Author

admin

Browsing

The Trae Young era in Atlanta is over.

The Atlanta Hawks are trading Young to the Washington Wizards in exchange for CJ McCollum and Corey Kispert, a person with knowledge of the deal told USA TODAY Sports.

The person spoke on the condition of anonymity because the deal was not yet official.

A breakup between the Hawks and their longtime face of the franchise had been inevitable for some time, and an ESPN report earlier Wednesday indicated that Washington was Young’s preferred trade destination.

The 27-year-old, four-time All-Star gets his wish and a fresh start in the nation’s capital.

Trae Young trade details

This is a rare player for players deal, with no draft picks involved.

Young, the fifth overall pick in the 2018 NBA Draft who’s spent his whole career in Atlanta, is going to Washington. The Hawks get back 13-year veteran CJ McCollum and Corey Kispert, the 15th overall pick in the 2021 NBA Draft.

Trae Young contract

Young’s cap hit is nearly $46 million this season and he has a player option for 2026-27, which means he could become a free agent this summer. ESPN’s Shams Charania reported that the Wizards ‘are not expected to have immediate extension talks with Young.’

McCollum’s cap hit is close to $31 million and he will be a free agent after the season. Kispert is under contract through 2029 (when including a club option) and he sports a modest cap hit south of $14 million.

Trae Young stats

In 10 games this season, Young has averaged 19.3 points and 8.9 assists.

McCollum, 34, has averaged 18.8 points, 3.5 rebounds and 3.5 assists in 35 games. Kispert, 26, has averaged 9.2 points in 19 games.

This story has been updated with new information.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Black coaches are rarely given second chances after being fired, unlike many of their white counterparts.
  • Experts suggest Black coaches are often judged collectively, while white coaches are evaluated as individuals.
  • The number of Black head coaches in the FBS has decreased from 17 in 2011 to 14 today.

The two most powerful leagues in college football began the 2025 season with a combined four Black head coaches out of 34 schools from coast to coast.

∎ There were no Black head coaches in the Southeastern Conference.

∎ In the Big Ten, there were four, including Sherrone Moore, the first Black head coach in Michigan history.

Four months later, only one remains — Mike Locksley at Maryland. The others were terminated, most notably Moore, who fell from grace in the kind of scandal that can unfairly affect perceptions of other Black coaches in ways that don’t affect white coaches after similar scandals, according to experts contacted by USA TODAY Sports.

“These Black coaches are often evaluated collectively, while white coaches, our peers, are evaluated individually,” said former San Jose State head coach Fitz Hill, who is Black. “That’s the difference. And that’s because when you look at minorities, you group minorities. That’s just a rational cognitive process.”

That doesn’t make it fair, however, Hill said.

After another round of firings and hirings in college football, USA TODAY Sports updated its historical data on Black head coaches and gathered additional context to put the fallout from Moore’s firing into perspective from the standpoint of race. The picture it paints isn’t exactly bright.

What it means and why it might get worse

The data compiled by USA TODAY Sports shows Black coaches still rarely get second chances after failures, primarily because they seldom get first chances. There are only 14 Black head coaches out of 136 schools in the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS), where nearly half the players are Black. That’s down from 17 out of 120 major college teams in 2011.

Meanwhile, the SEC hasn’t had a non-interim Black head coach since 2020. Out of 34 coaches in the Big Ten and SEC, 33 are white and one is Black.

In the bigger picture, all of this comes against the backdrop of colleges living in fear of the Trump Administration’s crackdown on efforts to improve diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI).

“I’m afraid that in the current climate, where DEI and efforts along those lines have been really sidelined in a major way, that it’s going to get worse, not better,” said Richard Lapchick, founder of Institute for Sport and Social Justice.

Short list of Black coaches with second chances vs. white coaches

In all of college football history, only five Black coaches have been given second chances as non-interim head coaches in the Power Four conferences after previously being fired from another head coaching job in the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS), according to USA TODAY Sports research. It’s a short list: Tyrone Willingham, Mike Locksley, Kevin Sumlin, Karl Dorrell and James Franklin, who recently was hired at Virginia Tech after getting fired from Penn State in the Big Ten.

Outside the Power Four leagues, only three Black head coaches in FBS history have gotten second chances after firings as FBS coaches: Charlie Strong, Willie Taggart and Derek Mason.

By contrast, 17 current white head coaches in the FBS are on their second or third chance after previously getting fired as an FBS head coach, including three in the Big Ten and two in the SEC. New LSU coach Lane Kiffin, who is white, even was considered the hottest candidate on the market after previously being fired as head coach of Southern California and the NFL’s Oakland Raiders.

White coaches survive scandals, too

Several white head coaches also have survived getting arrested or hiding an extramarital affair with a staff member to get a second chance as head coach. But some don’t think Moore will get that same opportunity despite leading Michigan to a 9-3 record in 2025. He violated school policy for hiding an extramarital affair with a staff member and then got arrested for allegedly invading her home after his firing.

“Will Moore get the same second chances his white counterparts receive?” asked Sandy Young, CEO of J. Walcher Communications, which specializes in crisis communications. “In today’s society, in which race is ‘othered’ and simplified as ‘persons of color bad’ and ‘white people good,’ Moore may have blown his one chance.”

Why don’t Black coaches get second chances?

Several factors help explain it, including that people hiring head coaches are often white and tend to hire those like themselves. Of the 131 athletic directors who oversaw FBS football programs in 2022, 100 were white, according to the most recent leadership report card from the University of Central Florida.

Another reason relates to Hill’s comment about how minorities are unfairly “grouped” together despite their individual differences. For example, after Charlie Strong was fired as head coach at Texas in 2016, he seemed to recognize this effect in comments he made to Fox Sports. He later was hired as head coach at South Florida, outside the power conferences. But he worried his failure at Texas would be symbolic.

‘When you’re the first minority coach at a major university like that, you feel like there’s so many people counting on you,’ Strong said then. ‘I got upset at myself for not being successful, and I got upset at myself because you feel like you let a lot of people down. There are only so many African-American coaches, so when you get on a stage like that. …’

Likewise, former NFL safety Ryan Clark said the same applies to the effect of the Moore firing at Michigan.

“He not only failed himself, but a community of coaches,” Clark said on Instagram. “Had he succeeded the next ‘Sherrone Moore’ would have a favorable comp during his interview process. If you’re Michigan’s AD would you be comfortable hiring someone who reminded you of your dismissed former coach?”

Few schools ever have hired more than two Black coaches

The “grouping” of minority coaches after they have failed also is supported by the evidence only four major college teams have hired at least three Black coaches in their history: Colorado, Stanford, Kent State and Bowling Green.

After Hill was forced out at San Jose State in 2004, he said he told a school administrator he hoped his lack of success didn’t keep the school from considering a person of color as his replacement.

“Do you really think there’s somebody out there we should consider?” the administrator asked, according to Hill.

 “By your statement, I realize you do not understand the challenges,” Hill said he replied.

San Jose State never hired a non-interim Black head coach after that. Its current coach, Ken Niumatalolo, is Samoan.

Deion Sanders made a similar point

Colorado is the only FBS school to have hired four non-interim Black head coaches, two of whom were fired.  

Current Colorado coach Deion Sanders addressed this same issue when he was hired by Colorado athletic director Rick George in December 2022. Sanders, who is Black, replaced Karl Dorrell, who is Black and was fired after an 0-5 start in 2022. Dorrell had replaced Mel Tucker, who is Black and left Colorado after one season in 2019 to become head coach at Michigan State.

“Rick, thank you once again, because there are several African-American head coaches around the country that were terminated, and they were not replaced by an African-American coach,” Sanders said then. “But you had the audacity to do such a thing, not only to do such a thing on this time but several times you’ve done such a thing. So I thank you for your nerve. I thank you for your courage. I thank you for seeing past the color and the ethnicity.”

The Mel Tucker and Sherrone Moore ‘grouping’

Another undercurrent to the firing of Moore was that Michigan State fired Tucker in 2023 after rape survivor Brenda Tracy said Tucker made sexual comments about her and masturbated during a phone call in 2022.

The similarities of their scandals and their firings from two rival Big Ten schools have led to racist jokes on social media and similar grouping of the two.

“The fact that we are so quick to place (Tucker and Moore) in the same pot shows how stereotypes operate about Black men and sexual promiscuity,” said Lou Moore, a sports history professor at Michigan State who is not related to Sherrone Moore.

Both Tucker and Sherrone Moore instead had separate scandals at separate jobs, the same way other white coaches have but weren’t grouped for it negatively based on race.

“I think the way we have to look at it is that, as bad as it is, it certainly does not paint a picture of anybody else in college sports,” Lapchick said of the Sherrone Moore scandal.

So what’s the answer?

After 110 years of college football starting in 1869, the first Black head coach at the major-college level didn’t come until 1979 — Willie Jeffries at Wichita State.

Since then, USA TODAY Sports counted only 70 total non-interim Black head coaches in major college football history.  In 2005, there were only three. Today there are 14.

So what’s the fairest way forward in the meantime? Casting a wider net for candidates always helps. Hill said it’s about Black coaches getting better “access” to these jobs. Unfortunately, unfair perceptions often override reality.

He authored a 2012 book about the subject titled “Crackback! How College Football Blindsides the Hopes of Black Coaches.”

“Perception always impacts the access in the hiring process,” Hill said. He said this in turn has led to unrealized potential among Black coaches who weren’t given first or second chances. Many schools, such as Alabama, never have hired a non-interim Black head coach.

“What would have happened if Nick Saban (the former Alabama coach) would have been born Black?” Hill asked. “He would have been a great coach that never would have been realized at Alabama.”

Another consideration would help Black coaches, too, as evidenced by the successful rehabilitation of white coaches like Lane Kiffin.

Sometimes failures make a coach better, not worse.

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Amber Glenn set a record-breaking score of 83.05 in the short program, placing her in first.
  • Alysa Liu sits in second place after her own flawless short program earned a score of 81.11.
  • Defending champions Alisa Efimova and Misha Mitrofanov lead the pairs competition after the short program.
  • The U.S. Figure Skating Championships is the final event before the 2026 Winter Olympics team is announced on Sunday, Jan. 11.

ST. LOUIS — A fist pump was all you needed to know about how Amber Glenn’s short program went Wednesday at the 2026 U.S. figure skating championships.

Her performance to “Like a Prayer” by Madonna was a powerful skate that didn’t have a single miss, a truly sensational outing. Her program boasts has one of the hardest degrees of difficulty, and she knew she nailed it when she finished, punctuating it with that emotional fist pump.

The result? A stunning — and record-breaking — score of 83.05, putting her in first ahead of Alysa Liu and Isabeau Levito. She was still emotional even after hearing the result.

‘I was so ecstatic, and for some reason I just felt my grandma with me today and that meant a lot and I think she really got me through this,’ Glenn said after, tears welling in her eyes. ‘It was a whole new experience for me today.’

Get our Chasing Gold Olympics newsletter in your inbox for coverage of your favorite Team USA athletes

Glenn said of all the moments in her long, winding career that this one is at the top.

‘I’m so grateful and happy to share it with these ladies,’ Glenn said of Alysa Liu and Isabeau Levito, who are in second and third, respectively. ‘And I hope we can continue that for the next, like, month and a half.’

For her part, Liu continued her spectacular season, putting up a score of 81.11, which was also a record until Glenn broke it two skaters later. Liu delivered a flawless “Promise” short program, arguably her best one of the season. She was all smiles getting off the ice, her chill vibe the talk of the broadcast.

‘Well, listen, I have a ton of friends here watching and I’m competing with and we all did really good today, so what’s there to be mad about?’ she said after. ‘And I really liked from my performance specifcally, I liked my Biellmann a lot, I liked by Lutz loop.’

Earlier Wednesday, defending national champions Alisa Efimova and Misha Mitrofanov put up the performance of the night for pairs short program, scoring a 75.31. However, their Olympic fate is in limbo.

The championships continue Thursday with the rhythm dance and the men’s short program, when “Quad God” himself Ilia Malinin will take the ice. This is the final event for American skaters before the 2026 Winter Olympics start in February, the last chance to show why skaters belong in Milano Cortina. U.S. Figure Skating will announce the Olympic team on Sunday, Jan. 11.

US figure skating championships results

Alysa Liu, reigning world champion, put up a monster 81.11 only for defending U.S. champion Amber Glenn to blow past it with an 83.05. Here are standings.

  1. Amber Glenn: 83.05 total segment score, 46.14 technical element score, 36.91 program component score.
  2. Alysa Liu: 81.11 total segment score, 43.68 technical element score, 37.43 program component score.
  3. Isabeau Levito: 75.72 total segment score, 40.10 technical element score, 35.62 program component score.
  4. Sarah Everhardt: 71.10 total segment score, 38.90 technical element score, 32.20 program component score.
  5. Bradie Tennell: 69.53 total segment score, 36.27 technical element score, 33.26 program component score.
  6. Starr Andrew: 65.77 total segment score, 34.09 technical element score, 31.68 program component score.
  7. Elyce Lin-Gracey: 65.24 total segment score, 34.52 technical element score, 30.72 program component score.
  8. Josephine Lee: 62.79 total segment score, 32.96 technical element score, 29.83 program component score.
  9. Sherry Zhang: 60.99 total segment score, 31.11 technical element score, 29.88 program component score.
  10. Sophie Joline von Felten: 60.68 total segment score, 34.36 technical element score, 27.32 program component score.
  11. Alina Bonillo: 58.94 total segment score, 32.10 technical element score, 27.84 program component score.
  12. Logan Higase-Chen: 55.22 total segment score, 29.51 technical element score, 26.71 program component score. She had a one-point deduction for a fall.
  13. Sonja Hilmer: 55.00 total segment score, 26.82 technical element score, 28.18 program component score. The crowd actually groaned when her score was announced.
  14. Emilia Nemirovsky: 53.28 total segment score, 26.16 technical element score, 27.12 program component score.
  15. Anabel Wallace: 52.74 total segment score, 28.84 technical element score, 23.90 program component score. The 17-year-old is competing at her first national championships.
  16. Brook Gewalt: 50.59 total segment score, 25.68 technical element score, 24.91 program component score.
  17. Katie Shen: 49.50 total segment score, 24.15 technical element score, 25.35 program component score.
  18. Erica Machida: 49.41 total segment score, 25.32 technical element score, 24.09 program component score.

Amber Glenn puts up record-breaking score

The two-time defending U.S. champion Amber Glenn put on a beautiful short program to ‘Like a Prayer’ by Madonna, the crowd clapping along as the song and program reached a crescendo. Glenn gave a massive fist bump when she finished, began to cry and put her face in her hands, overcome with emotion. She earned an 83.05, good for first place in the standings after the short program.

‘I think that’s the most intense I’ve reacted to any skate ever I’m usually but there was just a feeling today that was so different,’ she said.

Alysa Liu turns in flawless short program

The spectacular season for reigning world champion Alysa Liu continues. She delivered a flawless “Promise” short program, arguably her best one of the season. She was all smiles getting off the ice, and for good reason, scoring a season-best 81.11.

‘The fact that all of us are that good is just, I guess really good for the crowd, like the more people are coming in to watch us, and that fuels like our performances,’ Liu said.

Amber Glenn, Alysa Liu on their friendship

USA TODAY Sports’ Jordan Mendoza spoke to Amber Glenn and Alysa Liu on the tight friendship they have formed. Here’s what they said.

What Liu said about Glenn: “She’s just such a big sister to me. The idea that we compete against each other, it’s so weird to me. I really just see her as one of my friends and truly one of my teammates. I don’t know, doing things with her is really fun.”

When Glenn said about Liu: “It’s been great to have someone that has such a positive outlook on skating and on her career around me. And then on the flip side, I have an extra pair of tights if she rips them and doesn’t have a backup, or I have the schedule ready because she doesn’t have it.”

Sarah Everhardt turns in season-best short program

Two skaters into the final group and there was a new person in first in Sarah Everhardt. She felt like the crowd helped her remember to smile more, and as a result, that helped lead to a season-best score of 71.10. Elyce Lin-Gracey started the group and although she got a 65.24, it will likely keep her out of the top five by the end of the night

Starr Andrews’ routine a crowd favorite

Through two groups and 12 skaters, Starr Andrew ran the women’s short program to sit in first place. Her Beyoncé routine has always been a crowd pleaser, and it was no different this time around, executing another solid performance.

She earned a 65.77, just ahead of Josephine Lee, who had her own good showing. Lee stumbled with her short program at Skate America in November, but she didn’t have any issues with her Shakira-inspired Tango, getting a season-best score of 62.79. Sherry Zhang’s season-best of 60.99 has her in third.

Sonja Hilmer tap dances on ice

One of the coolest performances so far came from Sonja Hilmer, who incorporated tap dancing into her program. Not only was it unique, but she also executed it perfectly with the music and drew a loud applause from the audience.

“This is a concept I’ve been playing with here and there,” Hilmer said afterward.

The crowd actually groaned when Hilmer’s 55.00 score was announced.

Logan Higase-Chen tops Group 1 in short program

A junior champion is on the top step of the senior championship through Group 1 of the women’s short program. Logan Higase-Chen earned a score of 55.22 to put her in first, nearly two points ahead of Emilia Nemirovsky.

The first group featured a few senior championship debuts, including Higase-Chen, the 2024 U.S. junior champion, and Anabel Wallace, who scored a 52.74 in her short programt.

Erica Machida gains buzz with Chappell Roan program

Erica Machida knew just the music to use in the home state of the “Midwest Princess.” In their national debut, Erica performed their short program to Chappell Roan’s “Kaleidoscope” and “Super Graphic Ultra Modern Girl” that got the crowd amped for their performance. 

They earned a score of 49.41, putting them in sixth place after the first group completed their programs

Alisa Efimova, Misha Mitrofanov sit in first after pairs short program

The defending champions are well-positioned to defend their crown with Alisa Efimova and Misha Mitrofanov comfortably in first place after the short program. Their score of 75.31 is more than seven points ahead of Audrey Shin and Balazs Nagy in second place.

It was a justified score as Efimova and Mitrofanov looked miles ahead of the rest of the field, and some other contenders like Ellie Kam and Danny O’Shea, as well as Emily Chan and Spencer Akira Howe, had some big slips.

Efimova and Mitrofanov are a married couple and their story is an intriguing one as Efimova is not an American citizen. From Finland, Efimova is awaiting a ruling on her American citizenship after obtaining her green card approval in July 2024. If she doesn’t obtain it, the pair will not be eligible for the 2026 Winter Olympics.

Pairs figure skating standings

Here are the pairs standings after Wednesday’s short program. The winners will be decided after Friday’s free skate, which starts at 3 p.m.

  1. Alisa Efimova and Misha Mitrofanov: 75.31 total segment score, 41.58 technical score, 33.73 program components score. The defending champions put on the most impressive performance of the night.
  2. Audrey Shin and Balazs Nagy: 67.67 total segment score, 36.99 technical score and 30.68 program component score. The pair skated with confidence, and Shin put her face in her hands in disbelief after putting together the strong showing.
  3. Ellie Kam and Danny O’Shea: 67.13 total segment score, 36.12 technical score, 32.01 program components score. They had one point deducted.
  4. Valentina Plazas and Maximiliano Fernandez: 67.03 total segment score, 37.91 technical score, 29.12 program components score.
  5. Katie McBeath and Daniil Parkman: 66.81 total segment score, 36.78 technical score, 30.03 program components score.
  6. Olivia Flores and Luke Wang: 63.58 total segment score, 35.57 technical score and 28.01 program components score. This marked the pair’s senior national team debut. Wang pumped both his fists and Flores flashed a huge smile when they finished their program.
  7. Chelsea Liu and Ryan Bedard: 62.34 total segment score, 35.27 technical score and 27.07 program components score. Liu came off the ice coughing, battling through illness this week to be able to compete. The pair just came together in July 2025 and have put on some solid showings early on.
  8. Emily Chan and Spencer Akira Howe: 59.29 total segment score, 32.83 technical score, 29.46 program components score. Chan had three mishaps in succession, each worse than the one before. She had a wonky landing on a attempted triple toe, unable to complete a full final rotation. She fell on a transition and fell on an attempted throw.
  9. Naomi Williams and Lachlan Lewer: 55.09 total segment score, 30.97 technical score and 25.12 program components score. They had a one-point deduction for a fall. The pair, in their third season together, did a chest bump and laughed before starting their program.
  10. Linzy Fitzpatrick and Keyton Bearinger: 54.56 total segment score, 30.41 technical score and 24.15 program components score. The pair had to wait seemingly longer than usual — 8 minutes — for their scores to be announced.

Judges for women’s short program

  • Judge No. 1: Mr. Richard Perez
  • Judge No. 2: Ms. Jennifer Thompson
  • Judge No. 3: Mr. Jeffrey Charbonneau
  • Judge No. 4: Ms. Stefanie Mathewson
  • Judge No. 5: Ms. Deborah Currie
  • Judge No. 6: Ms. Karen Perreault
  • Judge No. 7: Ms. Joy Jin
  • Judge No. 8: Ms. Dawn Eyerly
  • Judge No. 9: Ms. Katherine Specht

Here is the technical panel.

  • Referee: Ms. Peggy Graham
  • Technical Controller: Mr. Robert Rosenbluth
  • Technical Specialist: Ms. Julie Newman
  • Technical Specialist: Ms. Cynthia Stevenson

Skaters from 2025 plane crash honored

Before the event began, U.S. Figure Skating honored the 28 athletes, coaches and parents that were killed in the January 2025 plane crash. On Jan. 29, 2025 near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in Arlington, Virginia, an Army helicopter collided with American Airlines Flight 5342, resulting in 67 deaths.

The skaters, coaches and parents were returning from a development camp in Wichita, Kansas, which was held in conjunction with the 2025 U.S. Figure Skating Championships.

A moment of silence was held and the skaters were shown on the jumbotron inside the arena.

When does Ilia Malinin compete?

The ‘Quad God’ himself takes the first on Thursday night for his short program.

Pairs short program judges

Here were the nine judges for pairs short program.

  • Judge No. 1: Mr. Hal Marron
  • Judge No. 2: Ms. Stefanie Mathewson
  • Judge No. 3: Ms. Sheren Chiang
  • Judge No. 4: Ms. Dawn Eyerly
  • Judge No. 5: Ms. Lorrie Parker
  • Judge No. 6: Ms. Gale Tanger
  • Judge No. 7: Ms. Katherine Specht
  • Judge No. 8: Ms. Danielle Hartsell Minnis
  • Judge No. 9: Ms. Karen Perreault

Here is the technical panel.

  • Referee: Mr. Aristeo Brito
  • Technical Controller: Ms. Deveny Deck
  • Technical Specialist: Mr. Steven Hsu
  • Technical Specialist: Ms. Dana Graham

Types of figure skating jumps

  • Toe jump: A skater drives the toe pick of their non-takeoff foot into the ice to launch themselves into the air and generate momentum into the jump.
    • Toe loop: A skater takes off backward and lands on the same back edge of their blade.
    • Lutz: A skater moving backward jumps off the back outside edge of their skate and uses the toe-pick of their other skate to catapult into the air in the opposite direction and lands on the back outside edge of the picking leg.
    • Flip: A skater launches off the back inside edge of one skate and lands on the back outside edge of the other skate.
  • Edge jump: A skater takes off not with their toe pick but off the edge of their skate.
    • Salchow: A skater launches off the back inside edge of one skate and lands on the back outside edge of their other skate.
    • Axel: The only forward-facing jump, a skater lands on the back outside edge of their non-takeoff foot while traveling backward. The axel is the hardest jump because of the extra half-revolution that comes with a forward takeoff and a backward landing.
    • Loop: The skater jumps off a back outside edge of their skate and lands on the same edge.

When is US Olympic figure skating team named?

The team will be named on Sunday, Jan. 11 at 2 p.m. Three men and three women singles skaters will be chosen, as will three ice dance teams and two pairs, 16 athletes in all. The USFS selection process includes past performances, focusing on the athlete’s body of work over the past two seasons.

Ice dancing vs. figure skating

Ice dancing does not feature jumps or lifts, like you see figure skating pairs execute. Ice dancing is made up of two segments, the rhythm dance and the free dance.

Why US has never won Olympic gold in pairs figure skating

As you watch the pairs short program today at the U.S. national championships and perhaps wonder how the United States has performed in pairs skating over the years at the Olympic Games, here’s a primer, which is short and not-so-sweet. 

Americans have never won an Olympic gold medal in pairs skating. That is not a typo. It has never happened, and Olympic pairs competition goes back to 1908.

The last time a U.S. pair earned an Olympic medal was 1988. That was Jill Watson and Peter Oppegard, who won the bronze medal at the Calgary Olympic Games. Four years earlier, the Carruthers siblings — Kitty and Peter — won silver at the 1984 Sarajevo Olympics. Four other U.S. pairs going back even further in the history books won either silver or bronze from 1932-1964. That’s it: 26 Winter Olympic pairs competitions, six U.S. medals, none of them gold.

The population of the United States is around 340 million. It is one of the great sports mysteries of our time that a nation this big could not find one young woman and one young man talented enough to skate together as a pair to become Olympic champions. But so far, no — and it’s not going to happen this year either as U.S. pairs, try as they might, are not expected to come close to a medal in Milan. 

Why has this happened over and over again? One strong possibility is that the focus and fame in U.S. figure skating traditionally has come in the singles events, from Peggy Fleming and Dorothy Hamill to Scott Hamilton and Brian Boitano. (Although the U.S. definitely has upped its game in ice dance over the past 20 years.) 

Throughout its history, the United States has been known as a nation of individualists. That clearly is true on the ice as well. 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Discoveries made by companies in the genetics sector help support every other life science industry in a variety of ways.

One of the genetic sector’s major contributions is the discovery of new genetic drivers of diseases. Genetic testing has grown substantially over the last few years, thanks to advances in technology; growth has also been spurred by an increase in chronic diseases and the continuing development of test kits for therapeutic areas with unmet medical needs.

Gene therapy is also a huge driver of growth in the overarching genetics market. This important segment of the life science market is focused on how genes can help treat or prevent serious conditions in patients. This includes the potential for healthcare professionals to implement gene therapy at the cellular level instead of using medication or surgery, replacing ‘faulty’ genes with new ones to potentially cure diseases.

Pharma and biotech companies often dabble in genetics along with their core disciplines, meaning that some firms may also have operations in other areas.

The top NASDAQ genetics stocks listed below have products related to gene therapy, genetic testing, genetically defined cancers and rare genetic diseases.

Data for this list of genetics stocks on the NASDAQ was collected on December 31, 2025, using TradingView’s stock screener, and stocks with market caps above US$50 million were considered.

1. Avidity Biosciences (NASDAQ:RNA)

Year-over-year gain: 143.8 percent
Market cap: US$10.87 billion
Share price: US$72.14

Avidity Bioscience is a biopharma firm developing a new form of RNA therapy called antibody oligonucleotide conjugates (AOC) that target the genes causing rare muscle diseases.

Through its proprietary AOC platform, Avidity developed programs for three rare muscle diseases: AOC 1001 for myotonic dystrophy type 1, AOC 1044 for Duchenne muscular dystrophy and AOC 1020 for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. The company is also working to expand its pipeline into cardiology and immunology.

In October 2025, Avidity entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by Novartis (NYSE:NVS), which will include the company’s late-stage neuromuscular programs (AOC 1001, 1020, 1044) and the AOC platform, for US$12 billion.

Avidity’s early-stage precision cardiology programs will spin off into a new public company prior to closing in H1 2026. The spin-off will also have rights to use and develop the AOC platform for cardiology applications.

2. Wave Life Sciences (NASDAQ:WVE)

Year-over-year gain: 36.52 percent
Market cap: US$3.13 billion
Share price: US$17.12

Wave Life Sciences is another clinical-stage firm focused on unlocking insights from human genetics to deliver RNA-based medicines. The company’s PRISM platform is targeting both rare and prevalent disorders. Its pipeline includes clinical programs for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and Huntington’s disease, as well as a preclinical program for WVE-007 in obesity.

Wave Life Sciences advanced its PRISM RNA platform across multiple programs in 2025. It is also performing a Phase 1 trial testing its WVE-007 obesity candidate, which is an investigational INHBE GalNAc-siRNA using Wave’s proprietary SpiNA design.

In December, the company reported positive interim data from the WVE-007 trial, which showed that a single dose resulted in sustained Activin E reduction, supporting infrequent dosing. Target engagement updates and body composition readouts are planned for Q1 2026.

3. UniQure (NASDAQ:QURE)

Year-over-year gain: 33.15 percent
Market cap: US$1.47 billion
Share price: US$23.86

UniQure is a gene therapy company focused on patients with severe medical needs. In November 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the company’s gene therapy Hemgenix (etranacogene dezaparvovec), which is the world’s first gene therapy for hemophilia B.

Today, uniQure’s proprietary gene therapy pipeline includes treatments for patients with Huntington’s disease, refractory temporal lobe epilepsy, ALS and Fabry disease.

Its gene therapy pipeline advanced in 2025, with positive Phase I/II topline data for Huntington’s disease candidate AMT-130 showing 75 percent slowing of disease progression at three years via cUHDRS, alongside 60 percent functional capacity preservation.

While data from the Phase I/II study led the FDA to grant AMT-130 breakthrough therapy designation in April, in December the agency told UniQure it believes the data may not be adequate to support a pre-biologics license application under the accelerated approval pathway. The company is pursuing a follow-up meeting.

4. Stoke Therapeutics (NASDAQ:STOK)

Year-over-year gain: 186.96 percent
Market cap: US$1.81 billion
Share price: US$31.74

Stoke Therapeutics is another biotech company with a focus on developing RNA medicine. With its proprietary research platform TANGO, which stands for targeted augmentation of nuclear gene output, the company is developing antisense oligonucleotides to selectively restore protein levels.

Stoke’s first product candidate, zorevunersen (STK-001), is in clinical testing for the treatment of Dravet syndrome, a severe form of genetic epilepsy. The company is also developing STK-002 for the treatment of autosomal dominant optic atrophy, an inherited optic nerve disorder.

Both candidates advanced in 2025, with STK-001 enrolling patients in Phase 3 after positive long-term data showed seizure reductions and cognitive gains. Likewise, STK-002’s clinical development program is being informed by results, presented in October, of a Phase 1 two year natural history study on the disease progression of autosomal dominant optic atrophy.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Investor Insight

E-Power Resources offers investors high-grade exposure to the rapidly expanding flake graphite sector through one of Québec’s most promising districts. With a strategic land position, near-surface discoveries, and a leadership team experienced in exploration and capital markets, E-Power is positioned to help supply North America’s critical battery materials chain.

Overview

E-Power Resources (CSE:EPR) is a Montréal-based company focused on advancing its flagship Tetepisca graphite property in Québec’s North Shore region. The company’s mission is to delineate and develop a high-grade, near-surface flake-graphite resource capable of supplying future North American battery-anode demand.

Since entering the Tetepisca district in 2019, E-Power has systematically advanced its project from regional geophysics to mapping, sampling, drilling and metallurgical testing. This disciplined exploration pipeline has confirmed the presence of district-scale, high-purity graphite mineralization within the same geological sequence that hosts neighboring deposits such as Focus Graphite’s Lac Tetepisca and Nouveau Monde Graphite’s Uatnan, which together hold more than 120 million tons (Mt) measured + indicated at approximately 14 percent Cg.

Graphite demand is accelerating globally as electric-vehicle production and energy-storage capacity expand. Québec’s hydroelectric grid, pro-mining policy environment, and rapidly developing anode-manufacturing infrastructure make it a world-class jurisdiction for low-carbon graphite development. Within this setting, E-Power’s land position, grade profile and technical results uniquely position the company to become a core participant in Canada’s graphite-to-battery supply chain.

Company Highlights

  • Flagship project in Québec’s premier graphite district: 100-percent-owned Tetepisca Property, 234 contiguous claims covering ≈ 12,840 ha, the largest land position in the district
  • Exceptional grades: 2025 surface sampling returned up to 68.7 percent Cg (carbon in graphite form) at the Graphi-Centre target, among the highest reported globally
  • High-purity metallurgy: 2024 bulk sampling produced concentrates grading up to 96.4 percent Cg, validating commercial potential.
  • Strategic infrastructure advantage: ~220 km from Baie-Comeau and within trucking distance of a planned 200,000 tons per year (tpy) graphite-anode facility, anchoring Québec’s battery-materials hub.
  • Surging Market Demand: With global battery production accelerating, the graphite market is forecast to soar, positioning E-Power to benefit from one of the most dynamic growth trends in the energy materials sector.
  • Led by Experience: Backed by a strong, technically skilled management team, E-Power is strategically positioned to advance North American graphite independence and capture growing demand in the energy transition economy.

Key Project

Tetepisca Graphite Project

The Tetepisca graphite property is approximately 220 km north of Baie-Comeau, covering 234 contiguous claims (~12,840 ha) in the heart of the Tetepisca Graphite District (TGD). The property is 100-percent-owned by E-Power and hosts the same graphitic metasedimentary units that define the district’s producing and feasibility-stage assets.

District-Scale Opportunity

The TGD is an emerging flake-graphite camp that now hosts more than 120 Mt of measured and indicated resources averaging ~14 percent Cg across nearby projects such as Nouveau Monde Graphite’s Uatnan and Focus Graphite’s Lac Tetepisca deposits.

E-Power controls the largest contiguous land position in the district, strategically covering the same graphitic metasedimentary horizons that host these deposits. The district’s proximity to the planned 200,000 tpy graphite-anode facility in Baie-Comeau creates a unique alignment of resource, infrastructure and processing capability, positioning E-Power as a potential key upstream feed source for Québec’s integrated graphite-to-anode supply chain.

2024–2025 Exploration Results

E-Power’s work since 2021 has validated the property’s high-grade, near-surface potential.

  • The 2025 Phase 1 program returned grab samples up to 68.7 percent Cg at the Graphi-Centre target, one of the highest surface graphite grades reported globally.
  • New discoveries on the northern claim block (N3 and N4 targets) yielded multiple samples exceeding 20 percent Cg, extending graphite mineralization across more than 330 meters of strike within continuous conductive trends.
  • The Syndicate Trend, a 12 km linear conductor in the southwest, produced a new showing with grades of 54.7 percent Cg within a broader corridor that includes a historical drill intercept of 12.74 percent Cg over 9.55 meters.
  • Metallurgical test work from 2024 bulk sampling confirmed high-purity concentrates of up to 96.4 percent Cg, with additional mineralogy and flake-size distribution studies underway to define commercial product potential.

E-Power’s 2025–2026 work program will focus on advancing the Tetepisca property toward an initial resource estimate. Key activities include expanded fieldwork and metallurgical testing at the Graphi-Centre, Captain Cosmos and Syndicate showings; follow-up ground and drone-borne geophysical surveys to refine drill targets; and a focused drilling campaign designed to define near-surface, high-grade graphite zones. In parallel, the company is initiating early environmental baseline and access studies to support future development and potential partnerships within Québec’s growing graphite-to-anode supply chain.

Management Team

Jean-Michel Gauthier – Chief Executive Officer

Jean-Michel Gauthier contributes significant expertise in capital markets, corporate development and strategic positioning within the resource sector. His focus will be on ensuring the optimal deployment of capital and maximizing the inherent value of the Tetepisca Project as it advances through key de-risking stages.

Mark Billings – Chairman of the Board

Mark Billings is a highly respected finance professional in the Canadian resource sector, bringing extensive investment banking and corporate finance experience. His prior roles, including VP corporate finance at Desjardins Securities, provide a crucial foundation for guiding E-Power’s capital formation and strategic financing plans necessary for the Tetepisca Project’s development phases.

Jamie Lavigne – Chief Operating Officer

Jamie Lavigne is a professional economic geologist with over 30 years of experience in exploration and mine development. He has worked with major Canadian and Australian mining companies and several junior explorers and operates his own consulting firm. Lavigne holds a B.Sc. from Memorial University and an MSc. from the University of Ottawa. He is a member of L’Ordre des Géologues du Québec and the Northwest Territories and Nunavut Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists.

Paul Haber – Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

Paul Haber brings over 20 years of experience in corporate finance and capital markets. He has served as CFO, board member, and audit chair for numerous public and private companies, including XTM (CSE:PAID), South American Silver (TSX:SAC), and Migao Corporation (TSX:MGO). A CPA and CA, Haber began his career at Coopers & Lybrand and holds an Honours B.A. in Management from the University of Toronto. He also holds a Chartered Director designation from the DeGroote School of Business and the Conference Board of Canada.

Christian Falk – Advisory Board Member

Christian Falk is co-founder of Camet AG, Zug Switzerland and Vega Metals Trading in Montreal, Canada. He offers more than 16 years of global mining and metals trading experience, including significant tenure with Glencore International AG. His expertise in global graphite and critical metals markets will be critical in formulating E-Power’s downstream commercial strategy and understanding customer specifications.
This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Alain Corbani, head of mining at Montbleu Finance and manager of the Global Gold and Precious Fund, sees the gold price reaching US$5,000 per ounce in the near term.

He sees real interest rates and the US dollar as the key factors to watch, but noted that other elements are also adding tailwinds.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The copper price climbed to a fresh record on Tuesday (January 6), with persistent supply disruptions and trade uncertainty pushing the metal to a nearly 30 percent rally since October.

Benchmark three month copper on the London Metal Exchange (LME) rose as much as 3.1 percent in early trading to an all‑time high of US$13,387.50 per metric ton before settling slightly lower, but still above US$13,200.

The jump marks another milestone in a rally that first saw copper breach US$12,000 late in December last year.

Copper is widely used across the industrial economy, from construction and power infrastructure to electric vehicles and data centers that support artificial intelligence growth. Analysts attribute the gains to a combination of production setbacks at major mines and heightened concerns that prospective US trade tariffs could further disrupt flows.

Large copper-mining operations such as Freeport-McMoRan’s (NYSE:FCX) Grasberg complex in Indonesia have faced challenges since last year, while a strike at Capstone Copper’s (TSX:CS,ASX:CSC,OTC Pink:CSCCF) Mantoverde mine in Chile has reduced output prospects in one of the world’s top copper‑producing nations.

The threat of new tariffs under the Trump administration has also shaped expectations. Traders have moved to ship refined copper into the US ahead of any potential levies, tightening supply elsewhere. Furthermore, data show copper stocks in Comex warehouses have jumped to more than 450,000 metric tons, well above last year’s levels.

Copper outlook for 2026

Market watchers expect many of the forces that drove copper through 2025 to persist.

Supply constraints are expected to remain acute this year as aging mines and capacity shortfalls weigh on availability. New projects such as Arizona Sonoran Copper Company’s (TSX:ASCU,OTCQX:ASCUF) Cactus project and the long‑anticipated Resolution mine in the US are still years from significant output.

Copper demand is projected to grow as the global energy transition accelerates.

“A huge amount of this tightness has to do with US tariff concerns,” she said.

China, the world’s largest copper consumer, is also shaping the outlook. Despite weakness in its property sector, the country posted economic growth and is expected to prioritize copper‑intensive sectors under its new five year plan.

Longer‑term projections from industry groups suggest structural demand growth will outpace supply additions.

A UN report estimates that copper demand could rise 40 percent by 2040, requiring substantial investment and new mines just to keep pace. Likewise, Wood Mackenzie forecasts that copper demand will increase 24 percent by 2035, while the International Copper Study Group predicts a refined copper deficit of 150,000 metric tons in 2026 alone.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Another Power Four program is losing its starting quarterback, and it’s reportedly pursuing legal avenues in the aftermath.

Demond Williams announced Jan. 6 he’s entering the transfer portal despite re-signing with the school on Jan. 2, according to ESPN. With numerous high-level quarterbacks already committed, the Huskies are likely to search for a replacement despite being late to the punch.

The first-year full-time starter was one of the best dual-threat quarterbacks in the Big Ten in 2025, passing for 3,065 yards with 25 touchdowns to eight interceptions while rushing for 611 yards and six scores. He’s entering the transfer portal with a do-not-contact tag, according to ESPN.

A do-not-contact tag means teams can’t reach out to Williams first and can only communicate if the player initiates the conversation.

Williams spent a week at Arizona in early 2024 before following Washington coach Jedd Fisch to Seattle as a transfer. Williams was also initially committed to now-LSU coach Lane Kiffin at Mississippi before flipping to Arizona. He was the No. 12-ranked quarterback out of high school and will be one of the best available quarterbacks in the transfer portal two seasons later.

Demond Williams contract

Williams agreed to a new deal with Washington on Jan. 2 to return to the school next season, according to ESPN. However, four days after the transfer portal opened, Williams announced his decision to enter the transfer portal.

Washington is reportedly pursuing legal avenues to enforce his signed contract, according to ESPN. It’s an interesting turn of events, and a likely disappointing one for Washington. In addition, the Big Ten is reportedly taking interest in Williams’ transfer, after a similar situation occurred last season between Wisconsin and Miami.

Demond Williams stats

  • 2024 (Washington): 82-of-105 passing (78.1%) for 944 yards with eight touchdowns to an interception; 83 carries for 282 yards with two touchdowns
  • 2025 (Washington): 246-of-354 passing (69.5%) for 3,065 yards with 25 touchdowns to eight interceptions; 143 carries for 611 yards with six touchdowns
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The San Francisco 49ers look to add depth to their injury-riddled linebacker core ahead of their wild-card playoff game against the Philadelphia Eagles at Lincoln Financial Field on Jan. 11.

The 49ers have signed eight-year veteran linebacker Kyzir White for the NFL postseason, according to Yahoo Sports NFL insider Jordan Schultz.

White, 29, played in one game during the 2025 NFL season, suiting up for the Tennessee Titans, for whom he recorded three tackles in a 41-20 loss to the Indianapolis Colts in Week 3.

For his career, White has tallied 618 tackles, 7.5 sacks, two forced fumbles and six interceptions. White was selected by the Los Angeles Chargers with 119th overall pick in the fourth round of the 2018 NFL Draft.

He played four seasons for the Chargers before signing a one-year deal with the Eagles in 2022. White was a part of the Philadelphia team that reached Super Bowl 57 but lost to the Kansas City Chiefs. He recorded four tackles in that game, a 38-35 Chiefs win.

White signed a two-year contract with the Arizona Cardinals in 2023. He led the Cardinals with 90 tackles that season and finished second in tackles in 2024 with 137.

White signed with the Titans’ practice squad in September 2025. He was later released in December.

White took to social media, posting on X, ‘let’s boogie’ in light of his recent signing with the 49ers.

Kyzir White highlights

All the NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Winnipeg Jets defenseman Haydn Fleury was stretchered off the ice and taken to a hospital via ambulance following a scary crash into the boards during Tuesday night’s home game against the Vegas Golden Knights.

Fleury was injured in the latter half of the first period, when he fell awkwardly after he was shoved by Vegas’ Keegan Kolesar and slid hard into the boards, his back taking the brunt of the impact. He was seen on the broadcast moving on the ice while being attended to by a trainer, but he was removed from the playing surface on a backboard and stretcher.

Kolesar was not penalized for his check, but immediately fought Jets captain Adam Lowry when play resumed.

The Golden Knights eventually won the game in overtime, 4-3.

Haydn Fleury injury update

Jets coach Scott Arniel said after the game that Fleury was ‘at the hospital, (he’ll) be staying overnight.’

‘Obviously he’s got a lot of tests to go through,’ Arniel said. ‘(Fleury) does have a broken nose, so there’s a few different things that kind of happened off it. Little bit of everything. Obviously slammed his back, hit his neck, hit his head, and obviously his nose.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY