Author

admin

Browsing

The three-time consecutive NBA Slam Dunk champion has reportedly found a home.

After spending time in the G League with the Orlando Magic and on two-way deals, Mac McClung has signed his first standard NBA contract, with the Indiana Pacers, ESPN reported Monday, Oct. 27.

McClung, 26, has played in just six NBA games in his five-year career. He averaged 5.5 points, 2.2 assists and 2.3 rebounds across those appearances.

In the G League, McClung was one of the more explosive and productive players. In 30 games last season for the Osceola Magic, he averaged 25.7 points, 3.9 rebounds and 5.7 assists per game.

According to ESPN, the deal is non-guaranteed and is a multi-year contract. In order to make room for McClung, the Pacers will waive James Wiseman, the No. 2 overall pick from the 2020 NBA Draft.

Indiana is contending with numerous injuries in its backcourt. Not only did star guard Tyrese Haliburton tear his Achilles in Game 7 of the 2025 NBA Finals, but Andrew Nembhard (shoulder), Bennedict Mathurin (foot), T.J. McConnell (hamstring) and Johnny Furphy (foot) are all expected to miss at least a few games with their injuries.

Wiseman had made his return from his own torn Achilles tendon, suffered in the first game of the regular season last year, and played in Indiana’s season opener. He started, but played just 20 minutes and scored 4 points and added 4 rebounds.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

LOS ANGELES – George Springer delivered the Toronto Blue Jays to the World Series. But he might be exiting for good after sustaining an injury in Game 3. 

Springer, Toronto’s designated hitter and leadoff man, winced and immediately walked toward the dugout after a seventh-inning swing as he faced Dodgers left-hander Justin Wrobleski. 

Springer, who has been playing through significant knee pain, clutched his left lower back after his swing, consulted briefly with manager John Schneider and a trainer and walked to the dugout. 

He was replaced by pinch-hitter Ty France, who struck out. 

Springer’s three-run, seventh-inning home run in Game 7 lifted them to victory in the AL Championship Series. He was 3-for-11 in the World Series at the time of injury. 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

TSX-V: WLR

Frankfurt: 6YL

 Walker Lane Resources Ltd. (TSXV: WLR,OTC:CMCXF) (Frankfurt: 6YL); ‘Walker Lane’) is pleased to announce that Precision Geosurveys Inc. has been contracted to complete an airborne total magnetic field and radiometric survey on its Tule canyon Project located in the prolific Walker Lane Gold Trend.

Precision Geosurveys Inc. of Reno, NV and Langley, BC will commence the airborne survey in the next few days following completion of ongoing surveys by Precision in the Tonopah area of west central Nevada. A total of 212 line-kilometers will be flown along lines spaced 100 meters apart, 30 meters above ground level. The results are anticipated to be useful in mapping the complex altered volcanic stratigraphy present on the property and to contribute information that will further pinpoint proposed drill targets on the property.

Mr. Kevin Brewer, P.Geo President and CEO of Walker Lane Resources Ltd. noted that ‘We are very excited to be commencing exploration at the Tule Canyon project. We thank Silver Range Resources for helping to coordinate this work. Their efforts are testimony to our shared belief that Tule Canyon holds significant promise. We look forward to soon being able to confirm a drilling program for this project in the near future.’

About the Tule Canyon Property

The Tule Canyon Property sits astride a prominent deflection in the regional magnetic field associated with the underlying Sylvania Pluton. High grade gold and silver mineralization in the district is localized along this feature. The principal objectives of the survey will be to accurately map this deflection and to locate second order anomalies which may be associated with structurally controlled precious metal mineralization.

The Tule Canyon Property is 95 km south of Tonopah and 80 km northwest of Beatty near the NevadaCalifornia border. Mineralization on the property occurs along a 5-kilometre-long trend coincident with a major structural inflection in the Sylvania Pluton mapped by regional aeromagnetic surveys. Gold and silver mineralization is hosted in numerous quartz veins with mesothermal textures. Precious metals are associated with hematite, pyrite, yellow plumbo-jarosite or similar lead oxides, rare galena and copper oxides. The western end of the trend covering the Ingall’s Vein and the China Doll zones are silver-dominant with mineralization returning up to 4,320 g/t Ag and up to 31.8 g/t Au. The eastern end of the trend is gold-dominant with assays up to 37.3 g/t Au at surface and 27.6 g/t Au underground. Silver assays from material collected in this eastern area range up to 183 g/t Ag.

Mining in Tule Canyon dates from prior to 1848 when Mexican placer miners first began work in the area. Hard rock mining on the property dates from the 1890’s at the Dark Secret Mine. Mining at the nearby Eastside Mine and the Ingalls Vein occurred during the late 1900’s with a small heap leach operation constructed at the latter property.

A small open pit mining operated at the Dark Secret Mine during the 1980’s and reportedly shipped material to Goldfield for processing. In the pit, coalescing veins appear to form a bulk tonnage target. A chip-trench sample across the bottom of the pit returned 40 m @ 0.469 g/t Au including 20 m @ 0.695 g/t Au. Grab samples of vein material in the pit returned up to 14.1 g/t Au. Despite the past history of mining and high-grade surface mineralization on the property, there is little evidence of modern exploration activity and no known drilling.

A video presentation describing results to date at Tule Canyon is available on Silver Range’s website at www.silverrangeresources.com and further information is also available on the Company website at www.walkerlaneresources.com.

Note: Technical information in this news release has been approved by Kevin Brewer, P.Geo who relied on information provided to him by Silver Range Resources Ltd. and information in the public domain. Historical information cited in this news release was obtained from Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology district files and from historical publications. Investors should be cautioned that this information has not been independently verified by the Company.

About Walker Lane Resources Ltd.

Walker Lane Resources Ltd. is a growth-stage exploration company focused on the exploration of high-grade gold, silver and polymetallic deposits in the Walker Lane Gold Trend District in Nevada and the Rancheria Silver District in Yukon/B.C. and other property assets in Yukon. The Company intends to initiate an aggressive exploration program to advance the Tule Canyon (Walker Lane, Nevada) and Amy (Rancheria Silver District, B.C.) projects through drilling programs with the aim of achieving resource definition in the near future.

On behalf of the Board:
‘Kevin Brewer’
Kevin Brewer, President, CEO and Director
Walker Lane Resources Ltd.

Cautionary and Forward Looking Statements

This press release and related figures, contain certain forward-looking information and forward-looking statements as defined in applicable securities laws (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). These statements relate to future events or our future performance. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. The use of any of the words ‘anticipate’, ‘plans’, ‘continue’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘project’, ‘predict’, ‘potential’, ‘should’, ‘believe’ ‘targeted’, ‘can’, ‘anticipates’, ‘intends’, ‘likely’, ‘should’, ‘could’ or grammatical variations thereof and similar expressions is intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this presentation. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning: our strategy and priorities including certain statements included in this presentation are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Canadian securities laws, including statements regarding the Tule Canyon, Cambridge, Silver Mountain, and Shamrock Properties in Nevada (USA), and its properties including Silverknife and Amy properties in British Columbia, the Silver Hart, Blue Heaven and Logjam properties in Yukon all of which now comprise the mineral property assets of WLR. WLR has assumed other assets of CMC Metals Ltd. including common share holdings of North Bay Resources Inc. (OTC-US: NBRI) and all conditions and agreements pertaining to the sale of the Bishop mill gold processing facility and remain subject to the condition of the option of the Silverknife property with Coeur Mining Inc. (TSX:CDE). These forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s current beliefs and are based on information currently available to the Company and assumptions the Company believes are reasonable. The Company has made various assumptions, including, among others, that: the historical information related to the Company’s properties is reliable; the Company’s operations are not disrupted or delayed by unusual geological or technical problems; the Company has the ability to explore the Company’s properties; the Company will be able to raise any necessary additional capital on reasonable terms to execute its business plan; the Company’s current corporate activities will proceed as expected; general business and economic conditions will not change in a material adverse manner; and budgeted costs and expenditures are and will continue to be accurate.

Actual results and developments may differ materially from results and developments discussed in the forward-looking statements as they are subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties, including: public health threats; fluctuations in metals prices, price of consumed commodities and currency markets; future profitability of mining operations; access to personnel; results of exploration and development activities, accuracy of technical information; risks related to ownership of properties; risks related to mining operations; risks related to mineral resource figures being estimates based on interpretations and assumptions which may result in less mineral production under actual conditions than is currently anticipated; the interpretation of drilling results and other geological data; receipt, maintenance and security of permits and mineral property titles; environmental and other regulatory risks; changes in operating expenses; changes in general market and industry conditions; changes in legal or regulatory requirements; other risk factors set out in this presentation; and other risk factors set out in the Company’s public disclosure documents. Although the Company has attempted to identify significant risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other risks that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Certain of these risks and uncertainties are beyond the Company’s control. Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements are qualified by these cautionary statements, and there can be no assurances that the actual results or developments will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences or benefits to, or effect on, the Company.

The information contained in this presentation is derived from management of the Company and otherwise from publicly available information and does not purport to contain all of the information that an investor may desire to have in evaluating the Company. The information has not been independently verified, may prove to be imprecise, and is subject to material updating, revision and further amendment. While management is not aware of any misstatements regarding any industry data presented herein, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made or given by or on behalf of the Company as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information or opinions contained in this presentation and no responsibility or liability is accepted by any person for such information or opinions. The forward-looking statements and information in this presentation speak only as of the date of this presentation and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise such information to reflect new events or circumstances, except as may be required by applicable law. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements and information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Because of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions contained herein, prospective investors should not read forward-looking information as guarantees of future performance or results and should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Nothing in this presentation is, or should be relied upon as, a promise or representation as to the future. To the extent any forward-looking statement in this presentation constitutes ‘future-oriented financial information’ or ‘financial outlooks’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws, such information is being provided to demonstrate the anticipated market penetration and the reader is cautioned that this information may not be appropriate for any other purpose and the reader should not place undue reliance on such future-oriented financial information and financial outlooks. Future-oriented financial information and financial outlooks, as with forward-looking statements generally, are, without limitation, based on the assumptions and subject to the risks set out above. The Company’s actual financial position and results of operations may differ materially from management’s current expectations and, as a result, the Company’s revenue and expenses. The Company’s financial projections were not prepared with a view toward compliance with published guidelines of International Financial Reporting Standards and have not been examined, reviewed or compiled by the Company’s accountants or auditors. The Company’s financial projections represent management’s estimates as of the dates indicated thereon.

SOURCE Walker Lane Resources Ltd

View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/October2025/27/c4329.html

News Provided by Canada Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The global transition to a green economy has been a boon for the cleantech market — it’s helping investment in renewable energy and clean technology continue to grow, allowing the sector to keep building momentum.

Though cleantech’s long-term outlook is stable, the industry is facing challenges in Western markets as US policy shifts have sparked climate finance concerns. With US leadership on climate finance appearing to recede, there’s an opportunity for the Canadian market to take a leading role.

In fact, Canada was the second-most represented country in the Global Cleantech 100.

Here’s a look at the best-performing Canadian cleantech stocks on the TSX and TSXV in 2025 by year-to-date gains. CSE-listed companies were considered, but none made the list at this time.

Data for this article was gathered on October 20, 2025, using TradingView’s stock screener. Only companies with market capitalizations greater than C$50 million were considered.

1. Anaergia (TSX:ANRG)

Year-to-date gain: 165.96 percent
Market cap: C$417.19 million
Share price: C$2.50

Anaergia is a global company that specializes in converting waste, including wastewater and agricultural and municipal solid waste, into renewable energy, clean water and organic fertilizer.

The company has operations in 17 countries spanning North America, Africa, Asia and Europe. In 2025, Anaergia has expanded its global reach through partnerships with companies in Italy and Spain, as well as through a partnership agreement to build a biogas facility in South Korea.

In July 2024, Anaergia closed the third tranche of a C$40.8 million investment deal with Marny Investissement that gave Marny a controlling interest of about 60 percent in Anaergia, supporting the company’s pivot to employ a greater focus on technology sales and operations and maintenance contracts.

The company’s September 2025 investor presentation highlighted its new strategy of streamlined operations, expanding through global partnerships and selective Build-Own-Operate delivery.

2. Tantalus Systems (TSX:GRID)

Year-to-date gain: 93.68 percent
Market cap: C$179.51 million
Share price: C$3.68

Tantalus Systems provides technology that gives utilities greater control and insight into their electric grids.

This includes advanced metering infrastructure (AMI), load management systems and grid analytics, all of which contribute to a more efficient and reliable power grid.

One of its key products, TRUConnect AMI, provides real-time data on energy consumption and grid conditions. The TRUFlex Load+DER Management system helps manage energy demand and integrate distributed energy resources like solar power, while TRUGrid Automation optimizes grid operations and improves response to events like power failures.

On July 7, Tantalus announced that it was extending its partnership with EPB in Chattanooga, Tennessee, to deploy 20,000 TRUSense Ethernet Gateways over the next five years, integrating with EPB’s fiber network to enhance grid modernization and operational efficiency.

The company’s annual recurring revenue has grown at an approximate compound annual growth rate of 18 percent since 2016, according to its October presentation.

3. CVW Sustainable Royalties (TSXV:CVW)

Year-to-date gain: 17.65 percent
Market cap: C$149.74 million
Share price: C$1.00

CVW Sustainable Royalties, previously CVW CleanTech, is a royalty company that invests in other cleantech enterprises in exchange for a share of their revenue.

The company rebranded and changed its TSX Venture exchange listing from a technology issuer to an investment issuer in July after transitioning to a royalty model in 2024.

It is still committed to commercializing its CVW technology, which recovers bitumen and valuable minerals like titanium and zircon from oil sands tailings ponds. This reduces the environmental impact of oil and gas production, making the Canadian oil sands industry more sustainable.

CVW is planning to deploy its technology through a model of non-operating interests or royalty streams.

Its first royalty investment was in Northstar Clean Technologies (TSXV:ROOF,OTCQB:ROOOF), a company with technology that processes end-of-life asphalt shingles into components, including liquid asphalt, as well as aggregate and fiber for industrial use. The deal was finalized in September 2024.

In July, Northstar completed commissioning and produced its first liquid asphalt at its plant in Alberta, Canada.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Metals Focus published its annual Precious Metals Investment Focus report on Saturday (October 25).

The report from the leading gold analysis firm outlines the investment options available for those interested in leveraging rising demand for precious metals such as gold and silver. It also highlights key supply and demand trends shaping the precious metals market and driving prices now and over the next 12 months.

Gold surged over 65 percent from the start of 2025 to its record high of US$4,379.13 per ounce on October 17. Not to be outdone, silver skyrocketed more than 88 percent its highest-ever price of US$54.47 per ounce on the same day.

Although prices for both precious metals have since pulled back on profit taking, Metals Focus believes the conditions that created these record-high prices are still very much in play.

US trade policy driving gold price in 2025

Metals Focus analysts attribute gold’s stellar performance in 2025 to a number of factors largely centered on growing global economic uncertainty and ongoing geopolitical conflicts. Gold’s safe-haven status is highly favored in these conditions, attracting both retail and institutional investors as well as central banks.

However, the firm sees US President Donald Trump’s trade policies as the most influential: “In our view, the single most important factor has been uncertainty around US trade policy.”

Trump’s constant trade war waffling has businesses and governments scrambling to keep up and unable to plan for the future. As tariffs increase the price of goods while disrupting supply chains, inflation is becoming stickier.

This is baking in more macroeconomic risks into the global economy, and in turn raising the risk for stagflation — an environment that experts agree is ideal for higher gold prices.

The US Federal Reserve’s reversal of its monetary policy in mid-September 2025 with its first interest rate cut and the anticipation of further rate cuts to come are further boosting the gold price. The sustainability of growing US debt and the waning strength of the US dollar on the global stage are also price supporting factors for the yellow metal.

Central bank gold buying, which has reached record levels in recent years, also continued to be net positive in 2025, further driving demand. “Put together, these drivers explain why gold has not only reached fresh highs in 2025, but also why pullbacks have been shallow and short-lived, as investors have been rushing to buy dips,” states Metals Focus.

Silver price shoots up on liquidity squeeze

The same forces sending gold prices to new heights are also bringing silver along for the ride.

Silver often lags behind its sister metal, and this latest price cycle was no exception.

However, investor belief that silver remains undervalued given strong industrial demand and unprecedented tight supply finally pushed the metal to break on through to the other side of a 45 year record high.

Metals Focus also points to the liquidity squeeze in the silver futures market, specifically concerning the COMEX in London. As the immediate supply of silver has not been enough to meet rising demand, the spot price for silver has risen higher than the price of futures contracts, a phenomenon known as backwardation.

This creates a squeeze on short sellers who must now buy back silver contracts at higher prices.

The situation amplified silver’s rally in early to mid-October. However, later in the month shipments of silver from New York and China helped to alleviate this pressure.

Gold price outlook for 2026

Looking forward, the trends underlying much of gold’s record-breaking price momentum are expected to remain strong well into next year. Metals Focus sees the price of gold posting another annual average high of US$4,560 as it heads toward US$5,000 in 2026, potentially reaching a record US$4,850 in the fourth quarter.

These gains in gold are projected to materialize despite supply side growth. Metals Focus is forecasting a surplus of 41.9 million ounces in 2026, up 28 percent year-on-year. The firm sees gold mine production reaching another record high in 2026 at the same time that gold recycling could climb by 6 percent to a 14-year high in jewellery demand is likely to be affected by high prices, low consumer confidence, and economic uncertainty.

What will move gold prices higher in 2026?

Gold investors should take cues from interest rate moves, inflation levels, strength or weakness in the US dollar and sentiment surrounding the independence of the Federal Reserve.

Of course, US trade policy will continue to be a main theme for precious metals over the next 12 months.

“As we have witnessed since the beginning of the Trump 2.0 administration, the abrupt and often unpredictable nature of US policy moves and the resulting uncertainty for the global trade system, and in turn the global economy, is expected to be a key driver of sentiment towards gold,” states the firm in the report.

Further driving demand, central banks around the world are expected to remain net buyers of safe-haven gold as the global push toward de-dollarization continues.

Gold and silver price outlook.

Chart via Metals Focus, Bloomberg.

Silver price outlook for 2026

As for silver, the white metal will continue to be seen as a more affordable alternative to gold. Metals Focus is looking for silver to average US$57 next year, and even take a run at the US$60 level in mid- to late 2026.

Silver has not only benefited from safe-haven investor demand and strong industrial demand, but also tight supply. However, the firm notes that the ongoing supply deficit for silver is expected to fall from 143.6 million ounces in 2024 to 63.4 million ounces in 2025. That figure is expected to shrink further to 30.5 million ounces in 2026.

Nevertheless, the silver market remains in a supply deficit at a time when demand is strong.

“We therefore remain bullish towards silver for the rest of this year and 2026,” note the report’s authors, who expect silver to continue outperforming gold at least in the first half of the new year.

In response, the gold-silver ratio has the potential to continue falling in 2026. However, Metals Focus believes the market will see this trend reverse in the back half of the year as silver loses some steam.

Gold-silver ratio.

Chart via Metals Focus, Bloomberg.

Investor takeaway

Overall, Metal Focus is confident the precious metals bull market will continue for the rest of 2025 and into 2026.

Gold especially is benefiting from its safe-haven status at a time of heightened macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainty. Silver is tracking its ascent and also seeing tight aboveground supply and sustained industrial demand.

For those who think they’ve missed out on the gains to be made in this latest precious metals bull cycle, there’s still plenty of upside to be had in the gold and silver markets in Q4 and heading into 2026.

Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, currently hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

  • Ole Miss coach Lane Kiffin is a top target for these openings, with potential offers reaching $13-14 million annually.
  • Kiffin’s success with the transfer portal and roster building has made him a highly sought-after commodity.
  • Despite his success at Ole Miss, Kiffin has not yet won a Power conference championship or reached the College Football Playoff.

Imagine you’re Lane Kiffin, and a potentially magical season is unfolding at Ole Miss while college football is going to hell around you. 

And everyone wants a piece of you. 

They’re practically firing coaches all over the country to get in line to offer Kiffin $13-14 million annually to reset their program and find a way to recapture the glory. 

Penn State fired James Franklin less than a year after he was one play from the national championship game. Florida fired Billy Napier after a win.

LSU needed a stiff bourbon, but eventually got around Sunday to firing Brian Kelly and giving him $53 million in go away money. And the only reason Hugh Freeze hasn’t been fired by Auburn is the decision-makers with all the cash tried to hire Kiffin three years ago. And failed. 

So there’s no incentive to fire a colossal failure of a coach, whom you hired because of his skillset at coaching and developing offense — and your offense is among the worst in the Power conferences.

Auburn will just wait in that other line over there. And maybe take a run at a guy named Urb.

These universities may as well be degenerate gamblers. What’s the difference?

They may as well be bellied up to the craps table, sweating and shaking and knowing ― I mean, just knowing ― this roll of the dice with $53 million stacked on one number isn’t imploding on the come out.

Come on, sevens!

Meanwhile back in reality, Kiffin is a year removed from blowing an opportunity to reach the College Football Playoff because of unthinkable losses to a terrible Kentucky team, and a Florida team that was on the verge of firing its coach but didn’t. 

Think about that fiscally reckless move: Florida could’ve gotten Kiffin much cheaper last year. Now they’ll have to make him the highest-paid coach in college football. Fully guaranteed, of course.  

That is, if he doesn’t think LSU is a better fit. 

This is where we are in this nuthouse of panic over patience, of if we don’t make a move, someone else will. There are other coaches who will be among the top of the collective wish list (Oregon’s Dan Lanning, Louisville’s Jeff Brohm, Missouri’s Eli Drinkwitz), but there’s little doubt these early firings are a move to get in line for the hottest coach of the moment. 

For a coach who has never reached the CFP, and never won a Power conference championship. It doesn’t mean Kiffin can’t or won’t, it just means he hasn’t.

And he’s going to make bank no matter what. 

Years ago, when then-Florida coach Steve Spurrier was the only college football coach earning a million a year, Washington hired Rick Neuheisel away from Colorado and paid him a million annually. 

Spurrier and Neuheisel were (and still are) good friends and golfing buddies, and Spurrier quipped to Neuheisel, “How much are they going to pay you when you win a championship, Ricky?”

As much as anything, they’re getting in line to pay Kiffin because he — maybe more than anyone — has figured out this transfer portal business. In the age of player empowerment, Kiffin understands and embraces the maddening job of roster building.

The multiple double-digit win seasons at SEC outcast Ole Miss is impressive, but imagine if he were at a program that could consistently land a Top-5 high school recruiting class — and then supplement from the portal.

Instead of turning over his roster every season. 

If you’re wondering why Kiffin would leave a program he has built into an elite player in the CFP race, look no further. At some point, there will be a missed season (or two) from the transfer portal, and then you’re chasing. 

Just look at Mike Norvell at Florida State. He somehow can’t consistently recruit high school players at an elite level, and has been reduced to the grab bag that is the portal. 

Who among us would ever think the FSU coach would struggle recruiting elite high school talent? In the state of Florida

You don’t need to imagine what Kiffin would do as a coach at Florida or Florida State, deep in the heart of one of the top three states for high school talent. Back in the day, Kiffin and his young pal Steve Sarkisian recruited the state of California like few have, loading up Pete Carroll’s USC roster for a dynastic run of conference championships and national titles.

Kiffin will crush high school recruiting in Florida or Louisiana (another talent-rich state), and the pressure of relying on the portal season after season won’t take a majority of his coaching oxygen. 

All of these programs lining up for Kiffin have similar money, and none are more invested than the other. Ole Miss will do whatever Kiffin wants to keep him, both contractually and an increase of NIL funds. 

This decision, no matter how many more blue-blood programs get in line, will be more about ease of transition and roster building. Not similar money and NIL commitments.

When Kiffin accepted his first major college job in 2009 at Tennessee, he roared into the stoic league taking shots at everyone. Coaches, players, the SEC commissioner; you name it, no one was safe. 

He later admitted he did so because the Tennessee job was suddenly stale and needed a jolt of life. He was the center of attention for all the wrong reasons. 

Now he’s in the thick of it again as the only right in a sea of wrong. 

And he’s going to make bank no matter what.

Matt Hayes is the senior national college football writer for USA TODAY Sports Network. Follow him on X at @MattHayesCFB. 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

In Sunday’s 38-14 loss to the Indianapolis Colts, the No. 1 pick in this year’s NFL draft once again aired out his feelings in a public fashion.

With the Titans trailing 17-7 in the third quarter, Tennessee opted to punt from Indianapolis’ 42-yard line after being stonewalled on a third-and-3 run by Tony Pollard. That call didn’t sit well with Ward, who appeared to mouth an expletive and question the decision by interim coach Mike McCoy in an interaction that quickly became a viral clip on social media.

Johnny Hekker’s punt only went 22 yards, and Colts running back Jonathan Taylor raced for an 80-yard touchdown on Indianapolis’ next play.

‘I think I’m a competitor,’ Ward said in a postgame news conference when asked about the interaction. ‘Our whole offense is like that. Our whole defense is like that. … I just think the biggest thing is we want to be an aggressive team. Especially with the record we have right now, we have to be an aggressive team at the end of the season to get where we want to be.’

Ward stood by his reaction but said it was a product of an aggressive mindset, adding that the problem was ultimately one of execution.

‘I just think it’s a missed opportunity for us as a team to get a first down and keep the drive moving. We weren’t down that much at that time,’ Ward said. ‘So, we’re going to always support whatever decision is made, but at the end of the day, we shouldn’t put ourselves in that position. We should get the first down on third down.’

McCoy, who was in just his second game as interim coach after Tennessee fired Brian Callahan, said he believed that the thinking that drove the decision was sound despite the outcome.

‘It was something we talked about,’ McCoy said of weighing whether to go for it on fourth down. ‘You know, hindsight, you look back and the last thing I thought they were going to do was have the big touchdown run after that. So yeah, I got it. You look back and say, ‘I should have gone for that.’ But initially when I said to punt it, you pin them deep, and the defense had done nice through the second quarter.’

Ward completed 22 of 38 passes for 259 yards with one touchdown and one interception.

Save for a 22-21 win over the Arizona Cardinals in Week 5, the Titans have dropped every game since their season opener by at least 10 points.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Jerry Jones and the Dallas Cowboys are rumored to be willing participants ahead of the NFL’s Nov. 4th trade deadline.

One might believe the Cowboys’ 44-24 blowout loss to the Denver Broncos on Sunday might persuade Jones to be aggressive in the coming days leading up to the deadline, but the Cowboys’ owner told reporters Week 8’s disappointing performance won’t have any impact on the team’s decision-making process.

“A loss is discouraging but as far as my temperament, if I saw a proposition for us to help this team, no matter what this score was today, I would look at it on the merits of this team. If you’re talking about trading for a player or trading a player, I’d completely look at it on the merits of this team, both for next week or the weeks after or for the longer term,” Jones told reporters following the Cowboys’ loss. “No, today would not affect decisions on trading for a player.”

Denver produced 426 total yards during Sunday’s wire-to-wire win over Dallas to improve its winning streak to five in a row. Cowboys QB Dak Prescott threw two interceptions and was sacked twice by a Broncos defense that leads the league with 36 sacks.

The Cowboys gave up a season-high 44 points. Dallas came into Week 8 ranked second-to-last in the NFL in both total defense and points allowed.

Jones hasn’t been shy about the possibility of the Cowboys making a move in advance of the trade deadline. The Cowboys clearly need assistance on defense. Their defensive shortcomings have only magnified after they traded Micah Parsons to the Green Bay Packers just prior to the start of the regular season.

Follow USA TODAY Sports’ Tyler Dragon on X @TheTylerDragon.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY