Author

admin

Browsing

As precious metals surge on safe-haven demand, some gold mining companies are following suit. One standout is AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. (AU), which has been riding this upward momentum.

Recently, AU showed up among the Top 10 Large Cap category in the StockCharts Technical Rank (SCTR) Reports, indicating that it’s among the top large-cap stocks showing bullish technical strength across multiple timeframes and indicators.

FIGURE 1. SCREENSHOT OF SCTR REPORTS ON MONDAY MORNING. AU, which held the #6 spot at the time of the screenshot, had an ultra-bullish SCTR score of 99.3.

Unless you follow gold miners, you may not know much about AU. But here’s the skinny: AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. is a global independent mining company that’s incorporated in the UK but headquartered in Colorado, US. 

AU’s recent surge can be attributed to several factors, including rising gold prices, strong financials, recent strategic acquisitions, revised dividend policy, and general investor shift to safe havens.

If you’re unfamiliar with the stock, a good starting point is to compare its relative performance against its industry (Dow Jones Gold Mining Index or $DJUSPM) and spot gold price performance ($GOLD). The PerfChart below displays AU’s performance relative to the industry and gold’s price over the past year.

FIGURE 2. PERFCHARTS OF AU, DJ GOLD MINING INDEX, AND GOLD. AU began outperforming its overall industry and gold’s performance in late January.

AU and $DJUSPM have shown volatile, back-and-forth price action over the past 12 months, but AU began taking the lead in late January, surpassing both in comparative terms.

Now that you have a comparative view, let’s take a longer-term look at AU’s price action. Here’s a monthly chart spanning 20 years. Why so long? I had to go this far back to plot long-term resistance levels.

FIGURE 3. MONTHLY CHART OF AU. The stock just broke above a resistance range between $35 and $37, but there are plenty more technical headwinds above.

AU appears to be soaring at relatively high valuations and is running up against a major resistance range between $42 and $45. What adds weight to the long-term bullish case of AU’s current valuations is the rising Ichimoku Cloud, indicating a long-term uptrend projection (26 months) and a Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading that is rising but not quite overbought. Another thing to note, which is interesting, is that every time the RSI crossed 70, AU reversed to the downside. 

Despite this bullish projection, keep in mind that AU could still pull back—while remaining in a long-term uptrend—and decline to as low as $22.50 before rebounding. This level marks a key swing low and aligns with the top of the Ichimoku Cloud’s support range.

That gives us a long-term perspective. What about the near term? Might there be a favorable entry point for those looking to go long, or is AU technically overbought? 

Let’s shift over to a daily chart.

FIGURE 4. DAILY CHART OF AU. Pay attention to the most recent swing high and low.

The Gold Miners Bullish Percent Index (BPI) indicates strong bullish breadth as over 89% of gold mining stocks are rallying and triggering P&F buy signals. However, this can also indicate potential overbought levels, and the RSI supports this reading, as it, too, is over the 70 threshold (caveat: a stock can continue to rally for an extended period despite being overbought).

Volume-wise, note how accumulation preceded AU’s rally as far back as September when the Accumulation/Distribution Line (ADL) shown in orange began rising above AU’s price as if the smart money began accumulating the stock as it continued to decline before rebounding. AU currently trades above the ADL line, which could signal a near-term pullback. 

Pay attention to AU’s price relative to its most recent swing high (magenta dotted line) and swing low (blue dotted line). I plotted a ZigZag line to make these swing points clear. 

  • If AU pulls back, it may find support at the swing high near $33. What’s more important is that the stock price must hold above the swing low near $28 to sustain the current uptrend.
  • Expect resistance between $42 and $45 (as mentioned earlier when analyzing the monthly chart).

What Should You Do?

If you’re already in AU and not necessarily committed to the long term, consider tightening your stops or scaling out partial profits as the stock approaches the $42–$45 resistance zone. The RSI above 70 and elevated breadth readings across the gold mining sector suggest short-term overbought conditions, making a pullback likely—even within a broader uptrend. Watch for any bearish divergences or volume reversals, and use a bounce from $28 or $33 to potentially add to your position.

If you’re looking to enter, patience may pay. A retracement to the $33 support zone—or the swing low at $28 if sentiment reverses sharply—could offer a more favorable risk-reward entry. Keep in mind that a break below $28 would weaken the current technical structure and could open the door to a deeper correction, potentially down to $22.50.

For long-term investors, AU still holds promise. The rising monthly Ichimoku Cloud you saw in the monthly chart, strong accumulation trends, and outperformance vs. peers support a bullish longer-term case. But stay disciplined, and keep an ear on economic developments that may have a longer-term impact. Consider using a tiered entry approach rather than chasing highs.

In short, AU’s long-term momentum is intact, but don’t ignore the warning signs of a short-term cooldown. Stay tactical—ride the trend, but always protect your capital!

At the Close

While AU continues to ride the wave of bullish sentiment in the gold sector, a few of its technical indicators, appearing seemingly stretched, hint at a possible short-term breather. Long-term prospects remain intact, but near-term caution is warranted.


Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

Did you know you can generate more than a 5% monthly yield by utilizing an options strategy? 

In this educational video, Tony Zhang walks you through an income-generating options strategy using the OptionsPlay Strategy Center on StockCharts.com.

Learn how to select the right stocks, identify strike prices and expiration dates, analyze various outcomes, and manage your trades.

Armed with this knowledge, you will never want to miss out on the opportunity to generate income from your portfolio. 

This video premiered on April 1, 2025.

Flag football is set to make its Olympic debut during the 2028 Los Angeles Summer Games. If NFL players have it their way, they will be able to participate in the festivities.

‘I’ve heard directly from a lot of players who want to participate and represent their country, whether it’s United States or the country that they came from,’ NFL commissioner Roger Goodell told reporters at the end of the NFL’s annual meeting Tuesday.

NFL players haven’t been shy about expressing their desire to play in the Olympics. Miami Dolphins wide receiver Tyreek Hill and Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow are among the many who are hopeful to become Olympians and compete on the world’s biggest athletic stage.

Goodell stopped short of guaranteeing players would be allowed to participate. He did, however, note that he expects the league and the NFLPA to come to a resolution about the Olympics in the not-so-distant future.

‘I think that’s something that we’ll continue to discuss with, not just the union, but also the clubs,’ Goodell said. ‘I think both of those are things that we’ll probably resolve sometime in the next 60 days.’

The NFL offered significant support to flag football the sports quest to get its Olympic debut in 2028. Goodell believes getting the sport onto the Olympic stage will allow it to experience significant growth, both domestically and internationally.

‘The Olympics is a critical moment for us in the flag development on a global basis,’ Goodell said. ‘The Olympics are the pinnacle of international sport. For us to be able to participate in that, to have both men’s and women’s flag teams participating in that from around the world, is a significant moment for us.’

It could also position the NFL, which is attempting to launch a professional flag football league, to capitalize quickly should the Olympics provide a boost in popularity to the sport.

‘It’s clear that there’s a lot of interest in a pro flag league,’ Goodell said. ‘We’ve been getting bids on people who want to invest in that either financially or invest in the operations of that. So, we’re hard at work, and I expect there’ll be progress soon.’

All the NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter. Check out the latest edition: Is there such a thing as too much NFL?

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

SUN VALLEY, Idaho — Mikaela Shiffrin is no longer the only U.S. woman making herself at home on the podium.

The U.S. women last week wrapped up their most successful season in more than a decade. Five different women made World Cup podiums, while four women got medals at the world championships.

“It’s a pretty special time to be part of the women’s U.S. ski team, tech or speed. We just continue to build off each other,” Paula Moltzan, who was the bronze medalist in two World Cup races and also finished third in the giant slalom at the world championships, said after wrapping up the World Cup finals.

“Hopefully we’re able to carry that momentum into the first couple races of the season and then yeah, carry it into the Olympics.”

For the last four decades, the Americans have always had a dominant female skier. Sometimes the dominant female skier. Tamara McKinney. Picabo Street. Lindsey Vonn. Shiffrin. But it was often a two-woman show at the end of Vonn’s career — the first iteration — and, during her five-year hiatus, up to Shiffrin to carry the load.

No more.

When Lauren Macuga won the super-G in St. Anton, Austria, it was the first time a U.S. woman not named Shiffrin or Vonn had been atop a World Cup podium since 2013, when Alice McKennis won the downhill, also in St. Anton. Breezy’s Johnson’s gold in the downhill at the world championships was the first win in an individual event at worlds by someone other than Shiffrin or Vonn since Hilary Lindh, also in the downhill, in 1997.

And Vonn’s silver medal in the super-G at the World Cup finals made her the fifth different U.S. woman to make a World Cup podium this season, the most since there were seven in 2012-13.

In addition to Moltzan and Vonn’s World Cup success, Shiffrin had four wins and a third-place finish in slalom, despite missing two months after a crash at Killington, Vermont, left her with a deep gash in her obliques. Macuga, who is 22, had a downhill silver in addition to her super-G win. Johnson won a bronze medal in the downhill.

“We always hope that we get these new generations coming in,” said Vonn, who came out of retirement in November after having a partial knee replacement. “And I think we’ve been waiting a little while for someone like Lauren Macuga to come along, and it’s great to see that because she’s so young. She’s going to keep going for a long time and we really need that.

“We’ve got to see that new group coming up and I think we have that. Especially on the technical side, we really have a strong group,” Vonn added. “It’s great to see because it’s the kind of thing that we need to keep stimulating ski racing in the U.S.”

While ski racing is expensive — athletes spend five months traversing Europe and North America in the World Cup season, and preseason training camps are often in the southern hemisphere — that alone doesn’t explain the depth challenge the Americans have had.

Training together as a team but then competing against one another in races is a challenge that doesn’t suit all athletes. But this group has found a way to make it work.

It doesn’t mean they care any less or are any less competitive. They’ve simply found a way to maximize the benefits of being part of a team, feeding off one another rather than feeding on one another.

“Finding the balance between being a supportive teammate and a fierce competitor is hard,” Shiffrin said. “I just feel like this group of women has been able to strike that balance in a really unique way that’s different from anything I’ve ever experienced or been able to witness. And that’s pretty cool going into next season.”

The atmosphere is also helping the women who didn’t make the podium. Nina O’Brien had her best season with four top-10 finishes — one more than in her previous seasons combined. Jacqueline Wiles had two top-10 finishes in the downhill. AJ Hurt was in the top 20 in both of her individual events at the world championships, giant slalom (13) and slalom (19).

“It’s been so much fun,” O’Brien said. “Our team has been pushing each other and it feels like every race, somebody is shining, which is really cool.”

The U.S. women, coming in hot to the Olympic year.

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

They’re making this more difficult than it is, which falls in line of late with just about all things college football.

So while we soak in the majesty of the three-week event that is March Madness, it’s time to reassess the postseason football clunker rolled out last season by the smartest men and women in college sports. 

Something, everyone, must be done about the College Football Playoff.

It’s time to introduce the CFP for Dummies plan.

“We’re only one year into the new playoff format,” said Oklahoma athletic director Joe Castiglione. “I don’t know that you make drastic decisions based off one year.”

While I’m all about not being trapped as a prisoner of the moment, there’s something so reassuring about the simplicity of the NCAA basketball tournament that can’t be ignored.

Everyone has a chance to play in it, and the highest seeds get more favorable draws. That’s it, period.

Hence, the CFP for Dummies plan.

But as we move toward the new CFP contract in 2026, and a likely increase to at least 14 teams, they’re reinventing the wheel again. And by “they” I mean the Big Ten and SEC — the insatiable beasts running college sports.

They’ve got grievances, and they want to be heard.

They want more guaranteed admission to the CFP, and they’re not sure they like the idea of a selection committee — which doesn’t exactly use strength of schedule as the determining factor. 

They’re talking about turning Championship Week into play-in week, but each of the Power conferences have different ideas about how to pull it off.

They’re still not sure about campus games, or if more are needed. And the seeding thing is an absolute mess. 

This isn’t rocket science. Simple is better.

Follow the lead of the NCAA tournament, and begin the 2026 season with a clear and unmistakeable path to the national championship. Here’s how it happens: 

SPRING POWER RANKINGS: Big Ten | SEC | ACC | Big 12

LOOKING AHEAD: Our way-too-early college football Top 25 for 2025

Commit to the selection committee

This begins and ends with clear and unambiguous metrics from disinterested sources. Translation: computer nerds!

The NCAA tournament uses NET, KenPom, BPI, KPI and – tada! – strength of record (see: record in relation to schedule difficulty) to decide selections for the 68-team field. I refuse to believe the highly qualified mathematicians running these programs can’t easily translate their formulas to college football.

The human committee will still have the ultimate say, and there will undoubtedly be questionable decisions (hello, Indiana). But at least there’s transparency.

Commit to a 20-team field

How did we jump all the way to 20, you ask? It’s less postseason games, in totality, than what the power conferences are currently discussing.

The need for new revenue streams has led the power conferences to the idea of play-in games. More games for television means more money from the CFP contract. 

More money from the CFP contract means less of a financial hit when universities begin spending as much as $20 million-23 million annually on de facto pay for play, beginning July 1.

By moving to 20 teams, championship week doesn’t change, and conference championships aren’t minimized because the winner of the four power conference championships receives a spot in the playoff. 

The other 16 teams are at-large selections, much like the NCAA tournament. But here’s the catch: just because you’re a power conference champion doesn’t mean you avoid a play-in game.

Commit to a basketball bracket

After championship weekend, the selection committee releases its field of 20, and the bottom eight teams will compete in play-in games at campus sites. The winners then move to the round of 16, where the CFP is seeded just like the NCAA tournament: No. 1 vs. No. 16, No .2 vs. No. 15, and so on.

The round of 16 is played on campus, and the seven remaining games – quarterfinals, semifinals and championship game – will be neutral sites through the bowl system.

If this system were in place for the 2024 season, the SEC would’ve had seven of the 20 teams, and the Big Ten five. The Big 12 and ACC would’ve had three teams each, and the final two spots would’ve been committed to Boise State and Notre Dame.

The play-in games: Illinois (20) at Miami (13), Missouri (19) at Mississippi (14), Iowa State (18) at South Carolina (15), and Brigham Young (17) at Clemson (16). The four winners move to spots 13-16 in the playoff, based on their end of season CFP ranking. 

It is here where I need to stress that the Big Ten and SEC are pushing a 14- or 16-team format for 2026 that includes four automatic qualifications for their respective conferences, and two each for the Big 12 and ACC.

In the CFP for Dummies plan, everyone increases their access. And, more to the point, their ability to earn.

Don’t believe it? Check out this empirical evidence of teams per conference (with current conference alignment) beginning with the first CFP after the Covid season. 

2023: SEC (7), Big Ten (6), ACC (3), Big 12 (2).

2022: Big Ten (7), SEC (6), Big 12 (3), ACC (2).

2021: Big 12 (6), Big Ten (5), SEC (4), ACC (4).   

A simple plan for a simple process. 

Welcome, everyone, to The CFP for Dummies plan.

Matt Hayes is the senior national college football writer for USA TODAY Sports Network. Follow him on X at @MattHayesCFB.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

There’s no shortage of star power in the NCAA men’s tournament Final Four. But who could be the unsung hero that steps up to help his team win a national championship?

With all four No. 1 seeds in San Antonio, Texas, it’s hard to ignore the big names that will be taking the court. Duke’s Cooper Flagg, Florida’s Walter Clayton or Auburn’s Johni Broome could very well lead their teams toward cutting down the nets at the Alamodome on Monday. But playing against the best of the best, they can’t do it all on their own. More than likely, a role player will emerge and provide the critical lift toward success on the sport’s biggest stage.

Here is one player on each Final Four team that could be the key person for each squad to advance to the national championship game and perhaps win it all.

Thomas Haugh, Florida

Walter Clayton Jr. provided the heroics in the comeback win over Texas Tech, but it wouldn’t have been possible without the contributions from Thomas Haugh. The sophomore tied career-highs with 20 points and 11 rebounds in the win over the Red Raiders.

Haugh has become one of the best players coming off the bench in the NCAA Tournament. He averaged 9.4 prior to the tournament started, but he’s been in double figures in three of the last four games. At 6-foot-9-inches, Haugh is also keep to why Florida is one of the best rebounding teams in the country. He’s gotten at least three offensive rebounds in every tournament game this season, allowing the Gators to capitalize on second-chance opportunities.

He showed off his 3-point shooting skills when he went 4-for-6 from deep against Texas Tech, and if he stays hot, Auburn will have its hands full trying to guard all of Florida’s shot makers. He put up 16 points and nine rebounds in the first meeting against the Tigers earlier this season, and he could have another productive night against the SEC foe.

Dylan Cardwell, Auburn

All eyes will be on whether Broome will be healthy enough for Auburn, but regardless of his status, there will be pressure on Cardwell to deliver for the Tigers.

Cardwell won’t wow anyone in points − averaging just 4.9 per game − but he is able to control the paint. He has contributed 27 rebounds in four tournament games, which is important with Florida one of the best rebounding teams in the country. The Gators are especially skilled on the offensive glass, so Cardwell will be critical to limiting second-chance points. He has excellent size and presence around the rim that could really stop the flow of opposing offenses by making sure other big men don’t get a rhythm. The fifth-year senior is a true leader on the court for the Tigers, and his toughness will set the tone for Auburn in the Final Four.

Auburn lost its lone meeting against Florida, but Cardwell was extremely productive in that game with a game-high 12 rebounds. If Cardwell can do that again, it sets up the offense for a potentially big night.

Khaman Maluach, Duke

Big-game experience is helpful, and Maluach played on the biggest stage at the 2024 Paris Olympics. The South Sudan native was a heralded international recruit and he’s lived up to the hype.

It took time for Malauach to get adjusted to the college game at the start of the season, but he’s blossomed into a solid post player, as if his 7-foot-2-inch frame wasn’t already helping him enough. In the tournament, Maluach has commanded the interior with 11.5 points and 6.3 rebounds per game. What’s even more impressive is his efficiency; he’s 20-for-23 (86.7%) from the field in the tournament with mostly dunks and other short-range baskets.

Duke is facing a top defense in Houston and will take any easy bucket it can get. Maluach can be the guy to throw down powerful slams for big momentum shifts, and he has an opportunity to own the boards against a team that doesn’t really have a premier rebounder. His effectiveness is tough to match, and the Cougars will have their hands dealing with his size and avoiding foul trouble.

Milos Uzan, Houston

Defense is what Houston is known for, but it’s somehow flown under the radar the Cougars are fifth in the country in 3-point shooting percentage. One of the biggest contributors to that is Uzan.

The junior guard is the best 3-point shooter for Houston at 44.5%, and it was on full display in the Sweet 16 matchup when he made a season-high six shots from behind the arc on nine attempts for a 22-point night. He didn’t make a 3-pointer in the Elite Eight against Tennessee in what was a quiet day for Uzan, but it wasn’t entirely needed given the Cougars dominated the Volunteers.

Houston will do its best to shut down Duke, but the Blue Devils are certainly going to find ways for the offense to score. That means the Cougars are going to need to find their own points, and they can do that with the three-ball from Uzan. If he’s able to replicate any of the big shots from the Purdue matchup, then Houston should like its chances of keeping up with the premier offense in the country.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Wednesday’s Washington Capitals-Carolina Hurricanes game is more than another chance for Alex Ovechkin to pull closer to Wayne Gretzky’s goal record.

It also is important to the NHL playoff standings.

The Hurricanes will clinch a playoff spot if they beat the visiting Capitals. Washington (105 points) can move 13 points ahead of Carolina (94) with a regulation victory and pull closer to a division title. The Capitals can also pass the idle Winnipeg Jets for best record in the league.

The Capitals will be playing their second road game in two nights after beating the Boston Bruins 4-3 Tuesday to end a three-game losing streak.

Ovechkin scored his 891st goal in that game and needs four more in the Capitals’ eight remaining games to break Gretzky’s record this season.

Here’s what to know about Wednesday’s game between the Capitals and Hurricanes:

When is Alex Ovechkin’s next game? Capitals vs. Hurricanes start time

The Capitals play the Hurricanes at 7 p.m. ET Wednesday at Lenovo Center in Raleigh, North Carolina.

Where to watch Capitals vs. Hurricanes game

The game is being aired by TNT and truTV. The truTV broadcast will feature an OviCast. An isolated camera will be on Ovechkin for the duration of the game. The alternate telecast will display Ovechkin’s live stats, his historical numbers and on-ice audio from the NHL on TNT broadcast.

How to stream Capitals vs. Hurricanes game

The game can be streamed on Max and Sling. Max will have the OviCast.

Capitals vs. Hurricanes date, start time, where to watch

  • Game Day: Wednesday, April 2, 2025
  • Game Time: 7 p.m. ET
  • Location: Lenovo Center (Raleigh, North Carolina)
  • TV Channel: TBS, truTV
  • Live Stream: Sling TV – Watch Now!

Alex Ovechkin goals vs. Hurricanes

Ovechkin has 51 goals in 91 career regular-season games against the Hurricanes, including one in an earlier meeting this season. He has scored 31 goals at Lenovo Center.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Pontax Lithium Project, James Bay, Canada

Cygnus Metals Limited (ASX: CY5, TSXV: CYG, OTCQB: CYGGF) is pleased to announce that it has negotiated a two-year extension to its two-stage earn-in with Stria Lithium Inc (‘Stria’) for the Pontax Lithium Project in James Bay, Quebec (‘Pontax’).

In July 2023, Cygnus announced that it had earned 51 per cent of Pontax under the first stage of the earn-in by spending C$4 million on the project and issuing 9,129,825 fully paid ordinary shares in Cygnus (‘Shares’) to Stria.

As a demonstration of the co-operation between Stria and Cygnus, the parties have now agreed that Cygnus has an additional 24 months to satisfy the second stage of the earn-in and earn an additional 19% interest in Pontax, bringing its total interest to 70%.

The extension means that Cygnus has until October 2027 to expend an additional C$2 million on exploration at the project and make a cash payment to Stria of C$3 million, enhancing the likelihood of successful exploration outcomes at Pontax.

As consideration for the extension and subject to TSXV approval, Cygnus will shortly issue 300,000 Shares to Stria utilising the Company’s available Listing Rule 7.1 capacity at a deemed price of A$0.105 per Share (based on the ASX closing price on 1 April 2025). These Shares will be subject to voluntary escrow for a period of 12 months from issue.

This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Directors of Cygnus.

David Southam
Executive Chairman
T: +61 8 6118 1627
E: info@cygnusmetals.com

About Cygnus Metals

Cygnus Metals Limited (ASX: CY5, TSXV: CYG, OTCQB: CYGGF) is a diversified critical minerals exploration and development company with projects in Quebec, Canada and Western Australia. The Company is dedicated to advancing its Chibougamau Copper-Gold Project in Quebec with an aggressive exploration program to drive resource growth and develop a hub-and-spoke operation model with its centralised processing facility. In addition, Cygnus has quality lithium assets with significant exploration upside in the world-class James Bay district in Quebec, and REE and base metal projects in Western Australia. The Cygnus team has a proven track record of turning exploration success into production enterprises and creating shareholder value.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

THIS NEWS RELEASE IS NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES.

Cartier Resources Inc. (TSX-V: ECR) (‘ Cartier ‘ or the ‘ Corporation ‘) announces the execution, on March 31, 2025, of an amending agreement (the ‘ Amending Agreement ‘) further to the engagement letter dated March 20, 2025 between Paradigm Capital Inc. (the ‘ Agent ‘) and the Corporation (the ‘ Engagement Letter ‘) with respect to its previously announced ‘best efforts’ private placement offering of securities of Cartier (the ‘ Offering ‘).

The Amending Agreement was concluded to address potential impacts of several tax measures unveiled on March 25, 2025 by the Minister of Finance (Québec) in connection with his 2025-2026 budget (the ‘ 2025 Québec Budget ‘).

The Offering will continue to raise aggregate gross proceeds for the Corporation of up to approximately $7,300,160 (subject to a potential increase thereof for additional gross proceeds of up to $1,095,024 in accordance with the exercise of the Agent’s Option, as further described below).

The Offering remains a combination of: (a) units of the Corporation issued on a charitable flow-through basis that will qualify as ‘flow-through shares’ within the meaning of subsection 66(15) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the ‘ Tax Act ‘) and section 359.1 of the Québec Tax Act (the ‘ Premium FT Units ‘) for gross proceeds of approximately $5,000,200; and (b) units of the Corporation (the ‘ Hard Dollar Units ‘) and, together with the Premium FT Units, the ‘ Offered Securities ‘) at $0.13 per Hard Dollar Unit for gross proceeds of $2,299,960. Each Premium FT Unit consists of one common share in the capital of the Corporation (each a ‘ Common Share ‘) and one common share purchase warrant (each a ‘ Premium FT Warrant ‘), with each such Common Share and Premium FT Warrant qualifying as a ‘flow-through share’ within the meaning of subsection 66(15) of the Tax Act and section 359.1 of the Québec Tax Act. Each Hard Dollar Unit consists of one Common Share of the Corporation and one common share purchase warrant (each a ‘ Hard Dollar Warrant ‘), and for certainty, each such Common Share and Hard Dollar Warrant will not qualify as a ‘flow-through share’.

Under the Engagement Letter, the subscription price of the Premium FT Units (the ‘ FT Subscription Price ‘) was set on March 20, 2025 at $0.23 per FT Unit, based on certain tax benefits then available under the Quebec Tax Act and the Tax Act, including, but not limited to, the Québec Capital Gain Exemption and Québec Additional Deductions (each as defined herein).

The 2025 Québec Budget introduced major changes to the flow-through share regime under the Taxation Act (Québec) (the ‘ Québec Tax Act ‘), including the following measures (collectively, the ‘ 2025 Québec Budget Amendments ‘):

(a) abolition of the capital gains exemption in respect of the disposition of certain ‘resource property’ (within the meaning of the Québec Tax Act) (the ‘ Québec Capital Gain Exemption ‘); and
(b) abolition of both (i) the additional 10% deduction under the Québec Tax Act in respect of certain exploration expenses incurred in Québec and (iii) the additional 10% deduction under the Québec Tax Act in respect of certain surface mining exploration expenses incurred in Québec (collectively, the ‘ Québec Additional Deductions ‘).

However, the 2025 Québec Budget provides that the abolition of the Québec Additional Deductions will not apply to flow-through shares issued after March 25, 2025 if they are issued following a public announcement made no later than March 25, 2025 (which is the case of the Offering), provided furthermore that a report of exempt distribution is filed with the Autorité des marchés financiers no later than May 31, 2025 (the ‘ Grandfathering Exception ‘).

Considering the potential impacts of the 2025 Québec Budget Amendments as announced on March 25, 2025, the Corporation, on March 31, 2025, (a) entered into the Amending Agreement; and (b) entered into a subscription and renunciation agreement with PearTree Securities Inc. (‘ PearTree ‘), on behalf of certain disclosed principals (the ‘ Subscription and Renunciation Agreement ‘).

Pursuant to the Subscription and Renunciation Agreement, a mechanism was introduced to allow for the adjustment of the FT Subscription Price to $0.205 or $0.182 from $0.23 (i.e. the price initially agreed upon on March 20, 2025 under the Engagement Letter) depending on whether the Québec Capital Gain Exemption and/or Québec Additional Deductions are determined on the Closing Date (as defined herein) to be available in respect of the Offering, based on any written statements that are issued by the Minister of Finance (Québec) to clarify the scope of the 2025 Québec Budget Amendments and the Grandfathering Exception. Under the Subscription and Renunciation Agreement, corresponding adjustments would also be made to the number of Premium FT Units issued so as to retain approximately the same aggregate gross subscription proceeds.

All of the other material terms of the Offering remain unchanged, including the following:

  • The gross proceeds from the sale of the Premium FT Units will be used by the Corporation to incur eligible ‘Canadian exploration expenses’ that qualify as ‘flow-through mining expenditures’ (as both terms are defined in the Tax Act) (the ‘ Qualifying Expenditures ‘) related to the projects of the Corporation in Québec. The Qualifying Expenditures will be renounced in favour of the subscribers of the Premium FT Units with an effective date no later than December 31, 2025 and in an aggregate amount of not less than the total amount of the gross proceeds raised from the issuance of the Premium FT Units.
  • Each Premium FT Warrant and Hard Dollar Warrant will entitle the holder thereof to acquire one Common Share of the Corporation (each a ‘ Warrant Share ‘) on a non-flow-through basis at an exercise price of $0.18 for a period of 5 years following the Closing Date (as herein defined).
  • The Corporation will grant the Agent an option (the ‘ Agent’s Option ‘), exercisable up to 48 hours prior to the Closing Date (as herein defined), to sell that number of Offered Securities for additional gross proceeds of up to $1,095,024.

The Offering is being made by way of private placement in Canada. The Offered Securities will be subject to a four month and one day hold period under applicable securities laws in Canada. The Offering is expected to close on or about April 14, 2025 (the ‘ Closing Date ‘), subject to the satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions, including the conditional listing approval of the TSX-V.

About Cartier Resources Inc.

Cartier Resources Inc., founded in 2006, is an exploration company based in Val-d’Or. The Corporation’s projects are all located in Québec, which consistently ranks among the world’s top mining jurisdictions. Cartier is advancing the development of its flagship Cadillac project, consisting of the Chimo Mine and East Cadillac properties, and its other projects. The Corporation has corporate and institutional support, including Agnico Eagle and Québec investment funds.

This news release does not constitute an offer of securities for sale in the United States. The securities offered have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and such securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration in the United States or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements in the United States.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This news release contains ‘forward-looking information’ within the meaning of the applicable Canadian securities legislation that is based on expectations, estimates, projections, and interpretations as at the date of this news release. Any statement that involves discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, interpretations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, future events or performance including in respect of the use of proceeds of the Offering, closing of the Offering and the tax treatment of the flow through shares (often but not always using phrases such as ‘expects’ or ‘does not expect’, ‘is expected’, ‘interpreted’, ‘management’s view’, ‘anticipates’ or ‘does not anticipate’, ‘plans’, ‘budget’, ‘scheduled’, ‘forecasts’, ‘estimates’, ‘believes’ or ‘intends’ or variations of such words and phrases or stating that certain actions, events or results ‘may’ or ‘could’, ‘would’, ‘might’ or ‘will’ be taken to occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking information and are intended to identify forward-looking information. This forward-looking information is based on reasonable assumptions and estimates of management of the Corporation, at the time it was made, involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Although the forward-looking information contained in this news release is based upon what management believes, or believed at the time, to be reasonable assumptions, the parties cannot assure shareholders and prospective purchasers of securities that actual results will be consistent with such forward-looking information, as there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended, and neither the Corporation nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of any such forward-looking information. The Corporation does not undertake, and assumes no obligation, to update or revise any such forward-looking statements or forward-looking information contained herein to reflect new events or circumstances, except as may be required by law.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein.

For more information, contact:

Philippe Cloutier, P. Geo.
President and CEO
Phone: 819-856-0512
Email: philippe.cloutier@ressourcescartier.com
www.ressourcescartier.com

News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com