Author

admin

Browsing

The Philadelphia Phillies, frustrated in their negotiations to bring back free-agent catcher J.T. Realmuto, are looking into the possibility of shaking up their roster and finding a creative way to add free-agent infielder Bo Bichette, a high-ranking Phillies executive told USA TODAY Sports.

The official spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of ongoing talks, but confirmed a report by The Athletic that the Phillies scheduled a virtual meeting with Bichette on Monday, Jan. 12 to discuss the possibility of joining the Phillies.

Two Phillies executives cautioned that signing Bichette remains a long-shot, insisting it would be complicated and involve significant roster changes, but that it’s certainly possible.

The Phillies would have to cut off negotiations with Realmuto, trade third baseman Alec Bohm and his $10.2 million salary, find a team who would take right fielder Nick Castellanos and pay at least a small portion of his $20 million salary, and perhaps move others as well.

The Phillies’ interest in potentially signing Bichette came about after the holidays when Bichette expressed a desire in playing for them, particularly after the hiring last week of Don Mattingly as their bench coach. Mattingly was the Toronto Blue Jays’ bench coach the past three years and became close to Bichette.

Bichette, 27, who has played shortstop throughout his career, also said he would be willing to move to second base, where he appeared during the World Series, or even third base.

Certainly, there is competition for Bichette, who is seeking a long-term deal likely worth at least $250 million. If the Boston Red Sox can’t re-sign shortstop Alex Bregman, they’ll turn to Bichette. The Chicago Cubs have expressed interest in both infielders. The Los Angeles Dodgers would gladly sign Bichette if he was interested on a short-term contract. And the door isn’t shut on a return to Toronto, where he has spent his entire career.

Still, with a projected luxury payroll of about $300 million, according to Spotrac, the Phillies say they would need to clear salary for Bichette. They would also need to find a catcher to replace Realmuto, 35, their three-time All-Star and two-time Gold Glove winner, who has been instrumental in their four-year playoff run.

The Phillies say they’re serious, and perhaps by next week we’ll find out just how realistic this could actually become, with Bichette being the latest high-priced star to join the Phillies.

Follow Bob Nightengale on X @Bnightengale.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Blackrock Silver Corp. (TSXV: BRC,OTC:BKRRF) (OTCQX: BKRRF) (FSE: AHZ0) (‘Blackrock’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce the completion of its non-brokered private placement (the ‘Offering’) previously announced on December 24, 2025. 2176423 Ontario Ltd., a company beneficially owned by Eric Sprott, purchased an aggregate of C$6,999,960 of the Offering. The Offering consisted of a total of 13,636,300 units of the Company (the ‘Units’) at a price of C$1.10 per Unit for gross proceeds of C$14,999,930. Each Unit consisted of one common share of the Company (each, a ‘Common Share’) and one-half of one Common Share purchase warrant (each whole warrant, a ‘Warrant’). Each Warrant entitles the holder thereof to acquire one Common Share at an exercise price of C$1.50 per Common Share until January 8, 2028.

Andrew Pollard, Blackrock’s President and Chief Executive Officer, commented: ‘Supported by Eric Sprott and a new cornerstone investor, this $15 million financing meaningfully strengthens our balance sheet as we advance Tonopah West toward development. As an emerging American silver developer, we are accelerating permitting and de-risking initiatives in 2026 to support the advancement of a secure, high-quality domestic source of silver for the U.S. market.’

The net proceeds of the Offering are intended to be used by the Company to fund exploration, permitting and pre-development activities on the Company’s Tonopah West project and for general working capital.

In connection with the closing of the Offering, the Company paid Research Capital Corporation (the ‘Finder‘) finder’s fees in cash totalling C$689,997 and issued to the Finder a total of 627,270 non-transferable finder’s warrants (‘Finder’s Warrants‘) in connection with the Units placed by the Finder. Each Finder’s Warrant entitles the holder thereof to acquire one Common Share at an exercise price of C$1.50 until January 8, 2028.

The participation of Eric Sprott in the Offering constituted a ‘related party transaction’, within the meaning of TSX Venture Exchange Policy 5.9 and Multilateral Instrument 61-101 (‘MI 61-101‘). The Company has relied on the exemptions from the formal valuation and minority shareholder approval requirements of MI 61-101 contained in sections 5.5(a) and 5.7(1)(a) of MI 61-101 in respect of the related party participation in the Offering as neither the fair market value (as determined under MI 61-101) of the subject matter of, nor the fair market value of the consideration for, the transaction, insofar as it involved the interested parties, exceeded 25% of the Company’s market capitalization (as determined under MI 61-101).

The Common Shares, Warrants and Finder’s Warrants issued in connection with the Private Placement and the Common Shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants and Finder’s Warrants are subject to a hold period expiring on May 9, 2026.

The securities offered have not been, and will not be, registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘U.S. Securities Act‘) or any U.S. state securities laws, and may not be offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, United States persons absent registration or any applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable U.S. state securities laws. This news release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities in the United States, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful.

About Blackrock Silver Corp.

Backed by gold and silver ounces in the ground, Blackrock is a junior precious metal focused exploration and development company driven to add shareholder value. Anchored by a seasoned Board of Directors, the Company is focused on its 100% controlled Nevada portfolio of properties consisting of low-sulphidation, epithermal gold and silver mineralization located along the established Northern Nevada Rift in north-central Nevada and the Walker Lane trend in western Nevada.

Additional information on Blackrock Silver Corp. can be found on its website at www.blackrocksilver.com and by reviewing its profile on SEDAR at www.sedarplus.ca.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Information

This news release contains ‘forward-looking statements’ and ‘forward-looking information’ (collectively, ‘forward-looking statements‘) within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this news release relate to, among other things: the net proceeds from the Offering and the intended use of proceeds therefrom; the advancement of the Tonopah West project towards development, including the acceleration of permitting and de-risking initiatives at the Tonopah West project; and the intention for the Tonopah West project to function as a future secure, high-quality domestic source of silver for the U.S. market.

These forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company, are inherently subject to significant operational, business, economic and regulatory uncertainties and contingencies. These assumptions include, among other things: conditions in general economic and financial markets; accuracy of assay results; geological interpretations from drilling results, timing and amount of capital expenditures; performance of available laboratory and other related services; future operating costs; the historical basis for current estimates of potential quantities and grades of target zones; the availability of skilled labour and no labour related disruptions at any of the Company’s operations; no unplanned delays or interruptions in scheduled activities; all necessary permits, licenses and regulatory approvals for operations are received in a timely manner; the ability to secure and maintain title and ownership to properties and the surface rights necessary for operations; and the Company’s ability to comply with environmental, health and safety laws. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive.

The Company cautions the reader that forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements contained in this news release and the Company has made assumptions and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such factors include, without limitation: the timing and content of work programs; results of exploration activities and development of mineral properties; the interpretation and uncertainties of drilling results and other geological data; receipt, maintenance and security of permits and mineral property titles; environmental and other regulatory risks; project costs overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses; availability of funds; failure to delineate potential quantities and grades of the target zones based on historical data; general market, political, economic and industry conditions; and those factors identified under the caption ‘Risks Factors’ in the Company’s most recent Annual Information Form.

Forward-looking statements are based on the expectations and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made. The assumptions used in the preparation of such statements, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statements were made. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements included in this news release if these beliefs, estimates and opinions or other circumstances should change, except as otherwise required by applicable law.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

For Further Information, Contact:

Andrew Pollard
President and Chief Executive Officer
(604) 817-6044
info@blackrocksilver.com

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/279846

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Investor Insight

Brightstar is a cash-flowing gold producer with a 4.0Moz Mineral Resource base and two major development hubs advancing toward investment decisions. Mining from two high-grade underground mines in Laverton, continuous high-grade drilling success and near-term production expansion positions the company for significant value creation in a record gold price environment.

Overview

Gold continues to demonstrate its strength as a store of value, reaching record highs above US$4,000 per ounce in 2025 amid persistent global uncertainty, inflationary pressures and heightened geopolitical risk. In this environment, investors are increasingly turning to high-quality Australian gold producers with scale, growth visibility and near-term catalysts.

Brightstar Resources (ASX:BTR) is strategically positioned to benefit from this macro setting as a cash-flowing, multi-asset gold producer and developer with operations and growth projects across the Goldfields (Laverton–Menzies) and Sandstone regions of Western Australia. The company now controls 3.9 Moz of mineral resources across these assets, providing a diversified and scalable platform for sustained growth.

Brightstar’s unique value proposition is centered on its existing production from two underground mines, which Brightstar operates directly rather than relying on external mining contractors. The Second Fortune and Fish underground mines are delivering consistent production under an ore purchase agreement with Genesis Minerals, generating cashflow that supports ongoing drilling and development studies.

The company’s growth is anchored by a dual-hub development strategy. In the Goldfields region, the company has completed a definitive feasibility study outlining ~70,000 ounces per annum of production over an initial five-year period, with a final investment decision targeted for early 2026. Ongoing underground and near-mine drilling continues to confirm mine life extensions and additional high-grade potential.

At Sandstone, Brightstar has consolidated a 2.4 Moz district-scale gold system following the Alto and Aurumin transactions and is now progressing a major PFS evaluating a new 4 to 5 Mtpa processing facility. More than 70,000 metres of drilling has already been completed toward a material mineral resource upgrade planned for mid-2026.

Together, these hubs underpin a pipeline of near-term and long-term catalysts supported by extensive infrastructure, a strengthened technical team, and a well-funded balance sheet. As Brightstar advances feasibility work, executes its multi-rig drilling programs, and expands its production profile, the company is well placed to deliver meaningful shareholder value in a rising gold price environment.

Company Highlights

  • ASX-listed gold producer and developer with a consolidated 3.9 Moz mineral resource base at 1.5 g/t gold, spanning the Goldfields portfolio (Laverton + Menzies projects) and the Sandstone Hub in Western Australia.
  • Established Goldfields production base, with Brightstar operating two underground mines – Second Fortune and Fish – within the Laverton area, supplying continuous gold production under an ore purchase agreement with Genesis Minerals.
  • Goldfields feasibility study (June 2025) completed, outlining ~70,000 oz of annual gold production over the first five years, with a final investment decision targeted for March 2026.
  • High-grade mine life growth targeted from the Goldfields underground mines, including depth and strike extensions at Fish and strong regional hits near Second Fortune.
  • Menzies Hub is positioned for future production, with Yunndaga advancing toward underground development following significant 2025 drill results, informing upcoming mineral resource and development updates.
  • Sandstone Hub expanded to 2.4 Moz at 1.5 g/t gold, with a major pre-feasibility study (PFS) underway for a 4 to 5 Mtpa processing facility and more than 70,000 m of drilling completed toward a material mineral resource upgrade in mid-2026.
  • Strong exploration momentum, with active drilling programs at Laverton and Sandstone and exceptional 2025 results, including 10 m @ 43.8 g/t gold at the Musketeer prospect.
  • Well-funded balance sheet, with ~$41 million in cash and liquidity (as of September 2025) and a revolving stockpile finance facility supporting continuous drilling and development activities.

Key Projects

Goldfields Assets (Laverton + Menzies)

Brightstar’s Goldfields portfolio combines the Laverton and Menzies hubs into a single, development-ready production centre. Together, these assets host a significant portion of Brightstar’s consolidated resource base and provide both near-term production and long-term growth opportunities.

Laverton Hub

Brightstar’s Laverton Hub comprises two operating underground mines – Second Fortune and Fish– and a series of advanced open pit deposits, including the material Cork Tree Well and Lord Byron Deposits. These deposits sit on granted mining leases and benefit from established haul roads, existing mine infrastructure, and proximity to Brightstar’s planned processing facility.

Highlights:

  • Two operating underground mines: Second Fortune and Fish continue to deliver steady production into Genesis Minerals’ Laverton mill under the ore purchase agreement. Recent underground and surface drilling has confirmed strong continuity of mineralisation at depth, particularly at Fish where multiple lodes have been intersected, including 7.0m @ 3.31 g/t gold, 9.9m @ 2.90 g/t gold, and 1.1m @ 17.6 g/t gold.
  • High-grade near-mine discoveries: At Second Fortune, drilling at nearby prospects such as Linden Giant and Alawa has returned strong results (10m @ 9.83 g/t gold; 1m @ 53.8 g/t gold), demonstrating the potential for new satellite ore sources within 3 km of existing mine workings.
  • Large-scale open pit opportunity: Cork Tree Well and Lord Byron remain central to Brightstar’s long-term development plan. The planning scenarios outlined in the June 2025 feasibility study support multi-year open pit mining with robust production profiles and strong economic potential.

Growth Drivers:

  • Ongoing underground drilling campaigns at Second Fortune and Fish targeting mine life extensions
  • DFS optimisation underway to refine the design and throughput of Brightstar’s proposed 1 Mtpa to 1.5 Mtpa processing plant
  • Continued evaluation of near-mine targets leveraging existing infrastructure and haulage routes
  • Integration of new high-grade drilling into updated open pit and underground mine plans

Menzies Hub

The Menzies Hub comprises a district-scale mineralised corridor extending more than 20 km along the Menzies Shear Zone. These deposits lie directly adjacent to the Goldfields Highway and sit on granted mining leases, supporting near-term development readiness.

Highlights

  • Substantial resource base: The Menzies Hub hosts 0.7Moz @ 1.5g/t Au of mineral resources across multiple deposits including Lady Shenton, Yunndaga, Aspacia and the Lady Harriet system.
  • Advancing underground development: Yunndaga is emerging as Brightstar’s next underground mining front, with drilling completed in 2025 returning high-grade intercepts such as 16m @ 8.03 g/t gold and 8m @ 6.67 g/t gold. These results will underpin updated mineral resource and ore reserve estimates planned for late 2025.
  • Open pit opportunities: Lady Shenton and surrounding deposits are expected to support a multi-year open pit mining schedule, forming part of the production base in the Goldfields feasibility study. Permitting and approvals work is progressing, with first production targeted post-FID.

Growth Drivers:

  • Updated mineral resource for Yunndaga to support underground mine planning
  • Feasibility study optimisation to refine timing and sequencing of Menzies open pits
  • Ongoing engagement with regional mills to evaluate toll-milling options where appropriate
  • Progression toward a mining decision following completion of study phases

Sandstone Hub

Brightstar’s Sandstone Hub has been transformed into a major district-scale opportunity following the consolidation of Alto Metals and Aurumin’s Sandstone assets. The combined project now contains 2.4 Moz at 1.5 g/t gold, spread across multiple open pit camps including Lords, Vanguard, Indomitable, Havilah and Montague.

Highlights:

  • Significant resource growth platform: The ambition at Sandstone is to convert this extensive mineralised system into a long-life standalone operation. Brightstar has already completed more than 70,000 m of drilling since acquisition, with a major mineral resource update targeted for mid-2026.
  • High-grade exploration success: Recent drilling has delivered standout results such as 10 m @ 43.8 g/t gold at the Musketeer prospect, highlighting the potential for new high-grade zones within the broader system.
  • Processing pathway defined: A PFS is underway examining a new 4 to 5 Mtpa processing hub located at the historic Sandstone mill site, aiming to establish Sandstone as a cornerstone asset in Brightstar’s future growth.

Growth Drivers:

  • 120,000 m drilling program planned through June 2026 to upgrade key deposits to indicated category
  • PFS delivery targeted for mid-2026
  • Long-term development scenario supported by strong infrastructure and granted mining tenure

Management Team

Alex Rovira – Managing Director

Alex Rovira is a qualified geologist and an experienced investment banker having focused on the metals and mining sector since 2013. Rovira has experience in ASX equity capital markets activities, including capital raisings, IPOs and merger and acquisitions.

Richard Crookes – Non-executive Chairman

Richard Crookes has over 35 years’ experience in the resources and investments industries. He is a geologist by training having previously worked as the chief geologist and mining manager of Ernest Henry Mining in Australia. Crookes is managing partner of Lionhead Resources, a critical minerals investment fund and formerly an investment director at EMR Capital. Prior to that he was an executive director in Macquarie Bank’s Metals Energy Capital (MEC) division where he managed all aspects of the bank’s principal investments in mining and metals companies.

Andrew Rich – Executive Director

Andrew Rich is a degree qualified mining engineer from the WA School of Mines and has obtained a WA First Class Mine Managers Certificate. Rich has a strong background in underground gold mining with experience predominantly in the development of underground mines at Ramelius Resources (ASX:RMS) and Westgold Resources (ASX:WGX).

Jonathan Downes – Non-executive Director

Jonathan Downes has over 30 years’ experience in the minerals industry and has worked in various geological and corporate capacities. Experienced with gold and base metals, he has been intimately involved with the exploration process through to production. Downes is currently the managing director of Kaiser Reef, a high grade gold producer, and non-executive director of Cazaly Resources.

Nicky Martin – Chief Financial Officer

Nicky Martin is an experienced finance and accounting professional holding tertiary qualifications in accounting and finance and is a qualified CPA. Martin was previously the Head of Finance at Pilbara Minerals Ltd (ASX:PLS) where she oversaw and was actively involved in a rapidly growing mining success story.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Yvonne Blaszczyk, president and CEO of BMG Group, sees the gold price hitting US$5,000 per ounce in Q1 on the back of a complex geopolitical landscape.

‘In terms of the geopolitical configuration of the world, we are witnessing history right now,’ she said.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The global lithium market enters 2026 after a punishing 2025 marked by oversupply, weaker-than-expected EV demand and sustained price pressure, although things began turning around for lithium stocks in Q4.

Lithium carbonate prices in North Asia fell to four-year lows early in the year, triggering production cuts and project delays, before rebounding sharply in the second half. By late December, prices had jumped 56 percent from their January levels, signaling the start of a potential market rebalancing.

Analysts point to tightening inventories and high-cost supply under strain as early signs of a recovery, while long-term demand from electrification, energy storage and the energy transition remains intact.

Battery energy storage systems are emerging as a major growth driver, expected to account for roughly a quarter of global battery demand in 2025. In the US, storage could make up 35 to 40 percent of battery demand in the coming years, according to Benchmark Mineral Intelligence’s Iola Hughes.

“LFP is the story right now,” Hughes said, highlighting falling costs and technological innovation as key enablers for large-scale deployment. Global storage remains concentrated in China and the US, but new markets like Saudi Arabia are scaling rapidly.

As storage expands in scale, geography and strategic importance, it is set to become a central pillar of lithium demand heading into 2026.

1. Lithium Argentina (NYSE:LAR)

Year-to-date gain: 106.39 percent
Market cap: US$891.03 million
Share price: US$5.49

Lithium Argentina produces lithium carbonate from its Caucharí-Olaroz brine project in Argentina, developed with Ganfeng Lithium (OTC Pink:GNENF,HKEX:1772). The company was spun out from Lithium Americas in October 2023 and changed its name from Lithium Americas (Argentina) in January 2025.

In mid-April, Lithium Argentina executed a letter of intent with Ganfeng Lithium to jointly advance development across the Pozuelos-Pastos Grandes basins.

In August, Lithium Argentina agreed to form a new joint venture with Ganfeng Lithium that will combine the companies’ projects in the Pozuelos and Pastos Grandes basins of Salta, Argentina.

The joint venture will bring together Ganfeng’s wholly owned Pozuelos-Pastos Grandes (PPG) project and Lithium America’s Pastos Grandes and Sal de la Puna projects, in which Ganfeng currently holds a 15 percent and 35 percent stake respectively.

Once completed, Ganfeng will hold a 67 percent stake in the consolidated PPG project, and Lithium Argentina will hold a 33 percent interest.

In Q4, Lithium Argentina released a positive scoping study for the PPG project, confirming its scale and strong economics. The consolidated project hosts a measured and indicated resource of 15.1 million metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) and is designed for staged production of up to 150,000 metric tons per year over a 30 year mine life.

In the same announcement, the company confirmed receipt of an environmental approval for Stage 1 from the Secretariat of Mining and Energy of the Province of Salta.

Lithium Argentina released its Q3 results in November, noting approximately 8,300 metric tons of lithium carbonate production at its Caucharí-Olaroz operation during the quarter, with 24,000 metric tons produced between January and September.

Company shares rose to a year-to-date high of US$5.58 on December 31, in line with rising lithium carbonate prices.

2. Sociedad Química y Minera (NYSE:SQM)

Year-to-date gain: 87.39 percent
Market cap: US$19.66 billion
Share price: US$68.98

SQM is a major global lithium producer, with operations centered in Chile’s Salar de Atacama. The company extracts lithium from brine and produces lithium carbonate and hydroxide for use in batteries.

SQM is expanding production and holds interests in projects in Australia and China, including a 50/50 joint venture for the Mt Holland lithium operation in Western Australia. In July, the company produced its first battery-grade lithium hydroxide production at its Kwinana refinery in the state.

In late April, Chile’s competition watchdog approved the partnership agreement between SQM and state-owned copper giant Codelco aimed at boosting output at the Atacama salt flat. The deal, first announced in 2024, reached another milestone when it secured approval for an additional lithium quota from Chile’s nuclear energy regulator CChEN.

SQM ended the year finalizing the agreement. The partnership was formalized through SQM’s subsidiary SQM Salar absorbing Codelco’s Minera Tarar and being renamed Nova Andino Litio.

SQM reported a net income of US$404.4 million for the first nine months of 2025, rebounding from a US$524.5 million loss in the same period of 2024. Revenue totaled US$3.25 billion, down 5.9 percent year-over-year, while gross profit reached US$904.1 million.

The company’s third-quarter performance highlighted the turnaround, as SQM achieved record lithium sales volumes. It reported net income of US$178.4 million, up 36 percent from Q3 2024, and revenue of US$1.17 billion, up 8.9 percent. Gross profit for the quarter climbed 23 percent to US$345.8 million.

SQM attributed the rebound to higher realized lithium prices and improved operational efficiency, signaling a strong recovery trajectory for the remainder of 2025.

Shares of SQM reached a year-to-date high of US$71.63 on December 26.

3. Albemarle (NYSE:ALB)

Year-to-date gain: 64.29 percent
Market cap: US$16.71 billion
Share price: US$142.01

North Carolina-based Albemarle is dividing into two primary business units, one of which — the Albemarle Energy Storage unit — is focused wholly on the lithium-ion battery and energy transition markets. It includes the firm’s lithium carbonate, hydroxide and metal production.

Albemarle has a broad portfolio of lithium mines and facilities, with extraction in Chile, Australia and the US. Looking first at Chile, Albemarle produces lithium carbonate at its La Negra lithium conversion plants, which process brine from the Salar de Atacama, the country’s largest salt flat. Albemarle is aiming to implement direct lithium extraction technology at the salt flat to reduce water usage.

Albemarle’s Australian assets Wodgina hard-rock lithium mine in Western Australia, which is owned and operated by the 50/50 MARBL joint venture with Mineral Resources (ASX:MIN,OTC Pink:MALRF). Albemarle wholly owns the on-site Kemerton lithium hydroxide facility. The company’s other Australian joint venture is the Greenbushes hard-rock mine, in which it holds a 49 percent interest.

In late October, Albemarle signed an agreement to sell its 51 percent stake in its refining catalyst business, Ketjen, leaving it with 49 percent ownership, part of a broader portfolio reshaping that also includes the sale of Ketjen’s 50 percent stake in the Eurecat joint venture to partner Axens.

The combined deals are expected to generate approximately US$660 million in pre-tax cash proceeds and strengthen Albemarle’s financial flexibility. Both transactions are anticipated to close in the first half of 2026, subject to regulatory approvals.

In November, Albemarle reported third‑quarter results that reflected improved operations amid continued lithium market headwinds. The company logged net sales of roughly US$1.31 billion, a slight year‑over‑year decline driven by lower energy storage pricing.

Albemarle generated US$356 million in quarterly cash from operations, noting the company remained on track to reduce full‑year capital expenditures to around US$600 million while targeting positive free cash flow of US$300 million to US$400 million in 2025.

Shares of Albemarle marked a year-to-date high of US$150.01 on December 26, amid strengthening lithium prices.

4. Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC)

Year-to-date gain: 47 percent
Market cap: US$1.24 billion
Share price: US$4.41

US-focused Lithium Americas is developing its flagship Thacker lithium Pass project located in Humboldt County in northern Nevada. The project is a joint venture between Lithium Americas at 62 percent and General Motors (NYSE:GM) at 38 percent.

According to the company, Thacker Pass holds the “largest measured lithium reserve and resource in the world.”

In March, Lithium Americas secured a US$250 million investment from Orion Resource Partners to advance Phase 1 construction of the project, which is expected to fully cover development costs through the construction phase. On April 1, the joint venture partners made a final investment decision for the project, with completion targeted for late 2027.

Shares of Lithium Americas surged in late September, rising from US$3.07 to US$7.37 in three days. Its share price reached a 2025 high of US$10.05 on October 13.

Lithium Americas’ share price rose on news of renegotiation talks over its US$2.26 billion Department of Energy loan tied to the Thacker Pass project. According to media reports, the Trump administration was seeking up to a 10 percent equity stake as part of amendments to the loan’s repayment structure.

In response, Lithium Americas offered no-cost warrants for 5 to 10 percent of its shares and agreed to cover related administrative costs, while requesting changes to the amortization schedule without altering the loan’s term or interest.

An agreement was reached on October 1 and Lithium Americas received the first US$435 million installment of the loan on October 20.

The company ended the year by announcing it was being added to the S&P/TSX Composite Index (INDEXTSI:OSPTX).

5. Sigma Lithium (NASDAQ:SGML)

Year-to-date gain: 20.23 percent
Market cap: US$1.5 billion
Share price: US$13.49

Sigma Lithium is a Brazil-focused lithium producer supplying chemical-grade lithium concentrate to the global battery market. The company operates the Grota do Cirilo project in Minas Gerais, one of the world’s largest hard-rock lithium operations.

Sigma’s Greentech industrial lithium plant currently produces about 270,000 metric tons per year of lithium concentrate, equivalent to roughly 38,000 to 40,000 metric tons of LCE. The company is building a second processing plant that is expected to lift total capacity to approximately 520,000 metric tons of concentrate annually.

In September, Sigma Lithium’s flagship Grota do Cirilo operation in Brazil faced both regulatory scrutiny and operational disruption.

That month, Brazilian prosecutors requested a pause in operations after a technical review flagged shortcomings in the project’s Environmental Impact Assessment, citing potential water-management risks to the Piauí stream from planned open pits, a key water source for nearby communities, particularly during droughts.

While it denied issues with its EIA, Sigma paused mining to upgrade equipment and improve efficiency. The company phased down operations in September and shut the mine throughout October, leading to a sharp drop in output.

In mid-November, Sigma reported a strong Q3 2025, with net revenue rising 69 percent quarter-over-quarter and 36 percent year-over-year. The company generated US$24 million from final price settlements on sales completed by the end of Q3, with a further US$4 million in cash expected from additional settlements.

Sigma also expects to receive approximately US$33 million from the sale of 950,000 metric tons of lithium-bearing material that can be reprocessed by its customers, providing an additional near-term cash inflow.

Operationally, it said mining activities would restart by the end of November, with full ramp-up targeted for the first quarter of 2026. Because the company took over mining operations from its equipment contractor earlier in 2025, the restart is supported by upgraded equipment leased directly from manufacturers and operated in-house.

Sigma Lithium shares rose to a year-to-date high of US$14.50 on December 26.

Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, currently hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Commodities giants Rio Tinto (ASX:RIO,NYSE:RIO,LSE:RIO) and Glencore (LSE:GLEN,OTCPL:GLCNF) said on Thursday (January 8) that they have restarted talks about a potential business combination.

The two major miners spoke previously back in 2024, but failed to reach an agreement.

This time around, they say their preliminary discussions are centered around a combination of some or all of their businesses; this could include the acquisition of Glencore by Rio Tinto.

The news was first reported by the Financial Times, with both companies confirming the story via press release shortly thereafter. According to the news outlet, the combination of Rio Tinto and Glencore would create a massive mining company with an enterprise value north of US$260 billion.

The two firms have said there’s no guarantee that any transaction will go through.

However, it’s worth noting that Rio Tinto has changed leadership since the 2024 talks ended, with Simon Trott now at the helm. For its part, Glencore has reorganized its coal assets.

The Financial Times also notes that Glencore CEO Gary Nagle spoke last month about the importance of size in the mining industry, saying that bigger companies have various advantages.

“It makes sense to create bigger companies,” the executive explained to reporters. “Not just for the sake of size, but also to create material synergies, to create relevance, to attract talent, to attract capital.”

Regulations require Rio Tinto to announce its intentions either way by February 5 of this year.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

HARTFORD, CT — Sarah Strong had 24 points, including 19 in the first half, to help No. 1 ranked UConn women’s basketball team beat St. John’s, 88-43, in Big East play on Wednesday at PeoplesBank Arena.

The sophomore phenom added team-best six steals and the Huskies totaled 23 for the game.

‘She has a knack that she has to put her hands, you know, get a piece of the ball every time she reaches for it,’ UConn coach Geno Auriemma said of Strong. ‘You know, there’s some kids reach, and they come in, either come out with air, or they come out with a foul, you know, she manages to get her hands on the ball.’

The Huskies, who have won 54 straight conference games, took a 20-2 lead less than five minutes into the game and never looked back. UConn (16-0, 7-0 Big East) continued their smothering defense with 46 points off of turnovers.

‘I thought our energy was incredible, and I thought we were flying to the ball and covered for each other really, really well,’ Auriemma said. ‘The best that I think I’ve seen so far this year.’

Azzi Fudd added 16 points and freshman Blanca Quiñonez had 14. KK Arnold stuffed the stat sheet with 11 points, six steals and four assists.

St. John’s (13-4, 3-3) had 14 points from Beautiful Waheed.

Third quarter: UConn 72, St. John’s 32

The Huskies are shooting 60% from the floor and have taken a 40-point lead. UConn has 19 assists and 19 steals and has scored 40 points off 28 St. John’s turnovers.

Sarah Strong has 24 points on 11 of 15 shooting.

Sa’Mya Wyatt and Beautiful Waheed have nine points each for St. John’s.

Three UConn players in double figures

Sarah Strong has 19 points, Azzi Fudd 16 and KK Arnold 11 as the Huskies continue to make easy work of St. John’s.

Halftime: UConn 50, St John’s 22

Sarah Strong has 19 points, five steals and three assists as the Huskies are dominating the Red Storm. KK Arnold, in her second game back after breaking her nose in practice eight days ago, has 9 points, 5 steals and 4 assists.

Sa’Mya Wyatt and Beautiful Waheed have six points each for St. John’s.

Sarah Strong is going off

The sophomore player of the year candidate just hit her first 3 of the contest. She has 19 points.

First quarter: UConn 28, St. John’s 9

The Huskies jumped out to a 20-2 with 5:29 left in the first quarter. UConn has 22 points in the paint, 18 points off turnovers and 14 points in the paint. KK Arnold has seven points and five steals in the early going.

We are underway in Hartford

Sarah Strong converts a layup after a steal to getting the scoring started. And, just like that, UConn is up 8-0.

What time is UConn vs St. John’s women’s basketball?

The UConn Huskies host the St. John’s Red Storm on Wednesday, Jan. 8, at 7:30 p.m. ET at PeoplesBank Arena in Hartford, Connecticut.

UConn vs St. John’s: TV, streaming

  • Date: Wednesday, Jan. 8
  • Time: 7:30 p.m. ET (4:30 p.m. PT)
  • Location: PeoplesBank Arena (Hartford, Connecticut)
  • TV: TruTV
  • Stream: Fubo

Stream live sports with Fubo

St. John’s starting lineup

UConn starting lineup

St. John’s in the house

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Black coaches are rarely given second chances after being fired, unlike many of their white counterparts.
  • Experts suggest Black coaches are often judged collectively, while white coaches are evaluated as individuals.
  • The number of Black head coaches in the FBS has decreased from 17 in 2011 to 14 today.

The two most powerful leagues in college football began the 2025 season with a combined four Black head coaches out of 34 schools from coast to coast.

∎ There were no Black head coaches in the Southeastern Conference.

∎ In the Big Ten, there were four, including Sherrone Moore, the first Black head coach in Michigan history.

Four months later, only one remains — Mike Locksley at Maryland. The others were terminated, most notably Moore, who fell from grace in the kind of scandal that can unfairly affect perceptions of other Black coaches in ways that don’t affect white coaches after similar scandals, according to experts contacted by USA TODAY Sports.

“These Black coaches are often evaluated collectively, while white coaches, our peers, are evaluated individually,” said former San Jose State head coach Fitz Hill, who is Black. “That’s the difference. And that’s because when you look at minorities, you group minorities. That’s just a rational cognitive process.”

That doesn’t make it fair, however, Hill said.

After another round of firings and hirings in college football, USA TODAY Sports updated its historical data on Black head coaches and gathered additional context to put the fallout from Moore’s firing into perspective from the standpoint of race. The picture it paints isn’t exactly bright.

What it means and why it might get worse

The data compiled by USA TODAY Sports shows Black coaches still rarely get second chances after failures, primarily because they seldom get first chances. There are only 14 Black head coaches out of 136 schools in the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS), where nearly half the players are Black. That’s down from 17 out of 120 major college teams in 2011.

Meanwhile, the SEC hasn’t had a non-interim Black head coach since 2020. Out of 34 coaches in the Big Ten and SEC, 33 are white and one is Black.

In the bigger picture, all of this comes against the backdrop of colleges living in fear of the Trump Administration’s crackdown on efforts to improve diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI).

“I’m afraid that in the current climate, where DEI and efforts along those lines have been really sidelined in a major way, that it’s going to get worse, not better,” said Richard Lapchick, founder of Institute for Sport and Social Justice.

Short list of Black coaches with second chances vs. white coaches

In all of college football history, only five Black coaches have been given second chances as non-interim head coaches in the Power Four conferences after previously being fired from another head coaching job in the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS), according to USA TODAY Sports research. It’s a short list: Tyrone Willingham, Mike Locksley, Kevin Sumlin, Karl Dorrell and James Franklin, who recently was hired at Virginia Tech after getting fired from Penn State in the Big Ten.

Outside the Power Four leagues, only three Black head coaches in FBS history have gotten second chances after firings as FBS coaches: Charlie Strong, Willie Taggart and Derek Mason.

By contrast, 17 current white head coaches in the FBS are on their second or third chance after previously getting fired as an FBS head coach, including three in the Big Ten and two in the SEC. New LSU coach Lane Kiffin, who is white, even was considered the hottest candidate on the market after previously being fired as head coach of Southern California and the NFL’s Oakland Raiders.

White coaches survive scandals, too

Several white head coaches also have survived getting arrested or hiding an extramarital affair with a staff member to get a second chance as head coach. But some don’t think Moore will get that same opportunity despite leading Michigan to a 9-3 record in 2025. He violated school policy for hiding an extramarital affair with a staff member and then got arrested for allegedly invading her home after his firing.

“Will Moore get the same second chances his white counterparts receive?” asked Sandy Young, CEO of J. Walcher Communications, which specializes in crisis communications. “In today’s society, in which race is ‘othered’ and simplified as ‘persons of color bad’ and ‘white people good,’ Moore may have blown his one chance.”

Why don’t Black coaches get second chances?

Several factors help explain it, including that people hiring head coaches are often white and tend to hire those like themselves. Of the 131 athletic directors who oversaw FBS football programs in 2022, 100 were white, according to the most recent leadership report card from the University of Central Florida.

Another reason relates to Hill’s comment about how minorities are unfairly “grouped” together despite their individual differences. For example, after Charlie Strong was fired as head coach at Texas in 2016, he seemed to recognize this effect in comments he made to Fox Sports. He later was hired as head coach at South Florida, outside the power conferences. But he worried his failure at Texas would be symbolic.

‘When you’re the first minority coach at a major university like that, you feel like there’s so many people counting on you,’ Strong said then. ‘I got upset at myself for not being successful, and I got upset at myself because you feel like you let a lot of people down. There are only so many African-American coaches, so when you get on a stage like that. …’

Likewise, former NFL safety Ryan Clark said the same applies to the effect of the Moore firing at Michigan.

“He not only failed himself, but a community of coaches,” Clark said on Instagram. “Had he succeeded the next ‘Sherrone Moore’ would have a favorable comp during his interview process. If you’re Michigan’s AD would you be comfortable hiring someone who reminded you of your dismissed former coach?”

Few schools ever have hired more than two Black coaches

The “grouping” of minority coaches after they have failed also is supported by the evidence only four major college teams have hired at least three Black coaches in their history: Colorado, Stanford, Kent State and Bowling Green.

After Hill was forced out at San Jose State in 2004, he said he told a school administrator he hoped his lack of success didn’t keep the school from considering a person of color as his replacement.

“Do you really think there’s somebody out there we should consider?” the administrator asked, according to Hill.

 “By your statement, I realize you do not understand the challenges,” Hill said he replied.

San Jose State never hired a non-interim Black head coach after that. Its current coach, Ken Niumatalolo, is Samoan.

Deion Sanders made a similar point

Colorado is the only FBS school to have hired four non-interim Black head coaches, two of whom were fired.  

Current Colorado coach Deion Sanders addressed this same issue when he was hired by Colorado athletic director Rick George in December 2022. Sanders, who is Black, replaced Karl Dorrell, who is Black and was fired after an 0-5 start in 2022. Dorrell had replaced Mel Tucker, who is Black and left Colorado after one season in 2019 to become head coach at Michigan State.

“Rick, thank you once again, because there are several African-American head coaches around the country that were terminated, and they were not replaced by an African-American coach,” Sanders said then. “But you had the audacity to do such a thing, not only to do such a thing on this time but several times you’ve done such a thing. So I thank you for your nerve. I thank you for your courage. I thank you for seeing past the color and the ethnicity.”

The Mel Tucker and Sherrone Moore ‘grouping’

Another undercurrent to the firing of Moore was that Michigan State fired Tucker in 2023 after rape survivor Brenda Tracy said Tucker made sexual comments about her and masturbated during a phone call in 2022.

The similarities of their scandals and their firings from two rival Big Ten schools have led to racist jokes on social media and similar grouping of the two.

“The fact that we are so quick to place (Tucker and Moore) in the same pot shows how stereotypes operate about Black men and sexual promiscuity,” said Lou Moore, a sports history professor at Michigan State who is not related to Sherrone Moore.

Both Tucker and Sherrone Moore instead had separate scandals at separate jobs, the same way other white coaches have but weren’t grouped for it negatively based on race.

“I think the way we have to look at it is that, as bad as it is, it certainly does not paint a picture of anybody else in college sports,” Lapchick said of the Sherrone Moore scandal.

So what’s the answer?

After 110 years of college football starting in 1869, the first Black head coach at the major-college level didn’t come until 1979 — Willie Jeffries at Wichita State.

Since then, USA TODAY Sports counted only 70 total non-interim Black head coaches in major college football history.  In 2005, there were only three. Today there are 14.

So what’s the fairest way forward in the meantime? Casting a wider net for candidates always helps. Hill said it’s about Black coaches getting better “access” to these jobs. Unfortunately, unfair perceptions often override reality.

He authored a 2012 book about the subject titled “Crackback! How College Football Blindsides the Hopes of Black Coaches.”

“Perception always impacts the access in the hiring process,” Hill said. He said this in turn has led to unrealized potential among Black coaches who weren’t given first or second chances. Many schools, such as Alabama, never have hired a non-interim Black head coach.

“What would have happened if Nick Saban (the former Alabama coach) would have been born Black?” Hill asked. “He would have been a great coach that never would have been realized at Alabama.”

Another consideration would help Black coaches, too, as evidenced by the successful rehabilitation of white coaches like Lane Kiffin.

Sometimes failures make a coach better, not worse.

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Amber Glenn set a record-breaking score of 83.05 in the short program, placing her in first.
  • Alysa Liu sits in second place after her own flawless short program earned a score of 81.11.
  • Defending champions Alisa Efimova and Misha Mitrofanov lead the pairs competition after the short program.
  • The U.S. Figure Skating Championships is the final event before the 2026 Winter Olympics team is announced on Sunday, Jan. 11.

ST. LOUIS — A fist pump was all you needed to know about how Amber Glenn’s short program went Wednesday at the 2026 U.S. figure skating championships.

Her performance to “Like a Prayer” by Madonna was a powerful skate that didn’t have a single miss, a truly sensational outing. Her program boasts has one of the hardest degrees of difficulty, and she knew she nailed it when she finished, punctuating it with that emotional fist pump.

The result? A stunning — and record-breaking — score of 83.05, putting her in first ahead of Alysa Liu and Isabeau Levito. She was still emotional even after hearing the result.

‘I was so ecstatic, and for some reason I just felt my grandma with me today and that meant a lot and I think she really got me through this,’ Glenn said after, tears welling in her eyes. ‘It was a whole new experience for me today.’

Get our Chasing Gold Olympics newsletter in your inbox for coverage of your favorite Team USA athletes

Glenn said of all the moments in her long, winding career that this one is at the top.

‘I’m so grateful and happy to share it with these ladies,’ Glenn said of Alysa Liu and Isabeau Levito, who are in second and third, respectively. ‘And I hope we can continue that for the next, like, month and a half.’

For her part, Liu continued her spectacular season, putting up a score of 81.11, which was also a record until Glenn broke it two skaters later. Liu delivered a flawless “Promise” short program, arguably her best one of the season. She was all smiles getting off the ice, her chill vibe the talk of the broadcast.

‘Well, listen, I have a ton of friends here watching and I’m competing with and we all did really good today, so what’s there to be mad about?’ she said after. ‘And I really liked from my performance specifcally, I liked my Biellmann a lot, I liked by Lutz loop.’

Earlier Wednesday, defending national champions Alisa Efimova and Misha Mitrofanov put up the performance of the night for pairs short program, scoring a 75.31. However, their Olympic fate is in limbo.

The championships continue Thursday with the rhythm dance and the men’s short program, when “Quad God” himself Ilia Malinin will take the ice. This is the final event for American skaters before the 2026 Winter Olympics start in February, the last chance to show why skaters belong in Milano Cortina. U.S. Figure Skating will announce the Olympic team on Sunday, Jan. 11.

US figure skating championships results

Alysa Liu, reigning world champion, put up a monster 81.11 only for defending U.S. champion Amber Glenn to blow past it with an 83.05. Here are standings.

  1. Amber Glenn: 83.05 total segment score, 46.14 technical element score, 36.91 program component score.
  2. Alysa Liu: 81.11 total segment score, 43.68 technical element score, 37.43 program component score.
  3. Isabeau Levito: 75.72 total segment score, 40.10 technical element score, 35.62 program component score.
  4. Sarah Everhardt: 71.10 total segment score, 38.90 technical element score, 32.20 program component score.
  5. Bradie Tennell: 69.53 total segment score, 36.27 technical element score, 33.26 program component score.
  6. Starr Andrew: 65.77 total segment score, 34.09 technical element score, 31.68 program component score.
  7. Elyce Lin-Gracey: 65.24 total segment score, 34.52 technical element score, 30.72 program component score.
  8. Josephine Lee: 62.79 total segment score, 32.96 technical element score, 29.83 program component score.
  9. Sherry Zhang: 60.99 total segment score, 31.11 technical element score, 29.88 program component score.
  10. Sophie Joline von Felten: 60.68 total segment score, 34.36 technical element score, 27.32 program component score.
  11. Alina Bonillo: 58.94 total segment score, 32.10 technical element score, 27.84 program component score.
  12. Logan Higase-Chen: 55.22 total segment score, 29.51 technical element score, 26.71 program component score. She had a one-point deduction for a fall.
  13. Sonja Hilmer: 55.00 total segment score, 26.82 technical element score, 28.18 program component score. The crowd actually groaned when her score was announced.
  14. Emilia Nemirovsky: 53.28 total segment score, 26.16 technical element score, 27.12 program component score.
  15. Anabel Wallace: 52.74 total segment score, 28.84 technical element score, 23.90 program component score. The 17-year-old is competing at her first national championships.
  16. Brook Gewalt: 50.59 total segment score, 25.68 technical element score, 24.91 program component score.
  17. Katie Shen: 49.50 total segment score, 24.15 technical element score, 25.35 program component score.
  18. Erica Machida: 49.41 total segment score, 25.32 technical element score, 24.09 program component score.

Amber Glenn puts up record-breaking score

The two-time defending U.S. champion Amber Glenn put on a beautiful short program to ‘Like a Prayer’ by Madonna, the crowd clapping along as the song and program reached a crescendo. Glenn gave a massive fist bump when she finished, began to cry and put her face in her hands, overcome with emotion. She earned an 83.05, good for first place in the standings after the short program.

‘I think that’s the most intense I’ve reacted to any skate ever I’m usually but there was just a feeling today that was so different,’ she said.

Alysa Liu turns in flawless short program

The spectacular season for reigning world champion Alysa Liu continues. She delivered a flawless “Promise” short program, arguably her best one of the season. She was all smiles getting off the ice, and for good reason, scoring a season-best 81.11.

‘The fact that all of us are that good is just, I guess really good for the crowd, like the more people are coming in to watch us, and that fuels like our performances,’ Liu said.

Amber Glenn, Alysa Liu on their friendship

USA TODAY Sports’ Jordan Mendoza spoke to Amber Glenn and Alysa Liu on the tight friendship they have formed. Here’s what they said.

What Liu said about Glenn: “She’s just such a big sister to me. The idea that we compete against each other, it’s so weird to me. I really just see her as one of my friends and truly one of my teammates. I don’t know, doing things with her is really fun.”

When Glenn said about Liu: “It’s been great to have someone that has such a positive outlook on skating and on her career around me. And then on the flip side, I have an extra pair of tights if she rips them and doesn’t have a backup, or I have the schedule ready because she doesn’t have it.”

Sarah Everhardt turns in season-best short program

Two skaters into the final group and there was a new person in first in Sarah Everhardt. She felt like the crowd helped her remember to smile more, and as a result, that helped lead to a season-best score of 71.10. Elyce Lin-Gracey started the group and although she got a 65.24, it will likely keep her out of the top five by the end of the night

Starr Andrews’ routine a crowd favorite

Through two groups and 12 skaters, Starr Andrew ran the women’s short program to sit in first place. Her Beyoncé routine has always been a crowd pleaser, and it was no different this time around, executing another solid performance.

She earned a 65.77, just ahead of Josephine Lee, who had her own good showing. Lee stumbled with her short program at Skate America in November, but she didn’t have any issues with her Shakira-inspired Tango, getting a season-best score of 62.79. Sherry Zhang’s season-best of 60.99 has her in third.

Sonja Hilmer tap dances on ice

One of the coolest performances so far came from Sonja Hilmer, who incorporated tap dancing into her program. Not only was it unique, but she also executed it perfectly with the music and drew a loud applause from the audience.

“This is a concept I’ve been playing with here and there,” Hilmer said afterward.

The crowd actually groaned when Hilmer’s 55.00 score was announced.

Logan Higase-Chen tops Group 1 in short program

A junior champion is on the top step of the senior championship through Group 1 of the women’s short program. Logan Higase-Chen earned a score of 55.22 to put her in first, nearly two points ahead of Emilia Nemirovsky.

The first group featured a few senior championship debuts, including Higase-Chen, the 2024 U.S. junior champion, and Anabel Wallace, who scored a 52.74 in her short programt.

Erica Machida gains buzz with Chappell Roan program

Erica Machida knew just the music to use in the home state of the “Midwest Princess.” In their national debut, Erica performed their short program to Chappell Roan’s “Kaleidoscope” and “Super Graphic Ultra Modern Girl” that got the crowd amped for their performance. 

They earned a score of 49.41, putting them in sixth place after the first group completed their programs

Alisa Efimova, Misha Mitrofanov sit in first after pairs short program

The defending champions are well-positioned to defend their crown with Alisa Efimova and Misha Mitrofanov comfortably in first place after the short program. Their score of 75.31 is more than seven points ahead of Audrey Shin and Balazs Nagy in second place.

It was a justified score as Efimova and Mitrofanov looked miles ahead of the rest of the field, and some other contenders like Ellie Kam and Danny O’Shea, as well as Emily Chan and Spencer Akira Howe, had some big slips.

Efimova and Mitrofanov are a married couple and their story is an intriguing one as Efimova is not an American citizen. From Finland, Efimova is awaiting a ruling on her American citizenship after obtaining her green card approval in July 2024. If she doesn’t obtain it, the pair will not be eligible for the 2026 Winter Olympics.

Pairs figure skating standings

Here are the pairs standings after Wednesday’s short program. The winners will be decided after Friday’s free skate, which starts at 3 p.m.

  1. Alisa Efimova and Misha Mitrofanov: 75.31 total segment score, 41.58 technical score, 33.73 program components score. The defending champions put on the most impressive performance of the night.
  2. Audrey Shin and Balazs Nagy: 67.67 total segment score, 36.99 technical score and 30.68 program component score. The pair skated with confidence, and Shin put her face in her hands in disbelief after putting together the strong showing.
  3. Ellie Kam and Danny O’Shea: 67.13 total segment score, 36.12 technical score, 32.01 program components score. They had one point deducted.
  4. Valentina Plazas and Maximiliano Fernandez: 67.03 total segment score, 37.91 technical score, 29.12 program components score.
  5. Katie McBeath and Daniil Parkman: 66.81 total segment score, 36.78 technical score, 30.03 program components score.
  6. Olivia Flores and Luke Wang: 63.58 total segment score, 35.57 technical score and 28.01 program components score. This marked the pair’s senior national team debut. Wang pumped both his fists and Flores flashed a huge smile when they finished their program.
  7. Chelsea Liu and Ryan Bedard: 62.34 total segment score, 35.27 technical score and 27.07 program components score. Liu came off the ice coughing, battling through illness this week to be able to compete. The pair just came together in July 2025 and have put on some solid showings early on.
  8. Emily Chan and Spencer Akira Howe: 59.29 total segment score, 32.83 technical score, 29.46 program components score. Chan had three mishaps in succession, each worse than the one before. She had a wonky landing on a attempted triple toe, unable to complete a full final rotation. She fell on a transition and fell on an attempted throw.
  9. Naomi Williams and Lachlan Lewer: 55.09 total segment score, 30.97 technical score and 25.12 program components score. They had a one-point deduction for a fall. The pair, in their third season together, did a chest bump and laughed before starting their program.
  10. Linzy Fitzpatrick and Keyton Bearinger: 54.56 total segment score, 30.41 technical score and 24.15 program components score. The pair had to wait seemingly longer than usual — 8 minutes — for their scores to be announced.

Judges for women’s short program

  • Judge No. 1: Mr. Richard Perez
  • Judge No. 2: Ms. Jennifer Thompson
  • Judge No. 3: Mr. Jeffrey Charbonneau
  • Judge No. 4: Ms. Stefanie Mathewson
  • Judge No. 5: Ms. Deborah Currie
  • Judge No. 6: Ms. Karen Perreault
  • Judge No. 7: Ms. Joy Jin
  • Judge No. 8: Ms. Dawn Eyerly
  • Judge No. 9: Ms. Katherine Specht

Here is the technical panel.

  • Referee: Ms. Peggy Graham
  • Technical Controller: Mr. Robert Rosenbluth
  • Technical Specialist: Ms. Julie Newman
  • Technical Specialist: Ms. Cynthia Stevenson

Skaters from 2025 plane crash honored

Before the event began, U.S. Figure Skating honored the 28 athletes, coaches and parents that were killed in the January 2025 plane crash. On Jan. 29, 2025 near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in Arlington, Virginia, an Army helicopter collided with American Airlines Flight 5342, resulting in 67 deaths.

The skaters, coaches and parents were returning from a development camp in Wichita, Kansas, which was held in conjunction with the 2025 U.S. Figure Skating Championships.

A moment of silence was held and the skaters were shown on the jumbotron inside the arena.

When does Ilia Malinin compete?

The ‘Quad God’ himself takes the first on Thursday night for his short program.

Pairs short program judges

Here were the nine judges for pairs short program.

  • Judge No. 1: Mr. Hal Marron
  • Judge No. 2: Ms. Stefanie Mathewson
  • Judge No. 3: Ms. Sheren Chiang
  • Judge No. 4: Ms. Dawn Eyerly
  • Judge No. 5: Ms. Lorrie Parker
  • Judge No. 6: Ms. Gale Tanger
  • Judge No. 7: Ms. Katherine Specht
  • Judge No. 8: Ms. Danielle Hartsell Minnis
  • Judge No. 9: Ms. Karen Perreault

Here is the technical panel.

  • Referee: Mr. Aristeo Brito
  • Technical Controller: Ms. Deveny Deck
  • Technical Specialist: Mr. Steven Hsu
  • Technical Specialist: Ms. Dana Graham

Types of figure skating jumps

  • Toe jump: A skater drives the toe pick of their non-takeoff foot into the ice to launch themselves into the air and generate momentum into the jump.
    • Toe loop: A skater takes off backward and lands on the same back edge of their blade.
    • Lutz: A skater moving backward jumps off the back outside edge of their skate and uses the toe-pick of their other skate to catapult into the air in the opposite direction and lands on the back outside edge of the picking leg.
    • Flip: A skater launches off the back inside edge of one skate and lands on the back outside edge of the other skate.
  • Edge jump: A skater takes off not with their toe pick but off the edge of their skate.
    • Salchow: A skater launches off the back inside edge of one skate and lands on the back outside edge of their other skate.
    • Axel: The only forward-facing jump, a skater lands on the back outside edge of their non-takeoff foot while traveling backward. The axel is the hardest jump because of the extra half-revolution that comes with a forward takeoff and a backward landing.
    • Loop: The skater jumps off a back outside edge of their skate and lands on the same edge.

When is US Olympic figure skating team named?

The team will be named on Sunday, Jan. 11 at 2 p.m. Three men and three women singles skaters will be chosen, as will three ice dance teams and two pairs, 16 athletes in all. The USFS selection process includes past performances, focusing on the athlete’s body of work over the past two seasons.

Ice dancing vs. figure skating

Ice dancing does not feature jumps or lifts, like you see figure skating pairs execute. Ice dancing is made up of two segments, the rhythm dance and the free dance.

Why US has never won Olympic gold in pairs figure skating

As you watch the pairs short program today at the U.S. national championships and perhaps wonder how the United States has performed in pairs skating over the years at the Olympic Games, here’s a primer, which is short and not-so-sweet. 

Americans have never won an Olympic gold medal in pairs skating. That is not a typo. It has never happened, and Olympic pairs competition goes back to 1908.

The last time a U.S. pair earned an Olympic medal was 1988. That was Jill Watson and Peter Oppegard, who won the bronze medal at the Calgary Olympic Games. Four years earlier, the Carruthers siblings — Kitty and Peter — won silver at the 1984 Sarajevo Olympics. Four other U.S. pairs going back even further in the history books won either silver or bronze from 1932-1964. That’s it: 26 Winter Olympic pairs competitions, six U.S. medals, none of them gold.

The population of the United States is around 340 million. It is one of the great sports mysteries of our time that a nation this big could not find one young woman and one young man talented enough to skate together as a pair to become Olympic champions. But so far, no — and it’s not going to happen this year either as U.S. pairs, try as they might, are not expected to come close to a medal in Milan. 

Why has this happened over and over again? One strong possibility is that the focus and fame in U.S. figure skating traditionally has come in the singles events, from Peggy Fleming and Dorothy Hamill to Scott Hamilton and Brian Boitano. (Although the U.S. definitely has upped its game in ice dance over the past 20 years.) 

Throughout its history, the United States has been known as a nation of individualists. That clearly is true on the ice as well. 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Trae Young era in Atlanta is over.

The Atlanta Hawks are trading Young to the Washington Wizards in exchange for CJ McCollum and Corey Kispert, a person with knowledge of the deal told USA TODAY Sports.

The person spoke on the condition of anonymity because the deal was not yet official.

A breakup between the Hawks and their longtime face of the franchise had been inevitable for some time, and an ESPN report earlier Wednesday indicated that Washington was Young’s preferred trade destination.

The 27-year-old, four-time All-Star gets his wish and a fresh start in the nation’s capital.

Trae Young trade details

This is a rare player for players deal, with no draft picks involved.

Young, the fifth overall pick in the 2018 NBA Draft who’s spent his whole career in Atlanta, is going to Washington. The Hawks get back 13-year veteran CJ McCollum and Corey Kispert, the 15th overall pick in the 2021 NBA Draft.

Trae Young contract

Young’s cap hit is nearly $46 million this season and he has a player option for 2026-27, which means he could become a free agent this summer. ESPN’s Shams Charania reported that the Wizards ‘are not expected to have immediate extension talks with Young.’

McCollum’s cap hit is close to $31 million and he will be a free agent after the season. Kispert is under contract through 2029 (when including a club option) and he sports a modest cap hit south of $14 million.

Trae Young stats

In 10 games this season, Young has averaged 19.3 points and 8.9 assists.

McCollum, 34, has averaged 18.8 points, 3.5 rebounds and 3.5 assists in 35 games. Kispert, 26, has averaged 9.2 points in 19 games.

This story has been updated with new information.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY