Author

admin

Browsing

After taking a bearish turn in late 2024, manganese prices started 2025 on a flat note despite a robust demand outlook supported by growth in the electric vehicle (EV) battery segment.

In the first half of 2025, the manganese market experienced mixed signals as supply dynamics shifted and demand from the steelmaking sector remained uneven. Early in the year, logistical disruptions and tight inventories in China briefly supported manganese ore prices — China’s port stocks fell to multi-year lows in March, drawing down to roughly 3.7 million metric tons due to by logistical bottlenecks and steady consumption by alloy makers and steel producers.

A rebound in sales in early spring pushed ore prices to a 2025 high of US$4.48 per metric ton.

However, by mid-year, the broader picture was one of ample supply and downward price pressure.

Manganese ore production climbed to around 10.1 million metric tons in H1, buoyed by strong export volumes from South Africa and Gabon and the resumption of Australian shipments that had been disrupted in 2024.

At the same time, global steel output weakened, particularly in China, where production declined about 3 percent year-on-year amid slowing domestic demand, while India and North America posted modest gains.

Demand for manganese alloys also softened, with sales volumes down modestly and margins compressed by rising feedstock costs, especially for alloy producers facing less favorable mixes.

Manganese prices struggle as structural demand builds

By June 20, 2025, manganese’s H1 gains had eroded and ore prices fell to US$4.21.

Eramet (EPA:ERA,OTCPL:ERMAF), a major producer, said it expected supply of manganese ore to increase in the second half of 2025, partly as key producers such as Australia returned volumes to market after earlier disruptions.

‘Ore supply should increase in H2, driven by the full return to the market of the leading Australian producer, partly offset by a potential downward revision of South African exports,’ the company notes. Demand for manganese alloys was expected to weaken in line with seasonality and softer global steel production.

Analysts cautioned that production expansions from major manganese producers could exacerbate oversupply. “Production increases … can only lead to oversupply, leading to a reduction in price,” one industry executive said.

Protectionist measures in key markets, including new EU quotas on ferroalloys, added uncertainty by potentially disrupting traditional trade flows and affecting alloy pricing dynamics.

Beyond the steel sector, structural shifts in consumption patterns emerged.

Although steelmaking still accounts for the lion’s share of manganese demand, interest in battery-related uses, particularly high-purity manganese for lithium-ion and next-generation EV chemistries, continued to gain attention.

“Our expectations of ongoing strengthening battery-grade demand and production in China in Q4 have been tempered somewhat by ongoing challenges within the nickel cobalt manganese (NCM) market,” Rob Searle, battery raw materials analyst at Fastmarkets, wrote in a November battery metals market update.

“While we expect a level of demand ramp-up in Q4, in the wider context of geopolitical challenges and a challenging Chinese market, the manganese demand uptick in the short term could be somewhat tempered,’ he added.

Changing battery chemistries

During a June Supply Chain (SC) Insights webinar, experts noted that manganese-rich cathode chemistries are increasingly drawing attention as automakers seek to cut costs and reduce exposure to cobalt and nickel.

Andy Leyland, founder of SC Insights, pointed out “manganese-rich chemistry is really offering a good solution … in terms of costs,” highlighting the commodity’s role in emerging battery designs.

While high-nickel NCM batteries remain dominant, industry players are exploring manganese as a lower-cost, high-performance alternative in Europe and North America, where supply chains remain heavily reliant on imports, particularly from China. OEMs are under pressure to secure raw materials directly, with vertical integration and direct sourcing emerging as key strategies to manage price volatility and supply security.

John Mulcahy, supply chain specialist at SC Insights, emphasized that sourcing upstream allows companies to negotiate better terms and reduce exposure to market fluctuations, even amid low pricing environments.

Manganese-rich chemistries are expected to expand steadily, complementing existing NCM and lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, rather than replacing them entirely.

As Leyland noted, these materials are “definitely very high up on the focus from the demand side,” signaling growing adoption in the global push for cost-effective, low-cobalt battery solutions.

In March, Firebird Metals (ASX:FRB,OTCPL:FRBMF) produced its first lithium manganese iron phosphate (LMFP) EV batteries, becoming the first Australian company to achieve the feat. The move could position Firebird as a low-cost manganese cathode player, and highlights growth in the LMFP battery production segment.

Rising nationalism presents trade challenges

With the demand picture for manganese showing promise, analysts warn that export restrictions in Gabon could lead to a supply crunch before the decade is over. According to the US Geological Survey, 63 percent of US manganese imports come from Gabon. In June, the African nation announced plans to implement an export ban in January 2029.

Gabon’s renewed push to ban manganese ore exports from 2029 underscores Africa’s broader shift toward value addition, but it also risks tightening an already fragile global supply picture, a Project Blue market note reads.

As the world’s second largest exporter, Gabon shipped more than 7 million metric tons of high-grade ore in 2024, material that is critical to both ferroalloy production and emerging battery supply chains.

An export ban would hit Chinese buyers and European processors reliant on Gabonese feedstock, while adding pressure to the high-grade market at a time when Australia’s GEMCO mine is expected to wind down later this decade.

Although in-country processing — through ferroalloys or batteries — offers a path to capture more value locally, it would require significant investment and could shift, rather than eliminate, environmental and logistical costs.

For global markets, Gabon’s move signals rising resource nationalism in Africa and a potential structural squeeze on manganese supply heading into the next decade.

“However, without large-scale investments from China, a key battery producer, such ambitious plans of African governments risk remaining unrealised,” the Project Blue overview states.

“China has invested in Africa’s mineral industry (e.g. Ghana), securing access to the continent’s high-quality raw materials, while keeping production of high value-added products directly in China.”

In early 2025, Euro Manganese (TSXV:EMN,OTCPL:EUMNF) scored a major boost when its Chvaletice manganese project was designated a “strategic project” under the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act.

The move underscores the EU’s push to secure local supply of critical battery materials and could tighten the manganese market by prioritizing European production in the continent’s energy transition.

Oversupply vs. new manganese demand drivers

For 2026, analysts expect the manganese market to remain broadly balanced, but with pressures and opportunities on both the supply and demand fronts. However, longer-term fundamentals point to steady growth.

Global market forecasts indicate the manganese industry could expand modestly in value and volume by 2035, driven by ongoing demand from steel and increasing uptake in battery and clean-energy applications.

Some reports project market size rising through the decades, with Asia-Pacific demand remaining dominant and new opportunities emerging in the electrification and high-purity material segments.

Steel demand will continue to be the principal driver in 2026, with India’s expanding production offering a potential buffer against slower growth in China and Europe. Battery applications may not yet move the pricing needle dramatically, but their structural importance is increasing as automakers and cathode developers look to diversify away from nickel and cobalt reliance, a trend that could support manganese demand in the medium term.

“Looking ahead to the coming weeks and months, it is likely we won’t see too much further upward pressure on prices. Asian markets are heading towards the seasonal lull in demand and manufacturing activity in February as the Lunar New Year holidays begin,” Searle said in a January Fastmarkets report.

“At the same time, there are concerns around what China’s EV demand outlook looks like in Q1 2026, with changes to subsidy schemes potentially leading to softening consumption of battery-grade manganese.”

Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Steve Barton, host of In It To Win It, shares price targets for silver and discusses when silver stocks may start to outperform the metal.

‘I fully expect a catch-up trade like this — I think that it’s coming, and I think it’s going to come this year and probably this first quarter,’ he said.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Aura Energy Limited (ASX: AEE, AIM: AURA) (“Aura” or “the Company”) is pleased to announce that MMCAP International Inc. SPC (‘MMCAP’) and certain other strategic investors (together the ‘Strategic Investors’) will provide funding of C$10 million for a 19.7% interest in the Company’s polymetallic Häggån project (‘the Häggån Project’) located in Sweden, establishing its value at C$50 million.

Aura has entered into a binding agreement to transfer 100% of the Häggån Project to SIU Metals Corp. (‘SIU Metals‘), an unlisted Canadian public company, in consideration for acquiring shares in SIU Metals. The agreement will result in SIU Metals being the 100% owner of the Häggån Project.

Aura will retain 78.7% ownership of SIU Metals and the Strategic Investors will own 19.7% after contributing C$10 million via a private placement. SIU Metals intends to seek a stock market listing on the TSX Venture Exchange (‘TSXV’) in connection with the transaction.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Valuation for Häggån project established at C$50 million (A$55 million)
  • Agreement with MMCAP and certain other strategic investors to provide aggregate gross proceeds of C$10 million to SIU Metals, which will be renamed following the transaction
  • Proceeds to be used for the advancement of the Häggån project, including permitting and resource expansion through continued exploration including on surrounding tenements
  • Aura will retain ownership of 78.7% of SIU Metals and consequently will retain indirect exposure to the Häggån project post-transaction
  • Aura to appoint new officers and directors to SIU Metals on closing of transaction
  • Financing is expected to complete in February 2026, with the transaction expected to complete in June 2026
  • New Canadian listed company to benefit from increased visibility and direct comparison with valuation of other public companies with similar deposits
  • On 1 January 2026, the Minerals Act in Sweden was amended to allow exploration for and extraction of uranium
Phil Mitchell, Executive Chairman Aura Energy, said:

“We are delighted to welcome investors of the calibre of MMCAP, Aura’s largest shareholder, and other high-quality investors into this new vehicle for Aura’s Häggån project, and the future support they can bring. We believe their investment is a demonstration of the quality and potential of the project, and its exciting future as, following legislation changes brought into effect on 1 January 2026, mining of uranium is now allowed again in Sweden. This transaction shines a spotlight on the under-recognized value of Häggån within Aura Energy, and creates an independent and dedicated pathway for funding, growth and management of the project.

Upon successful completion of the transaction, Aura’s existing shareholders will continue to benefit from Häggån’s upside potential, and by way of a direct comparison with the valuation of other companies with similar deposits in the region.”

Click here for the full ASX Release

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

San Francisco 49ers general manager John Lynch did not mince words on the status of wide receiver Brandon Aiyuk’s future with the team.

‘I think it’s safe to say he’s played his last snap with the 49ers,’ Lynch told reporters in a Jan. 21 press conference, according to Matt Barrows of The Athletic.

Aiyuk, 27, has not played in a game since October 2024, when he sustained ACL and MCL injuries in a Week 7 game.

The 2020 first-round pick was at the center of 49ers drama throughout the 2025 season. Aiyuk began the summer on the physically unable to perform (PUP) list as he worked his way back from the knee injury he suffered in 2024. By November, the 49ers had voided Aiyuk’s guaranteed money for 2026, with The Athletic’s Dianna Russini and Michael Silver reporting that the wideout had ‘failed to attend meetings and declined to participate in other team activities.’

In December, the 49ers moved Aiyuk to the reserve/left squad list. A week later, the wide receiver posted a video to his YouTube account showing himself driving faster than 90 mph through intersections near Levi’s Stadium – the 49ers’ home field in Santa Clara, California.

The speed limit in the area where Aiyuk was driving is 25 mph, according to San Jose city data.

Niners head coach Kyle Shanahan told reporters on Jan. 21 that communication with Aiyuk broke down completely at some point during the season. The receiver ‘stopped answering anyone’s phone calls, including the head coach’s,’ Barrows reported.

‘That’s something I’d never seen in 22 years of coaching,’ Shanahan said, per Barrows.

With the 49ers’ voiding of Aiyuk’s guaranteed money for 2026 and Lynch’s comments on Jan. 21, a split between the two sides appears likely.

At the start of the 2026 season, Aiyuk will be 28 years old and a season and a half removed from NFL action.

USA TODAY Sports’ Ayrton Ostly contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Kansas City Chiefs are bringing an old friend back to their coaching staff.

The Chiefs are hiring Eric Bieniemy as their offensive coordinator, USA TODAY Sports’ Tyler Dragon has confirmed, returning the NFL coach to the same position he held from 2018 to 2022 – quarterback Patrick Mahomes’ first five years as a starter.

Bieniemy, 56, has spent the last three seasons with other teams during his time away from the Chiefs. In 2023, he was the Washington Commanders’ assistant head coach and offensive coordinator. In 2024, Bieniemy was the assistant head coach and offensive coordinator for the UCLA Bruins. Most recently, Bieniemy was the Chicago Bears’ running backs coach in 2025.

In the three years since Bieniemy left Kansas City, the Chiefs’ offensive production has declined steadily. In 2022, Bieniemy’s last year as the Chiefs’ offensive coordinator, they led the NFL in average yards (413.6 per game) and points (29.2 per game). In 2025, Kansas City ranked 20th in average yards (320.6) and 21st in points scored (21.3).

During Bieniemy’s one-year tenure as the Bears’ running backs coach, Chicago saw veteran RB D’Andre Swift set new career highs in yards (1,087) and touchdowns (9). Seventh-round pick Kyle Monangai also played a significant role in the Bears’ offense as he broke out in his rookie season.

The Bears finished the regular season averaging 144.5 rushing yards per game, which ranked third in the NFL. Their 46.2% rushing success rate also ranked third.

Bieniemy will replace former Chiefs offensive coordinator Matt Nagy, whose contract expired after the 2025 season and is among several head coaching candidates in this year’s hiring cycle.

The Chiefs won two Super Bowls during Bieniemy’s last stint as offensive coordinator and will be seeking a return to playoff contention after missing the postseason in 2025.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Milwaukee Brewers have traded pitcher Freddy Peralta to the New York Mets for a pair of top prospects.

The addition of Peralta adds an ace to the Mets’ pitching rotation and the move is expected to help keep New York competitive in the National League East, after finishing 13 games behind the Philadelphia Phillies for the top spot in the division in 2025.

The Mets’ pitching staff showed early signs of dominance in 2025, leading the league with a 2.32 ERA … before the team collapsed in the second half and missed the postseason with an 83-79 record.

The team finished out the final 92 games with a 38-54 record. Kodai Senga dealt with injuries, which limited his availability. Clay Holmes made the transition to a starter after spending time coming out of the bullpen.

Here’s grades for the Freddy Peralta deal:

Freddy Peralta trade grades:

Mets

The trade provides not only another big name to the roster − Peralta was a 2025 All-Star and is held in high regard for his fastball and his strikeout ability. The 29-year-old Dominican pitcher has reached over 200 strikeouts and over 30 starts in three consecutive seasons.

The Mets also received pitcher Tobias Myers in the deal.

Grade: A

Brewers

The Brewers added two of the Mets’ top prospects to their system. 

Jett Williams was the 14th overall pick in the 2022 MLB Draft, having spent the past four seasons playing at various levels of the minor leagues. He has not yet played at the major league level. Williams, who was ranked as the Mets’ No. 3 prospect by MLB.com, has shown the ability to play multiple positions, including shortstop, second base and outfield.

Brandon Sproat obviously doesn’t have the level of experience that was lost by sending Peralta away, but he’s a highly-regarded pitching prospect (ranked as the Mets’ No. 5 prospect, per MLB.com). Sproat has played in four major league games for the Mets. He has an 0-2 record.

Grade: B-

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • he Yankees signed free-agent outfielder/first baseman Cody Bellinger to a five-year, $162.5 million contract.
  • The deal includes opt-outs after the second and third years of the contract, a full no-trade clause and a $20 million signing bonus.
  • If Bellinger opts out after the second year of the contract, he will have earned a nifty $85 million the first two years.

The New York Yankees got their man, and yes, at their price, too.

The Yankees signed free-agent outfielder/first baseman Cody Bellinger to a five-year, $162.5 million contract Wednesday morning, two officials with direct knowledge told USA TODAY Sports. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because the deal won’t become official until Bellinger passes his physical.

The deal includes opt-outs after the second and third years of the contract, a full no-trade clause and a $20 million signing bonus. If Bellinger opts out after the second year of the contract, he will have earned a nifty $85 million the first two years.

The average $42.5 million salary the first two years is $500,000 higher than Bo Bichette’s three-year, $126 million deal with the Mets, that includes an opt-out after each season.

It was actually during Bichette’s news conference in New York that the Yankees and agent Scott Boras agreed to Bellinger’s deal, setting off a frenzy in New York.

The Yankees, who refused to budge off their five-year proposal, insisted they would not get into a bidding war. They believed all along that no one would outbid them and provide Bellinger the seven-year deal he was seeking.

They proved to be right.

They never believed the rumors that the Mets were in on Bellinger, and once the Mets traded Tuesday night for Chicago White Sox center fielder Luis Robert, it only confirmed their belief.

The Philadelphia Phillies offered Bichette a seven-year, $200 million contract last week, but they had no interest in pivoting to Bellinger. It was the same with the Blue Jays, who offered Kyle Tucker a 10-year, $350 million contract before he went to the Dodgers, but weren’t going to give the same deal to Bellinger.

So, the Yankees waited, and waited, tweaked their five-year, $160 million offer little by little with opt-outs, a no-trade clause and then bumped up it by $5 million, before reaching their agreement.

Really, this is a deal that made sense all along.

Bellinger loved his season in New York, and the Yankees loved him right back.

The reality is that the Yankees had to have him.

They needed someone to protect Aaron Judge in the lineup with Juan Soto’s departure a year ago.

They needed his defense, his versatility, his left-handed bat and his ability to handle the pressure of New York.

If the Yankees didn’t sign re-sign Bellinger, their offseason could have been an unmitigated disaster. They had a few backup plans, but nothing that could have come close to replacing Bellinger.

Bellinger was the ideal fit, hitting .272 with 29 homers and 98 RBI in 152 games last season. In his last three seasons, he’s accumulated a 12 WAR, hitting .281 with an .818 OPS, averaging 24.3 homers and 91 RBI a year.

He’s also still just 30 years old, just 1 1/2 years older than Tucker, which is why he was seeking at least a seven-year contract in free agency.

It was a huge signing for the Yankees, who weren’t shy in telling the world that bringing Bellinger back was their No. 1 priority the entire winter.

Now, the question is what the Yankees do next?

They acquired Ryan Weathers from the Miami Marlins last week, but still need another starter. And with Bellinger in left field, Trent Grisham in center and Judge in right, they have a surplus of outfielders. They could use young outfielder Jasson Dominguez, their former No. 1 prospect, as trade bait.

They are one of the teams that have been in contact with the Milwaukee Brewers about ace Freddy Peralta, who earns just $8 million and is in the final year of his contract. They’re talking to other teams, too, and plenty of starters like Framber Valdez and Zac Gallen remain on the market.

Three weeks remain before spring training, but the Yankees, after watching the Toronto Blue Jays and Baltimore Orioles get better, are finally back in business.

The Yankees still may not be the team to beat in the AL East, but they can finally exhale.

They got the man they wanted, and most of all, needed all along.

Bellinger is back.

So are the Yankees’ World Series hopes.

Follow Nightengale on X @Bnightengale

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Winter is here, and with it is coming a sizeable snow and ice storm that is expected to impact large swaths of the United States.

Millions of Americans are already under advisories for cold weather and dangerous ice conditions in addition to the oncoming snow. More than two dozen states are in the line of the developing storm, from Texas up through the Northeast, according to AccuWeather meteorologists.

The exact path of the storm isn’t yet clear. However, at present, it isn’t expected to have an impact on either of this weekend’s NFL playoff contests. The AFC and NFC championship games are being played in cities that are presently out of the predicted path of the storm.

Here’s what to know about the forecast for the AFC and NFC championship games as the United States gears up for a major winter storm.

Where is the AFC championship game?

The AFC championship game is set to be in Denver this season. The Broncos earned the No. 1 seed in the AFC, so Empower Field at Mile High Stadium will be the site for their game against the New England Patriots.

The Broncos last hosted the AFC championship game during the 2015 NFL playoffs, which were played in 2016. It was 46 degrees with 6 mph of wind at kickoff of the contest, per Pro Football Reference, which Denver won 20-18 over New England.

AFC championship game weather forecast

Conditions for the AFC championship game in Denver are expected to be relatively benign, according to the National Weather Service (NWS).

Below is a full breakdown of the agency’s early-week forecast for the Jan. 25 game between the Broncos and Patriots:

  • High temperature: 31 degrees
  • Low temperature: 12 degrees
  • Chance of precipitation: TBD
  • Wind: TBD

The Broncos vs. Patriots game is scheduled to take place at 3 p.m. ET, which is 1 p.m. locally in Denver. Temperatures will be below freezing for Sunday’s game, but the lowest temperatures won’t happen until the evening.

As such, the teams will dodge the worst of Sunday’s cold while the band of snow crossing the country is not expected to impact the game. No precipitation is currently listed among the NWS forecast for Jan. 25.

Where is the NFC championship game?

The NFC championship game will be played in Seattle. The Seahawks earned the NFC’s No. 1 seed and have the right to host the conference title game after thrashing the 49ers 41-6 in the divisional round of the playoffs.

The Seahawks last hosted the NFC championship game during the 2014 NFL playoffs, which were contested in 2015. It was 52 degrees at kickoff with 15 mph winds blowing, according to Pro Football Reference.

The Seahawks beat the Packers 28-22 in overtime. Russell Wilson helped lead Seattle to a come-from-behind victory after Packers tight end Brandon Bostick failed to handle an onside kick late in regulation of the conference championship game.

NFC championship game forecast

Sunday’s NFC championship game will also be played amid mild conditions, according to the National Weather Service (NWS).

Below is a full breakdown of the agency’s early-week forecast for the Jan. 25 game between the Seahawks and Rams:

  • High temperature: 45 degrees
  • Low temperature: 34 degrees
  • Chance of precipitation: TBD
  • Wind: TBD

The NWS notes there is ‘a slight chance of rain before 10 p.m.’ but it isn’t yet clear whether that will intersect with the game.

The Seahawks vs. Rams game is set to kick off at 6:30 p.m. ET, which is 3:30 p.m. locally in Seattle.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The US is among the world’s top silver producers, recording output of 1,100 metric tons in 2024.

While that’s far below first-place Mexico’s production of 6,300 metric tons of silver, the US is still a major producer of the precious metal, and is likely to remain a key source moving forward. However, few mines in the US are primary silver producers — much of the silver in the country is produced as a by-product of gold mining, and it can also be found with metals like copper and zinc.

So where exactly is silver produced in the US, and which companies are mining it? Alaska is the leading silver-producing state, followed by Nevada and Idaho. America’s three largest primary silver mines by production are the Greens Creek mine in Idaho, the Rochester mine in Nevada and the Lucky Friday mine in Alaska.

Read on for an overview of the three largest US silver producers by market cap.

Data for the stocks listed was current as of January 15, 2026.

1. Hecla Mining Company (NYSE:HL)

Market cap: US$16.91 billion

Hecla Mining operates the Greens Creek and Lucky Friday silver mines in Alaska and Idaho. Greens Creek is the United State’s largest silver mine. In addition to being a major silver miner in the US, Hecla also has mines in Canada, with the Keno Hill silver operation in the Yukon Territory and Casa Berardi gold-silver mine in Québec. Additionally, Hecla has a variety of exploration projects across North America.

In its 2024 results, Hecla reported silver reserves of 240 million ounces, silver production of 16.2 million ounces and a record US$929.9 million in total sales. The majority of Hecla’s 2024 silver production was derived from its Greens Creek and Lucky Friday mines, which produced 8.48 and 4.89 million ounces respectively.

Hecla’s 2025 production guidance stands at 16.2 million to 17 million ounces, with the vast majority expected to come from its US operations. In Q3 2025, the company produced 4.59 million ounces of silver, and 13.22 million ounces through the first nine months of the year.

‘Our third quarter results represent a defining moment for Hecla, with record-breaking performance across a number of key financial metrics,’ Rob Krcmarov, Hecla’s president and CEO, said in its Q3 results. ‘Greens Creek continues to exceed expectations, Keno Hill has delivered three consecutive quarters of profitability under our ownership, Lucky Friday maintained consistent production while advancing the surface cooling project, and Casa Berardi’s cost trajectory is improving.’

2. Coeur Mining (NYSE:CDE)

Market cap: US$13.58 billion

Coeur Mining describes itself as a growing precious metals producer with four producing mines in the Americas. Its major silver-producing operation in the US is the Rochester silver-gold mine in Nevada. Its other US mines are the Kensington gold mine in Alaska and Wharf gold mine in South Dakota, with Wharf also producing silver as a by-product.

In Mexico, Couer owns the Palmarejo silver-gold complex in Chihuahua and the Las Chispas silver-gold mine in Sonora. Coeur added Las Chispas to its portfolio when it acquired SilverCrest in early 2025. Coeur is also advancing work at its Silvertip silver-zinc-lead project in British Columbia, Canada.

For 2024, Rochester’s silver production totaled 4.38 million ounces, falling slightly shy of its 2024 guidance of 4.8 million to 6.6 million ounces, while Coeur’s full silver production across its operations totaled 11.4 million ounces.

As of Q3 2025, Coeur’s 2025 silver production guidance stood at 18.1 million ounces, with Rochester expected to produce 6 million to 6.7 million ounces of silver. In the first nine months of the year, Coeur produced 13.2 million ounces of silver across its operations, with Rochester accounting for 4.38 million ounces.

“Coeur delivered another quarter of record financial results, driven by higher prices, balanced contributions from all five of our North American gold and silver operations along with overall strong cost control,” President and CEO Mitchell J. Krebs said in the release. “Las Chispas experienced a particularly strong quarter, with the team continuing to exceed expectations in just its second full quarter of operations with the Company.”

3. Americas Gold and Silver (NYSEAMERICAN:USAS)

Market cap: C$1.69 billion

Americas Gold and Silver is mining for silver in the US and Mexico. The company has two producing assets: the Galena Complex in Idaho, which produces silver, copper and antimony, and the Cosalá operation in Mexico. It also owns the Relief Canyon mine in Nevada, currently on care and maintenance, and the newly acquired, past-producing Crescent silver mine, located 9 miles from Galena in Idaho.

In December 2024, the company consolidated full ownership of Galena when it acquired the outstanding 40 percent interest from an affiliate of Eric Sprott and Paul Andre Huet. As part of the deal, Sprott acquired a significant interest in the company, and Huet was appointed its CEO and Chairman. Americas stated that its benefits from 100 percent ownership in the property include streamlined decision making and a focused vision for Galena.

The company has been working on expansion efforts at Galena since early 2024. In its 2024 results, Americas Gold and Silver reported attributable silver production from Galena of approximately 1.5 million ounces compared to 1.6 million ounces the previous year.

In September 2025, Americas completed the first upgrade on Galena’s No 3 shaft ahead of schedule, improving productivity. In its Q3 results, the company reported 2025 year-to-date production of 1.9 million ounces of silver.

In December, the company completed the acquisition of the past-producing Crescent silver mine near Galena. The historic resource at the site demonstrates mineralization similar to that at Galena, with the potential to add 1.4 million to 1.6 million ounces of silver annually.

In an operational update in January 2026, the company said development of Crescent was progressing rapidly and it was aiming for a mid-2026 restart of operations.

“This rapid execution is an excellent start to our plan to establish best-in-class operations at Crescent. We’re poised to unlock multiple synergies with our neighbouring Galena Complex from procurement savings and equipment sharing to G&A efficiencies and spare processing capacity,’ Chairman and CEO Huet stated.

Securities Disclosure: I, Dean Belder, currently hold a small investment in Hecla Mining, but do not hold investments in any other company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com