Author

admin

Browsing

The Chicago Bears and Green Bay Packers rivalry dates back to the earliest days of the NFL, and yet they’ve only ever met in the playoffs two times.

A new chapter will be added in the storied history of these teams in the wild-card round of this year’s postseason, when the Bears host the Packers for a third matchup this year. Chicago and Green Bay each won its home game in the two divisional clashes during the regular season, so this meeting in the playoffs will serve as something of a high-stakes rubber match for the season series.

It’s also a rubber match for the all-time postseason series. The Bears won the first playoff matchup between the two teams in 1941. It took over 60 years for the next postseason meeting in 2010, when the Packers won the NFC championship en route to a Super Bowl 45 victory.

Here’s what to know ahead of Chicago’s first home playoff game in seven years:

Bears vs. Packers wild card game odds

The Bears hold a very slight edge over the Packers in the wild-card matchup, according to the BetMGM NFL odds as of Jan. 5. Not interested in this game? Check out expert picks and best bets for every NFL game this week.

  • Spread: Bears (-1)
  • Moneyline: Bears (-110); Packers (-110)
  • Over/under: 46

Our guide to NFL betting odds, picks and spreads has you covered.

New to sports betting? USA TODAY readers can claim exclusive promos and bonus codes with the best online sportsbooks and sports betting sites.

Bears vs. Packers matchups to watch

Ben Johnson vs. Matt LaFleur

Two of the game’s best offensive minds are set to meet in another head-to-head matchup. We’ve seen plenty of this before, when Johnson was the Lions’ offensive coordinator playing the Packers twice per year. But we’ve only seen the two face off as head coaches twice – earlier this year – and never with the stakes so high. Expect to see both of these young masterminds reach deep in their bag to pull out any and everything they can to put more points on the board and move on to the divisional round.

Jordan Love and Packers WRs vs. Bears passing defense

Love was knocked out of the latter matchup between these two teams earlier this year with a head injury, but he put on a show against the Bears in the earlier regular season meeting, throwing for 234 yards and three touchdowns. Chicago’s defense led the NFL in takeaways during the regular season, boosted by a league-leading 23 interceptions as a defense – including one against Love.

The Bears’ takeaway-focused defensive strategy had major boom-or-bust potential all year – Chicago still had the 10th-worst scoring defense despite the turnovers – and they’ll need to figure out how to stop Love and the Packers’ young wideouts without relying so heavily on interceptions.

Packers’ Micah Parsons-less pass-rush vs. Bears O-line and Caleb Williams

In the first 15 weeks of the season, when Green Bay had their prized offseason acquisition healthy, the Packers ranked seventh in dropback success rate allowed (43.9%) and had 34 sacks as a team with 61 tackles for a loss. Since Parsons’ injury in Week 15, Green Bay is allowing the sixth-highest success rate on dropbacks (53.2%) and had two sacks as a team – both by third-stringers against Max Brosmer in Week 18 – with 11 TFLs.

The Bears’ re-tooled offensive line has been one of its biggest strengths this year, and Williams evades sacks better than almost any other starting quarterback. His 10.8% pressure-to-sack rate is third-lowest of quarterbacks with nine or more starts this year. The Packers are going to have a hard time getting to the quarterback in this matchup and are still looking for their first win without Parsons active.

Early prediction for Bears vs. Packers

  • Bears 24, Packers 23

It’s a division game in the playoffs. If the first two games these two teams played in the regular season were any indication, this one is also coming down to the wire.

Ultimately, the Packers have looked like a different (read: weaker) team since Parsons suffered his season-ending ACL tear. Quarterback Jordan Love’s absence with a concussion did nothing to help their outlook as they lost four straight to end the season, but at least they’re getting him back for this game.

Week 18 weirdness aside, the Bears have looked resurgent in their first season under Johnson, particularly on offense. Williams has taken a step forward in his second season as a pro, and the offensive line is suddenly among the league’s best, opening up more possibilities in the run and passing games.

Green Bay has won three playoff games since LaFleur took over as head coach in 2019 and only one in the last four years. The injury to Parsons and lack of home-field advantage thanks to their four-game slide down the stretch may be enough to keep LaFleur and the Packers from a fourth playoff win since 2019 and first in two years.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Perth, Australia (ABN Newswire) – Altech Batteries Ltd (ASX:ATC,OTC:ALTHF) (FRA:A3Y) (OTCMKTS:ALTHF) announced that binding conditional funding approval in the amount of 46.11 million Euro has now been granted for the CERENERGY(R) Sodium-Chloride Solid-State battery project in Saxony, Germany. The grant approval materially derisks project funding and supports progression toward construction of the planned 120 MWh CERENERGY(R) battery manufacturing facility in Saxony, Germany.

Highlights

– Altech Batteries GmbH’s CERENERGY(R) battery project has received conditional binding funding approval under Germany’s federal ‘STARK’ economic development program.

– The approval relates to a grant covering approximately 30% of eligible project CAPEX, with funding of up to EUR46.11M.

– The funding commitment is conditional on achieving full project financial close by 30 June 2026 and parliamentary approval of funds under Germany’s 2026 Federal Budget.

Conditional Binding Funding Commitment

The funding is being provided as part of the federal STARK program, which is supported by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy in cooperation with the EU. The aim of this program is to lead regions undergoing structural change into an ecologically, economically and socially sustainable future.

With the approval of the funding, the project has successfully completed the second and decisive stage of the approval process. The funding covers approximately 30% of the eligible investment costs and represents a significant milestone for the construction of the planned 120 MWh CERENERGY(R) battery factory in Germany.

This decision underscores the importance of the innovative CERENERGY(R) technology, which is being developed in collaboration with the Fraunhofer Society. The Sodium-Chloride Solid-State battery offers a safe, sustainable and strategically independent alternative to lithium-ion batteries and is expected to play an important role in future stationary energy storage solutions – especially for the European market.

Mr Daniel Raihani, Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer, commented ‘Securing conditional binding funding approval of up to EUR46.11 million under Germany’s STARK program is a major milestone for the CERENERGY(R) project. The support reflects the strategic importance of establishing advanced, nonlithium energy storage manufacturing capability in Europe and recognises the technical progress achieved to date in collaboration with Fraunhofer IKTS.

‘Importantly, the grant materially de-risks the project’s capital structure by covering approximately 30% of eligible investment costs and provides a strong foundation as we progress toward full project financing and construction of the planned 120 MWh production facility in Saxony, Germany.

‘We remain focused on completing financial close by mid-2026 and advancing the CERENERGY(R) technology toward commercial deployment to support long-duration, safe and sustainable stationary energy storage solutions for the European market’.

As is customary for projects of this size, the funding commitment is subject to final financial close of the CERENERGY(R) battery project by June 2026 and budgetary approval of the funds in the 2026 federal budget.

*To view tables and figures, please visit:
https://abnnewswire.net/lnk/918BT5H8

About Altech Batteries Ltd:

Altech Batteries Limited (ASX:ATC,OTC:ALTHF) (FRA:A3Y) is a specialty battery technology company that has a joint venture agreement with world leading German battery institute Fraunhofer IKTS (‘Fraunhofer’) to commercialise the revolutionary CERENERGY(R) Sodium Alumina Solid State (SAS) Battery. CERENERGY(R) batteries are the game-changing alternative to lithium-ion batteries. CERENERGY(R) batteries are fire and explosion-proof; have a life span of more than 15 years and operate in extreme cold and desert climates. The battery technology uses table salt and is lithium-free; cobalt-free; graphite-free; and copper-free, eliminating exposure to critical metal price rises and supply chain concerns.

The joint venture is commercialising its CERENERGY(R) battery, with plans to construct a 100MWh production facility on Altech’s land in Saxony, Germany. The facility intends to produce CERENERGY(R) battery modules to provide grid storage solutions to the market.

Source:
Altech Batteries Ltd

Contact:
Daniel Raihani
Managing Director
Altech Batteries Limited
Tel: +61-8-6168-1555
Email: info@altechgroup.com

Martin Stein
Chief Financial Officer
Altech Batteries Limited
Tel: +61-8-6168-1555
Email: info@altechgroup.com

News Provided by ABN Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Investor Insight

Centurion Minerals offers investors an early-stage entry point into a strategically located gold exploration company positioned within one of North America’s most prolific and active mining districts. With a restructured corporate foundation, and a highly experienced geological and corporate finance team, the company is primed for value-creating discoveries.

investingnews.com

Overview

Centurion Minerals (TSXV:CTN) is a Canadian exploration company focused on the acquisition, exploration and development of precious metals projects in the Americas.

The company’s strategy is centered on advancing high-quality, early-stage gold assets through systematic exploration to define drill-ready targets and unlock the discovery potential inherent in its three-part claim package: the Newman, Noseworthy and Hepburn properties. Situated near major operations and new discoveries, these claims benefit from excellent infrastructure, year-round road access and proximity to proven mineralized structural corridors. Centurion intends to increase shareholder value through targeted geophysics, ground truthing and drilling programs designed to reveal new high-grade zones, as well as through potential future acquisitions of complementary gold assets across the Americas.

Backed by a leadership team with decades of exploration, geology, corporate finance and project development experience, Centurion is positioned to capitalize on strong gold market fundamentals and renewed investor interest in junior exploration companies. With a low current valuation and advancing work program, the company provides leverage to both exploration success and broader trends in the gold sector.

Company Highlights

  • Highly prospective gold project in a world-class district located in the central north Abitibi greenstone belt, adjacent to major deposits and producing mines including Hecla Mining’s (NYSE:HL) Casa Berardi mine and Agnico Eagle’s (TSX:AEM) Detour Lake operations.
  • Exceptional closeology advantage, with its Casa Berardi West project situated just 12 km from AMEX Exploration’s (TSXV:AMX) 1.6 Moz “Perron” discovery and along the same structural corridors that have produced multi-million-ounce deposits.
  • Significant historic drilling across the three claim groups, including results up to 38 g/t gold and multiple intervals indicating gold-bearing iron formations and shear zones.
  • Clear exploration strategy including historic data compilation, geophysical surveys, target generation and a planned program to define new mineralized zones.
  • Experienced management and technical team with decades of experience in mineral exploration, and international corporate finance, enhances the potential of uncovering additional exploration opportunities.
  • Low market capitalization and recently reactivated corporate structure, offering investors a low entry point ahead of meaningful upside catalysts.

Key Project

Casa Berardi West Gold Project

The Casa Berardi West project is Centurion’s flagship gold exploration asset, encompassing approximately 6,732 hectares across three contiguous claim groups – Newman, Noseworthy and Hepburn – located 66 km northeast of Cochrane, Ontario. The project sits along structural corridors that host some of the region’s most significant deposits, including Hecla Mining’s Casa Berardi mine (3 Moz past production, plus 4 Moz in reserves and resources), Agnico Eagle’s Detour Lake mine (15 Moz reserve, producing ~659,000 oz of gold per year ), and AMEX Exploration’s Perron discovery (1.6 Moz measured and indicated resource at 6.14 g/t gold).

Location of the three claim groups at Casa Berardi West

Geological Setting & Closeology Advantage

The project is situated within the central north Abitibi Subprovince, an Archean greenstone belt known globally for its prolific endowment of gold and base metals. The claims lie adjacent to geological features associated with multiple major deposits – iron formations, shear zones and VMS trends – creating strong analogues to high-grade gold mines such as the Musselwhite mine in Northern Ontario.

This “closeology” positioning significantly enhances the potential for Centurion’s ground to host similar mineralization.

Historic Results & Target Areas

Historic exploration across the Casa Berardi West project – spanning more than 70 RC and diamond drill holes – has already confirmed the presence of gold-bearing structures and favorable host rocks. Notably, previous work returned multiple samples above 1 g/t gold, including a standout result of 38 g/t gold, demonstrating strong mineralization potential across the claim area.

Significant historic drill results at Newman target

Across the three claim groups, drilling and geophysical surveys have identified key geological features associated with major deposits in the region, including iron formations, shear zones and sulphidized horizons. Several zones of interest remain untested or underexplored, particularly along structural trends that extend from nearby high-grade gold and VMS systems such as the Perron and Normetal areas.

These findings provide Centurion with multiple high-priority target areas for follow-up exploration, forming the foundation for its next phase of geophysical work and upcoming drill targeting.

Management Team

David Tafel – Director, President and CEO

David Tafel brings over 30 years of experience in corporate structuring, strategic planning, financing and executive management across multiple public and private resource companies. He has raised several hundred million dollars for ventures in mining, technology and life sciences, and previously managed private investment funds at Canada’s largest independent securities firm.

Jeremy Wright – Director and CFO

A seasoned financial executive with more than 20 years of experience, Jeremy Wright serves as president & CEO of Seatrend Strategy Group and has held CFO roles across numerous public companies in the resource and technology sectors. His background includes financial management, negotiations and environmental economics, supported by extensive board leadership experience.

Joseph Del Campo – Director

Joseph Del Campo has served as CFO and Interim CEO across several mining companies, including Unigold and First Nickel. With decades of corporate financial leadership and board experience, he contributes deep governance, audit and operational oversight expertise to Centurion’s board.

Mike Kilbourne – Geological Consultant

A veteran geologist with 40+ years of industry experience, Mike Kilbourne has managed over 100,000 metres of drilling across North America and Mexico, worked as a production geologist in multiple mining environments, and generated over 700 exploration targets for private and public companies.

Jamie Lavigne – Geological Consultant

Jamie Lavigne is a senior exploration geologist with more than 30 years of experience in base and precious metals. He has held senior technical roles with major mining companies and specializes in advanced exploration, resource delineation and geological modeling across global mineral belts.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

From established players to up-and-coming firms, Canada’s pharmaceutical landscape is diverse and dynamic.

Canadian drug companies are working to discover and develop major innovations amidst an increasingly competitive global landscape. Rising technologies such as artificial intelligence are playing a role in the landscape as well.

Read on to learn about what’s been driving the share prices of the best-performing Canadian pharma stocks.

1. HLS Therapeutics (TSX:HLS)

Year-on-year gain: 26.6 percent
Market cap: C$149.8 million
Share price: C$4.76

HLS Therapeutics focuses on drugs for cardiovascular and central nervous system problems, often through partnerships. The company specializes in acquiring and commercializing pharmaceuticals that address unmet needs, including Vascepa to reduce cardiovascular risk and Clozaril for treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

HLS in-licensed the exclusive rights to the treatments Nilemdo and Nexlizet, both of which are already approved in other countries, from Esperion (NASDAQ:ESPR) in May.

The November 2025 Health Canada approval of LDL-cholesterol lowering treatment Nilemdo represents the most significant catalyst for the company since the launch of Vascepa, positioning HLS as a dominant leader in the Canadian cardiovascular market. The company is targeting Nilemdo’s commercial launch in Q2 2026.

Along with the approval, Health Canada issued a notice of non-compliance for its Nexlizet cholesterol-reducing treatment. According to HLS, the decision was related to chemistry, manufacture and controls data, not clinical data or safety.

Additionally, the company generates revenue from a diversified portfolio of royalty interests on various products marketed by third parties.

2. Satellos Bioscience (TSXV:MSCL)

Year-on-year gain: 14.49 percent
Market cap: C$141.04 million
Share price: C$0.79

Satellos Bioscience is a Canadian pharmaceutical company expanding treatment options for muscle disorders. The company has focused specifically on Duchenne muscular dystrophy, developing therapies that target the specific biological pathways involved in regenerating and repairing muscle tissue.

Its lead candidate, SAT-3247, targets a protein called AAK1, which regulates the activity of stem cells that activate and differentiate new muscle fibers.

In Q4 2025, Satellos administered the first dose to a patient in its 11-month open-label follow-up study for adults who completed its initial Phase 1b trial. The study seeks to demonstrate the lasting impact of the significant functional improvements observed earlier in the year.

On December 9, the company received Investigational New Drug (IND) clearance from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and several other global regulators to initiate BASECAMP, a global Phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate SAT-3247 in pediatric patients.

3. Knight Therapeutics (TSX:GUD)

Year-on-year gain: 14.29 percent
Market cap: C$592.59 million
Share price: C$6.00

Knight Therapeutics is a specialty pharmaceutical company headquartered in Montreal, Québec. It operates on an acquisition and in-licensing model, obtaining the rights to innovative medicines from global pharmaceutical companies and commercializing them across Canada and Latin America.

The company was originally founded by the former leaders of Paladin Labs, which was acquired by Endo International in 2014. In June 2025, Knight bought the Paladin business back from Endo for C$107 million, adding over 40 products to Knight’s Canadian roster.

The additions, helped drive 32 percent revenue growth year-over-year to a record C$122.55 million in Q3. The company projects its Knight Canada subsidiary will be the company’s top revenue-contributor within two years.

4. BioSyent (TSXV:RX)

Year-on-year gain: 10.07 percent
Market cap: C$146.89 million
Share price: C$12.90

BioSyent is a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on in-licensing or acquiring established, high-margin healthcare products for the Canadian and international markets. Its growth is anchored by brands in iron health and women’s wellness. Its flagship brand, FeraMAX, has been Canada’s leading iron supplement for over a decade.

The company’s 2024 acquisition of Tibella, a treatment for menopausal symptoms, has been a major growth driver. According to its Q3 earnings report. BioSyent’s sales grew 19 percent year-over-year in Canada and 94 percent in the international market.

5. NurExone Biologic (TSXV:NRX)

Year-on-year gain: 6.45 percent
Market cap: C$47.54 million
Share price: C$0.66

NurExone Biologic is behind ExoTherapy, a drug-delivery platform that uses exosomes, which are nano-sized extracellular vesicles, to create treatments for central nervous system disorders, spinal cord injuries and traumatic brain injuries. It is a less invasive alternative to cell transplantation, which requires surgery and carries the risk of rejection.

NurExone’s first nano-drug, ExoPTEN, uses a proprietary sIRNA sequence delivered with the ExoTherapy platform to treat spinal cord injuries. ExoPTEN received orphan drug designation from the US FDA in October 2023.

The company expects to initiate its Phase 1/2a first-in-human trial for acute spinal cord injury in the second half of 2026, targeting patients with traumatic injuries.

It continues to make significant progress, with recent preclinical studies demonstrating strong, dose-dependent vision recovery in glaucoma models and improved motor function in spinal cord injury models.

The company announced plans for a US exosome production facility in Indianapolis, Indiana, in September. According to the release, ‘The GMP compliant site would produce exosomes both for NurExone’s therapeutic pipeline and for a growing business-to-business opportunity in regenerative aesthetics.’

In December, the company began planning for small-scale production of ExoPTEN in Israel to support its clinical trial.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Here’s a quick recap of the crypto landscape for Monday (January 5) as of 9:00 p.m. UTC.

Get the latest insights on Bitcoin, Ether and altcoins, along with a round-up of key cryptocurrency market news.

Bitcoin and Ether price update

Bitcoin (BTC) was priced at US$94,127.01, up by 3.2 percent over 24 hours.

Bitcoin price performance, January 6, 2025.

Chart via TradingView.

Bitcoin started Monday strong, rising above US$92,000 in early trading before briefly breaking US$94,600, signaling a potential shift in near-term momentum after a bruising finish to 2025.

Research firm 10X said the move reflects a return to more normalized trading volumes and early signs of renewed institutional positioning at the start of the year. The firm notes that Bitcoin is holding above key moving averages, with the 21 day line emerging as a critical support level for maintaining upside bias.

It added that the shift suggests growing expectations for a push toward the US$100,000 level. The rebound follows three consecutive monthly declines — a historically rare pattern that has often preceded January recoveries.

“The strength across crypto and traditional safe havens reflects a rebalancing phase driven by geopolitical risk and liquidity positioning,” said Lacie Zhang, a research analyst at Bitget Wallet.

“In this setup, Bitcoin has room to push toward US$105,000, while Ethereum could test US$3,600, as traders balance inflation risks with crypto’s deflationary characteristics and long-term adoption narrative.’

Zhang said DeFi is currently driving significant growth, with protocols such as Uniswap (UNI) and Aave (AAVE) seeing benefits from improved governance, new revenue-sharing frameworks and institutional investor involvement.

“For large-cap altcoins, XRP and Solana stand out: XRP’s role in cross-border payments and improving regulatory clarity, combined with ETF inflows, could support price ranges of US$5 – US$10, while Solana’s high-throughput ecosystem and network expansion position it for US$500 – US$800 over the next growth phase.

“The renewed surge in memecoin activity reflects improving retail risk appetite,” she added. “It’s not a long-term thesis, but often a precursor to liquidity rotating into higher-quality, utility-driven altcoins as the cycle matures.”

Ether (ETH) was priced at US$3,239.82, up by 3.2 percent over the last 24 hours.

Altcoin price update

  • XRP (XRP) was priced at US$2.31, up by 10.4 percent over 24 hours.
  • Solana (SOL) was trading at US$137.92, up by three percent over 24 hours.

Today’s crypto news to know

Crypto investment products pull in US$47.2 billion in 2025

Global crypto exchange-traded products attracted US$47.2 billion in net inflows in 2025, falling just short of the prior year’s record despite a noticeable slowdown in Bitcoin demand, according to CoinShares.

Bitcoin-focused products added US$26.9 billion, a sharp drop from 2024 levels, as price weakness dampened inflows and modest interest emerged in short-bitcoin vehicles. The cooling in Bitcoin was offset by a surge into select altcoins, led by Ethereum products, which posted US$12.7 billion in inflows.

Meanwhile, XRP and Solana funds followed closely as each recorded multibillion-dollar inflows and triple-digit percentage growth year over year.

Japan signals crypto integration across traditional markets

Satsuki Katayama, Japan’s finance minister, has signaled stronger government backing for integrating digital assets into the country’s stock and commodities exchanges.

Speaking at the Tokyo Stock Exchange, she emphasized the role of exchanges in expanding public access to blockchain-based assets and modern investment tools. She pointed to the US experience with crypto-linked exchange-traded funds (ETFs) as a reference point, even as Japan currently lacks domestically listed crypto ETFs.

Katayama described 2026 as a “digital year,” pledging policy support for exchanges adopting advanced trading technologies. The remarks build on regulatory reforms already underway, including discussions on allowing banks to hold crypto assets and the approval of Japan’s first yen-pegged stablecoin.

Bitget’s tokenized stock milestone and TradFi launch

Bitget’s new Universal Exchange vision has reached two major milestones that signal a major shift in how digital and traditional assets are traded in one place. Bitget announced last week that its tokenized stock volume surpassed US$1 billion, with 95 percent of that total volume occurring in December alone.

Building on that momentum, and following a successful private beta with over 80,000 users, today Bitget officially opened its TradFi trading suite to the public, allowing customers access to 79 different instruments across forex, metals, indices and commodities. These products are traded as contracts for difference and are settled entirely in USDT, meaning crypto-native traders can execute macro strategies without leaving the platform or converting to fiat currency.

During the test phase, XAU/USD recorded over US$100 million in single-day trading volume, one of the highest daily figures observed during the beta.

“Traders want the flexibility to choose between assets in a unified ecosystem,” said Chen.

“They want the freedom to move between crypto and traditional markets as conditions change. TradFi going public is about giving them that accessibility in one place, without friction.”

The move signals a broader shift in how exchanges are evolving, not just as venues for speculation, but as comprehensive gateways to global markets under a unified trading experience.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The USA’s quarterfinal ouster means the world junior hockey championship will have a new champion.

And Canada’s loss to Czechia in Sunday’s semifinal means North America’s six-year run is also over.

Sweden (2012) and Czechia (2001) will look to end long gold medal droughts at the tournament for the world’s best under-20 players when they face off in Monday’s championship game (8:30 p.m. ET, NHL Network).

Sweden got past Finland 4-3 in a shootout, avenging a loss in last year’s semifinal. Draft-eligible Ivar Stenberg had a goal and an assist and Chicago Blackhawks draft pick Anton Frondell scored the shootout winner.

Czechia ended Canada’s gold medal hopes for the third year in a row with a 6-4 victory, a wild back-and-forth game that saw Canadian Michael Hage awarded back-to-back penalty shots. Czechia’s Vojtech Cihar scored twice and Tomas Poletin had the winning goal go in off his skate.

Canada and Finland will play for the bronze medal on Monday at 4:30 p.m. ET.

Canada vs. Czechia highlights

Medal games

Monday’s schedule at the world junior championships:

Bronze medal: Canada vs. Finland, 4:30 p.m. ET

Gold medal: Sweden vs. Czechia, 8:30 p.m. ET

Best players

Canada – Tij Iginla, Zayne Parekh, Sam O’Reilly

Czechia – Adam Jiricek, Petr Sikora, Tomas Galvas

Final score: Czechia 6, Canada 4

Czechia will advance to the gold medal game against Sweden. This is the third year in a row that the Czechs have beaten the Canadians in the playoffs. Canada will face Finland for the bronze medal.

Gavin McKenna out of game

He receives two minutes for abuse of officials, plus a misconduct.

Czechia scores empty-netter

Vojtech Cihar gets his second goal of the game. Canadian players are furious. Czechia 6, Canada 4

Canada penalized

Cole Reschny is called for goalie interference.

Czechia retakes lead

The puck goes in off Tomas Poletin’s skate with 1:14 left. It’s reviewed and the goal is upheld. Czechia 5, Canada 4.

Canada’s Porter Martone ties game

The captain scores off a rebound with 2:41 left. Canada 4, Czechia 4

Czechia power play

Gavin McKenna is called for cross-checking. It was reviewed for a possible five minutes, but was ruled to be only two minutes. But the penalty ends early when the Czechs are called for too many on the ice, so it will be 4-on-4. Then Michael Misa is penalized for putting his hand on the puck on a faceoff, so it’s 4-on-3. Now we’re back to 5-on-5.

Czechia retakes the lead

Vojtech Cihar enters the zone with speed, fights off a check and roofs a shot to give Czechia the lead with 10:11 left. Czechia 4, Canada 3

Cole Reschny ties game for Canada

Reschny makes a power move to the front of the net and ties the game at 3:59. Canada 3, Czechia 3

Third period underway

3-2 Czechia. Winner will face Sweden in the gold medal game.

End of second: Czechia 3, Canada 2

Czechia goes ahead early in the second period and dominates play. Canada tuns it around to tie the game, but a late turnover leads to a last-minute goal by Adam Benak and a Czech lead. Michal Hage gets two penalty shot attempts and has also hit the post three times in the game.

Czechia retakes lead

The Czechs take advantage of a Canada turnover and break into the zone. Max Curran makes a great pass to Adam Benak for the score with 42 seconds left in the second period. Czechia 3, Canada 2

Michael Hage awarded penalty shot

He’s slashed on a breakaway. Hage is tripped by the goalie on the shootout attempt, so he goes again. He tries the same move, but is stopped. Still 2-2.

Canada ties it up

Zayne Parekh scores. It’s the defenseman’s 11th point of the tournament. There’s still power play remaining. Canada 2, Czechia 2

Canada power play

Petr Sikora is called for slashing and Tomas Poletin is called for delay of game. Two-man advantage for 1:39:

Canada pressing

After being outplayed early in the period, Canada is started to press. Shot counter is not moving, however.

Czechia save

Michal Orsulak stops Tij Iginla in tight. Porter Martone tries to go for the rebound and is wrestled to the ice.

Brady Martin injury update

He won’t return to the game, TSN reports. Big loss for Canada.

Czechia takes the lead

The Czechs pin Canada in its own end and the puck eventually comes to Adam Titlbach, who gives Czechia its first lead of the game. Czechia 2, Canada 1

Second period underway

Czechia has a carryover power play, but it’s over. Canada’s Brady Martin is not on the bench, per TSN.

End of first: Canada 1, Czechia 1

Their first meeting at the tournament featured 12 goals. This is more of a defensive battle. But the action picked up late as Canada’s Tij Iginla and Czechia’s Max Curran swap goals. Canada’s Brady Martin is shown grimacing on the bench after a collision.

Czechia power play

Jett Luchaenko is called for cross-checking after he’s shoved into Czech goalie Michal Orsulak. Jack Ivankovic stops Adam Novotny twice and the power play will carry over into the second period.

Max Curran ties it for Czechia

Curran is left alone in front and he scores off a rebound of a Tomas Galvas shot. Canada 1, Czechia 1

Tij Iginla scores for Canada

The Canadians look dangerous on the power play. Michael Hage has a great chance. Later, Michael Misa feeds Tij Iginla for the opening goal at 15:14. Canada 1, Czechia 0

Canada power play

Tomas Poletin is called for goaltender interference. Canada has the best power play in the tournament.

Midway through first

Defensive battle so far. Czechia leads 3-2 in shots.

Canada vs. Czechia underway

Goalies are Canada’s Jack Ivankovic vs. Czechia’s Michal Orsulak.

Canada-Czechia lines

Canada vs. Czechia rivalry

Czechia ousted Canada the last two years in the quarterfinals. Canada beat Czechia in the 2023 gold-medal game.

When is Canada vs. Czechia?

The game is scheduled to start at 8:30 p.m. ET.

Next up

Canada and Czechia will play in the second semifinal to determine the other gold-medal game opponent.

Sweden vs. Finland highlights

Final score: Sweden 4, Finland 3 (SO)

Sweden is heading to the gold medal game for the second time in three years.

Sweden wins in eighth round of shootout

Blackhawks prospect Anton Frondell scores to send Sweden to the gold-medal game. They’ll play the Canada-Czechia winner.

Shootout round five

Jack Berglund scores to extend shootout.

Shootout round four

Victor Eklund and Jasper Kuhta stopped

Shootout round three

Ivar Stenberg and Emil Hemming stopped.

Shootout round two

Anton Frondell stopped. Matias Vanhanen scores. 1-0 Finland

Shootout round one

Sweden’s Viggo Bjorck stopped as is Finland’s Leo Tuuva.

Shootout delay

They’re scraping the ice again.

Team Sweden will shoot first

Five-round shootout, then sudden death rounds if tied.

We’re going to a shootout

Finland hits the crossbar

There’s 32 seconds left in the power play.

Finland power play

Viggo Bjorck is called for slashing. Finland won last year’s game on an overtime power play.

Sweden chance

Petteri Rimpinen stops Viggo Bjorck for another time on an overtime breakaway.

Overtime so far

There’s 4:32 left. Good chances on either side.

Overtime underway

It’s 10 minutes of 3-on-3 sudden death before a shootout, if needed.

End of third: Sweden 3, Finland 3

2 minutes left

Tied 3-3.

Finland ties it up

Joona Saarelainen scores on a rebound of an Arttu Valila shot with 5:59 left to tie the game.

Sweden power play

Sweden on power play because of earlier call on Leu Tuuva. Sweden gets three shots but Finland kills it off. Petteri Rimpinen robs Jack Berglund.

Finland power play

Ivar Stenberg is called for tripping. Finland 0-for-2 so far. Finland gets chances but power play ends when Leo Tuuva is called for slashing.

Third period underway

3-2 Sweden. Winner goes to the gold-medal game. Loser plays for bronze.

End of second: Sweden 3, Finland 2

Two more strange goals in that period. Finland ties it up on a Sweden own goal and Sweden goes ahead after Petteri Rimpinen gets his stick stuck in the mesh after making a save. Shots are 20-15 Finland.

Finland pressure

The Finns hit the crossbar and two Swedish players break their sticks as Finland applies pressure late in the period. But Swedish goalie Love Harenstam dives out to cover the puck.

Sweden retakes lead on bank shot

Petteri Rimpinen is out of position with his stick stuck in the mesh after he make a save on Eddie Genborg. Genborg then banks in the puck off the goalie. Another strange goal in this game. Ivar Stenberg gets an assist for his second point of the game. Sweden 3, Finland 2

Finland ties it up on own goal

It’s an own goal as the puck comes off the glass and Swedish defenseman Alfons Freij puts it in off his goaltender as he tries to clear. Finland’s Jasper Kuhta get credit for the goal. Sweden 2, Finland 2

Sweden takes lead

Draft-eligible Ivar Stenberg scores through a screen on a delayed penalty. Sweden 2, Finland 1

Second period underway

Score is tied 1-1.

End of first: Sweden 1, Finland 1

The start of the game was nearly disastrous for Finland. Goalie Petteri Rimpinen misplayed a puck for a Sweden goal at 36 seconds. Then Sweden went on a power play 16 seconds later. Finland killed that off and settled down. They got a tying goal with 3:34 left in the period. Finland-Sweden games tend to be tight, and that’s the case again. Finland leads in shots, 11-7.

Finland ties it up

Atte Joki takes a pass atop the right faceoff circle, gets into better position and beats a screened Love Harenstam for the tying goal. Sweden 1, Finland 1

Finland power play

Felix Carell is called for delay of game for putting the puck over the glass. Sweden kills it off. Finland gets two shots and lead 8-4 in shots for the game.

Finland power play

Casper Juustovaara is called for slashing. Sweden kills it off.

Sweden power play

Heikki Ruohonen is called for tripping at 52 seconds. Finland gets a big kill, allowing no shots.

Sweden takes early lead

Linus Eriksson flips a shot toward the net and it goes in at 36 seconds as Petteri Rimpinen appears to misplay it. Sweden 1, Finland 0

Lucas Pettersson update

Sweden’s Lucas Pettersson is missing the game because he’s ill.

Sweden vs. Finland game underway

It’s Sweden’s Love Harenstam vs. Finland’s Petteri Rimpinen in net.

What channel is Sweden vs. Finland and Canada vs. Czechia world juniors hockey semifinals today?

TV channel: NHL Network

Livestream: Fubo, which offers a free trial to new subscribers, or Sling TV.

Watch world junior championships on Fubo

What time are Sweden vs. Finland and Canada vs. Czechia world juniors hockey semifinals today?

Date: Sunday, Jan. 4

Time: 4:30 p.m. ET and 8:30 p.m. ET (3:30 and 7:30 local time)

The Sweden-Finland game is scheduled to start at 4:30 p.m. ET and Canada-Czechia will start at 8:30 p.m. ET at the Grand Casino Arena in Saint Paul, Minnesota, the home of the Minnesota Wild.

World juniors hockey semifinals: How to watch, stream

Time: 4:30 p.m. ET and 8:30 p.m. ET on Sunday, Jan. 4

Location: Grand Casino Arena (Saint Paul, Minnesota)

TV: NHL Network

Streaming: Fubo and certain levels of Sling TV carry NHL Network.

World junior championships semifinals today

Jan. 4

All times p.m. ET

Sweden 4, Finland 3 (OT)

Czechia 6, Canada 4

Sweden has powerful power play

Sweden’s power play is connecting at 45% in the tournament, second only to Canada (47%).

Sweden vs. Finland lineups

Sweden players to watch

Blackhawks No. 3 overall pick Anton Frondell has five goals and seven points. Forward Jack Berglund (Flyers) and defenseman Alfons Freij (Jets) also have seven points. Forward Ivar Stenberg is expected to be a top draft pick in June. He has two goals and five points at the tournament.

Finland players to watch

Forward Heikki Ruohonen (Flyers) has two goals and six points. So does defenseman Lasse Boelius (Ducks). Finnish goalie Petteri Rimpinen (Kings) has played every minute of the tournament.

Sweden vs. Finland rematch

Sweden and Finland played in the 2025 semifinal, and Finland skated off with a 4-3 overtime victory. Benjamin Rautiainen scored the winner from a bad angle on the power play. Konsta Helenius, a Buffalo Sabres first-round pick, had four assists in the game.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The college football transfer portal opened Friday, Jan. 2, and players are flying off the shelf. The portal runs through Jan. 16, with an extra five-day window (Jan. 20-24) for teams playing in the national championship.

We’ll keep you posted with daily live updates of portal commitments.

Transfers by conference: SEC | Big Ten | ACC | Big 12

HIT REFRESH FOR UPDATE.

Today’s transfer portal commitments

QB

  • Alonza Barnett III: James Madison to UCF
  • Rocco Becht: Iowa State to Penn State
  • Cutter Boley: Kentucky to Arizona State
  • Jaden Craig: Harvard to TCU
  • Drew Dickey: Vanderbilt to Arkansas State
  • Billy Edwards Jr.: Wisconsin to North Carolina
  • Josh Hoover: TCU to Indiana
  • Katin Houser: East Carolina to Illinois
  • Colton Joseph: Old Dominion to Wisconsin
  • Lincoln Kienholz: Ohio State to Louisville
  • Alex Manske: Iowa State to Penn State
  • Mason McKenzie: Saginaw Valley State to Boston College
  • Kenny Minchey: Notre Dame to Nebraska
  • Aaron Philo: Georgia Tech to Florida
  • Jaylen Raynor: Arkansas State to Iowa State
  • Brendan Sorsby: Cincinnati to Texas Tech
  • Marcelis Tate: South Florida to Tennessee State

RB

  • David Avit: Villanova to Arizona State
  • Landen Chambers: Central Arkansas to UCF
  • Bill Davis: Louisiana to Virginia Tech
  • Jalen Dupree: Colorado State to Kansas
  • Jerrick Gibson: Texas to Purdue
  • Carson Hansen: Iowa State to Penn State
  • Caleb Hawkins: North Texas to Oklahoma State
  • Makhi Hughes: Oregon to Houston
  • Jekai Middlebrook: Middle Tennessee to Virginia
  • Turbo Richard: Boston College to Indiana
  • Abu Sama: Iowa State to Wisconsin
  • JaQuali Smith: Sacramento State to Colorado

WR

  • Karon Brookins: Iowa State to Penn State
  • Tychaun Chapman: Southern Miss to Memphis
  • Miles Coleman: North Texas to Oklahoma State
  • Brett Eskildsen: Iowa State to Penn State
  • RJ Garcia II: Bowling Green to FAU
  • Jayden Gibson: Oklahoma to South Carolina
  • Jackson Harris: Hawaii to LSU
  • Cody Jackson: Tarleton State to Iowa State
  • Marquis Johnson: Missouri to Mississippi State
  • Jalen Jones: Alabama State to Texas Tech
  • Donte Lee: Liberty to Texas Tech
  • Terrence Lewis: North Texas to Oklahoma State
  • Nick Marsh: Michigan State to Indiana
  • Christian Neptune: South Florida to Auburn
  • Kory Pettigrew: South Florida to Auburn
  • Jahmari Powell-Wonson: Maryland to FAU
  • Shamar Rigby: Oklahoma State to Wisconsin
  • Danny Scudero: San Jose State to Colorado
  • Victor Snow: Buffalo to NC State
  • Prince Strachan: USC to West Virginia
  • Raiden Vines-Bright: Washington to Arizona State
  • Wyatt Young: North Texas to Oklahoma State

TE

  • Richie Anderson: Fresno State to Texas A&M
  • Gabe Burkle: Iowa State to Penn State
  • Jayvontay Conner: East Carolina to Vanderbilt
  • Hayden Hansen: Florida to Oklahoma
  • Jacob Harris: Bowling Green to Wisconsin
  • Nate Kurisky: Louisville to Duke
  • Ryan Schwendeman: Southern Illinois to Wisconsin
  • Michael Smith: South Carolina to Syracuse
  • Mason Williams: Ohio to Ohio State

OL

  • Xavier Bausley: West Virginia to Marshall
  • Trevor Buhr: Iowa State to Penn State
  • Malachi Breland: Memphis to Arkansas
  • Nicholas Cruji: Maine to Charlotte
  • Johnny Dickson: North Texas to Oklahoma State
  • Coen Echols: LSU to Texas A&M
  • Valen Erickson: NC State to Liberty
  • Shadre Hurst: Tulane to Houston
  • Toriyan Johnson: UConn to Colorado State
  • Austin Kawecki: Oklahoma State to Wisconsin
  • Maasai King: Akron to Iowa State
  • Kuol Kuol II: Iowa State to Penn State
  • Desmond Magiya: North Texas to Oklahoma State
  • Logan Moore: UAB to Baylor
  • Ben Murawski: UConn to Michigan State
  • Braydon Nelson: North Texas to Oklahoma State
  • Netinho Olivieri: Penn to Pitt
  • Sione Perkins: Iowa State to Northern Arizona
  • Gavin Proudfoot: Northern Iowa to Iowa State
  • Connor Stroh: Texas to Kansas
  • Drew Terrill: Miami (Ohio) to Houston
  • Andrew Threatt: Charleston Southern to North Carolina
  • Will Tompkins: Iowa State to Penn State
  • Bennett Warren: Tennessee to Minnesota
  • Brady Wayburn: UConn to UCF
  • Christian Young: Emory & Henry College to Southern Miss

DL

  • Demetrius Ballard: Buffalo to Boston College
  • Justus Boone: Arkansas to Wisconsin
  • Ahmad Breaux: LSU to Kentucky
  • Josh Burnham: Notre Dame to Indiana
  • Blake Burris: SMU to FAU
  • Alijah Carnell: Iowa State to Penn State
  • Esean Carter: Toledo to UConn
  • Christian Davis: Louisiana Tech to SMU
  • Malachi Davis: Toledo to Rutgers
  • Ian Geffrard: Arkansas to Texas
  • Nate Henrich: Gannon to San Diego State
  • Carter Janki: Penn to Illinois
  • Daniel Jennings: Penn State to Virginia Tech
  • Lamont Lester Jr.: Monmouth to Colorado
  • Jonathan Maldonado: Nevada to Ole Miss
  • Dylan Manuel: Appalachian State to Colorado
  • Andrew Marshall: Eastern Michigan to Minnesota
  • Ryan McCulloch: Cal to UCLA
  • Antonio O’Berry: Gardner Webb to Kentucky
  • Tobi Osunsanmi: Kansas State to Indiana
  • Chidera Otutu: UTSA to Cincinnati
  • Khamani Potts: Grand Valley State to Colorado State
  • Kevin Roberts: West Florida to James Madison
  • Wisdom Simms: North Carolina Central to Purdue
  • Eamon Smalls: UAB to Kansas
  • Jordan Walker: Rutgers to Georgia Tech
  • Landyn Watson: Kentucky to Kansas
  • Solomon Williams: Texas A&M to Cal

LB

  • Caleb Bacon: Iowa State to Penn State
  • Cael Brezina: Iowa State to Penn State
  • Nylan Brown: Kent State to Washington State
  • Deven Bryant: Washington to USC
  • Ray Coney: Tulsa to Texas A&M
  • Kooper Ebel: Iowa State to Penn State
  • Jon Jon Kamara: Kansas to Wisconsin
  • Isaiah Patterson: UNLV to West Virginia
  • Austin Romaine: Kansas State to Texas Tech
  • Montreze Smith: Austin Peay to Iowa State
  • Keaton Thomas: Baylor to Ole Miss
  • Tavion Wallace: Arkansas to Kentucky

DB

  • Khalil Barnes: Clemson to Georgia
  • Tawfiq Byard: Colorado to Texas A&M
  • MJ Cannon: Bowling Green to Cincinnati
  • Nehemiah Chandler: South Alabama to Florida State
  • Tyran Chappell: UConn to Michigan State
  • Caleb Chester: Texas to Arizona State
  • DJ Coleman: Baylor to Florida
  • Jay Crawford: Auburn to Ole Miss
  • Jameel Croft Jr.: Kansas to Charlotte
  • Keshawn Davila: Arkansas to Kansas State
  • Zahmir Dawud: Villanova to Rutgers
  • Sharif Denson: Florida to Ole Miss
  • Christian Ellis: Virginia Tech to Virginia
  • Caleb Flagg: Missouri to UCF
  • Dylan Flowers: Western Kentucky to Duke
  • Quinton Hammonds: North Texas to Oklahoma State
  • Christian Harrison: Cincinnati to Arkansas
  • Anthony Hawkins: Villanova to Iowa
  • A’Mon Lane-Ganus: Auburn to South Florida
  • Kyon Loud: Montana to Duke
  • Darius Malcolm Jr.: Wofford to Memphis
  • Nateen Mitchell: New Mexico State to Colorado
  • Qua Moss: Kansas State to Tennessee
  • Marcus Neal: Iowa State to Penn State
  • Anthony Rogers: Nicholls State to Tulane
  • Jiquan Sanks: Cincinnati to Indiana
  • Hasaan Sykes: Western Carolina to Kentucky
  • Jaylen Thomas: San Jose State to Washington State
  • Devin Vaught: Maine to Michigan State
  • DJ Waller Jr.: Kentucky to Louisville
  • Keyon Washington: Bowling Green to Iowa State
  • Jontez Williams: Iowa State to USC
  • Lavon Williams: East Texas A&M Commerce to Illinois
  • Preston Zachman: Wisconsin to Indiana

K

  • Braeden McAlister: Georgia State to Arkansas
  • Max Gilbert: Tennessee to Arkansas
  • Eli Ozick: North Dakota State to Iowa
  • Gianni Spetic: Memphis to Texas

P

  • Mac Chiumento: Florida State to Texas

LS

  • Hudson Powell: Miami (Ohio) to Auburn
  • Dalton Riggs: UCF to Ohio State

College football 2026 transfer portal dates: When does transfer portal open, close?

The portal period now runs from Jan. 2-16, with an extra five-day window (Jan. 20-24) for teams playing in the national championship. The spring portal window in April is no longer a part of the schedule, so January is the only open window for teams to add via the portal in 2026.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Las Vegas Raiders are No. 1 − and former owner Al Davis would doubtless be sick about it.

But the Silver and Black’s current Commitment to Excellence unfortunately extends only to summiting the apex of the 2026 NFL draft order, the Raiders clinching − for lack of a better term − the spot Jan. 4 when the New York Giants, who cruised past Las Vegas 34-10 in Week 17, defeated the Dallas Cowboys in their regular-season finale. The Giants’ victory locked the Raiders into the league’s worst record, even though they improved to 3-14 by beating the Kansas City Chiefs on Sunday afternoon. But Las Vegas’ .538 strength of schedule, the weakest among the four 3-14 clubs, kept it in the top spot.

2026 NFL Draft first-round order

  1. Las Vegas Raiders (3-14, .538 strength of schedule)
  2. New York Jets (3-14, .552)
  3. Arizona Cardinals (3-14, .571)
  4. Tennessee Titans (3-14, .574)
  5. New York Giants (4-13)
  6. Cleveland Browns (5-12, .486)
  7. Washington Commanders (5-12, .507)
  8. New Orleans Saints (6-11, .495)
  9. Kansas City Chiefs (6-11, .516)
  10. Cincinnati Bengals (6-11, .521)
  11. Miami Dolphins (7-10)
  12. Dallas Cowboys (7-9-1)
  13. Los Angeles Rams (from Atlanta Falcons (8-9, .495))
  14. Baltimore Ravens (8-9, .507)
  15. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (8-9, .529)
  16. Jets (from Indianapolis Colts (8-9, .538))
  17. Detroit Lions (9-8, .490)
  18. Minnesota Vikings (9-8, .514)

(Note: Spots 19 through 32 in Round 1 will be determined by when teams exit from the playoffs, wild-card round losers slotting 19 through 24.)

Who will the Raiders draft first in 2026?

That will likely be a topic of some debate over the next four months, but Heisman Trophy-winning quarterback Fernando Mendoza from Indiana University will likely be the prohibitive choice − whether the Raiders use the pick or trade it.

Have the Raiders picked No. 1 overall before?

Yes, the then-Oakland Raiders chose QB JaMarcus Russell No. 1 overall in 2007 in one of the worst draft decisions in NFL history. Who could they have taken instead? Calvin Johnson, Joe Thomas, Adrian Peterson, Patrick Willis, Marshawn Lynch and Darrelle Revis all came off the board in the first half of Round 1.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

As evidenced by the 2025 College Football Playoff final four, quarterback play is extremely important to win a national championship.

All four finalists ― Indiana, Oregon, Ole Miss and Miami ― used the NCAA transfer portal to find their ‘franchise quarterback’ to guide them to the semifinal round of the CFP bracket. That’s why the position will be just as important this offseason for filling out a future CFP berth.

CFP semifinalists like Indiana and Miami need a QB for the 2026 season, while Oregon could be in the market, depending on Dante Moore’s NFL draft decision. Penn State, Florida and LSU are three teams with coaching changes in need of a new signal caller.

And of course, don’t discount another Trinidad Chambliss committing to a program as a potential backup and emerging as a superstar, as Chambliss has during Ole Miss’ run to the CFP semifinal.

Here’s a look at our tracker for the top quarterbacks in the portal this season, according to the 247 Sports Transfer Portal Rankings.

1. Sam Leavitt

  • Old team: Arizona State
  • New team: TBD
  • Eligibility remaining: 2 years

Leavitt is the No. 1 overall player in the 2026 transfer portal rankings. He threw for 1,628 yards, 10 touchdowns and three interceptions in 2025.

2. Brendan Sorsby

  • Old team: Cincinnati
  • New team: Texas Tech
  • Eligibility remaining: 1 year

The Cincinnati QB is the No. 2 overall player in the portal, as well as the No. 2 QB. Sorsby is expected to be one of the most impactful players in the portal this cycle. He has totaled 5,613 passing yards, 1,027 rushing yards and 63 total touchdowns in two seasons with the Bearcats. Sorsby will take the baton from Behren Morton under center for the Red Raiders.

3. Drew Mestemaker

  • Old team: North Texas
  • New team: Oklahoma State
  • Eligibility remaining: 3 years

Mestermaker opted to follow his North Texas football head, Eric Morris, to Oklahoma State. He led the Mean Green to a 12-2 record during the 2025 college football season and to the American Conference Championship game.

4. Dylan Raiola

  • Old team: Nebraska
  • New team: TBD
  • Eligibility remaining: 2 years

Raiola suffered a season-ending broken right fibula against USC in early November, but should be ready to contribute to his next team in 2025. The former 5-star QB was originally committed to Georgia before flipping to have an opportunity to play as a freshman with the Cornhuskers.

5. Josh Hoover

  • Old team: TCU
  • New team: Indiana
  • Eligibility remaining: 1 year

Hoover has been entrenched as the Horned Frogs’ starting QB since his redshirt freshman season, making 31 straight starts for TCU. He has 9,629 career passing yards and 71 passing touchdowns, which lead all returning QBs in 2026. However, he needs to cut down on his turnovers, with 33 career interceptions thrown.

6. Rocco Becht

  • Old team: Iowa State
  • New team: Penn State
  • Eligibility remaining: 1 year

Like Mestemaker, Becht followed his former head coach, Matt Campbell, to his new destination at Penn State. He has made 39 career starts and could be someone to plug in right away in the Big Ten and play well.

7. DJ Lagway

  • Old team: Florida
  • New team: TBD
  • Eligibility remaining: 2 years

Lagway seemed to be the player who would save Billy Napier and the Florida program. However, following an injury-plagued 2025 season, Lagway is in the portal following Napier’s firing and the hiring of Jon Sumrall.

8. Byrum Brown

  • Old team: USF
  • New team: TBD
  • Eligibility remaining: 1 year

Brown could follow his head coach, Alex Golesh, from USF to Auburn. He has been the perfect fit in Golesh’s offense with an FBS-best 42 touchdowns during the regular season. With 32 career starts, Brown is one of the most experienced QBs in the portal this cycle.

9. Deuce Knight

  • Old team: Auburn
  • New team: TBD
  • Eligibility remaining: 3 years

Despite showing flashes of his potential for Auburn, Knight is in the portal and will play for a new team in 2026, with Alex Golesh taking over as the head coach. Knight finished 17-of-25 passing for 259 yards with two touchdowns and added 13 rushes for 178 yards and four scores as a true freshman.

10. Kenny Minchey

  • Old team: Notre Dame
  • New team: Nebraska
  • Eligibility remaining: 2 years

Minchey completed 20 of 26 passes for 196 yards and rushed for 84 yards and a touchdown as the backup to CJ Carr after losing the QB competition this season. The redshirt sophomore could likely step in as a starter at Nebraska, who needs to replace Dylan Raiola.

11. Aidan Chiles

  • Old team: Michigan State
  • New team: TBD
  • Eligibility remaining: 1 year

Chiles has never lived up to the promise he showed as a freshman with Oregon State, but he did show flashes with Michigan State under Jonathan Smith. He is in a prove-it year in his final year of eligibility and could still prove to be a good addition.

12. Beau Pribula

  • Old team: Missouri
  • New team: TBD
  • Eligibility remaining: 1 year

The 2025 season was a trying one for Pribula, but he showed off his talent and toughness. He led Missouri to a 5-0 start behind 1,941 and 17 total touchdowns, but suffered a dislocated left ankle. Pribula returned in less than a month from the injury and started the final two games for the Tigers.

13. Colton Joseph

  • Old team: Old Dominion
  • New team: Wisconsin
  • Eligibility remaining: 2 years

The Sun Belt Offensive Player of the Year committed to Wisconsin on Sunday, Jan. 4. He threw for 2,624 yards and 21 touchdowns, while adding 158 rushes for 1,007 yards and 13 touchdowns, for the Monarchs in 2025.

14. Aaron Philo

  • Old team: Georgia Tech
  • New team: Florida
  • Eligibility remaining: 3 years

In two seasons with the Yellow Jackets, Philo has made just eight career appearances, but has shown flashes as Haynes Kings’ backup. However, with offense coordinator Buster Faulkner leaving for the Gators, Philo will continue his career in Gainesville, Florida.

15. Austin Simmons

  • Old team: Ole Miss
  • New team: TBD
  • Eligibility remaining: 2 years

Simmons began the 2025 season as the starter for Ole Miss, but lost his spot not due to poor play, but because of the emergence of Trinidad Chambliss following an injury to Simmons. The left-hander is expected to stick with Ole Miss for its playoff run before heading to Missouri.

16. Ethan Grunkemeyer

  • Old team: Penn State
  • New team: TBD
  • Eligibility remaining: 3 years

The redshirt freshman stepped into a starting role following a season-ending injury to starter Drew Allar. He started the final seven games, which included four straight wins to end the season. Grunkemeyer finished his first year with 1,341 passing yards, nine total TDs and four interceptions.

17. Lincoln Kienholz

  • Old team: Ohio State
  • New team: Louisville
  • Eligibility remaining: 2 years

Kienholz competed with freshman Julian Sayin for the starting position for the Buckeyes this past season. However, with Sayin’s strong season, the path for Kienholz is closed. He committed to Louisville and playing for coach Jeff Brohm on Jan. 3.

18. Cutter Boley

  • Old team: Kentucky
  • New team: Arizona State
  • Eligibility remaining: 3 years

Cutter Boley committed to Arizona State on Jan. 3 and will be in line to replace Sam Leavitt. As a redshirt freshman in 2025, he threw for 2,160 passing yards with 15 touchdowns and 12 interceptions. Boley started the final 10 games for Kentucky this season.

19. Katin Houser

  • Old team: East Carolina
  • New team: Illinois
  • Eligibility remaining: 1 year

The former Michigan State QB threw for 3,300 yards with 28 total TDs and 10 turnovers and led ECU to an 8-4 record. With his performance with the Pirates, he will to return to the Big Ten for his final year of eligibility at Illinois, replacing Luke Altmyer.

20. Jaden Craig

  • Old team: Harvard
  • New team: TCU
  • Eligibility remaining: 1 year

The Harvard star threw for 2,869 yards, 25 touchdowns and seven interceptions in 2025. Over his career, he has been a 24-game starter with 6,074 career passing yards with 63 career total touchdowns and 12 interceptions. He could prove himself for the NFL with a strong performance in the Power 4 conferences. He’ll replace Josh Hoover, who entered the portal and committed to Indiana.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY