors to adapt their strategies accordingly.

    How can investors prepare for a new BRICS currency?

    Adjusting a portfolio in response to emerging BRICS currency trends may be a challenge for investors. While it does not currently seem like a BRICS currency is on the immediate horizon, Trump’s aggressive trade tactics have pushed allies away from the US, making diversification important.

    Several strategies can be adopted to capitalize on these trends and diversify your portfolio:

    • Gain exposure to BRICS equity markets through stocks and ETFs that track BRICS market indexes.
    • Consider alternative investments such as real estate or private equity in the BRICS countries.

    Prudent investors will also weigh these strategies against their exposure to market, political and currency fluctuations.

    In terms of investment vehicles, investors could consider ETFs such as the iShares MSCI BIC ETF (ARCA:BKF) or the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (NASDAQ:ECOW). They could also invest in mutual funds such as the T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Fund, or in individual companies within the BRICS countries.

    Simply put, preparing for a new BRICS currency or potential de-dollarization requires careful research and due diligence by investors. Diversifying currency exposure, and investing in commodities, equity markets or alternative investments are possible options to consider while being mindful of the associated risks.

    Investor takeaway

    While it is not certain whether the creation of a BRICS reserve currency will come to pass, its emergence would pose significant implications for the global economy and potentially challenge the US dollar’s dominance as the primary reserve currency. This development would present unique investment opportunities, while introducing risks to existing investments as the shifting landscape alters monetary policy and exacerbates geopolitical tensions.

    For those reasons, investors should closely monitor the progress of a possible BRICS currency. And, if the bloc does eventually create one, it will be important watch the currency’s impact on BRICS member economies and the broader global market. Staying vigilant will help investors to capitalize on growth prospects and hedge against potential risks.

    FAQs for a new BRICS currency

    Is a BRICS currency possible?

    Some financial analysts point to the creation of the euro in 1999 as proof that a BRICS currency may be possible. However, this would require years of preparation, the establishment of a new central bank and an agreement between the five nations to phase out their own sovereign currencies; it would most likely also need the support of the International Monetary Fund to be successful internationally.

    The impact of its war on Ukraine will continue to weaken Russia’s economy and the value of the ruble, and China is intent on raising the power of the yuan internationally. There is also a wide chasm of economic disparity between China and other BRICS nations. These are no small obstacles to overcome.

    Would a new BRICS currency be backed by gold?

    Additionally, speaking at the New Orleans Investment Conference 2023, well-known author Jim Rickards gave a detailed talk on how a gold-backed BRICS currency could work. He suggested that if a BRICS currency unit is worth 1 ounce of gold and the gold price goes to US$3,000 per ounce, the BRICS currency unit would be worth US$3,000, while the dollar would lose value compared to the BRICS currency as measured by the weight of gold.

    Importantly though, he doesn’t see this as a new gold standard, or the end of the US dollar or the euro.

    “(With) a real gold standard, you can take the currency and go to any one of the central banks and get some gold,” Rickards said at the event. “With BRICS they don’t have to own any gold, they don’t have to buy any gold, they don’t have to prop up the price. They can just rise on the dollar gold market.’

    How much gold do the BRICS nations have?

    The combined central bank gold holdings of the original BRICS nations plus Egypt (the only nation of the five new additions to have central bank gold reserves) accounts for more than 20 percent of all the gold held in the world’s central banks. Russia, India and China rank in the top 10 for central bank gold holdings.

    Russia controls 2,329.63 metric tons (MT) of the yellow metal, making it the fifth largest for central bank gold reserves. China follows in the sixth spot with 2,303.51 MT of gold and India places eighth with 880.18 MT. Brazil and South Africa’s central bank gold holdings are much smaller, coming in at 145.14 MT and 125.47 MT, respectively. New BRICS member Egypt’s gold holdings are equally small, at 128.82 MT.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Bert Dohmen, founder and CEO of Dohmen Capital Research, discusses precious metals.

    He believes gold’s fundamentals support ‘much higher prices’ for a number of years, and sees silver doing even better as the US faces down the specter of potential deflation.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    For years, rare earths have been discussed mostly in times of crisis — a supply scare here, a geopolitical flare there. This year, the strategic minerals are again taking center stage as China reasserts control over the sector.

    The latest round of rare earths policy shifts has put new attention on how producers outside China are positioning themselves. For MP Materials (NYSE:MP), 2025 has been less about responding to market turbulence and more about testing what a viable, strategically resilient rare earths supply chain could look like beyond China’s dominance.

    “We’ve been talking about these issues for many, many years,” CFO Ryan Corbett said during a fireside chat at the Benchmark Week conference in Marina del Rey, California.

    “But the export controls in April put everything in stark relief.” The result, he told the audience, has been a level of public and government attention he has “never seen before.”

    And the attention is coming at a pivotal moment for the US-based company.

    This year marked five years since MP went public, an anniversary the team celebrated by ringing the bell at the New York Stock Exchange, as well as the culmination of several major announcements aimed at strengthening rare earths production, processing and magnet making outside of China.

    The long road from mine to magnet

    Corbett is the first to admit that the broader conversation around rare earths often oversimplifies the challenge. Headlines usually focus on mining or magnets, but the real bottlenecks, he stressed, live in the middle.

    “You don’t magically take NdPr oxide and turn it into a magnet in a magnet factory,” he said. The process includes converting oxide to metal, metal to alloy flake, flake to powder, then pressing, sintering, slicing and grinding. Each step requires specific infrastructure, technical expertise and — perhaps most critically — experience.

    Corbett sees this gap clearly in the wake of announcements from companies claiming to have plans for large-scale magnet facilities. “We see all these announcements — ‘We’re going to do a 10,000 ton magnet plant.’ They’ve never made metal before,” he said. “Good luck. It takes time. It takes investment. It takes R&D.”

    When MP listed publicly five years ago, it was still producing only rare earths concentrate. The company told investors it would revisit magnet-making discussions around 2025.

    Geopolitical urgency pushed MP to accelerate that timeline, leading to the company’s fully integrated US facility in Fort Worth, where metal, alloy and finished magnets are now all made domestically.

    “It is critical that we master all of them at scale,” Corbett said. Without that know-how, any new facility will be vulnerable to single-point failures, the same dynamic that has left the industry heavily reliant on China.

    Where the real rare earths bottleneck lies

    When asked what truly slows down western rare earths supply chain development, Corbett didn’t point to mining. Instead, he pointed to refining, a stage China has dominated for decades.

    “China doesn’t have 99 percent of the upstream reserves,” he noted. “They have the refining capacity and capability.”

    That distinction is shaping MP’s next major step: a new world-scale refining facility in Saudi Arabia, built in partnership with Maaden and backed by the US Department of Defense (DoD).

    The project is designed to process feedstocks from around the world, including materials that are too small, too short-lived or too geographically constrained to justify their own refineries.

    Crucially, the new plant is being built with capital from the US government, not MP. “We didn’t want to be putting more capital at risk overseas while we’re fulfilling promises in the US,” Corbett said.

    He added that the government wanted the facility built, and MP brought the technical and operational capability; the equity investment from the DoD bridged the gap.

    The structure is unusual. According to Corbett, this is the first time since World War II that the DoD has taken an equity stake in a private enterprise. But he argued that the situation demands it.

    “From a supply chain and national security perspective, we are that far behind.”

    A price floor that reshapes incentives

    The DoD’s involvement isn’t limited to the Saudi facility.

    This past summer, the department also struck a landmark agreement with MP, establishing a price floor for NdPr oxide, the high-value rare earths ingredient inside permanent magnets.

    The deal is “absolutely transformational,” Corbett said.

    Rare earths prices have historically been highly vulnerable to sudden moves from China, a fact that has long posed an existential risk to western refiners. “What good is it to invest billions of dollars if the second you turn your refinery on, prices go from US$170 to US$45?” questioned Corbett.

    The agreement is structured to avoid distorting the downstream market. MP still sells oxide at market prices; the government covers the difference only when prices fall below the negotiated threshold.

    “It doesn’t impact the pricing of our magnets at all,” Corbett explained. “That was really important to us.”

    If prices soar — something Corbett says he would welcome — MP would pay the government.

    “I hope five years from now I’m being accosted by investors for taking this deal, because prices are so high we’re cutting checks back to the government,” he said.

    Apple, recycling and the next phase

    Also over the summer, MP announced another milestone — a major partnership with Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) to source 100 percent recycled rare earth materials for the tech giant’s devices.

    Recycling is often framed as a threat to miners. Corbett argues the opposite.

    “It’s still a game of scale and expertise in refining,” he said. “It’s just a different feedstock.”

    In many ways, recycled magnets are easier to process than raw ore. The challenge is achieving sufficient volume and consistency, something MP believes Mountain Pass is uniquely positioned to enable.

    “Integration matters,” Corbett said. By blending recycled materials with the mine’s large, steady feedstock, MP can smooth out the variability inherent in end-of-life magnets.

    A new playbook for national resources?

    Taken together, MP’s 2025 announcements point toward a broader shift in how western governments approach critical minerals supply chains moving forward. Heavy government involvement through frameworks like equity stakes, price floors and international partnerships may represent a new template.

    “This administration is approaching it with the mentality that it’s going to take real dollars to make this happen,” Corbett said. And if its investments pay off, he argued, they could help rebuild an industrial base the US hasn’t had in decades as MP positions itself to offer the full value chain, from mining and refining to producing finished magnets.

    “Once the flywheel gets going,” Corbett said, “You’re onto something.”

    Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com