Author

admin

Browsing

(TheNewswire)

Vancouver, British Columbia TheNewswire – November 10, 2025 Juggernaut Exploration Ltd (JUGR.V) (OTCPK: JUGRF) (FSE: 4JE) ( the ‘Company’ or ‘Juggernaut’) is excited to announce that detailed mapping and sampling have confirmed that the gold-rich Big Mac Zone, Whopper Zone and Gold Dome Zone all form part of the 22 Km 2 district-scale Eldorado System that remains wide open where grab samples assayed up to 263.70 gt AuEq or 8.48 ozt AuEq and channel cuts assayed up to 4.89 gt AuEq over 5.21 m from >400 mineralized veins that are up to 10 m wide hosted in shear zones up to 50 m wide, and are exposed on surface for >1 km with >1 km of vertical relief, remains open and is drill ready on the Big One property (the ‘Property’), Golden Triangle, British Columbia. In addition, based on excellent assay results, the Company has acquired additional claims and expanded the Gold Swarm discovery area of strong gold potential from 1 km 2 to 3 km 2 and 700 m of vertical relief and remains open, effectively tripling this area of strong gold potential, where grab samples assayed up to 231.81 gt AuEq or 7.45 ozt AuEq and channel cuts assayed up to 4.51 gt AuEq over 4.36 m that remains open and is drill ready. The Big One discovery is located in an area of recent glacial and snowpack abatement adjacent to the Tier 1 gold-rich porphyry systems, the likes of Galore Creek. The 100% controlled Big One property covers 39,271 hectares of geological terrane with tremendous additional discovery potential.

Link to map with samples > 1 g/t AuEq

Big One Gold Rich District Scale System Highlights:

  • The district-scale Eldorado System covers an area ~half the size of the Island of Manhattan (22 km ) that remains wide open where grab samples assayed up to 263.70 g/t AuEq or 8.48 oz/t AuEq and channel cuts assayed up to 4.89 g/t AuEq over 5.21 m from 400 mineralized veins that remain open and are up to 10 m wide, the equivalent to ~3-story building, hosted in shear zones up to 50 m wide, comparable to a 15-story building, and are exposed on surface for 500 m, or 5 football fields, with 1 km of vertical relief, the height of 2.5 Empire State Buildings.

Link to Gold Dome Figure

Link to Whopper Zone Figure

  • The Gold Swarm Area of strong gold potential has been expanded from 1 km to 3 km , equivalent to more than the downtown core of Vancouver B.C, with 700 m of vertical relief and remains wide open, with 100 veins up to 4.5 m wide, the equivalent of a 1.5-story building, and exposed on surface for 200 m equivalent to 2 football fields and remain open containing grab samples that assayed up to 231.81 g/t AuEq or 7.45 oz/t AuEq a nd channel cuts that assayed up to 4.51 g/t AuEq over 4.36 m. The Gold Swarm Area is drill ready.

Link to Goldswarm Figure

  • 41% (219 samples out of 527) collected within the Eldorado System in 2024 and 2025 assayed 1 g/t AuEq; 65% (28 samples out of 43) collected withing the Gold Swarm Zone in 2024 and 2025 assayed 1 g/t AuEq.

Grade (AuEq)

>1 g/t

>3 g/t

>5 g/t

>10 g/t

>15 g/t

>20 g/t

>30 g/t

>60 g/t

>90 g/t

Samples

219

129

95

66

51

40

23

8

5

  • Gold samples up to 256.60 g/t or 8.25 oz/t, silver samples up 2810 g/t or 90.34 oz/t, and copper samples up to 14.40 % were collected on Big One.

  • Detailed mapping has confirmed common orientations as well as similar geochemical signatures and textures of the gold-mineralized veins along the 15 km Highway of Gold corridor surrounding the snowcap of Deeker Glacier, strongly indicating that the gold-rich mineralization found throughout is all part of one huge district-scale gold system that remains wide open.

  • The polymetallic veins, alteration signature, geochemical pathfinder element signature, and geophysical anomalies strongly indicate the presence of a large common buried gold-silver-copper rich porphyry feeder source or similar magmatic source or sources at depth responsible for the extensive high-grade veining confirmed on surface over 22 km

  • The company recently received a 5-year property-wide advanced exploration drill permit.

  • Detailed geological and structural mapping has been completed on the reported drill targets in order to define the full geometry of these high-grade gold-bearing shears and veins and will be instrumental in designing the drill plan for the upcoming maiden drill program.

  • A high-resolution UAV photogrammetry survey was completed over an area of 52 km2 on the Eldorado System and Gold Swarm Zone encompassing all of the maiden drill targets. The data will be used to support modelling and define targeting the high-grade gold mineralization recently discovered.

  • A property wide LiDAR survey covering an area of 385 km has been conducted and will be used to augment information obtained from the mapping as well as plan the upcoming inaugural drill campaign.

  • Multiple drill-ready targets have been confirmed and are planned to be tested in the fully funded inaugural drill program and include but are not limited to: the 22 km Eldorado System hosting the Gold Dome Zone where grab samples assayed up to 263.70 g/t AuEq or 8.48 oz/t AuEq; the Big Mac Zone where grab samples assayed up to 113.92 g/t AuEq or 3.66 oz/t AuEq; the Whopper Zone where grab samples assayed up to 43.94 g/t AuEq or 1.41 oz/t AuEq; and the Gold Swarm Area where grab samples assayed up to 231.81 g/t AuEq or 7.45 oz/t AuEq.

  • Juggernaut is working in consultation with the Tahltan First Nation and the local community and is committed to maintaining respectful and collaborative relationships. As we advance exploration on our project, we will continue working closely with the Tahltan First Nation and all the local stakeholders and regulatory agencies to ensure our activities create long-term value and reflect community priorities.

Dan Stuart, President and CEO of Juggernaut Exploration states: ‘With a district-scale discovery of this magnitude host to so many large gold-rich veins and shears exposed on surface that rise above the valley floor for >1 km we are likely only seeing the tip of the iceberg on this mountain of gold. We look forward to the fully funded maiden drill program on this remarkable gold discovery with much anticipation. The best is yet to come!’

Manuele Lazzarotto, PhD, Chief Geologist of Juggernaut Exploration, states: ‘With the advanced exploration permit in hand, we look forward to unlocking the full potential of the Big One gold discovery in the third dimension during the inaugural drill program. Once we receive, compile, and interpret all the deliverables from the detailed and regional mapping, UAV orthophotos survey, and LiDAR survey, the same team responsible for the Tier 1 Surebet gold discovery will design and execute the maiden drill program. Obvious opportunities with the scale and grades seen on Big One are extremely rare, and we have clearly barely begun to scratch the surface. The team looks forward to testing this remarkable discovery at depth.’

Table 1: Samples from 2024-2025 with assays >1 g/t AuEq

Sample ID

Year

Sample Type

Au (g/t)

Ag (g/t)

Cu (%)

Pb (%)

Zn (%)

AuEq (g/t)

M224886

2025

Float

256.60

546.00

0.43

0.41

0.01

263.70

M217656

2025

Float

226.94

335.00

0.00

4.99

0.01

231.81

D751423

2025

Grab

138.70

29.96

0.08

0.02

0.02

139.14

M220659

2025

Grab

111.35

159.00

0.02

3.88

0.01

113.92

M224956

2025

Grab

95.04

49.60

0.02

0.02

0.01

95.67

D751282

2024

Grab

79.01

58.90

0.13

0.43

0.80

80.08

D751407

2025

Grab

68.57

115.00

0.35

1.25

6.53

72.02

D751424

2025

Grab

60.08

9.57

0.01

0.00

0.01

60.21

D751966

2024

Grab

56.54

23.30

0.03

0.02

0.03

56.84

M220561

2025

Grab

55.50

38.62

0.09

2.02

0.44

56.47

M217807

2025

Channel

47.18

156.00

0.01

9.28

0.07

50.57

D750642

2025

Grab

43.99

102.00

0.00

9.19

0.44

46.79

M217601

2025

Channel

39.84

333.00

0.02

0.07

0.06

43.94

M217579

2025

Channel

34.96

415.00

0.02

21.13

0.06

43.38

D751216

2024

Grab

37.98

75.50

0.24

5.72

3.93

41.46

D751191

2024

Channel

12.12

2810.00

0.02

8.04

0.00

37.20

D751156

2024

Grab

33.72

177.00

0.27

2.71

0.27

36.11

D751357

2025

Grab

18.06

333.00

12.05

0.00

0.14

32.65

M217613

2025

Channel

31.68

9.40

0.16

0.00

0.10

31.96

M224961

2025

Grab

31.25

13.98

0.39

0.00

0.00

31.77

D750638

2025

Grab

14.46

621.00

0.11

54.39

0.44

30.79

D751375

2025

Grab

28.47

70.39

0.15

2.43

0.40

29.94

D751402

2025

Grab

29.23

11.44

0.17

0.01

0.00

29.52

D751373

2025

Grab

21.44

172.00

0.07

15.92

6.21

27.59

D751964

2024

Talus

23.47

110.00

1.37

0.01

0.00

26.07

D750389

2024

Grab

8.10

1420.00

1.11

0.15

2.70

26.01

D751163

2024

Float

23.97

116.00

0.02

2.16

0.13

24.53

D750639

2025

Grab

18.12

174.00

3.36

2.91

0.03

23.63

M217567

2025

Channel

17.00

461.00

0.04

0.87

0.31

22.86

D750624

2025

Grab

21.62

45.06

0.00

2.33

0.16

22.58

M217705

2025

Channel

20.78

48.45

0.62

2.37

1.05

22.53

M224905

2025

Talus

9.48

646.00

5.48

0.05

0.05

22.15

M224982

2025

Chip

21.17

20.30

0.02

0.92

0.03

21.58

M217655

2025

Grab

19.64

15.34

0.00

1.37

2.93

20.74

M224983

2025

Grab

14.06

191.00

0.15

17.27

4.50

20.31

D751365

2025

Grab

9.35

566.00

0.01

25.22

0.06

20.24

M217657

2025

Grab

18.11

88.95

0.00

2.08

0.01

19.53

D750621

2025

Grab

3.76

223.00

14.45

0.00

0.11

19.09

D750644

2025

Grab

18.47

12.54

0.00

0.89

0.01

18.77

D750625

2025

Grab

18.32

6.19

0.01

0.01

0.55

18.54

D751374

2025

Talus

16.60

66.43

0.38

1.82

0.60

18.17

D750641

2025

Grab

15.52

55.65

0.63

1.85

0.08

17.06

M224959

2025

Grab

15.94

16.54

0.00

0.01

0.01

16.15

D750394

2024

Grab

13.12

163.00

0.51

1.65

0.42

16.04

M217852

2025

Channel

15.39

20.95

0.04

1.02

0.37

15.93

M217649

2025

Channel

14.96

22.24

0.41

0.64

0.95

15.92

D751285

2024

Grab

3.74

91.20

7.96

0.01

0.01

13.18

D751975

2024

Grab

10.62

198.00

0.00

0.77

0.01

13.10

D750192

2024

Grab

3.44

220.00

6.61

0.00

0.01

12.91

M224932

2025

Grab

0.00

755.00

0.63

6.07

7.28

12.43

D750852

2025

Subcrop

1.07

860.00

0.01

2.12

1.32

12.20

M220602

2025

Grab

11.92

2.04

0.01

0.00

0.04

11.96

M224883

2025

Grab

11.07

20.98

0.03

0.01

0.00

11.36

D751943

2024

Grab

4.00

128.00

0.30

15.35

8.35

11.32

D750198

2024

Float

6.01

34.10

0.14

0.04

15.30

11.21

M217784

2025

Channel

10.83

1.88

0.00

0.00

0.04

10.87

D750704

2025

Grab

2.59

325.00

0.35

22.97

1.56

10.83

D750608

2024

Grab

10.62

3.20

0.00

0.01

0.01

10.67

M217785

2025

Channel

10.17

1.97

0.00

0.00

0.01

10.20

M224957

2025

Grab

9.65

15.14

0.03

0.18

0.48

10.00

D751154

2024

Grab

5.72

218.00

0.22

1.81

1.34

9.20

D751969

2024

Float

5.59

185.00

0.40

1.91

0.98

8.82

D751284

2024

Float

6.34

47.70

0.03

6.78

0.59

8.66

D751151

2024

Float

2.79

474.00

0.01

20.00

1.22

8.59

D751192

2024

Channel

3.39

366.00

0.01

0.11

0.00

7.68

D751372

2025

Grab

7.44

16.56

0.00

0.17

0.01

7.67

D751104

2024

Float

3.79

204.00

0.30

4.60

1.12

7.54

D750395

2024

Grab

6.01

105.00

0.01

0.06

0.09

7.42

D750643

2025

Grab

7.36

2.04

0.00

0.03

0.02

7.40

M217571

2025

Channel

6.06

89.91

0.04

0.01

0.67

7.35

M220559

2025

Grab

1.55

262.00

0.01

13.83

0.08

6.94

M220601

2025

Grab

6.77

5.19

0.08

0.00

0.01

6.91

M224865

2025

Grab

0.05

213.00

4.32

0.07

0.48

6.53

M217589

2025

Channel

5.81

19.08

0.35

0.37

0.28

6.48

D751403

2025

Float

6.13

14.47

0.00

0.02

0.01

6.31

D751368

2025

Talus

6.09

6.80

0.01

0.25

0.04

6.24

D751433

2025

Grab

0.03

139.00

2.99

4.42

4.65

6.13

D751369

2025

Grab

4.97

71.63

0.02

1.44

0.07

6.10

D751939

2024

Channel

5.06

96.30

0.00

0.05

0.03

6.10

M217566

2025

Channel

4.40

118.00

0.02

0.13

0.22

5.93

D751107

2024

Float

4.09

71.80

0.22

1.20

0.95

5.71

D751112

2024

Float

4.94

59.50

0.00

0.31

0.02

5.70

M217702

2025

Channel

4.30

38.77

0.58

2.16

0.10

5.64

M224981

2025

Grab

5.31

13.36

0.01

0.69

0.04

5.60

D751435

2025

Grab

5.19

10.98

0.00

0.54

0.20

5.46

D751158

2024

Grab

4.60

30.70

0.04

1.36

0.02

5.31

M220673

2025

Grab

0.00

345.00

0.03

0.45

4.17

5.29

M217648

2025

Channel

4.69

7.08

0.26

0.44

0.43

5.17

M217788

2025

Channel

5.15

1.29

0.01

0.01

0.00

5.17

D750657

2024

Grab

3.71

40.80

0.76

0.01

0.02

4.98

M220603

2025

Grab

0.39

313.00

0.26

1.50

1.07

4.92

D751215

2024

Grab

2.96

102.00

0.04

0.04

2.15

4.84

D750094

2024

Grab

0.02

108.00

1.01

0.06

8.60

4.83

D750632

2025

Float

4.44

20.01

0.02

0.74

0.01

4.83

D750656

2024

Grab

1.56

97.60

0.06

7.88

0.25

4.53

M217573

2025

Channel

4.27

16.46

0.00

0.00

0.00

4.48

M217643

2025

Channel

4.35

3.99

0.01

0.01

0.04

4.42

M217608

2025

Channel

4.35

1.50

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

D751406

2025

Grab

4.07

12.47

0.00

0.02

0.05

4.24

M224868

2025

Grab

0.38

68.48

3.42

0.01

0.15

4.23

M217805

2025

Channel

4.18

2.82

0.00

0.03

0.01

4.22

D750088

2024

Grab

0.16

143.00

0.04

7.63

1.50

4.18

M224938

2025

Grab

0.00

89.59

3.15

0.01

1.15

4.11

D751417

2025

Grab

3.38

46.67

0.00

0.41

0.00

4.02

M217637

2025

Channel

3.63

10.25

0.03

0.53

0.59

4.00

D750664

2024

Float

0.46

292.00

0.02

4.51

0.08

3.99

D750854

2025

Grab

0.00

186.00

0.07

7.28

1.99

3.95

M224935

2025

Grab

0.00

271.00

0.23

1.45

0.78

3.91

M224866

2025

Grab

0.20

146.00

1.78

0.04

1.31

3.85

M224851

2025

Chip

2.61

38.00

0.13

1.99

0.85

3.70

D751697

2024

Grab

0.09

105.00

2.35

0.01

0.07

3.65

M220553

2025

Grab

0.59

200.00

0.01

3.58

0.06

3.61

D751283

2024

Float

0.26

12.60

3.02

0.00

0.00

3.57

D751946

2024

Grab

0.02

136.00

0.72

0.18

4.35

3.54

D751699

2024

Grab

2.15

68.90

0.01

2.63

0.06

3.51

D750751

2025

Grab

1.16

82.41

0.03

4.01

2.80

3.48

M224904

2025

Grab

1.04

187.00

0.00

0.43

0.17

3.43

D751195

2024

Channel

1.61

38.20

0.82

1.27

0.71

3.37

D751398

2025

Grab

0.09

65.28

2.01

2.59

1.34

3.36

D751436

2025

Grab

0.14

80.25

0.09

13.18

0.20

3.32

D751394

2025

Grab

0.24

187.00

0.16

1.40

1.42

3.22

D750554

2024

Channel

0.05

81.50

0.35

1.05

5.34

3.17

D750199

2024

Grab

0.15

108.00

0.01

7.73

0.05

3.13

D751836

2024

Chip

0.22

114.00

0.00

5.21

1.59

2.95

D751845

2024

Chip

2.63

24.80

0.00

0.01

0.00

2.95

D751972

2024

Channel

1.42

47.30

0.03

3.43

0.68

2.90

D751846

2024

Grab

2.59

24.70

0.01

0.00

0.00

2.87

D751207

2024

Grab

0.04

256.00

0.01

12.65

0.01

2.85

M224963

2025

Grab

2.63

9.40

0.09

0.08

0.01

2.84

M224855

2025

Grab

2.23

30.34

0.03

0.95

0.20

2.83

M217727

2025

Channel

2.73

2.04

0.01

0.03

0.01

2.77

D751109

2024

Grab

1.65

89.50

0.10

0.01

0.03

2.73

D751962

2024

Grab

0.55

95.20

0.26

1.17

1.98

2.65

D751404

2025

Grab

2.61

1.26

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.63

M220555

2025

Grab

0.09

83.19

0.04

8.00

0.64

2.55

D751968

2024

Grab

1.49

53.50

0.01

1.68

0.13

2.55

D751153

2024

Grab

0.83

86.60

0.38

0.08

1.16

2.52

M220674

2025

Grab

0.00

175.00

0.01

0.62

0.74

2.42

D751213

2024

Float

1.65

51.40

0.02

0.31

0.02

2.41

M224927

2025

Grab

0.70

40.80

0.13

6.73

0.02

2.37

M217782

2025

Channel

0.02

88.40

0.84

0.78

1.59

2.32

M224902

2025

Subcrop

2.02

10.72

0.01

0.90

0.02

2.31

M220677

2025

Talus

0.00

29.29

0.29

0.29

6.78

2.26

D751992

2024

Grab

0.33

102.00

0.03

3.27

0.06

2.21

D750448

2024

Grab

0.42

71.70

0.03

4.57

0.09

2.20

D751391

2025

Grab

1.89

14.34

0.10

0.24

0.01

2.19

D751947

2024

Grab

0.01

74.70

0.48

0.09

2.81

2.16

D750086

2024

Channel

0.17

17.30

0.12

1.11

4.70

2.16

D751371

2025

Grab

1.56

39.69

0.00

0.20

0.00

2.08

M224852

2025

Grab

1.08

50.66

0.16

0.93

0.29

2.05

D750555

2024

Channel

0.05

73.10

0.17

1.03

2.65

2.03

M217618

2025

Channel

1.94

6.23

0.00

0.00

0.01

2.02

D750629

2025

Grab

1.23

39.89

0.15

0.00

0.58

1.99

D751165

2024

Grab

1.95

6.80

0.00

0.01

0.01

1.99

M217592

2025

Channel

1.69

10.63

0.17

0.02

0.01

1.97

D750393

2024

Grab

1.01

41.30

0.02

1.79

0.37

1.97

D750449

2024

Grab

0.24

32.60

0.01

6.38

0.02

1.96

D751426

2025

Grab

1.91

1.49

0.00

0.00

0.01

1.94

D751352

2025

Chip

0.22

41.10

1.34

0.01

0.07

1.91

D751422

2025

Grab

0.01

41.14

1.55

0.01

0.02

1.86

M217853

2025

Channel

1.75

2.88

0.00

0.02

0.06

1.81

M217665

2025

Channel

0.80

43.76

0.53

0.00

0.01

1.80

M224912

2025

Grab

1.00

64.20

0.00

0.01

0.00

1.78

D751194

2024

Grab

0.44

130.00

0.01

0.08

0.09

1.74

D750725

2025

Grab

0.00

62.49

0.07

4.77

0.60

1.71

M224903

2025

Grab

0.47

39.05

0.86

0.01

0.01

1.70

M217721

2025

Channel

0.03

53.49

0.88

0.46

0.76

1.70

M220604

2025

Grab

0.50

29.35

0.89

0.30

0.03

1.69

D751429

2025

Grab

0.06

73.61

0.02

2.36

1.37

1.67

M224901

2025

Grab

1.46

12.66

0.02

0.22

0.01

1.66

D750197

2024

Grab

0.10

95.80

0.02

1.43

0.53

1.66

D750195

2024

Grab

0.33

15.30

0.07

2.21

1.77

1.60

D750083

2024

Channel

0.81

32.70

0.01

1.63

0.12

1.57

M217565

2025

Channel

0.47

12.27

0.61

0.04

1.67

1.56

M217724

2025

Channel

1.50

2.88

0.01

0.06

0.01

1.55

D750616

2025

Grab

0.11

64.83

0.52

0.35

0.56

1.54

D751251

2024

Grab

1.27

11.10

0.11

0.02

0.02

1.53

M217636

2025

Channel

1.33

12.99

0.01

0.07

0.01

1.52

D750552

2024

Channel

0.02

33.00

0.24

0.04

2.82

1.51

D751948

2024

Grab

0.11

53.10

0.01

3.48

0.07

1.49

D751993

2024

Grab

1.20

11.90

0.03

0.35

0.17

1.48

M224885

2025

Grab

0.48

14.86

0.90

0.00

0.01

1.45

D751116

2024

Grab

1.27

13.20

0.00

0.01

0.01

1.44

D750553

2024

Channel

0.02

25.10

0.22

0.06

2.82

1.42

D751115

2024

Grab

0.05

45.10

0.02

0.95

2.03

1.40

D751397

2025

Grab

0.01

26.13

0.65

0.05

2.10

1.40

M224914

2025

Grab

0.02

49.81

0.32

1.61

0.85

1.36

D750607

2024

Grab

0.68

43.40

0.00

0.75

0.03

1.36

D751941

2024

Grab

0.35

26.00

0.06

0.64

1.54

1.34

D750095

2024

Channel

0.06

52.40

0.07

1.56

0.93

1.32

D750093

2024

Channel

0.02

43.70

0.15

0.65

1.65

1.31

D751159

2024

Grab

0.54

29.00

0.03

1.93

0.03

1.31

M217707

2025

Channel

0.03

35.15

0.46

1.41

0.94

1.30

M217591

2025

Channel

1.17

3.78

0.06

0.04

0.03

1.28

D751599

2024

Float

0.05

67.20

0.02

1.54

0.23

1.27

M217625

2025

Channel

0.35

20.84

0.55

0.02

0.61

1.22

M217673

2025

Channel

0.07

48.23

0.03

1.41

1.35

1.22

M217626

2025

Channel

0.84

17.58

0.18

0.00

0.02

1.22

M224854

2025

Grab

0.95

20.56

0.05

0.91

0.24

1.21

D750706

2025

Float

0.03

86.21

0.09

0.10

0.05

1.18

D750091

2024

Channel

0.02

56.00

0.13

0.07

1.40

1.18

D751193

2024

Grab

0.44

20.60

0.48

0.01

0.01

1.17

D750087

2024

Channel

0.14

37.00

0.00

1.49

0.91

1.15

D751945

2024

Grab

0.02

27.30

0.08

1.53

1.17

1.13

M217704

2025

Channel

1.07

1.61

0.02

0.01

0.02

1.11

M224856

2025

Grab

0.01

18.03

0.66

0.02

1.22

1.10

D750727

2025

Grab

0.00

28.20

0.83

0.00

0.02

1.07

D751835

2024

Chip

0.12

25.20

0.05

1.76

0.75

1.05

M224919

2025

Grab

0.86

8.94

0.03

0.17

0.01

1.03

M217602

2025

Channel

0.55

25.19

0.16

0.03

0.05

1.02

The Big One property is situated in a region that is well known for hosting Tier 1 precious metal and porphyry deposits, several of which occur near the property including the multiple porphyry systems at Galore Creek (12,159 million pounds of copper, 9.438 million ounces of gold, 174.086 million ounces of silver), the world’s largest known gold reserve at KSM (47.3 million ounces of gold, 160 million ounces of silver, 7.32 billion pounds of copper) and the polymetallic copper project at Shaft Creek (5 billion pounds of copper, 3.7 million ounces of gold, 16.4 million ounces of silver), as well as the Brucejack high-grade epithermal gold deposit (14 million ounces of gold, 91.8 million ounces of silver), and the structurally controlled high-grade hydrothermal gold-silver zones at Trophy and Sphal Creek. The property geology is favorable to host these types of deposits as confirmed by the presence of extensive areas of propylitic alteration, untested geophysical anomalies, strong silt, soil and rock geochemistry including path finder elements directly related to porphyry systems, key structures and textures, porphyry-style mineralization, and high-grade polymetallic veins, that have been discovered within the Big One claims.

The Big One property can be accessed year-round via helicopter from the Glenora/Telegraph Creek Road at the Barrington Mine (33 km to the north-northeast) as well as the Galore Creek Road (15 km to the southeast). The Canadian government committed $20 M to extend/improve the Galore Creek Road to within 15 km of the Big One property. The property is 2 km west of the Scud River airstrip used in the early days of Galore Creek.

The Big One property exploration qualifies for the Critical Mineral Exploration Tax Credit (CMETC).

The Company would like to extend a special thanks to the Tahltan First Nation, the local community, and service providers for supporting our efforts and contributing to the success of this year’s program. We look forward to continuing to work with the Tahltan First Nation and all local stakeholders and businesses while we move forward to unlocking the full potential of this amazing new discovery. WORKING TOGETHER WE SUCCEED!

About Juggernaut Exploration Ltd.

Juggernaut Exploration Ltd. is an explorer and generator of precious metals projects in the prolific Golden Triangle of northwestern British Columbia. Its projects are in world-class geological settings and geopolitical safe jurisdictions amenable to Tier 1 mining in Canada. Juggernaut is a member and active supporter of CASERM, an organization representing a collaborative venture between the Colorado School of Mines and Virginia Tech. Juggernaut’s key strategic cornerstone shareholder is Crescat Capital.

For more information, please contact:

Juggernaut Exploration Ltd.

Dan Stuart

President and Chief Executive Officer

Tel: (604)-559-8028

www.juggernautexploration.com

Follow us on LinkedIn: Click Here
Follow us on Facebook:
Click Here
Follow us on X / Twitter:
Click Here
Follow us on YouTube:
Click Here

Qualified Person

Rein Turna, P. Geo, is the qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, for Juggernaut Exploration projects, and supervised the preparation of, and has reviewed and approved, the technical information in this release.

Other

The reader is cautioned that grab samples are spot samples which are typically, but not exclusively, constrained to mineralization. Grab samples are selective in nature and collected to determine the presence or absence of mineralization and are not intended to be representative of the material sampled.

Grab, channels, chip and talus samples were collected by foot with helicopter assistance. Prospective areas included, but were not limited to, proximity to MINFile locations, placer creek occurrences, regional soil anomalies, and potential gossans based on high-resolution satellite imagery. The rock grab and chip samples were extracted using a rock hammer, or hammer and chisel to expose fresh surfaces and to liberate a sample of anywhere between 0.5 to 5.0 kilograms. All sample sites were flagged with biodegradable flagging tape and marked with the sample number. All sample sites were recorded using hand-held GPS units (accuracy 3-10 meters) and sample ID, easting, northing, elevation, type of sample (outcrop, subcrop, float, talus, chip, grab, etc.) and a description of the rock were recorded on all-weather paper. Samples are then inserted in a clean plastic bag with a sample tag for transport and shipping to the geochemistry lab. QA/QC samples including blanks, certified reference materials, and duplicate samples are inserted regularly into the sample sequence at a rate of 10%.

All samples are transported in rice bags sealed with numbered security tags. The rice bags are transported from the core shacks to the MSALABS facilities in Terrace, BC. MSALABS is certified with both AC89-IAS and ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2017. The core samples undergo preparation via drying, crushing to ~70% of the material passing a 2 mm sieve and riffle splitting. The sample splits are weighed and transferred into three plastic jars, each containing between 300 g and 500 g of crushed sample material. A 250 g split is pulverized to ensure at least 85% of the material passes through a 75 µm sieve. The crushed samples are transported to the MSALABS PhotonAssayTM facility in Prince George, where gold concentrations are quantified via photon assay analysis (method CPA-Au1). Samples that result in gold concentrations ≥5 ppm are analyzed to extinction. Photon assay uses high-energy X-rays (photons) to excite atomic nuclei within the jarred samples, inducing the emission of secondary gamma rays, which are measured to quantify gold concentrations. The assays from all jars are combined on a weight-averaged basis. Multielement analyses are carried at the MSALABS facilities in Surrey, BC, where 250 g of pulverized splits are analyzed via ICF6xx and IMS-230 methods. The IMS-230 method uses 4-acid digestion (a combination of hydrochloric, nitric, perchloric and hydrofluoric acids) followed by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry to quantify concentrations of 48 elements. Samples with over-limit results for Ag, Cu, Pb and Zn undergo ore-grade analysis via the ICF-6xx method (where ‘xx’ denotes the target metal). This method employs 4-acid digestion followed by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT

Certain disclosures in this release may constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties relating to Juggernaut’s operations that may cause future results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements, including its ability to complete the contemplated private placement. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements.

NOT FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES OR TO U.S. PERSONS OR FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES. THIS PRESS RELEASE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR AN INVITATION TO PURCHASE ANY SECURITIES DESCRIBED IN it.

NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.

Copyright (c) 2025 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The following is a list of Upcoming Meeting Dates for Reporting Issuers in Canada. The data is supplied by Issuing Companies through the service of CDS Clearing and Depository Services Inc.

Company Name Record Date Meeting Date Type
 ATLANTIS SUBMARINES INTL HLDS November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 S
 Anonymous Intelligence Company* October 21, 2025 December 19, 2025 A
 Arcus Development Group Inc November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 AG
 BLUE LAGOON RESOURCES INC. November 19, 2025 December 30, 2025 A
 Big Ridge Gold Corp. November 6, 2025 December 16, 2025 AGS
 BrandPilot AI Inc. % September 29, 2025 November 13, 2025 AGS
 BrandPilot AI Inc. November 28, 2025 January 15, 2025 AGS
 CLEAN SEED CAPITAL GROUP LTD % October 2, 2025 November 20, 2025 A
 Deveron Corp. November 28, 2025 December 30, 2025 S
 EV Nickel, Inc. November 7, 2025 December 17, 2025 A
 FAB-FORM INDUSTRIES LTD November 7, 2025 December 12, 2025 AG
 Gabriel Resources Ltd November 17, 2025 December 18, 2025 AS
 Gabriel Resources Ltd % October 31, 2025 December 4, 2025 AS
 Glenstar Minerals Inc. November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 A
 Gold Strike Resources Inc. November 18, 2025 December 23, 2025 AGS
 Golden Harp Resources Inc November 4, 2025 December 9, 2025 AS
 Grafton Resources Inc. November 25, 2025 January 2, 2025 AS
 Grit Metals Corp. November 14, 2025 December 19, 2025 A
 Grosvenor Cpc I Inc. December 1, 2025 January 6, 2025 AS
 Helium Minerals Limited November 14, 2025 December 19, 2025 AG
 J2 Metals Inc. * October 8, 2025 December 3, 2025 S
 LOMIKO METALS INC * November 5, 2025 December 18, 2025 AS
 Makenita Resources Inc November 26, 2025 January 12, 2025 AG
 Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc. November 25, 2025 December 30, 2025 A
 Muzhu Mining Ltd. November 7, 2025 December 19, 2025 AS
 New Media Capital 2.0 Inc. * October 21, 2025 December 10, 2025 AGS
 New Zealand Energy Corp. November 19, 2025 December 19, 2025 AGS
 POCML 7 Inc. November 17, 2025 December 18, 2025 AS
 Pacific Geoinfo Corp. November 25, 2025 December 30, 2025 AG
 Pinnacle Silver and Gold Corp November 7, 2025 December 17, 2025 AG
 Pioneer AI Foundry Inc. November 13, 2025 December 18, 2025 A
 Pure Energy Minerals Limited * November 4, 2025 December 19, 2025 A
 QUADRO RESOURCES LTD November 28, 2025 December 30, 2025 AS
 Queen’s Road Capital Inv Ltd. November 28, 2025 January 9, 2025 AG
 Railtown AI Technologies Inc. November 10, 2025 December 17, 2025 A
 Robex Resources Inc. November 3, 2025 December 15, 2025 S
 Rev Exploration Corp. * October 27, 2025 December 19, 2025 AGS
 Route 109 Resources Inc. November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 AG
 Silver Bear Resources Plc November 25, 2025 December 30, 2025 AGS
 Sky Gold Corp November 6, 2025 December 17, 2025 AG
 Stockworks Gold Inc. * October 27, 2025 December 11, 2025 AGS
 SuperQ Quantum Computing Inc. November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 AS
 Teryl Resources Corp. November 13, 2025 December 22, 2025 AG
 Troy Minerals Inc. November 19, 2025 December 30, 2025 A

 

Legend:

* = Change in Previously Reported Information
% = Cancelled Meeting
@ = Adjourned Meeting

Type of Meeting

A = Annual Meeting
S = Special Meeting
G = General Meeting
X = Extra Meeting
E = Extraordinary Meeting

For more information, please visit https://www.cds.ca/

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/273462

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Here’s a quick recap of the crypto landscape for Friday (November 7) as of 9:00 p.m. UTC.

Get the latest insights on Bitcoin, Ether and altcoins, along with a round-up of key cryptocurrency market news.

Bitcoin and Ether price update

Bitcoin (BTC) was priced at US$103,760, a 3.8 percent decrease in 24 hours, and its highest valuation of the day. Its lowest was US$99,590.49.

Bitcoin price performance, November 7, 2025.

Chart via TradingView.

After a week that has seen the world’s largest cryptocurrency slip more than 20 percent from its early October record high, the crypto market began to show signs of recovery on Friday afternoon.

Speaking about Tether’s Bitcoin accumulation during the recent downturn, Bitget Wallet’s Lacie Zhang said the move underscores institutions’ view of Bitcoin as a strategic reserve asset rather than a speculative trade.

“However, institutional accumulation does not necessarily signal an immediate rebound — it’s a strategic positioning move grounded in the expectation that Bitcoin will outperform once global liquidity conditions improve.’

Zhang explained that Bitcoin’s recent selloff was driven more by broader liquidity stress rather than crypto-specific issues, with exchange-traded fund redemptions causing mechanical selling, and leverage unwinding amplifying volatility — a typical liquidity-drain cycle. She also offered her outlook on what’s to come:

“Looking ahead, recovery depends on how quickly liquidity returns: if unemployment climbs above 4.4 percent or economic data softens once the US shutdown ends, the (US Federal Reserve) may be pushed toward easing. Until then, conditions remain tight, and the January to February credit cycle could still test markets. Longer term, though, institutional accumulation and resilient on-chain activity suggest the foundation for the next phase of crypto recovery is quietly being built.”

Ether (ETH) was priced at US$3,463.13, a 4.8 percent increase in 24 hours to its highest valuation of the day. Its lowest was US$3,199.47.

Altcoin price update

  • Solana (SOL) was priced at US$163.40, up by 5.2 percent over the last 24 hours to its highest valuation of the day. Its lowest was US$150.79.
  • XRP was trading for US$2.36, up by 8 percent over the last 24 hours, also at its highest valuation of the day. Its lowest was US$2.17.

Crypto derivatives and market indicators

Crypto derivatives markets displayed notable liquidation activity on Friday afternoon amid cautious trader sentiment and volatile price action. Bitcoin liquidations hit US$35.8 billion, primarily from short positions unwinding, while Ether saw US$29.8 billion in short liquidations, reflecting significant adjustments in bearish bets.

Open interest in Bitcoin futures climbed modestly by 0.65 percent to US$71.24 billion, indicating persistent market engagement despite recent price pressures just below the key US$100,000 level. Ether’s open interest rose more sharply by 3 percent to US$40.24 billion, underscoring increasing participation ahead of critical expiration events.

Funding rates for both Bitcoin (0.005) and Ether (0.006) remain marginally positive, signaling a slight long bias among traders, but a generally cautious and balanced market stance.

Crucially, Bitcoin’s relative strength index (RSI) at 48.86 sits near neutral territory, suggesting neither overbought nor oversold conditions. This RSI level aligns with the view of an equilibrium phase with potential for either consolidation or a directional move, depending on forthcoming catalysts.

Today’s crypto news to know

Senate members still gridlocked

The US government shutdown entered day 38 on Friday, with the Senate voting down a House-passed funding bill designed to temporarily restore operations. The deadlock centers on the extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies, a key sticking point for Democrats who rejected the GOP-backed measure.

In response, Senate Democrats proposed a counteroffer to reopen the government with a one year extension of healthcare subsidies. However, bipartisan agreement has yet to be reached, and negotiations continue amid growing economic and social impacts, including flight cancelations and delayed pay for federal workers.

Tempo invests in Commonware

Crypto infrastructure startup Commonware has raised US$25 million in a funding round led by Tempo, a payments-focused blockchain network launched by Stripe and crypto venture firm Paradigm.

Commonware was founded in 2024. The company develops open-source tools that empower companies to launch and manage their own blockchains. Commonware’s CEO, Patrick O’Grady, reportedly told Fortune, which first reported the story, that strategic partnerships and network growth are more important than capital alone at this stage, highlighting the long-term value of collaboration over fundraising milestones.

Japan’s financial regulator backs bank-led stablecoin pilot

Japan’s Financial Services Agency has confirmed it will support a project by the country’s three largest banks — Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (TSE:8306), Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (TSE:8316) and Mizuho Financial Group (NYSE:MFG,TSE:8411) — to jointly issue stablecoins for cross-border payments.

In a Reuters report, Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama said the agency will oversee legal and operational compliance as the initiative moves into testing. The banks intend to issue yen-pegged tokens under Japan’s revised Payment Services Act, which requires full asset backing and enhanced consumer safeguards. Startup JPYC recently launched its first fully regulated yen-denominated stablecoin backed by domestic savings and government bonds.

UNDP to launch global blockchain training program for governments

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is expanding its blockchain education initiatives to include government officials, aiming to accelerate digital infrastructure adoption in the public sector.

Robert Pasicko, who leads UNDP’s Alternative Finance Lab, said four countries will be selected for the initial rollout within weeks. The program will build on UNDP’s internal blockchain academy, and will include both training and hands-on project support. Research by UNDP has identified over 300 potential government applications for blockchain technology, from transparent fund tracking to public sector payments.

Twenty-five major blockchain organizations, including Polygon Labs, Stellar Foundation and the Ethereum Foundation, have discussed forming an advisory group under UNDP coordination.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Questcorp Mining Inc. (CSE: QQQ,OTC:QQCMF) (OTCQB: QQCMF) (FSE: D910) (the ‘Company’ or ‘Questcorp’) completed the first tranche of its non-brokered private placement (the ‘Offering’) on October 24, 2025. In connection with closing of the first tranche, the Company issued 14,000,334 units (each, a ‘Unit’) at a price of $0.15 per Unit for gross proceeds of $2,100,050. Each Unit consists of one common share of the Company (each, a ‘Share’) and one-half-of-one share purchase warrant (each whole warrant, an ‘Warrant’). Each Warrant entitles the holder to acquire an additional common share of the Company at a price of $0.20 until October 24, 2027, subject to accelerated expiry in the event the closing price of the Shares is $0.50 or higher for ten consecutive trading days.

A portion of the Units issued under the first tranche the Offering, representing $2,000,000 are held pursuant to a sharing agreement entered into with an institutional investor, Sorbie Bornholm LP (‘Sorbie‘) and the Company (the ‘Sharing Agreement‘). Funds deposited under the Sharing Agreement are secured in escrow with a third-party. The Sharing Agreement provides that the Company’s economic interest will be determined in twenty-four monthly settlement tranches as measured against the Benchmark Price (as defined herein). Unless subject to adjustment, each monthly settlement tranche will total $79,792.

If, at the time of settlement, the Settlement Price (determined monthly based on a volume-weighted average price for twenty trading days prior to the settlement date) (the ‘Settlement Price‘) exceeds the benchmark price of $0.1949 (the ‘Benchmark Price‘), the Company shall receive more than one-hundred percent of the monthly settlement due, on a pro-rata basis. There is no upper limit placed on the additional proceeds receivable by the Company as part of the monthly settlements. If, at the time of settlement, the Settlement Price is below the Benchmark Price of $0.1949, the Company will receive less than one-hundred percent of the monthly settlement due on a pro-rata basis. In no event will a decline in the Settlement Price of the Units result in an increase or decrease in the number of Units being issued to Sorbie, but it could result in the Company receiving less than the full amount of the subscription received from Sorbie or in the Company receiving a nominal amount for a particular month.

As an example, the following are the monthly settlement amounts the Company would receive based on varying Settlement Prices:

Settlement Price Monthly Settlement Amount
$0.2449 $100,262
$0.1949 (Benchmark Price) $79,792
$0.1449 $59,322

 

For further information concerning the Offering, readers are encouraged to review the news release issued by the Company on October 27, 2025.

About Questcorp Mining Inc.

Questcorp Mining Inc. is engaged in the business of the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties in North America, with the objective of locating and developing economic precious and base metals properties of merit. The Company holds an option to acquire an undivided 100% interest in and to mineral claims totaling 1,168.09 hectares comprising the North Island Copper Property, on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, subject to a royalty obligation. The Company also holds an option to acquire an undivided 100% interest in and to mineral claims totaling 2,520.2 hectares comprising the La Union Project located in Sonora, Mexico, subject to a royalty obligation.

Contact Information

Questcorp Mining Corp.

Saf Dhillon, President & CEO

Email: saf@questcorpmining.ca
Telephone: (604) 484-3031

This news release includes certain ‘forward-looking statements’ under applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results and future events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to: general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties, uncertain capital markets; and delay or failure to receive board or regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that the geophysical surveys will be completed as contemplated or at all and that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/273791

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The Winter Olympics are several months away, but the U.S. women’s hockey team is showing good signs against archrival Canada in the Rivalry Series.

The USA won 6-1 on Saturday, Nov. 8 in Buffalo, two days after winning 4-1 in the opening game in Cleveland.

They have been getting balanced scoring – and a lot of it.

The first game was the Abbey Murphy (three goals) and Taylor Heise (four points) show.

Saturday night was the Hilary Knight show as the U.S. captain and four-time Olympian had a hat trick.

Murphy played a role again by intercepting a clearing attempt from Canada goalie Kayle Osborne and feeding Kelly Pannek for the second goal of the game.

So did Heise, who faked a shot and made a drop pass on a goal by Hayley Scamurra.

Laila Edwards, 21, had an impressive goal and two assists on Saturday to give her four points in two games.

Canada has been limited to one goal in each game. Gwyneth Philips made eight saves in the first period to keep the game scoreless and allowed only a goal to Marie-Philip Poulin.

“We saw a lot of great production between Hilary Knight’s hat trick and a strong showing from Laila Edwards, anchored by a strong performance in net,’ USA coach John Wroblewski said. ‘We look forward to building off these two games in December and beyond.”

The series will take a break before resuming in Edmonton, Alberta, on Dec. 10 and 13. The Olympics are in February.

USA TODAY provided live updates from the second game of the Rivalry Series. Here are the highlights:

USA vs Canada highlights

Final score: USA 6, Canada 1

The Americans have outscored Canada 10-2 in the first two games of the Rivalry Series. The USA has back-to-back hat tricks: Abbey Murphy in Game 1 and Hilary Knight in the second game.

Hilary Knight hat trick

Canada pulled Kayle Osborne for an extra skater. Hilary Knight scores an empty-netter for her third goal of the game. 6-1 USA.

USA’s Hayley Scamurra scores

Taylor Heise fakes a shot and makes a drop pass to Hayley Scamurra, who scores before her hometown fans to make it 5-1.

USA’s Hilary Knight scores again

Knight scores her second power-play goal of the night. She’s alone near the crease and tucks in a solid cross-ice pass from Laila Edwards.

USA back on power play

Canada captain Marie-Philip Poulin is called for boarding.

USA’s Laila Edwards scores

Laila Edwards takes advantage of a Renata Fast turnover, skates into the zone, does some nice stickhandling and rips an even nicer shot for a 3-1 U.S. lead.

USA pressing

After being outshot all game, the USA now leads 26-24 in shots.

Third period underway

2-1 USA.

Tracking the Olympic roster

USA Hockey is expected to release its rosters for the Olympics and Paralympics at the end of December or early January.

There are 30 players on the Rivalry Series roster, which means U.S. women’s coach John Wroblewski will have to cut seven players. But don’t ask him about it, because he’s not anywhere close to deciding which seven players won’t make the cut.

“A week ago, Layla and Kirsten Simms weren’t even practicing at Wisconsin. They weren’t going to be here,” he said after Thursday’s game. “So we’ve really got to pump the brakes on any speak of when we’re going to trim things down.”

Edwards and Simms suffered knee injuries last month. They returned for Wisconsin’s games against Minnesota last weekend, and both scored in the Badgers’ 7-2 win Saturday. Simms also had two assists while Edwards had one.

Edwards had an assist on the Americans’ first goal Thursday night while Simms assisted on the last goal.

End of second period: USA 2, Canada 1

Both teams connect on the power play, with their Olympic veterans and captains getting the goals. Hilary Knight gave the USA a 1-0 lead and after Kelly Pannek connected, Canada’s Marie-Philip Poulin cut the U.S. lead to 2-1. Cayla Barnes made a great defensive play late to disrupt a scoring chance from Canada’s Sarah Fillier.

Shots are 22-18 Canada through two periods.

USA power play

Julia Gosling is called for holding. The USA already has a power-play goal in this period. Canada kills this one off. Kirsten Simms was stopped in close.

Canada gets one back

Marie-Philip Poulin scores off a pass from Renata Fast 14 seconds into a power play. That cuts the U.S. lead to 2-1.

USA scores again

Abbey Murphy intercepts goalie Kayle Osborne’s clearing attempt behind the net and feeds Kelly Pannek, who scores before Osborne can get back into position. 2-0 USA.

Hilary Knight gives USA the lead

The USA moves the puck around well on the power play. Megan Keller’s point shot is stopped, but Hilary Knight knocks in the rebound. Laila Edwards gets the secondary assist.

USA power play

Micah Zandee-Hart is called for holding.

Canada power play

Hayley Scamurra is called for holding. Canada was 1-for-3 on the power play in the opening game. USA kills it off. It has a couple short-handed chances.

Second period underway

Scoreless. USA is on the power play, but Canada kills off the remainder.

End of first period: USA 0, Canada 0

Not a lot of great chances in that period. Shots went high on a couple breakaways. Shots were 8-4 Canada, but the USA will have a little more than a minute of carry-over power play at the start of the second period.

USA power play

Renata Fast is called for interference for knocking Laila Edwards into goalie Gwyneth Philips. The net goes off the moorings and Philips’ mask comes off. Despite that, someone from Canada takes a shot near Philips, who is not happy.

Canada chance

Laura Stacy shoots high on a breakaway.

Abbey Murphy chance

Murphy breaks in from the blue line but her backhander goes high. She had a hat trick in the opener.

Game underway

Game 2 of the Rivalry Series has started. Gwyneth Philips in net for the USA. Kayle Osborne is in net for Canada.

When do the U.S. women and Canada play?

Game 2 of the Rivalry Series between the USA and Canada is at 6 p.m. ET on Saturday, Nov 8.

Where is the game being played?

The game is at Key Bank Center in Buffalo, New York

Where can I watch the USA-Canada Rivalry Series?

The game will air on NHL Network.

How can I stream the USA-Canada Rivalry Series?

Fubo and certain Sling TV packages carry NHL Network. Fubo offers a free trial for new subscribers. 

Watch Rivalry Series on Fubo

Team USA lineup

Team Canada lineup

Hot streak for Team USA

The U.S. women’s victory Thursday night was their third in a row against Canada, their longest streak since winning four in a row in 2023. That streak started in the title game of the world championships in Brampton, Ontario, where Hilary Knight had a hat trick to lead the Americans’ 6-3 win.

Fun fact: Neither team has ever swept the Rivalry Series.

Why is US-Canada women’s hockey rivalry so heated?

Canada and the United States are the dominant teams in the women’s game, and no one else (yet) comes close.

The teams have played each other in the final at every Olympics and world championships but two, with Canada winning five of the seven Olympic gold medals and 13 of the 24 world titles. But the U.S. women have won two of the last three world championships, including an overtime thriller in Czechia in April.

Abbey Murphy, Harvey and Heise had goals in regulation for the Americans before Tessa Janecke scored the game-winner on a tap-in.

Canada leads the Americans in all-time meetings (108-84-1). But the United States has bragging rights for winning gold in the first Olympic women’s hockey tournament, beating Canada 3-1 at the Nagano Games in 1998.

Homecoming game

“The Cleveland Queen” had a night to remember.

Laila Edwards, who grew up in Cleveland Heights, had an assist on the first U.S. goal Thursday night. She also drew the loudest cheers when she was introduced as a starter, and Hilary Knight handed over ceremonial puck drop duties to her.

The day before the game, Cleveland Cavaliers forward Larry Nance Jr. was spotted wearing Edwards’ jersey.

“This has definitely been a very special couple of days that I’m going to remember forever,” said Edwards, who had not played in her hometown since her sophomore year in high school. (She went to a Bishop Kearney High School in Rochester, New York to play hockey.)

“It’s been super fun and I’m sad it’s ending,” she added.

Saturday’s game will be a homecoming for veteran forward Hayley Scamurra, who grew up in Buffalo, and Haley Winn, who is from Rochester, which is about an hour away.

What is the Rivalry Series?

Now in its sixth season, the Rivalry Series features the U.S. and Canadian women’s national teams. This year’s edition consists of four games, the first two in the United States and the last two in Canada.

The Americans won the opener in Cleveland 4-1. After Saturday night’s game in Buffalo, the Rivalry Series will wrap up with games Dec. 10 and 13 in Edmonton, Alberta.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Things haven’t gone to plan for LSU football quarterback Garrett Nussmeier, and he may have hit his lowest point with the Tigers on Saturday, Nov. 8 against Alabama.

Nussmeier, a Heisman Trophy candidate entering the season, was benched by interim coach Frank Wilson in the third quarter against the Crimson Tide for sophomore Michael Van Buren. The projected first-round pick entering the season entered the matchup having lost three of his last four games before his coach, Brian Kelly, was fired.

Nussmeier hasn’t looked himself this season after passing for an SEC-leading 4,052 yards in 2024. LSU spent big in the transfer portal ahead to get him weapons to throw to in 2025, but it hasn’t paid off.

Here’s what to know of Van Buren, a backup quarterback with rare starting experience in the SEC.

Who is LSU backup QB Michael Van Buren?

Van Buren, a sophomore transfer from Mississippi State, started eight games for the Bulldogs last season as a true freshman.

Van Buren showed flashes of potential in 2024, passing for 1,886 yards with 11 touchdowns to seven interceptions, adding five rushing scores. He threw for three touchdowns in back-to-back games against Georgia and Texas A&M last season.

Michael Van Burn 247 rating

A four-star recruit in 2024, Van Buren flipped his commitment from Oregon to Mississippi State in 2023 after Jeff Lebby was hired by the Bulldogs. He opted to transfer ahead of the 2025 season after Blake Shapen returned for Mississippi State.

Van Buren was the No. 15-ranked quarterback and No. 239 player nationally in 2023, according to 247Sports’ Composite rankings. He attended St. Frances Academy High School and hails from Bowie, Maryland.

Van Buren led St. Frances, a high school powerhouse, to the 2022 high school national championship against IMG Academy, although IMG opted out of the game.

Michael Van Buren stats

Here are Van Buren’s year-by-year stats in college.

  • 2024 (Mississippi State): 140 of 256 passing (54.7%) for 1,886 yards with 11 touchdowns to seven interceptions; 69 carries for negative-12 yards with five touchdowns
  • 2025 (LSU): 13 of 16 passing (81.3%) for 172 yards with two touchdowns; nine carries for 23 yards with a touchdown
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The muddy ACC football standings became even muddier on Saturday, Nov. 8.

After No. 11 Virginia (No. 14 in College Football Playoff) and No. 15 Louisville (No. 15 CFP) were upset by Wake Forest and Cal, respectively, there are now five teams with one loss or fewer in ACC play. Louisville and Miami have two losses in conference play.

Duke, who has a 5-4 record and suffered a rough loss to independent UConn on Nov. 8, still has a shot at reaching the College Football Playoff with a 4-1 record in ACC play, as wild as it sounds. It seems more and more likely for the ACC to only put one team into the 12-team CFP, coming down to whoever wins the conference title game.

Here’s a look at the ACC standings after Virginia and Louisville’s losses after Week 11:

ACC football standings after Week 11

Here’s a full look at the ACC standings after Week 11 of the college football season.

  • T-1. Georgia Tech (8-1, 5-1 ACC)
  • T-1. Virginia (8-2, 5-1 ACC)
  • T-1. Southern Methodist (7-3, 5-1 ACC)
  • T-1. Pittsburgh (7-2, 5-1 ACC)
  • 5. Duke (5-4, 4-1 ACC)
  • 6. Louisville (7-2, 4-2 ACC)
  • 7. Miami (7-2, 3-2 ACC)
  • T-8. Wake Forest (6-3, 3-3 ACC)
  • T-8. California (6-4, 3-3 ACC)
  • 10. Clemson (4-5, 3-4 ACC)
  • T-11. North Carolina State (5-4, 2-3 ACC)
  • T-11. Virginia Tech (3-6, 2-3 ACC)
  • T-11. North Carolina (4-5, 2-3 ACC)
  • 14. Stanford (3-7, 2-5 ACC)
  • 15. Florida State (4-5, 1-5 ACC)
  • 16. Syracuse (3-7, 1-6 ACC)
  • 17. Boston College (1-9, 0-6 ACC)
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

FORT LAUDERDALE, FL — Lionel Messi and Inter Miami are moving on in the MLS Cup Playoffs.

Messi had two goals and two assists – including the 400th of his career for club and country – and No. 3 seed Inter Miami beat No. 6 seed Nashville SC 4-0 in the decisive Game 3 of their first-round series on Saturday, Nov. 8 at Chase Stadium.

Tadeo Allende also scored twice in a three-minute span in the second half, as Inter Miami is three matches away from their first MLS Cup title.

Inter Miami will visit No. 2 FC Cincinnati in the conference semifinals, beginning Nov. 22 or 23. Every match moving forward in the MLS playoffs is single elimination.

Inter Miami was on the brink in the first round for the second straight year, but relied on their Argentine World Cup champion and captain to lead the way.

“I’m happy for the club because after what happened last year, there were lingering feelings and a fear it could happen again,” Inter Miami coach Javier Mascherano said after the win. “Now, we can look ahead.”

Messi scored twice in the first half – his first coming 10 minutes into the match. He dribbled around several defenders, and connected with a left boot into the lower right corner of the net on an assist from Allende.

Messi doubled the lead in the 39th minute, connecting on a drop pass from 19-year-old Argentine Mateo Silvetti, who played on Argentina’s runner-up Under-20 World Cup team and started in place of a suspended Luis Suarez in the match.

Messi also orchestrated Allende’s goals in the second half. Messi and Jordi Alba exchanged several passes in the box before Allende scored in the 73rd minute.

Messi’s finishing touch was a through pass up the pitch to Allende in the 76th minute to register his historic assist to end the night.

“It’s crazy. Every game, you’re kinda speechless. It’s unbelievable I get to play with him,” Inter Miami defender Noah Allen said of Messi after the match. “He creates magic. It’s unreal.”

Inter Miami goalie Rocco Ríos Novo earned his first clean sheet of the postseason as Nashville missed 11 shots in the match, despite a second-half push to get back into the contest.

While Messi led the way offensively, he also received praise from Alba and Mascherano for pushing the envelope on the defensive end, as well.

“He really put on a show – both defensively and offensively,” Alba said in an Apple TV interview after the win. “… But defensively, he helped us more than anyone else.”

Added Mascherano: “How he pressed today at 38 years old, it’s crazy. I think we already know everything about Leo with the ball, but Leo without the ball, today, was impressive.”

Messi scored eight goals in a span of four matches in 22 days against Nashville – an MLS rivalry that has been one-sided since Messi joined the league.

Inter Miami beat Nashville for the 2023 Leagues Cup title and has only dropped one match against them since then (Game 2 of this series).

The MLS playoff series victory is the first for Inter Miami, which started play in 2020.

The MLS careers of Alba and Sergio Busquets, the former Barcelona stars who announced they will retire at the end of the 2025 season, will also continue during this postseason run.

“There aren’t many games left. God willing, there will be three more games, and hopefully we can win and bring joy to the fans and ourselves,” Alba said.

Messi is expected to join the Argentine national team next week for a Nov. 14 match against Angola in the African country. Mascherano acknowledged at least seven players would be away on international duty before the next playoff game.

USA TODAY Sports provided updates and highlights from the match:

Inter Miami vs. Nashville highlights

Inter Miami 4, Nashville 0: Tadeo Allende scores brace (76′)

This one is over: Tadeo Allende scores his second goal in a three-minute span, and Inter Miami will move on. Allende received an assist up the field from Messi, and finished the opportunity with ease.

Inter Miami 3, Nashville 0: Tadeo Allende scores goal (73′)

Inter Miami will move on in the MLS Cup playoffs: Tadeo Allende scores in the 73rd minute to triple the lead.

The sequence: Jordi Alba to Messi, back to Alba, and dropped off to Allende in front of the net.

Inter Miami 2, Nashville 0: Sam Surridge misses shot (56′)

Inter Miami 2, Nashville 0: Another Messi dribbling highlight (53′)

Inter Miami 2, Nashville 0: Sam Surridge goal negated (46′)

Nashville’s Sam Surridge gets tangled with Inter Miami defender Maxi Falcon, and a goal was disallowed about 30 seconds into the second half.

Inter Miami 2, Nashville 0: Halftime 

Lionel Messi scored twice (10’ and 39’) to propel Inter Miami to a 2-0 lead in the first half of Game 3 against Nashville. Can he get a hat trick in the second half?

Inter Miami 2, Nashville 0: Messi misses free kick before halftime (45’+2′)

Messi lined up for a free kick, but Nashville goalkeeper Joe Willis caught the shot attempt. Messi drew a yellow card after colliding into Walker Zimmerman in the sequence.

Inter Miami 2, Nashville 0: Messi scores second goal (39′)

Messi has a brace, scoring his second goal just before halftime on an assist from 19-year-old Argentine Mateo Silvetti.

Inter Miami 1, Nashville 0: Baltazar Rodriguez misses shot (32′)

Inter Miami performed a set piece in the 32nd minute: Messi sent a pass to Rodriguez, who was just off the mark on his shot from outside the box.

Inter Miami 1, Nashville 0: Messi’s free kick hits Najar (30′)

Inter Miami 1, Nashville 0: Messi nutmegs Edvard Tagseth (19′)

The crowd erupted when Messi pulled off a nutmeg on Nashville’s Edvard Tagseth in the 19th minute. The exchanges from both players after the sequence was comical, too.

Inter Miami 1, Nashville 0: Messi scores goal (10′)

Ten minutes in, and No. 10 has scored: Messi connects on a left boot into the lower right corner of the net to give Inter Miami an early lead.

Inter Miami 0, Nashville 0: Why is Luis Suárez not playing?

Inter Miami will play without Uruguayan striker Luis Suárez, who was suspended for the match and fined for kicking Nashville’s Andy Najar in Game 2. He was seen on the Inter Miami bench during the opening minutes of the game broadcast.

Inter Miami 0, Nashville SC 0: We’re underway (1′)

The match has begun shortly after 8:15 p.m. ET.

Messi arrives for Game 3

What time is Game 3 between Inter Miami vs. Nashville?

The match begins at 8 p.m. ET (7 p.m. CT, 9 p.m. in Argentina) at Chase Stadium in Fort Lauderdale, FL.

Where to watch Inter Miami vs. Nashville Game 3 on TV/live stream?

The match will be available on MLS Season Pass via Apple TV.

Is Messi playing tonight?

Yes, Messi is a starter and will play tonight.

Inter Miami vs. Nashville starting lineups

Mateo Silvetti, a 19-year-old who played on Argentina’s runner-up Under-20 World Cup team, earned the start in place of Suarez on the front line for Inter Miami alongside Messi, Tadeo Allende and Baltazar Rodriguez.

Inter Miami vs. Nashville prediction

Inter Miami 3, Nashville 2: Inter Miami prevails with a brace and an assist by Messi at home, but don’t expect Nashville to just bow away so easily. –Safid Deen

Who does Inter Miami-Nashville winner play next in MLS playoffs?

The winner of Inter Miami-Nashville series will face No. 2 FC Cincinnati, which beat the No. 7 Columbus Crew 2-1 in Game 3 earlier Saturday. Cincinnati would host No. 3 Inter Miami or No. 6 Nashville, whichever advances, in the conference semifinals.

Inter Miami vs. Nashville recent matches

Saturday will be the fourth match in as many weeks between Inter Miami and Nashville.

  • Decision Day:Messi had a hat trick in a 5-2 win for Inter Miami at Nashville on Oct. 18 to end the regular season.
  • Game 1: Messi scored twice with an assist in a 3-1 home win for Inter Miami on Oct. 24.
  • Game 2: Messi scored in the final minutes, but Nashville won 2-1 at home on Nov. 1. Nashville broke an 11-game winless streak against Inter Miami in the victory.

Messi’s upcoming schedule with Inter Miami, Argentina

Messi was called up by Argentina to participate in a November 14 friendly against Angola in the African country. The match occurs during the Nov. 10-18 FIFA international window. It’s possible Messi will travel for the match, even if Inter Miami advances to the next round of the playoffs.

MLS Cup playoff schedule

  • Nov. 22-23: Conference semifinals
  • Nov. 29-30: Conference finals
  • Dec. 6: MLS Cup Final

Inter Miami vs. Nashville betting odds

Here are the betting odds for tonight’s match during regulation, according to BETMGM.

  • Inter Miami: -165
  • Draw: +350
  • Nashville: +340
  • Over/under goals: 3.5 goals
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Roll Tide Roll.

Thanks to a late fourth-quarter fumble caused by Yhonzae Pierre, No. 4 Alabama (No. 4 in College Football Playoff) continued to roll through the Southeastern Conference with a defensive 20-9 win over LSU on Saturday, Nov. 8 in Tuscaloosa, Alabama.

Stream Alabama vs. LSU football live with Fubo (free trial)

With its win, No. 4 Alabama has now won eight consecutive games, giving Kalen DeBoer’s a shot at making the SEC championship game and, potentially more. 

A low-scoring game through the midway point of the second quarter, Alabama’s offense kicked it into high gear to end the first half, as the Crimson Tide scored two touchdowns in the final 9:25, including a 13-yard touchdown pass from Ty Simpson to Ryan Williams just before they went into the locker room.

LSU interim head coach Frank Wilson benched Garrett Nussiemer in the third quarter, replacing him with backup Michael Van Burden. The Tigers weren’t able to overcome numerous self-inflicted wounds on offense despite a stellar night from their defense.

Simpson struggled at times throughout the night, especially with the deep ball. The Heisman Trophy candidate completed 21 of 35 passes (60%) for 277 yards and a touchdown, but also lost a fumble on the first play of the fourth quarter. 

The win for the Crimson Tide extends its nation leading home win streak to 17 straight, and its record at home under DeBoer to 12-0. USA TODAY Sports provided live updates, stats and highlights from the Crimson Tide Week 11 win over the Tigers. Follow below: 

Alabama vs LSU football live score

This section will be updated during the game

Alabama vs LSU football updates

Final: Alabama 20, LSU 9

It wasn’t pretty, but Alabama slogged through a defensive-dominant game vs. LSU to emerge victorious, 20-9. The Crimson Tide return to Bryant-Denny Stadium in Week 12 to take on Oklahoma.

Alabama forces fumble

Yhonzae Pierre comes up with his second big play of the night, and this time it results in a turnover. The Alabama linebacker came around the side and knocked the ball out of the hand of Michael Van Buren for the fumble at the end of a sack, which was recovered by London Simmons.

Alabama takes over on offense.

Alabama extends lead with FG

Conor Talty redeems himself from an earlier miss in the game with a successful 44-yard field goal to push Alabama’s lead over LSU to a two-score game, at 20-9. Those are the first points for the Crimson Tide since Ty Simpson connected with Ryan Williams for a 13-yard touchdown just before halftime.

Alabama now leads LSU 20-9 with 4:25 remaining in the fourth quarter.

Alabama punts

Alabama has gone cold on offense, as Kalen DeBoer sends out the punt unit for the second time in the Crimson Tide’s last three drives. The Crimson Tide’s defense got some help from its special teams unit, however, as the ball is spotted at LSU’s own 2-yard line.

LSU cuts deficit to one score with FG

LSU is not going away that easily.

The Tigers make it a one-score game at 17-9 against Alabama with 10:28 remaining in the fourth quarter after Damon Ramos makes the 37-yard field goal attempt. LSU had made it all the way down to the Alabama 7-yard line, but a false start penalty and a 10-yard sack on Michael Van Buren sent the Tigers backwards.

An important drive is coming up for Ty Simpson and Alabama’s offense after Simpson turned the ball over on the first play of the fourth quarter.

Alabama sacks Michael Van Buren

LT Overton comes up with the second sack of the night for the Alabama defense on first-and-goal from the 12-yard line, as he sacks Michael Van Buren for a loss of 10 yards to make it second-and-goal from the Crimson Tide’s 22-yard line.

LSU sacks Ty Simpson, forces fumble

LSU opens the fourth quarter with its first takeaway on defense, as Harold Perkins sacks Ty Simpson and forces the ball out of the hands of the Alabama quarterback. The Tigers linebacker recovers his own forced fumble and gives the ball back to Michael Van Buren and the LSU offense deep in Alabama territory, down 17-6.

Alabama takes lead over LSU into fourth quarter

Fours up in Tuscaloosa, as Alabama takes a 17-6 lead over LSU into the fourth quarter. The Crimson Tide will start the fourth quarter with a second-and-9 at their own 48-yard line following a 1-yard carry from Daniel Hill.

Alabama is 15 minutes away from picking up its eighth consecutive win of the season. Ty Simpson is 17 of 28 passing for 244 yards and a touchdown, while Michael Van Buren is 2 of 4 for 16 yards since he came in for Garrett Nussmeier during LSU’s last drive.

End of third quarter: Alabama 17, LSU 6

LSU false start forces to punt

LSU’s communication struggles on offense continue on fourth-and-1, as offensive lineman Bauer Sharp jumps before the snap. The 5-yard penalty sends Michael Van Buren and the Tigers’ offense off the field, and sends a punt unit on.

It’s the second big communication error by the Tigers in as many plays, and kills a drive that showed a slight pulse from LSU’s offense after Garrett Nussmeier was benched.

Michael Van Buren takes over for Garrett Nussmeier

As the LSU offense heads back onto the field, the Tigers do so with a new quarterback, as backup quarterback Michael Van Buren is in for Garrett Nussmeier.

Alabama sacks Garrett Nussiemer, LSU hits FG attempt

Alabama dials the pressure on third-and-8 with the three-man rush to Garrett Nussmeier, who was sacked for a loss of 14 yards by Yhonzae Pierre. Nussmeier attempted to get away from the rush, but he turned in the wrong direction and into the diving hands of Pierre.

Nussiemer’s sack sends out the LSU field goal unit. The Tigers cut their deficit to 17-6 after Damian Ramos hit the 44-yard field goal attempt. LSU has yet to score a touchdown on the night.

Nic Anderson injury update

LSU will be down a man at wide receiver, as Nic Anderson is carted off the field after being tended to by LSU trainers on the sidelines. Anderson appeared to have gone down weirdly at the conclusion of a 16-yard catch when he was tackled by two Alabama defenders.

End of first half: Alabama 17, LSU 3

Alabama vs LSU halftime stats

Here’s a look at how Alabama and LSU stack up statistically at halftime, with the Crimson Tide holding a 17-3 lead:

  • Total yards: Alabama 244, LSU 131
  • Passing yards: Alabama 210, LSU 76
  • Rushing yards: LSU 55, Alabama 34
  • Yards per play: Alabama 7.4, LSU 4.9
  • Third downs: Alabama 2-6, LSU 2-7

Alabama scores quick TD before halftime

Alabama offensive coordinator Ryan Grubb is in his bag.

One play after Ty Simpson connected with Lotzeir Brooks for a 53-yard catch on the deep route, the Heisman Trophy candidate finds Ryan Williams in the end zone for a 13-yard touchdown pass. It’s an impressive drive by Alabama, as Simpson threw back-to-back dots into the hands of his receivers to get points on the board before halftime.

The scoring drive was three plays for 66 yards and took just 34 seconds of game time.

Alabama misses field goal attempt

Alabama is unable to extend its lead over LSU to two scores, as Conor Talty’s 26-yard field goal attempt goes wide left. It’s an important series coming up for the Crimson Tide’s defense, as they will look to get a stop to keep their seven-point lead intact as LSU begins the second half with the ball.

Aaron Anderson injury report

ESPN’s Molly McGrath reports that LSU wide receiver Aaron Anderson hyperextended his left elbow on the Tigers’ previous offensive drive and that LSU’s medical staff has put a brace on his elbow. He is expected to return to the game.

Daniel Hill TD puts Alabama in front

The first touchdown of the night goes to Alabama and Daniel Hill, who fights his way through a group of LSU defenders to get into the end zone. It’s a 4-yard rushing touchdown for the sophomore running back, and his second rushing score of the season.

The big play of the drive was a 33-yard pass down the left side of the field on second-and-3 when Simpson found his tight end, Josh Cuevas, in stride. The scoring drive was seven plays for 75 yards and took 3:02 off the game clock.

It’s 10-3 Alabama with 9:25 remaining in the second quarter.

LSU ties game with 37-yard FG

Wilson elects to take the field goal out of the injury timeout on the field for Aaron Anderson. Damian Ramos hits the 37-yard field goal to tie the game at 3-3 against Alabama with 12:27 remaining in the second quarter.

Both teams have exchanged field goals in the first half, as both teams’ offenses continue to settle in.

LSU facing fourth down decision

LSU interim head coach Frank Wilson faces an early big decision: go for it on a fourth-and-2 at the Alabama 20-yard line or take the field goal. Before heading off the injury tent, Aaron Anderson caught a 7-yard pass from Garrett Nussiemer to make it fourth-and-short for the Tigers.

End of first quarter: Alabama 3, LSU 0

Alabama gets on board with field goal

Despite the good starting field position, Alabama goes backward, setting up a 45-yard field goal attempt from kicker Conor Talty. His kick is true, however, sailing through the middle to give the Crimson Tide the first points of the game.

Alabama forces turnover

What looked like a huge LSU chunk play on third-and-5 from the Tigers’ 11 instead turns into a turnover, courtesy of the Alabama defense. Linebacker Nikhai Hill-Green punched the ball out of tight end Bauer Sharp and recovers it deep in LSU territory.

Alabama punts

The Crimson Tide get a nice chunk play off a 33-yard connection between Ty Simpson and Germie Bernard out to the Alabama 39-yard line, but follow that up with three straight incompletions (including two throwaways) to end the drive. Following a 40-yard punt by Blake Doud, LSU will take over at its own 7-yard line.

LSU misses field goal attempt

Another bend-don’t-break effort by Alabama’s defense sets LSU up with a field goal attempt from the Crimson Tide 13-yard line. But Tigers kicker Damian Ramos, who entered the game 14 of 17 on field goal attempts, kicked it wide right to negate the scoring opportunity.

Alabama turns ball over on downs

Alabama tries to catch LSU off guard with a fake on fourth-and-1, as Jam Miller takes the direct snap, but LSU linebacker West Weeks is all over it and tackles Miller for no gain. It was an interesting play-calling sequence by the Crimson Tide, as they called three consecutive run plays.

LSU takes over at its own 39-yard line.

Alabama starts on offense

After LSU won the toss and deferred the opening kickoff to the second half, Alabama gets its night started on offense with a 25-yard kickoff return from Lotzeir Brooks. Underway in Tuscaloosa!

Pregame

Dave Roberts at Alabama-LSU game

World Series champion manager Dave Roberts is in attendance for Alabama vs. LSU in Tuscaloosa. According to The Tuscaloosa News’ Colin Gay, the Los Angeles Dodgers manager is friends with Alabama coach Kalen DeBoer.

Ryan Williams status vs LSU

Ryan Williams looks to be a go against LSU. The Crimson Tide sophomore was removed from the final SEC injury report, which was released 90 minutes before the game on Saturday, Nov. 8, after being listed as ‘probable’ on the previous three.

What was Alabama football ranked in first CFP ranking?

Who is LSU football’s interim head coach vs Alabama?

Ty Simpson Heisman Trophy odds 

The first-year Alabama starting quarterback enters his Week 11 start vs. LSU with the third-best odds on BetMGM (+350) to win the 2025 Heisman Trophy. 

What time does Alabama vs LSU start?

  • Date: Saturday, Nov. 8
  • Start time: 7:30 p.m. ET

Alabama vs. LSU will kick off at 7:30 p.m. ET on Saturday, Nov. 8 from Bryant-Denny Stadium in Tuscaloosa, Alabama.

What TV channel is Alabama vs LSU on today?

  • TV: ABC
  • Streaming: ESPN app | Fubo (free trial)

Alabama vs. LSU will be broadcast nationally on ABC in Week 11 of the 2025 college football season. Sean McDonough and Greg McElroy will broadcast the game from the booth at Bryant-Denny Stadium, with Molly McGrath reporting from the sidelines.

Streaming options for the game include the ESPN app (with a TV login) and Fubo, which carries ABC and offers a free trial to new subscribers.

Stream Alabama vs. LSU football live with Fubo (free trial)

How to watch college football on ESPN, ABC without YouTube TV

Disney-owned channels such as ABC and the ESPN family of networks are no longer available on YouTube TV after it and Disney were unable to agree to new contract terms.

One way college football fans who subscribe to YouTube TV can stream games on Disney-owned channels is via Fubo, which carries ABC and the ESPN family of networks and offers a free trial to potential subscribers.

Alabama vs LSU predictions

Colin Gay, The Tuscaloosa News: Alabama 32, LSU 21

‘Who knows what LSU could look like with interim coach Frank Wilson? With two weeks to prepare for Alabama, the Tigers could lead with one of the better pass offenses and pass defenses in the SEC. But, especially facing an Alabama pass rush that is finding its footing, and the best passing offense that it has faced all season, LSU has a tall task, one that should continue the Crimson Tide’s SEC success.’

Chase Goodbread, The Tuscaloosa News: Alabama 23, LSU 17

‘A lower-scoring affair could be in order. LSU QB Garrett Nussmeier has struggled to be effective behind an underperforming offensive line. A full house at Bryant-Denny Stadium won’t make it any easier for him. But it likely won’t be an easy night for Alabama’s offense, either.’

Alabama schedule 2025

Here’s a look at Alabama’s 2025 schedule, including past scores and available kickoff and TV channel information:

  • Saturday, Aug. 30: Florida State 31, Alabama 17
  • Saturday, Sept. 6: Alabama 73, ULM 0
  • Saturday, Sept. 13: Alabama 38, Wisconsin 14
  • Saturday, Sept. 20: BYE
  • Saturday, Sept. 27: Alabama 24, No. 5 Georgia Tech
  • Saturday, Oct. 4: Alabama 30, No. 16 Vanderbilt 14 *
  • Saturday, Oct. 11: Alabama 27, No. 14 Missouri 24 *
  • Saturday, Oct. 18: Alabama 37, No. 11 Tennessee 20 *
  • Saturday, Oct. 25: Alabama 29, South Carolina 22 *
  • Saturday, Nov. 1: BYE
  • Saturday, Nov. 8: vs. LSU * | 7:30 p.m. | ABC (Fubo)
  • Saturday, Nov. 15: vs. No. 12 Oklahoma * | 3:30 p.m. ET | ABC (Fubo)
  • Saturday, Nov. 22: vs. Eastern Illinois | 2 p.m. ET | SEC Network+
  • Saturday, Nov. 29: at Auburn *

* Denotes SEC game

LSU schedule 2025

Here’s a look at LSU’s 2025 schedule, including past scores and available kickoff and TV channel information:

  • Saturday, Aug. 30: LSU 17, No. 4 Clemson 10
  • Saturday, Sept. 6: LSU 23, Louisiana Tech 7
  • Saturday, Sept. 13: LSU 20, Florida 10
  • Saturday, Sept. 20: LSU 56, Southeastern Louisiana 10
  • Saturday, Sept. 27: No. 13 Ole Miss 24, LSU 19 *
  • Saturday, Oct. 4: BYE
  • Saturday, Oct. 11: LSU 20, South Carolina 10 *
  • Saturday, Oct. 18: No. 17 Vanderbilt 31, LSU 24 *
  • Saturday, Oct. 25: No. 3 Texas A&M 49, LSU 25 *
  • Saturday, Nov. 1: BYE
  • Saturday, Nov. 8: at No. 4 Alabama * | 7:30 p.m. ET | ABC (Fubo)
  • Saturday, Nov. 15: vs. Arkansas * | 12:45 p.m. ET | SEC Network (Fubo)
  • Saturday, Nov. 22: vs. Western Kentucky
  • Saturday, Nov. 29: at No. 12 Oklahoma *

* Denotes SEC game

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • In the wake of Thursday’s loss, the Raiders announced they fired special teams coordinator Tom McMahon.
  • A blocked punt in the third quarter led to the Broncos’ go-ahead field goal to make it 10-7.
  • With 4:30 left in the fourth quarter, Raiders kicker Daniel Carlson missed a 48-yard field goal that would have tied the game 10-10.

Week 10 of the 2025 NFL season started off with an AFC West tilt in Denver on ‘Thursday Night Football.’ After a game that featured nearly as many first downs (20) as points, the Broncos earned a 10-7 win over the Las Vegas Raiders.

That three-point margin of victory loomed large for the Raiders, especially with special teams mistakes.

A blocked punt in the third quarter led to the Broncos’ go-ahead field goal to make it 10-7. With 4:30 left in the fourth quarter, Raiders kicker Daniel Carlson missed a 48-yard field goal that would have tied the game 10-10.

In the wake of that loss, the Raiders announced they fired special teams coordinator Tom McMahon.

‘Earlier today, we made the tough decision to relieve Tom McMahon of his duties as special teams coordinator,’ coach Pete Carroll said in a team statement. ‘I have a great amount of respect for Tom and the work that he has done in this league, but we have decided to move in a different direction.

‘Derius Swinton II will assume special teams coordinator duties on an interim basis and we are excited to attack the second half of this season with outstanding intent and purpose. We are grateful for Tom and his work here with the Raiders and wish him nothing but the best moving forward.’

Thursday’s game was the latest in a season of special teams mistakes under McMahon. A blocked field goal against the Chicago Bears in the final minute of regulation ensured a 25-24 Raiders loss. A missed extra point on the Raiders’ first touchdown against Jacksonville made a difference in a 23-23 tie after regulation that became a 30-29 loss in overtime.

Swinton II will become a special teams coordinator for the first time since 2021 with the Los Angeles Chargers under Brandon Staley. A former safety in college, he also held the special teams coordinator position in 2016 with the San Francisco 49ers.

Las Vegas is back home in Week 11 for a ‘Monday Night Football’ matchup against the Dallas Cowboys.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast.Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY